Transcript Presentation
1
UTILIZING STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS FOR SEISMIC HAZARD MITIGATION
NASA CIPAIR Summer Internship By: Agustin Robles, Cham Htun, David Alvarez, and Jasmine Flores Advisor: Dr. Cheng Chen Student Advisor: James Enright
Presentation Outline • Introduction to Steel Plate Shear Walls • Background information on building and location
2
• Design calculations • ASCE 7-10 Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure • AISC Code Provisions • Analysis of structure • SAP2000 lateral force simulations
Steel Plate Shear Wall Frames • A SPSW frame has three main components:
HBE Steel Plate 3
• Advantages of SPSW: • High plastic energy dissipation • Enhanced stiffness, strength and ductility • Cost efficient
4
Problem Statement Design a
3-story office building
located at
1300 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103
. Utilize steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) as the lateral force resisting system.
• Design the optimal member sizes for the: • Steel plates • Horizontal boundary elements (HBEs) • Vertical boundary elements (VBEs) • Utilize SAP2000 to simulate and evaluate the structures response to lateral forces.
5
Building Specifications
Floor Floor 3: Floor 2: Floor 1: psf
95 90 92
Height
12 12 12
Total length: Total width: Total floor area: Total weight:
150 120 13,740 3,806 𝑓𝑡 𝑓𝑡 𝑓𝑡 2 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
Earthquake Probability in the Bay Area
6
Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure
7
Vertical Distribution of Lateral Forces
8
Max Story Drift
9
AISC Seismic Code Provisions • Determine preliminary sizes for the three main components of the Lateral System • SPSW • HBE • VBE
10
AISC Seismic Code Provisions • The Strip-model was used to approximate SPSW response to lateral forces
11
• • • • Solving for the angle of inclination, α 3 2 1 rd nd st : α =41.3° : α =39.3° : α =38.3°
12
AISC Seismic Code Provisions • Demand Capacity Ratios (DCR) • • Ratio of forces acting on a member with respect to the maximum strength or capacity of that member Shear Capacity • Combined compression and flexure check
AISC Seismic Code Provisions • Final member sizes • 2 nd floor steel plate redesigned • 3 rd and 2 nd floor HBE redesigned • Final design
13
SAP2000 Analysis of Structure
14
Building Drift: Inelastic building roof drift Maximum allowable building drift Roof drift over building height % 5.35 in 10.8 in 1.2
%
SAP2000 Analysis of Structure • Figures of forces acting on the structure
15
SAP2000 Analysis of Structure
16
Future Work/ Conclusion • Future/Current Work • Better approximation of the fundamental period • of the structure Designing the HBEs and VBEs to withstand some of the shear forces
17
Any Questions?
18