Transcript Leader SLTs

Leader & Teacher SLTs
2014 – 2015
The Teacher and Leader Evaluations work together to
increase educator effectiveness and student outcomes.
Component
Evaluation for Teachers
Evaluation for
School Leaders
Setting Goals
Teachers set two SLTs in collaboration
with evaluator
Leaders set two SLTs in collaboration
with evaluator
Focusing on Practice
Uses NIET / TAP Rubric to help
prioritize instructional activities that
will increase student outcomes and
identify teacher strengths and areas
for development
Uses three domains that help
prioritize leadership activities that
will increase student outcomes and
identify leaders strengths and areas
for development
Formal Feedback Cycles Minimum two observations
Minimum two site visits
Evaluation Measures
Weighted 50% Professional Practice
and 50% Student Outcomes
Weighted 50% Professional Practice
and 50% Student Outcomes
Final Evaluations
Based on five-point scale to be
entered into CODE (converted to four
point scale)
Based on four-point scale to be
entered into HCIS
Goals for school leaders should set a vision
for what students should be able to
accomplish by the year’s end.
Goals for school leaders should:
• Tie into your district-wide
goals
• Drive a leader’s daily work
• Align to teachers’ goals
• Help students be college and
career ready
District Goals
• Increase the percentage of students scoring proficient on iLEAP/LEAP to
63% (grades 3 – 8).
• Decrease the percentage of students in grades 1 – 3 who are intensive on
Dibels to 10%.
• Increase the percentage of students scoring Good or Excellent on EOC
tests to 58%.
• Increase the percentage of students scoring 18 or higher on the ACT to
50%.
• Increase the opportunities for Middle School Students to earn a minimum
of 3 Carnegie Units
• Measure of Professional Practice: NIET Rubric- Increase the consistency of
scoring of Teacher Evaluations across the district
• SLT’s: Increase the rigor and consistency of Leader and Teacher SLT’s
across the district aligned to resources that will improve student mastery
• Measure of Student Outcomes: Student Growth Measures-Increase the
performance of students across the district
LEADER SLTS
General Format for SLTs
_____% of students will score ________
(however proficient is defined: Basic or above, Good or
Excellent, 80% or higher, etc.)
____% of students who scored below proficient will
improve one achievement level.
(however achievement levels are defined)
Grades K-2 schools
• Option 1:
(examples for C school):
– One based on percentage of students who score Basic
or above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in
ELA.
• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in
ELA, 69% of the students will score Basic or above.
– One based on percentage of students who score Basic
or above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in
mathematics.
• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in
mathematics, 56% of the students will score Basic or above.
Grades K-2 schools
(examples for C school):
• Option 2:
– One based on percentage of students who score Basic
or above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in
ELA and mathematics.
• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in
ELA and mathematics, 63% of the students will score Basic
or above.
– One based on percentage of students who were
below Basic on Test 1 who increase their percent
correct by 25% or more on the District Benchmark
Test 3 in ELA and mathematics.
• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Tests in
ELA and mathematics, 50% of the students who were below
Basic will increase their percentage correct by 25% or more
from Benchmark Test 1 to Test 3.
Options for Assistants in K-2
• Divide goals by grade and/or subject
• One could have all ELA and the other all math
• One could have all of one or two grades (both ELA and
math)
• Divide by whole school goal and intervention
goal (50% or more).
• Divide the whole school goal with one on ELA and the
other on math
• Divide the intervention goal with one on ELA and the
other on math.
Grades 3-8 schools
(examples for C school):
• Option 1:
– One based on percentage of students who score Basic
or above on the ELA and math District Benchmark
Test.
• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in
ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.
– One based on percentage of students who score Basic
or above on the Science and Social Studies Leap or
iLeap test.
• Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and/or iLeap tests in
science and social studies, 62% of the students will score
Basic or above.
Grades 3-8 schools
(examples for C school):
• Option 2:
– One based on percentage of students who score Basic or
above on the ELA and math District Benchmark Test and
the Science and Social Studies Leap/iLeap.
• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in ELA
and math and the Spring 2014 Leap/iLeap tests in science and
social studies, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.
– One based on percentage of students below Basic who
improve one achievement level on the district benchmark
test or Leap/iLeap test from the previous year.
• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Tests in ELA
and mathematics and the Leap/iLeap in social studies and science
50% or more of the students who were below Basic will move up
one achievement level from their previous year’s level.
Options for Assistants in 3-8
• Divide goals by grade and/or subject
• One could have all ELA and social studies and the other
all math and science.
• One could have all of one or two grades (all subjects)
• Divide by whole school goal and intervention
goal (50% or more).
• Divide the whole school goal with one on ELA and
social studies and the other on math and science.
• Divide the intervention goal with one on ELA and social
studies and the other on math and science.
Example
Principal
On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grades K-5 in
ELA and math, 61% of the students will score Basic or above.
Assistant 2
Assistant 1
On the End of the Year District
Benchmark Test for grades K-2 in ELA
and math, 62% of the students will
score Basic or above.
Kindergarten
Teacher
On the End of the
Year District
Benchmark Test
for Kindergarten
in ELA and math,
62% of the
students will score
Basic or above.
On the End of the Year District
Benchmark Test for grades 3-5 in ELA
and math, 60% of the students will
score Basic or above.
1st Grade Teacher
2nd Grade Teacher
3rd Grade Teacher
4th Grade Teacher
5th Grade Teacher
On the End of the
Year District
Benchmark Test
for grade 1 in ELA
and math, 62% of
the students will
score Basic or
above.
On the End of the
Year District
Benchmark Test
for grade 2 in ELA
and math, 62% of
the students will
score Basic or
above.
On the End of the
Year District
Benchmark Test
for grade 3 in ELA
and math, 57% of
the students will
score Basic or
above.
On the End of the
Year District
Benchmark Test
for grade 4 in ELA
and math, 60% of
the students will
score Basic or
above.
On the End of the
Year District
Benchmark Test
for grade 5 in ELA
and math, 63% of
the students will
score Basic or
above.
Grades 9-12 Schools
(examples for C Schools)
– One must be based on percentage of students
scoring Good or Excellent on all of the EOC tested
subjects.
• Example: On the Spring 2014 EOC tests, 53% of the
students will score good or excellent.
– One must be based on having a certain
percentage of Seniors score 18 or higher on the
ACT by April 2014.
• Example: By April of 2014 53% of seniors will have a
score of 18 or higher on the ACT.
9-12 Options for Assistants
• Goals around the 4 parts of the SPS
– Graduation index
• AP, IB, IBC, dual enrollment, etc.
– Graduation rate
• On track graduation rate, credit recovery, etc.
– EOC
• Could be divided by subject clusters (use rates for each
subject from the charts)
– ACT
• Could be divided by component scores
• Could focus on improvement from Explore, Plan, and ACT
(progress points – should use 30% or more for goal)
School Leaders and Teachers will set
their Student Learning Target Goals
using District created charts based on
previous year’s data (when available)
See charts on upcoming slides.
Guidance for Setting SLTs in Grades K-2
% Scoring Basic of Above
ELA
K
A Schools
B Schools
C Schools*
D Schools
1st
89
79
69
59
Guidance for Setting SLTs in Grades Pre-K
2nd
89
79
69
59
89
79
69
59
% Scoring Basic of Above
Math
K
% Scoring Average or Above
ELA
Pre-K
C Schools
D Schools
80
70
% Scoring 80% or above
1st
2nd
A Schools
B Schools
76
66
76
66
76
66
C Schools*
D Schools
56
46
56
46
56
46
Math
C Schools
D Schools
* District Average
K and 1 are predicted scores. This may change after the results are in.
Pre-K
70
60
Guidance for Setting SLTs in Grades 3 - 8
% Scoring Basic or
Above
ELA
3rd
A Schools
B Schools
C Schools*
D Schools
4th
76
66
56
46
5th
83
73
63
53
6th
85
75
65
55
7th
87
77
67
57
8th
Total
82
83.5
72
73.5
62
63.5
52
53.5
8th
Total
81
81.2
71
71.2
61
61.2
51
51.2
88
78
68
58
*District Average
Total used for school leaders
% Scoring Basic or
Above
Math
3rd
A Schools
B Schools
C Schools*
D Schools
4th
78
68
58
48
*District Average
Total used for school leaders
5th
77
67
57
47
6th
80
70
60
50
7th
84
74
64
54
87
77
67
57
Guidance for Setting SLTs in Grades 3 - 8
% Scoring Basic or
Above
Science
A Schools
B Schools
C Schools*
D Schools
3rd
4th
74
64
54
44
5th
76
66
56
46
6th
81
71
61
51
7th
82
72
62
52
8th
Total
80
79.7
70
69.7
60
59.7
50
49.7
8th
Total
83
83.0
73
73.0
63
63.0
53
53.0
85
75
65
55
*District Average
Total used for school leaders
% Scoring Basic or
Above
S.S.
