THERAPEUTIC HYPOTHERMIA FOR CARDIAC ARREST

Download Report

Transcript THERAPEUTIC HYPOTHERMIA FOR CARDIAC ARREST

THERAPEUTIC HYPOTHERMIA FOR
CARDIAC ARREST
USING PERFORMANCE TARGETS
Raghu Loganathan, MD, FCCP
Director, Medical ICU & Stroke Center
March 2010
Disclosures
• Nothing extraordinary in the case reports
• Use 2 case studies to describe successful
implementation of a new protocol
RL
Cardiac Arrest
Epidemiology
Out of Hospital
cardiac arrests
• 64% of all arrests
• 2 to 9% survive to discharge
• 1/ 3rd of survivors have
irreversible cognitive
dysfunction
RL
In-hospital cardiac
arrests
• 36 % of all arrests
• 18% survive to
discharge
ILCOR 2008 Circulation 2008; 118:2452-83
MILD THERAPUETIC HYPOTHERMIA
CLINCIAL STUDIES
• RCT’s
– Bernard S et al – NEJM 2002; 346(8)
– Holtzer M et al – NEJM 2002; 346 (8)
– Idrissi et al – NEJM 2001
• Other Designs
– Benson D et al – Anaes Analg 1959; vol 38
– Bernard S et al – Ann Emerg Med 1997; 33(2)
– Bernard S et al – Resuscitation 2003; 56(1)
• Meta-analysis
– Holtzer M et al – Crit Care Med 2005; 33(2)
RL
Summary of Landmark Trials
HACA
(European)
Bernard
(Australian)
Initial rhythm
VF or VT
VF
Pre ED Cooling
Target Temp
Hypothermia patients
Standard Rx Patients
No
32 to 33 C
136
137
Yes
33 C
43
34
Hypothermia duration
Morbidity Reduction
Mortality Reduction
24 hours
12 hours
ARR 16%, NNT 6
ARR 16%, NNT 4
ARR 14%, NNT 6
ARR 17%, NNT 6
NS
NS
Adverse events (sepsis,
arrhythmias & Bleeding)
RL
HACA study group, NEJM, 2002 & Bernard SA, NEJM 2002
MILD THERAPEUTIC HYPOTHERMIA
FDNY initiative
• Less than 15% hospitals are currently using
hypothermia in US
• Designated hypothermia centers
– Cardiac arrests triaged by EMS
• Model based on STEMI/ PCI centers &
Stroke Centers
RL
Case Study -1
•
•
•
•
•
69 year old male progressively dyspenic for 5 days
EMS found him cyanotic
Initial PEA, followed by asystole and V fib
Intubated on the field
Downtime 26 minutes
PMH: HTN, COPD, CAD, Morbid Obesity
• Arrived in ED comatose, GCS 3T
• RLPAP 54 on ventilator
Case Study -1
• Cold saline: 4.5 liters started within 5
minutes
• Surface cooling in 25 minutes
• Central line placed 30 minutes
• Initial Lactate was 9.3, ScVo2 65%
• Baseline Temp was 37.2
• Target temp reached in 3.4 hours
– Double vests used in series
RL
Case Study -1
• EKG: no STEMI
• Mild elevation of troponins
• ECHO showed depressed EF (30%) with
wall motion abnormalities
• CXR showed lower lobe infiltrates
RL
Case Study -1
• Posturing with de-cerebrating signs noted at 5
hours
• TH continued with sedation and paralytics for
shivering
• Re-warming after 24 hours
• EEG showed diffuse slowing, no seizures
• No clinical response when sedation was stopped
• Day 3; spontaneous eye opening and followed
some commands
• Day 6 Able to follow more commands
RL
Case Study -1
• Day 9: Unable to extubate transferred to
vent floor
• Day 17 Trach done
• Day 23 weaned off Trach
• Day 25 discharged to SNF
• March 25th: Trach de-cannulated,
ambulating and functioning at baseline
RL
Case Study : 2
• 72 year old male well known to Lincoln BIBEMS
• ESRD, Known asthma, Known CAD
• EMS called for respiratory distress, “noted to
hypotensive and dyspneic and went into cardiac
arrest”
• “Wide QRS on 3 lead” placed on NRB
• Subsequently “patient agonal, PEA on monitor, 3
blocks from hospital, CPR started immediately”
• ED arrival 10 minutes later: CPR continued
• Intubated in ED, various rhythms, 2 doses of
epinephrine and atropine given
RL
Case Study : 2
• Post intubation, noted to be “de-cerebrating” by ED
attending
• ROSC at 25 minutes: BP 143/ 76, RR 20 at set
rate and Pulse 67
• MICU called for therapeutic hypothermia
– Unresponsive to deep stimuli, comatose
• Hypothermia initiated 40 mins after ROSC
• Myoclonic jerks observed day 1
• 36 hours into protocol: patient opens eyes
and following simple commands
RL
Who to Cool?
Inclusion Criteria
• Post-cardiac arrest: defined as absence of pulses
requiring chest compressions, regardless of location or
presenting rhythm
• Any Initial rhythm (VF/VT, asystole or PEA)
• ROSC within 30 minutes to a SBP > 90 mmHg (with or
without vasoactive meds)
• Patient is comatose (unable to follow commands/ GCS <
6) upon arrival to the hospital in the absence of sedation
• RLTime at start of cooling is within 4 hours after ROSC
Who to Cool?
Exclusion Criteria
• Another reason to be comatose
