Transcript Document

Watershed Programme (IWDP/DPAP)
in Jharkhand
by
B. NIJALINGAPPA
Additional Secretary
Department of Rural Development,
Jharkhand, Ranchi
Date- 2-3 August 2004
Place- Hyderabad
Organiser- WASSAN
Jharkhand at a Glance
Capital
Total Geographical Area
Division
Districts
Sub-Division
No. of Blocks
No. of Villages
Total Numbers of Panchayats
Total Numbers of Lok Sabha Seats
Total Numbers of Assembly Seats
Total Population
Density of Poverty
Total ST Population
Total SC Population
Literacy Rate
BPL
-
Ranchi
79,714 Sq. km.
5
22
35
211
32,620
3,759
14
82
2,69,09,428
338 persons/Sq. km.
28% of total population
12% of total population
54.13%
54.00%
Land Use Pattern
Total Geographical Area
Total Cultivable Land
Net Sown Area
Net Irrigated Area
Forest Area
Wasteland
-
79.71 lakh hec.
38.00 lakh hec.
18.04 lakh hec (25%)
01.57 lakh hec (8%)
23.60 lakh hec (29%)
15.11 lakh hec (18.97%)
Sl.
No.
District
1
2
Daltanganj
1
(Palamu)
2 Garhwa
DISTRICT-WISE AND CATEGORY-WISE WASTELANDS OF JHARKHAND
Annexure "A"
Distribution of wasteland (Area in Sq. Km.)
Deg.
Deg.
Gullied/
Land Waterlog saline/
Shifting
Deg.
Land
SandsMining/ Barren
Steep
Pastures/
ravinous with/with ged/Mars alkaline Cultivatio Notified
under
Inland/ Industrial Rocky sloping
grazing
land out scrub hy land
Area
n area forest land
plantaion Coastal wastelands Area
Area
land
crop
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Snow/
glacial
Area
Total
wastelands
Total
Geog.
Area
% to
total
Geog.
Area
15
16
17
18
239.09
188.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
2134.45
0.00
31.08
1.35
1.83
2.79
0.00
0.00
2598.75 12749.00
20.38
3 Deoghar
4.92
257.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
192.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.55
8.72
0.00
0.00
467.35
2476.00
18.88
4 Dhanbad
21.18
104.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
68.00
123.46
5.19
0.00
81.92
5.53
1.11
0.00
411.30
2996.00
13.73
5 Dumka
11.90
185.93
0.00
0.00
0.12
341.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.53
3.68
0.00
0.00
543.22
6212.00
8.74
6 Giridih
15.22
344.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
1349.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.77
27.22
5.87
0.00
1767.95
6890.00
25.66
8 Godda
22.03
283.41
0.00
0.00
7.23
119.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.37
2.05
0.00
0.00
438.47
2108.00
20.80
9 Gumla
4.52
486.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
660.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
133.00
24.42
0.00
1308.87
9077.00
14.42
15.82
370.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
2084.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.88
14.25
13.07
0.00
2522.58 11164.00
22.60
13 Lohardaga
5.45
18.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
26.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.97
6.57
0.00
0.00
59.51
1491.00
3.99
14 Pakur
0.00
181.91
0.27
0.00
2.87
41.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
231.07
1805.00
12.80
15 Ranchi
12.47
270.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