A Schools
B Schools
C Schools*
D Schools
3rd
4th
75
65
55
45
*District Average
Total used for school leaders
5th
78
68
58
48
6th
85
75
65
55
7th
85
75
65
55
92
82
72
62
Guidance for Setting SLT Goals for Grades 9 - 12
EOC
% of Students Scoring Good or Excellent
A Schools
US
Algebra I English II Geometry Biology English III History Total
72
85
65
73
69
72
B Schools
C Schools*
D Schools
62
52
42
75
65
55
55
45
35
63
53
43
59
49
39
62
52
42
73
63
53
43
*District Average
*Total would be used for Leaders
District EAGLE Test
% of Students Scoring 50% or higher
World
World
Phy.
Civics
Geo.
Chemisty Env. Sci. History Science Physics
A Schools
76
81
64
69
78
71
73
B Schools
C Schools*
D Schools
*District Average
66
56
46
71
61
51
54
44
34
59
49
39
68
58
48
61
51
41
63
53
43
Guidance for Setting SLT Goals for Grades 9 - 12
District Benchmark Test
% of Students Scoring 50% or higher
A Schools
English I English IV Algebra II Adv. Math
66
65
68
66
B Schools
C Schools*
D Schools
56
46
36
55
45
35
58
48
38
56
46*
36
Advanced Math score is a predicted score based on the other scores. Adjustments can be made.
ACT
% of seniors scoring 18+
A Schools
73%
B Schools
63%
C Schools*
53%
D Schools
43%
*District Average
Suggested Scale for other non-tested
grades and subjects
Percent of students who score “proficient”
• D or F schools: 70%
• C schools: 80%
• B schools: 90%
• A schools: 100%
*based on the idea that A schools are expected to have 100% of their students
proficient. Adjustments can be made based on academic and non-academic
courses and baseline data. When there are no proficiency levels assigned,
proficient will be defined as 80% or higher.
Formula for Achievement Ranges
with 70% as the Goal
Insufficient Attainment is any result below Partial Attainment. (1
point)
Below 54%
Partial Attainment is a range from 15% below the target to just below
the actual SLT. (2 points)
54%-69%
START HERE: Full Attainment is a range from the actual SLT up to 15%
above the target. (3 points)
70% - 85%
Exceptional Attainment is any result above the Full Attainment range.
This range should represent more than a year’s worth of growth. (4
points)
Above 85%
Example Scoring Range with 53% as
the goal. (student population 1,200)
less than 37% (455 or less
students) score Basic or
above.
37% - 52% (456-635
students) score Basic or
above
53% - 68% (636-816 students)
score Basic or above
-15% from goal
+15% from goal
69% or more (817 or more
students) score Basic or
above
• For goals that are 70% or higher, spilt the difference between Full and
Exceptional.
• Include number and percent in goals.
Teacher SLTs
• Step 1: The school leader sets goals and provides
guidance to teachers regarding assessments and goals
to use.
• Goals should be set using district recommended assessments
when available and/or using the same assessments that the
leader used to set their goals.
• When district or state created assessments are not available
or the leader goals do not include the content of the course
(i.e. physical education), goals must be set using the most
rigorous and reliable assessments available.
• A teacher made test should not be used as the posttest when
other assessments are available (see assessment chart).
• When possible, one goal should be for all of the students a
teacher teachers and the other goal should focus on moving
lower performing students to proficient (Basic or Good).
Student Learning Targets
Due Dates
September 19: Principal Deadline for approval
October 17: Draft due to evaluator
October 31: Teacher Deadline for entering into
CIS and being approved by evaluator
Resources
District SLT website (C&I Webpage):
http://www.tangischools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=17531