• Purposeful response to verbal commands or
noxious stimuli after ROSC and prior to initiation of
hypothermia
• Absent brainstem function not explained by
treatment with sedatives, paralytics or anticholinergic agents
• A known terminal illness preceding arrest
• RL? Pregnancy ( Case report showing benefit)
Who to Cool?
Exclusion Criteria
• Pre-existing DNR and / or DNI code status and patient not
intubated as part of resuscitation efforts
• Multi-organ system failure, refractory shock requiring high
doses of vasopressors (MAP<60 on 2 or more vasopressor
agents), severe persistent hypoxia, acidosis or comorbidities with minimal chance of meaningful survival
independent of neurological status
• Uncontrolled bleeding to coagulopathy
• Recurrent VF or refractory VT in spite of appropriate
therapy should generate consideration of emergent referral
for cardiac catheterization
RL
Aa
Typical Cooling and Rewarming Protocol
Aa
RL
How to Cool?
ICU Notification
•
Once eligibility for induced hypothermia is
determined, call MICU/ Stroke attending ASAP
•
Obtain 2 large bore IV lines
•
Obtain baseline temperature
•
Infusion of approximately 2 to 3 liters (for 70 kg
individual) of normal saline refrigerated at 4-5 °C
–
RL
Can safely and reliably lower core body temperature by
3-4 °C when infused over 50 minutes.
COOLING PROTOCOL
• Obtain laboratory tests ASAP:
–
–
–
–
–
–
Beta HCG on all women of childbearing age
Arterial blood gas
CBC/ platelets / PT / PTT/INR, Fibrinogen
Electrolyte “panel 7”, plus iCa / Mg / Phos , Cl-, Glucose
Amylase, Lipase, LFTs, , Lactate, CPK-MB, CK, Troponin
Blood Cultures, Urine Cultures, Urinalysis
• Toxicology screen if appropriate
• 12 lead EKG, Chest X-ray
• Placement of urinary catheter with temperature sensor
• RLInsertion of Central Line Catheter (subclavian or IJ)
HYPOTHERMIA BUNDLE
TIME ZERO
RETURN OF SPONTANEUOUS
CIRCULATION (ROSC)
10 MINUTES
COMPLETE SCREENING & NOTIFY ICU
ATTENDING
• “HYPOTHERMIA LABS” TO BE SENT
OUT
• START COLD SALINE
PLACE CENTRAL LINE IN SUBCLAVIAN
PLACE TEMP SENSING FOLEY
15 MINUTES
30 MINUTES
45 MINUTES
4 HOURS
RL
START SURFACE COOLING
ACHIEVE TARGET TEMP OF 32 C
GAYMAR III
Not selling this product
RL
January 2009 to February 2010
58 cardiac arrest patients to ED
22 patients in ED with ROSC
14 PATIENTS COOLED
RL
18 INPATIENTS
screened
12 INPATIENTS COOLED
Clinical Characteristics
• 26 patients cooled
• Rhythm:
– Vtach/ Vfib = 3 patients
– Asystole/ PEA = 18
– Mixed (VF with asystole/ PEA) = 5 patients
• Average APACHE II = 26 (predicted death rate of
64%)
• 22/ 26 had 100% compliance with hypothermia
bundle
• RL Average ICU days on vent 7.03 days
OUTCOMES
• 26 patients cooled
• 11/ 26 (42.3%) survived to hospital discharge
• 10/ 26 (38.4%) had “good outcomes”
CPS
category
Description
Number
1
Conscious and alert with normal function or
only slight disability
8
2
3
4
5
Conscious and alert with moderate disability
2
1
0
15
RL
Conscious with severe disability
Comatose or persistent vegetative state
Brain dead or death from other causes
OUTCOMES BY RHYTHM
Rhythm
Cooled
Survived
VF/ V-tach
3
1 (33.3%)
Asystole / PEA
18
8 (44.4%)
Mixed (VF/ V-tach
and asytole / PEA)
5
2 (40%)
RL
Summary of Studies
Neurologic
50% vs 14%
Neurologic
23% vs 7%
Survival
50% vs 23%
Survival
54% vs 33%
Neurologic
49% vs 26%
Neurologic
55% vs 39%
Survival
48% vs 32%
RL
Survival
59% vs 45%
Who to Cool ?
Does Rhythm Matter?
• Data from RCTs”
– Suggest VF and VT
• Combination of rhythms during a cardiac arrest
event
• Underlying mechanisms of brain injury are same
• Multiple observational trials on asystolic rhythm
have shown benefit
RL
Who to cool?
Do Circumstances of Arrest Adequately Predict Outcome?
RL
Practice Parameters: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors
after cardiopulmonary resuscitation, NEUROLOGY 2006;67:203–210
Complications
RL
HACA study group, NEJM, 2002
SUMMARY
• Screening of patients:
– Judgement improves with time
– Rhythm alone should not exclude patients
• Most have combined rhythms
• Information on initial rhythm not always available
• Use of bundles helps with rapid
implementation and achieving target temp
– Performance targets helps
RL
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
• Phase 2 FDNY hypothermia
– Cool Enroute to hospital
• MCA ischemic Infarcts
• Traumatic brain injury
• SAH patients with increased ICP
• Hepatic encephalopathy
RL
Old CPR
RL
HYPOTHERMIA
RL