648.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.65
53.12
8.75
0.00
998.83
7698.00
12.98
0.00
282.47
17.22
0.00
34.32
44.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
382.25
1600.00
23.89
98.45
292.93
0.73
0.00
0.91
2652.25
18.45
42.37
0.11
9.95
258.90
12.51
0.00
3387.56 13440.00
25.21
451.05 3268.41
18.22
0.00
45.45 10363.40
141.91
78.64
1.46
167.61
515.83
65.73
0.00
15117.71 79706.00
18.97
7 Bokaro
10 Hazaribag
11 Chatra
12 Koderma
16 Sahebganj
Singbhum
17
(West)
Singbhum
18
(East)
G. Total
Land Administration in Jharkhand
1. Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act (1908)
2. Santhalparagna Tenancy Act (1949)Dumka, Sahebganj, Godda, Deoghar, Pakur
3. Bihar Schedule Area Regulation Act, 1969
4. Wilkinson Rules (Under Bengal Regulation XIII of 1833)
5. Indian Forest Act 1927
6. Forest Conservation Act 1980
7. Joint Forest Management Resolutions 1990 & 2001
8. Mining (Coal Bearing Act)
Rainfall in Ranchi, Palamu & Hazaribag Districts in Jharkhand State
Month
January
Feb
March
April
May
June
July
August
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Total
Ranchi
Palamu
Hazaribag
Rainfall Surplus Rainfall Surplus Rainfall Surplus
water
water
water
23.40
0.00
23.40
0.00
22.60
0.00
47.70
0.00
32.30
0.00
32.00
0.00
30.20
0.00
17.00
0.00
23.90
0.00
22.60
0.00
10.40
0.00
14.00
0.00
53.90
0.00
14.50
0.00
49.80
0.00
218.20
0.00
152.90
0.00
211.60
0.00
392.40 198.50 340.40 56.70 331.00 106.80
351.50 210.60 343.10 176.30 335.50 201.10
236.00 114.90 181.40 30.40 227.10 106.70
79.50
14.60
49.00
0.00
78.70
0.00
15.50
0.00
14.20
0.00
14.20
0.00
6.90
0.00
6.30
0.00
6.90
0.00
1477.80 538.60 1184.90 263.40 1347.30 414.60
SCHEDULE AREA IN JHARKHAND
Sl. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Schedule Area
Dumka
E. Singhbhum
Garhwa (Bolba Block)
Godda (Sunderpahri & Boarijore)
Gumla
Jamtara
Latehar
Lohardaga
Pakur
Ranchi
Sahebganj
Saraikela
Simdega
W. Singhbhum
Non Schedule Area
Bokaro
Chatra
Deoghar
Dhanbad
Garhwa (Except Bolba Block)
Giridih
Godda (Except Sunderpahri & Boarijore)
Hazaribag
Koderma
Palamau
DPAP BLOCKS IN JHARKHAND
Sl. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Districts
Ranchi
Gumla
E. Singhbhum
Lohardaga
Simdega
Saraikela
W. Singhbhum
Hazaribag
Koderma
Chatra
Bokaro
Dhanbad
Giridih
Palamau
Latehar
Jamtara
Garhwa
Dumka
Godda
Pakur
Sahebganj
Deoghar
Total
DPAP Blocks
1
10
4
4
2
8
10
7
4
8
10
7
6
8
7
96
IWDP Blocks
20
10
9
5
7
8
15
6
1
6
6
12
1
6
1
1
1
115
Total Blocks
20
11
9
5
7
8
15
16
5
10
8
8
12
11
7
4
14
10
8
6
9
8
211
DPAP PROJECTS IN JHARKHAND
Sl. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Districts
Bokaro
Chatra
Deoghar
Dhanbad
Dumka
Jamtara
Gumla
Godda
Hazaribag
Koderma
Pakur
Sahebganj
Palamau
Latehar
Total:
I
6
19
28
16
15
V
19
34
15
40
18
12
7
23
7
7
38
36
54
263
VI
7
19
14
24
24
19
200
VII
4
8
15
16
28
16
23
7
12
12
32
173
VIII
4
14
16
8
28
14
20
8
12
12
28
164
IX
4
8
14
16
20
8
28
14
20
8
12
12
22
14
200
Total
25
73
85
88
87
16
124
55
110
46
43
79
146
42
1019
FINANCIAL AND PHYSICAL PROGRESS OF WATERSHED PROJECT UNDER DPAP BATCH V,VI,VII, VIII & IX
State-JHARKHAND Year-2003-2004 Month - March 2004
Sl. No.
