Transcript Elements of Reasoning - Innovative Educators

Introduction to Critical Thinking
Part II
Asking Analytical Questions using Elements of
Reasoning
3 Key Questions
Why do we need critical thinking?
What is critical thinking?
What do we do to think critically?
The Three Dimensions
of Critical Thinking
Critical
Thinking
Analysis
of thinking
by focusing on
the parts
Evaluation
of thinking
by focusing on
the standards
Improvement
of thinking
by using what
you learned
Elements of Reasoning
Traits of
the
Disciplined
Mind
Reasoning: three aspects
Reasoning
The process of
drawing conclusions or
figuring something out
Standards
for
Reasoning
The quality of our thinking is largely
reflected in the quality of our
questions.
Circle –
Dots
Critical Thinking
≠
Something you add
onto everything else
Rather
=
The Way You Do
Everything You Do
LOGIC
OF
Student
Thinking
Instruction
Content
The Underlying Principles of Critical Thinking
The Standards
Clarity
Precision
Accuracy
Significance
Relevance
Completeness
Logical
Fairness
Breadth
Depth
Intellectual Traits
Intellectual Humility
Intellectual Perseverance
Intellectual Autonomy
Intellectual Integrity
Confidence in Reasoning
Intellectual Courage
Intellectual Empathy
Fair-mindedness
must be applied to
The Elements
Purpose
Inferences
Questions
Concepts
Points of view
Implications
Information
Assumptions
as we develop
What is involved in analyzing reasoning?
(Story, argument, point of view, subject)
In other words, what elements must you account for in order for
the analysis to be substantive?
Analyzing a Cartoon
 Look at the cartoon and analyze it by asking questions.
Individually, write a series of questions that attempt to
probe the meaning of the cartoon.
2. With a group, compare your questions with others. Add to
your list.
1.
Whenever we think
in attempting We think
to answer a for a
question. purpose
based on
concepts and
theories
to make
inferences and
judgments
We use
data, facts,
and
experiences
within a
point of view
based on
assumptions
leading to
implications
and conse quences.
A CRITICAL THINKER
Considers the
Elements of Thought
Points of View
Frame of Reference
Perspective
Orientation
Implications &
Consequences
Assumptions
Presuppositions,
taking for granted
Goal, objective
Elements
of
Thought
Concepts
Theories, laws,
models, definitions, principles
Elements wheel
Purpose of the
Thinking
Questions at
Issue
Problem
Information
Data, observations,
facts, experiences
Interpretation
& Inference
Conclusions,
solutions
Eight Questions Students Can Routinely Ask
When They Understand
the Elements of Reasoning
1. What is the main purpose of the reasoning?
2. What are the key issues, problems, and questions being
addressed?
3. What is the most important information being used?
4. What main inferences are embedded in the reasoning?
5. What are the key concepts guiding the reasoning?
6. What assumptions are being used?
7. What are the positive and negative implications?
8. What point of view is/should be represented?
Logic of a Cartoon
 Now use the elements of reasoning to generate more questions
for the same cartoon.
ALSO,
 Examine your original questions and identify which elements
they target.
Key Points
 Individually we can ask a limited number of questions
 Collectively we can ask even more
 However, when equipped with a framework, individually and
collectively we can ask even more
We must
routinely
Take our
thinking
We must routinely take our thinking apart
apart
Eight Questions Students Can Ask to
Figure out the Logic of a Subject or
Discipline:
1. What is the main purpose of the subject?
2. What are the key issues, problems, and questions addressed within
the subject?
3. What kinds of information are pursued within the discipline?
4. What types of inferences or judgments are made?
5. What key concepts inform the discipline?
6. What key assumptions underlie the discipline?
7. What are some important implications of studying the discipline?
8. What points of view are fostered within the discipline?
Eight Questions Students Can Ask to Figure out the
Logic of a Character in a Story
1. What is the main purpose of the character?
2. What are the key issues and problems facing the character?
3. What is the most significant information the character uses in his or her
reasoning?
4. What main inferences or judgments are made by the character?
5. What key concepts guide the character’s reasoning?
6. What main assumptions guide the behavior of the character?
7. What are the most important implications of the character’s thinking and
behavior?
8. What is the main point of view of the character? Does that point of view
change during the story? If so, how?
Questions Targeting the Elements of Thought
in a writing a paper
Purpose: What am I trying to accomplish? What is my central aim or goal?
Information: What information am I using in coming to that conclusion? What
experience have I had to support this claim? What information do I need to settle
the question?
Inferences/Conclusions: How did I reach this conclusion? Is there another way to
interpret the information?
