Looking for Autism in The Criminal Justice System

Download Report

Transcript Looking for Autism in The Criminal Justice System

Looking for Autism
in
The Criminal Justice System
Jim O’Donnell
Clinical Autism Specialist
Adult Autism Team
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
Problem Assessment Study
HMP Barlinnie
Scottish Prison Service – April 2007
Brief was to answer some key questions:• Were there people in prison with undiagnosed ASD?
• Did the prison population have an incidence of ASD
which was higher than in the general population?
• Was the incidence of ASD in prison a significant
concern?
Autism Awareness Sessions
A number of ASD awareness sessions were offered to a
wide range of staff working in the prison.
A total of 22 individuals took part from various departments
within the prison (Prison Officers, Mental Health & General
trained Nurses, Social Workers and Forensic Psychologist).
All 22 responded to evaluations.
Evaluations
18 of the 22 respondents stated that they would like to
attend further ASD training.
All 22 stated that they would view the development of a
screening tool as being useful.
Some Quotes
Respondents felt that ASD Awareness Training would allow
then to change their practice in the following ways:“To possibly identify ASD during admission and ensure
correct procedures in dealing with it.”
“Take more time to try and understand the problems people
with ASD may have.”
“Will begin to think about people differently if they respond
in certain ways to certain questions/instructions.”
Development of Screening Tool –
Barlinnie Prison
• It was felt that Health Staff were the most appropriate to
complete screening tools/questionnaires with clients.
• There was a smaller unit within the prison that
accommodated more vulnerable prisoners, those
assessed as ‘at risk’ due to mental health issues, mild
learning disability etc.(40)
• It was felt that this may be where there was likely to be
the greatest prevalence of ASD within the prison.
• Adult Autism Team supported a member of the SPS
mental health team to develop the skills that enabled her
to support screening this population.
Screening
• It was found that SPS staff did not have the knowledge of the
prisoners to complete screening checklists.
• Self reporting questionnaires required to be paraphrased and
examples given before they could be answered.
• ‘Off the shelf’ tools proved difficult.
• Reduced literacy skills.
• Lack of self evaluation.
• ‘Hard man’ image.
Screening (Cont)
• Self reporting of a detailed personal history,
direct observation and results from paraphrased
AQ were used to determine the likelihood of the
presence of an ASD.
• Only those with a significant score in AQ and a
supporting developmental history were counted
in figures of ‘probable ASD’
Results
• General Prison population – 7.5% of
probable ASD.
• High support Unit population – 14.6% of
probable ASD.
(The incidence of ASD in mainstream society is widely recognised as 1:100.)
Why do Criminal Justice Services
need to think about this?
1. People with undiagnosed ASD are currently in the criminal justice
system.
2. ASD is over represented in the criminal justice system.
3. Hidden communication difficulties both understanding and expressing
of both verbal and non verbal language render people with ASD as
extremely vulnerable at many stages in the criminal justice system.
4. Failure to understand the full nature of the behaviour and impact of
the environment and others upon this will lead to disadvantage at
various stages for the person with ASD in the criminal justice system.
5. Re-offending is likely to occur unless behaviour is understood in the
context of ASD and appropriate supports put in place.
Points of vulnerability in Criminal Justice System
1.
Social enquiry report – the possibility of an undiagnosed ASD requires to
highlighted and communicated with the PF
2. Attendance at social enquiry report interview may be difficult due to communication
regarding the appointment and need for change to be tolerated.
3.
Community based disposals may not meet the needs of those with ASD but the
nature of these could render attendance impossible.
4.
Children’s reporter may place children ‘out-with parental control’ in residential care.
There is no specific service of this kind for those with ASD.
5.
During police interview a person with ASD may appear to have well developed
communication skills and the fact that they may fail to fully understand the question
and the implications of the questions may not be apparent. The use of appropriate
adults should be utilised where ASD or the possibility of ASD has been identified.
Any others?????
Possible Predisposing Factors
(Howlin, 2004;Berney, 2004)
Innate lack of empathy can lead to offence that is
disproportionately intense/damaging. Individuals often lack
insight, deny responsibility, blame others. May be due to
inability to see inappropriate behaviour as others do
Innate lack of awareness of outcome allows individuals to
embark on actions with unforeseen consequences

Impulsivity, sometimes violent, can be a component of comorbid ADHD or of anxiety that turns into panic

Social naivety and misinterpretation of relationships can
result in exploitation as a stooge

Misinterpreting rules, especially social rules, can find
individuals unwittingly embroiled in offences such as date
rape

Difficulty judging the age of others may lead to illegal
relationships, sexual advances to minors etc.

Over-riding obsessions can lead to offences such as
stalking or compulsive theft.

Lacking motivation to change, individuals may remain stuck
in risky patterns of behaviour

Forensic presentations possibly indicative of undiagnosed
Asperger Syndrome (Berney, 2004)

Obsessive harassment (stalking)

Inexplicable violence

Computer crime

Offences arising out of misjudged social
relationships
Why do we need to recognise
ASD?
4. Failure to understand the full nature of the
behaviour and impact of the environment and others
upon this will lead to disadvantage at various stages
for the person with ASD in the criminal justice system.
5. Re offending is likely to occur unless behaviour is
understood in the context of ASD and appropriate
supports put in place
What should you look out for?
(Remembering that everyone is different and none of these points are diagnostic in
themselves)
• Odd social interaction – too formal, too informal, body
language, interruption, eye gaze etc
• Mismatch between cognitive abilities and level of skill
in everyday tasks.
• Lack of organisation
• Clumsy
• The unofficial police.
• Insensitive to the emotions of others.
• Bullied and sometimes unaffected by this.
• Ritualistic and rule bound
• Intense interest in a particular subject often with
immense level of knowledge
• Underperformance – Mismatch between academic
achievements and occupation.
• Unable to progress through career, many changes in
job, lack of tolerance for imperfection.
• Academic progress arrested at point of transition
when structure lessens.
• Few ‘real’ friends and often many acquaintances.
• Islets of ability or skill sometimes associated with
special interest.
• Sensory differences – food fads, annoyed by sounds
others would not notice, sensitivity to being touched,
averse to the feelings of some surfaces, fascinated
by the touch of some surfaces.
• Often get into troublesome situations because of their
ill-timed responses.
• Great collectors of facts or things, the focus of which
can change over time and can sometimes stop due to
financial or other constraints.
• Fall out easily with others and sometimes seem
perplexed as to what went wrong
The Adult Autism Team,
Yarrow View Centre,
1880 Dumbarton Road,
Glasgow. G14 0YA.
Telephone 0141 342 3030.
James.O’[email protected]