District
Opening
Balance on
1st April
Central
Release
State Release
+ Other
Release
Total
Availability
Expenditure
Balance
Amount
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
% of
No. of Project
Expenditure A/C Opened
10
1
Bokaro
79.840
13.50
30.25
123.590
20.360
103.230
16.474
2
Chatra
26.220
116.80
10.40
153.412
88.450
64.962
57.655
46
3
Deoghar
122.650
87.35
47.25
257.250
118.660
138.590
46.126
29
4
Dhanbad
241.050
104.50
54.03
399.580
0.900
398.680
0.225
0
5
Dumka
133.990
67.50
119.58
321.070
132.000
189.070
41.113
5
6
Garhwa
244.740
94.50
115.00
454.240
186.220
268.020
40.996
62
7
Godda
117.234
47.25
62.75
227.234
71.970
155.264
31.672
0
8
Hazaribag
82.530
67.50
67.50
217.530
85.886
131.644
39.482
43
9
Jamtara
75.860
27.00
24.00
126.860
90.600
36.260
71.417
10
Koderma
161.990
39.00
27.00
227.990
1.830
226.160
0.803
11
Latehar
93.319
47.25
47.25
187.819
105.000
82.819
55.905
12
Pakur
122.183
40.50
67.95
230.633
11.967
218.666
5.189
13
Palamau
93.573
47.25
173.25
314.073
184.775
129.298
58.832
14
Sahebganj
130.900
40.50
67.95
239.350
85.500
49.880
35.722
25
Total
1726.079
840.397
914.155
3480.631
1184.118
2192.543
34.020
210
No. of NGOs Working as PIAs Under DPAP
Sl. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
District
Chatra
Deoghar
Dhanbad
Dumka
Garhwa
Godda
Hazaribag
Jamtara
Latehar
Pakur
Bokaro
Koderma
Palamau
Sahebganj
Total
No. of PIAs
7
15
2
15
8
7
13
7
8
3
0
0
17
4
106
IWDP PROJECTION IN JHARKHAND
Dist.
Ranchi
E. Singhbhum
Block
Year of Sanction
Area
Ranchi
1999-2000
6273
KGVK
1
Patmada
2000-01
7253
Soil Conervation/ 5 NGOs
5
2000-01
5115
KGVK
1
W. Singhbhum (Saraikela)
PIA
No. of NGOs
Giridih
Jamua
2000-01
6037
Vikas Darpan
1
Saraikela
Kuchai
2003-04
6000
Creative
1
Bhandra
2003-04
6000
Pradhan, Adivasi Kendra,
Durgam
3
Lohardaga
2003-04
Bengabad
2003-04
6000
Soil/ DFO
0
Noamundi
2003-04
6000
DFO
0
Jhinkpani
2003-04
Sisai
2003-04
5000
Soil Conservation
1
Simdega
2003-04
5000
Soil Conservation
1
Lohardaga
Giridih
W. Singhbhum
Gumla
Simdega
Total:
14
FINANCIAL AND PHYSICAL PROGRESS OF WATERSHED PROJECT UNDER IWDP
State-JHARKHAND Year-2003-2004 Month - March 2004
Sl. No.
District
Opening
Balance on
1st April
Central
Release
State Release
Total
Availability
Expenditure
Balance
Amount
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
% of
No. of Project
Expenditure A/C Opened
1
E. Singhbhum
52.270
0.000
5.940
58.210
20.251
37.959
34.790
2
Giridih
0.000
91.000
4.530
95.530
31.440
64.090
32.911
3
Gumla
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
4
Hazaribag
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
5
Lohardaga
0.000
49.500
4.500
54.000
0.000
54.000
0.000
6
Ranchi
37.630
0.000
0.000
37.630
19.576
18.054
52.022
7
Saraikela
47.740
49.500
8.340
105.580
30.500
75.080
28.888
8
Simdega
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
9
W. Singhbhum
4.500
0.000
4.500
9.000
0.000
9.000
0.000
142.140
190.000
27.810
359.950
101.767
258.183
28.273
Total
10
0
Evaluation of IWDP Projects by SIRD, Ranchi
As per Govt. of India's Report
Sl. No.