Concepts: What is the main idea here? Could I explain this idea?
Assumptions: What am I taking for granted? What assumption has led me to that
conclusion?
Implications/Consequences: If someone accepted my position, what would
implications? What am I implying?
Points of View: From what point of view am I looking at this issue? Is there another
point of view I should consider?
Questions: What question am I raising? What question am I addressing?
The Logic of an Experiment
(Attach a detailed description of the experiment or
laboratory procedure.)
The main goal of the experiment is…
The hypothesis(es) we seek to test in this experiment is(are)…
The key question the experiment seeks to answer is…
The controls involved in this experiment are…
The key concept(s) or theory(ies) behind the experiment is(are)…
The experiment is based on the following assumptions…
The data that will be collected in the experiment are…
The potential implications of the experiment are…
The point of view behind the experiment is…
A CRITICAL THINKER
Considers the
Elements of Thought
Points of View
Frame of Reference
Perspective
Orientation
Implications &
Consequences
Assumptions
Presuppositions,
taking for granted
Goal, objective
Elements
of
Thought
Concepts
Theories, laws,
models, definitions, principles
Elements wheel
Purpose of the
Thinking
Questions at
Issue
Problem
Information
Data, observations,
facts, experiences
Interpretation
& Inference
Conclusions,
solutions
Unconscious Level of Thinking
Conscious and Unconscious thinking
Information
(situation)
1. You see a man with a
black eye
2. A police officer
trails your car for
several blocks
3. During class, a
student asks “is this
going to be on the
test?”
Inference
He has been hit by
someone
People who have black
eyes have been hit
He is trying to catch Anytime a police officer
trails you he is trying to
me breaking the
catch you breaking the law
law
This student is not
interested
in learning the
subject
4. You see a child crying The mother has
next to her mother in a
hurt the child
grocery store
5. You see a man
He must be a
in tattered clothes sitting on bum
a curb with a paper bag in
his hand
Assumption
Students who ask questions
like: “Is this going to be on
the test?” are not interested
in learning the subject
Whenever a child is crying
next to her mother she has
been hurt by her mother
All men in tattered clothes
sitting on curbs with paper
bags in their hands are
bums
Information
1. Your teenage son is late
coming home from a late
night date
2. Your spouse is late
coming home from
work
3. You meet a beautiful
woman with blond hair
4. You get an ‘A’ on a
history test.
5. Your spouse is talking
to a member of the
opposite sex at a late
night party
Inference
Assumption
A critical thinker considers the elements of reasoning
Activity Two:
Beginning to Figure Out the Logic of Education
Using your beginning understanding of the elements of reasoning,
take turns completing these statements.
The purpose of education is…
The main problem(s) we face in educating our students is/are…
If we truly educate students, some of the important implications
are…
Elements blank wheel
The Underlying Principles of Critical Thinking
The Standards
Clarity
Precision
Accuracy
Significance
Relevance
Completeness
Logical
Fairness
Breadth
Depth
Intellectual Traits
Intellectual Humility
Intellectual Perseverance
Intellectual Autonomy
Intellectual Integrity
Confidence in Reasoning
Intellectual Courage
Intellectual Empathy
Fair-mindedness
must be applied to
The Elements
Purpose
Inferences
Questions
Concepts
Points of view
Implications
Information
Assumptions
as we develop
Take your understanding of the elements of reasoning
to the next level
 Work in pairs.
 Each person draws two circles
 Using your best thinking, fill in your two circles with as
much detail as possible:
a. One circle includes the main points about the elements.
b. One circle has questions you can ask when you understand
the elements.
Elements wheel with directions
Elements of wheel – add questions
Activity Three:
Beginning to Figure Out the Logic of a Subject or Discipline
Using your beginning understanding of the elements of reasoning,
take turns completing these statements.
The purpose of the discipline is…
Some of the main questions pursued within the discipline are…
Some of the important implications of studying the discipline are…
The Logic of Ecology
Goals of Ecologists: Ecologists seek to understand plants and animals as they exist in
nature, with emphasis on their interrelationships, interdependence, and interactions with
the environment. They work to understand all the influences that combine to produce
and modify an animal or given plant, and thus to account for its existence and
peculiarities within its habitat.
Questions that Ecologists Ask: How do plants and animals interact? How do animals
interact with each other? How do plants and animals depend on one another? How do
the varying ecosystems function within themselves? How do they interact with other
ecosystems? How are plants and animals affected by environmental influences? How do
animals and plants grow, develop, die, and replace themselves? How do plants and
animals create balances between each other? What happens when plants and animals
become unbalanced?
