Productivity - mona alahmadi

Download Report

Transcript Productivity - mona alahmadi

Productivity & Constrains on Productivity

Lec. 5

The open-endedness of lexicon

   Morphological theorizing & the formation of words (established words +freshly coined words) Lexicon vs. syntax Word formation rules are passive: to analyze existing words rather that to create new ones

The open-endedness of lexicon

   In principle, no word is infinite in length, but there is no upper limit to the formation of bases (e.g. uncomplicatedness).

Borrowing & the lexicon of a language Morphology is productive

What is productivity?

 1.

2.

Productivity & generality: the more general a word-formation process is, the more productive it will be assumed to be.

Productivity is a matter of degree Productivity is subject to the dimension of time  Productivity and the inherent ambiguity

Productivity, Time dimension & Fashion

Singular

Plural

 I take  Thou takest  He, she taketh  We take  Ou take  They take

Exercise

-id

morbid tepid timid splendid horrid Latin suffix *unproductive/ frozen

-ist

anarchist communist pianist violinist racist Buddhist vs. *Muhammedist Mid-way suffix *Unexplainable gaps

-er

worker painter swimmer dancer jogger Germanic productive

The suffix -itis

   The suffix (–itis) is (Greek origin) is suffixed to form the feminine of adjectives It is used in modern medical English to form words referring to inflammatory diseases, e.g.

arthritis

the words suffixed with (-itis) are fewer than those suffixed with (–er), however the former suffix (-itis) attaches with an extremely high degree of regularity to most suitable bases.

      Cephalitis Hepatitis Vaginitis Neuritis Bronchitis Arthritis

The suffix -itis

The suffix -ant

 The suffix (–ant) (Latin origin) is suffixed to turns a verbal base into an agentive nominal.

 There is some restriction (historical) to the bases to which the suffix –ant is attached.

The suffix -ant

 The base is originally Latin, so it attaches to Latin bases only. Germanic bases are not allowed.

        dependent participant assistant servant consultant *wri(e)tant *buildant *shoutant

The suffix -ant

  Semantically, the –ant has unpredictable effects, and the meaning of words created by suffixing –ant is inconsistent

defendant vs. accountant

Productivity & Creativity

   1.

2.

Productivity = creativity The capacity of all human languages to use finite means to produce an infinite number of words & utterances In the scope of morphology, creativity can be seen in 2 ways: Rule-governed creativity Rule-bending creativity

Productivity & Creativity

1.

Words are formed following general rules and principles internalized by speakers in the process of language acquisition (quick  quickly) or (post  postwar) 2.

however, speaker have the ability to extend the stock of words idiomatically, producing words without following the standard rules of word-formation.

Stool pigeon / security reasons/ collateral damage/ anti-terror law / deadline

Constrains on Productivity

Blocking (i)

Blocking may be due to the prior existence of another word with the same meaning that the new word would have , i.e. Perfect synonyms are avoided.

Thief  *stealer

Constrains on Productivity

Blocking (ii)

If there are two semantically similar morphemes, blocking one than its of which less is more productive than the other, the more productive morpheme is less likely to productive counterpart.

-ness & -ity

Examples

 -ness & -ity

X + (-ous)

adjective

Pre-existing Noun Noun

(-ness) More productive

Noun

(-ity) Less productive

Glorious Furious Couragous Spacious glory Fury Courage space Gloriousness Furiousness Courageousness spaciousness *Gloriosity *Furiosity *Couragity *spaciosity

blocking

 The concept of blocking is due to a number of factors; these factors may be (i) phonological, (ii) morphological, (iii) semantic, or (iv) aesthetic.

1. Phonological factors

Verbs with the meaning ‘to begin x’ can be usually formed from adjectives by suffixing

(-en)

to an adjectival base provided which meets the following phonetic conditions:  

The base must be monosyllabic The base must end in (stop/ fricative) which may be optionally preceded by a (nasal consonant/ or approximate)

Blocking -en

      

Allowed verbs

blacken dampen quieten soften whiten harden fasten

*disallowed verbs

 dryen  blueen   greenen dimmen

Blocking -ly

Adverbs, in general, are can be usually formed from adjectives by suffixing

(-ly)

to an adjectival base:  The an

(-ly) (-ly)

suffix tends to be avoided where adjective ends in

Blocking -ly

allowed

 grand – grandly  clever – cleverly   fierce – fiercely elegant – elegantly  serious – seriously

*disallowed

 sillyly  friendlyly   miserlyly sisterlyly

2. morphological factors

The morphological properties of a base may prevent the application of morphological rules.

Often native morphemes behave differently from foreign morphemes.

Some affixes may only be added either to native bases or bases of foreign origin.

Velar softening

      According to the rule of velar softening, the /k/, is usually spelled as the letter (c) when attached to words of Latin & French origin.

/k/  cynic /s/  cynicism critic  fanatic sceptic criticism   fanaticism scepticism

Blocking -hood

       

Allowed native bases

boyhood girlhood motherhood fatherhood sisterhood brotherhood manhood womanhood

*disallowed Foreign bases

 Judgehood  Authorhood   Prisonerhood Colonelhood  Generalhood  Governerhood

Note

    The distinction between native & borrowed morphemes is very important. However, we should be careful not to press this too far. There are roots borrowed from French, yet they can take the suffix –hood. With the passage of time, foreign morphemes can be fully assimilated and nativised so that they behave in the same way as indigenous morphemes. E.g. parenthood – statehood - nationhood

3. Semantic factors

  Semantic considerations may be involved in the application of word-formation processes.

For example, forming compounds from adjectives plus past participle is not always allowed.

       

allowed

short-sleeved short-sighted green-roofed blue-eyed one-armed three-legged red-nosed red-haired

Examples

disallowed

 *Two-carred  *Three-housed

3. Semantic factors

  If there are 2 adjectives with opposite meanings, one of which has a more positive meaning than the other, normally the negative prefix (–un) attaches to the positive adjective If (–un) is attached to the negative member of the pair, the resulting word is usually ill-formed.

allowed

 unwell  unloved   unhappy unwise  unclean  unoptimistic

Examples

disallowed

 *unill  *unhated   *unsad *unfoolish  *unfilthy, * undirty  *unpessimistic

4. Aesthetic factors & the adoption of words

  Word-formation sometimes is inhibited by vague aesthetic factors.

In principle, there are many words well-formed words whose adoption has nevertheless been resisted.

e.g. stagflation (stagnation + inflation)