Information that Ecologists Use: The primary information used by
ecologists is gained through observing plants and animals themselves,
their interactions, and how they live within their environments.
Ecologists note how animals and plants are born, how they reproduce,
how they die, how they evolve, and how they are affected by
environmental changes. They also use information from other
disciplines including chemistry, meteorology and geology.
Judgments that Ecologists Make: Ecologists make judgments about
how ecosystems naturally function, about how animals and plants
within them function, about why they function as they do. They make
judgments about how ecosystems become out of balance and what can
be done to bring them back into balance. They make judgments about
how natural communities should be grouped and classified.
Concepts that Guide Ecologists’ Thinking: One of the most fundamental
concepts in ecology is ecosystem, defined as a group of living things that are
dependent on one another and living in a particular habitat. Ecologists study how
differing ecosystems function. Another key concept in ecology is ecological
succession, the natural pattern of change occurring within every ecosystem when
natural processes are undisturbed. This pattern includes the birth, development,
death, and then replacement of natural communities. Ecologists have grouped
communities into larger units called biomes, regions throughout the world
classified according to physical features, including temperature, rainfall and type
of vegetation. Another fundamental concept in ecology is balance of nature, the
natural process of birth, reproduction, eating and being eaten, which keeps
animal/plant communities fairly stable. Other key concepts include imbalances,
energy, nutrients, population growth, diversity, habitat, competition, predation,
parasitism, adaptation, coevolution, succession and climax communities and
conservation.
Key Assumptions that Ecologists Make: Patterns exist within
animal/plant communities; these communities should be studied and
classified; animals and plants often depend on one another and modify one
another; and balances must be maintained within ecosystems.
Implications of Ecology: The study of ecology leads to numerous
implications for life on Earth. By studying balance of nature, for example,
we can see when nature is out of balance, as in the current population
explosion. We can see how pesticides, designed to kill pests on farm crops,
also lead to the harm of mammals and birds, either directly or indirectly
through food webs. We can also learn how over-farming causes erosion and
depletion of soil nutrients.
Point of View of Ecologists: Ecologists look at plants and animals and see
them functioning in relationship with one another within their habitats,
and needing to be in balance for the earth to be healthy and sustainable.
Activity Three:
Beginning to Figure Out the Logic of a Subject or Discipline
Using your beginning understanding of the elements of reasoning,
take turns completing these statements.
The purpose of the discipline is…
Some of the main questions pursued within the discipline are…
Some of the important implications of studying the discipline are…
Process
 What important insights did you gain through
doing these activities – insights about the
elements of reasoning?
 How might you better foster use and
understanding of the elements of reasoning in
your classes?
Circle –
Dots
Elements of Reasoning
 Conclusions, assumptions, points of view
Think of a difficult situation in your life, a problem in your
relationship w/ someone, a decision you have to make, or
something important about CT and education.
Formulate three good questions about that situation, using each of
the three elements listed.
Answer the questions as well as you can.
For Example
 Situation (from a student’s point of view): I’m considering dropping
this course b/c it looks too hard.
Question: What assumptions am I making about this situation?
Answer: I am assuming it will be too hard – I wonder if that is accurate?
Question: What conclusion should I draw?
Answer: My conclusion is to wait and see. I need more information.
Making the Standards Intuitive
For X in the questions below, substitute the name of your discipline
(course). Then answer them.
 In what ways is it necessary to be clear in X?
 What are the areas where people are most likely to be
inaccurate in X? What are the most important aspects of X to
master?
 What are the dangers of giving insufficient responses in X?
 In what ways are depth and breadth central to X?
 How is precision most important in X?
Discovering and Following out the
Implications
 Using the word critical in the sense of critical thinking, what would you
say are the main earmarks of critical reading?
 What is the difference between reading your text and reading it critically?
 How about critical listening?
 What is the difference between listening to a lecture in a course and
listening to it critically?
 Can a person listen critically and not disagree at all?
Essential Idea:
To learn well, we must write well.
Short Writing: Physics
Acceleration and Velocity
You are Dr. Science, the question-and-answer person for a
popular magazine called Practical Science. Readers of your
magazine are invited to submit letters to Dr. Science, who
answers them in “Dear Abby” style in a special section of the
magazine. One day you receive the following letter:
Dear Dr. Science:
You’ve got to help me settle this argument I am having with my
girlfriend. We were watching a baseball game several weeks ago
when this guy hit a high pop-up straight over the catcher’s head.
When it finally came down, the catcher caught it standing on
home plate. Well, my girlfriend told me that when the ball
stopped in midair just before it started back down, its velocity
was zero, but its acceleration was not zero. I said she was
stupid. If something isn’t moving at all, how could it have any
acceleration?
Ever since then, she has been making a big deal out of this
and won’t let me kiss her. I love her, but I don’t think we
can get back together until we settle this argument. We
checked some physics books, but they weren’t very clear.
We agreed that I would write to you and let you settle the
argument. But, Dr. Science, don’t just tell us the answer.
You’ve got to explain it so we both understand because
my girlfriend is really dogmatic. She said she wouldn’t
even trust Einstein unless he could explain himself clearly.
Sincerely, Baseball Blues
Can this relationship be saved? Your task is to write an answer
to Baseball Blues. Because space in your magazine is limited,
restrict your answer to what can be put on a single five-by
eight-inch card. Don’t confuse Baseball and his girlfriend by
using any special physics terms unless you explain clearly
what they mean.
Analyzing Assignments
 What is the purpose of this assignment?
 What intellectual skills does it target?
 What are the key concepts students are to engage?
 What types of questions should students ask when working
through the problem?
 What are we, as instructors, assuming when giving such an
assignment? Are our assumptions sound?
Principle of Leverage
 “A small amount of writing preceded by a great amount of thinking.”
(Bean, 80).
 Design short writing assignments that target one or two key
concepts.
 Design the assignment to require that students explain the concept,
differentiate the concept(s) from related and opposite concepts,
contextualize/exemplify the concept.
Psychology: Operant Conditioning
Consider the following problem:
In the morning, when Professor Catlove opens a new can of cat
food, his cats run into the kitchen purring and meowing and
rubbing their backs against his legs. What examples, if any, of
classical condition, operant conditioning, and social learning
are at work in this brief scene? Note that both the cats and
the professor might be exhibiting conditioned behavior here.
You and some fellow classmates have been discussing this problem
over coffee, and you are convinced that the other members of
your group are confused about the concepts. Write a one- to
two-page essay that sets them straight.
Analyzing Assignments
 What is the purpose of this assignment?
 What intellectual moves are we asking students to make?
 What connections are students challenged to make? (content and
process)
 If we regularly ask students to engage in such work, then what
insights / skills should we expect to see developed?
Analytical Framework
 The elements of reasoning provide concepts that, when
critically engaged, direct our thinking in a way that can lead
to greater insight.
 They are a system probing system.
Key Point
 Help foster critical thought by giving
assignments that explicitly focus
student thinking in directions that
require reasoning through a problem or
issue.
Thesis Governed Thinking
1. Present a proposition (thesis) that students defend or refute.
2. Give students a problem or question that requires a thesis
answer.
3. Ask students to follow an organizational structure that
requires a problem-thesis pattern.
Students take position you specify
Mathematics Example
Write a letter to the editor against sales tax
on the grounds of it being a regressive tax.
Explicitly use ratio and proportion to
explain to the uninformed reader the
meaning of regressive tax.
Economics Example
Upon arriving home for Christmas, you
discover your father writing a letter to his
representative in Congress urging the passage
of legislation limiting beef imports from
Argentina. He argues that such imports put
ranchers out of business, cause U.S. packing
houses to close, and generally make this
country poorer.
You, on the basis of your brilliant
performance in Economics 105, engage
your father in a spirited discussion. Write
the argument that you use to convince him
of the error of his position.Your father
doesn’t understand economic jargon, so
any jargon you use must be explained.
(1) Present a proposition (thesis) that
students defend or refute.
 “This proposed bridge design does/does not meet the criteria set forth
by the city in its requires for proposal.” (civil engineering)
 “The path to holiness lies through questioning everything.” Agree or
disagree. (religious studies)
 Mercury amalgam fillings are/are not safe. (research project on
scientific argument)
Key Point
 Help foster critical thought by giving
assignments that explicitly focus
student thinking in directions that
require reasoning through a problem or
issue.
Selected Sources
• Bean, J.C. (1996). Engaging Ideas: A Professor’s Guide to Integrating
•
•
•
•
Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom.
Nosich, G. (2009). Learning to Think Things Through: A Guide to
Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum. 3rd Ed.
Tishman, S., Perkins, D., & Jay, E. (1995). The Thinking
Classroom: Learning and Teaching in a Culture of Thinking.
Tovani, C. (2000). I Read It, But I Don’t Get It: Comprehension
Strategies for Adolescent Readers.
Unrau, N. (1997). Thoughtful Teachers,Thoughtful Learners: A Guide
to Helping Adolescents Think Critically.