As per Evaluation Report
Districts
Project
Period
Total Area
Total
Total Area
Total
Total Cost
Total Cost
(In Hec.)
Release (In Hec.)
Release
Total
Balance
Expenditure Amount
1
Chatra
93-94 to
96-97
1445
138.45
39.11
621
138.45
43.38
43.38
0.00
2
Lohardaga
93-94 to
96-97
2670
248.66
147.79
NA
248.66
72.79
64.54
8.25
3
Garhwa
93-94 to
96-97
1295
114.21
84.05
NA
310.00
33.96
31.07
2.89
4
Deoghar
94-95 to
97-98
4400
331.60
120.46
1185
331.60
120.46
61.90
58.56
5
Palamau
93-94 to
96-97
2705
233.97
203.46
2225
233.97
167.53
153.78
13.75
Evaluation of IWDP Projects By SIRD, Ranchi
Sl. No.
1
2
3
4
5
District
Work Done
Nursery,
Chatra
Afforestation,
Soil conservation,
Earthen Chekdams,
Ponds,
Lohardaga
Agroforestry,
Rehabilitation of Degraded forest
Rehabilitation of Degraded forest,
Construction of Checkdams,
Garhwa
Wells,
Smokeless Chulha Distribution
Rehabilitation of Degraded forest,
Deoghar
Fuel wood plantation
Palamau
Plantation work
Outcome of the Watershed Workshop-11th March 2004
Proposals
1.
WDT members- Quality training, Exposure visits, Project management.
2.
Regular district level watershed committee meeting should be held.
3.
Block level committee should also be formed so that full involvement of block level
officials is ensured.
4.
Block level officials should also be included in the district WAC.
5.
NGOs, WDT, Govt. Officials should be trained in renowned institutions like MANAGE or
MYRADA.
6. One PIA should get at least 5000 hec. Area for implementation.
7.
Cost of the project should be based on quantum and nature of work required for eventual
requirement.
8.
One percent project cost to prepare DPR to be given to PIA.
9.
Line departments should be the partners with WDT for planning, evaluation and
implementing.
Impact Assessment Study of Watershed Development Projects in Jharkhand State
Points for action
 Guidelines for implementation of these projects were not meticulously followed, watershed association and
watershed committees were not as per the guidelines.
 Assets created was not satisfactory and most of them abandoned. Non use of assets.
 Communities involvement in planning and designing was generally weak.
 There were only 920 training camps were organised in four years and 772 persons were trained, which included
16% females consequently the projects have not succeeded in arousing community awareness for managing the land
and water resources in an eco friendly manner.
 Positive impact of the programmes was observed in terms of irrigability and crops coverage, the productivity
increase has been inadequate and reflecting feeble of the watershed projects.
Some of the findings of the Study are listed below:

Performance of both DPAP and IWDP in the assigned districts was quite unsatisfactory in terms of the utilisation of
financial allocations. In case of IWDP, the utilization was 67% and for DPAP, it was 65%.

The land use pattern in the selected watershed project areas in the assigned districts has shown improved land
utilisation. The impact of the watershed development programmes is seen in the decrease in current follows by 9% and unused
cultivable lands by 16% in the watershed area under DPAP. The net sown area and gross cropped area have recorded a
moderate increase of 4% and 9% respectively after implementation of watersheds, which in turn increased the cropping
intensity to 63.8% from 57.9% in the pre project period. There is no such change reported under IWDP.

The soil and water conservation works carried out in the watershed area under DP AP have effected augmentation of
ground water as a result of deep percolation of rainwater and continuing stream flows. Also, water storage in percolation tanks
and check dams have helped in improving the soil moisture regime. Area under irrigation, particularly during rabi season has
increased.

The watershed districts have been found to be rich in animal population. Through watershed programmes, the animal
population has increased by 12.9%. In case of poultry and fisheries, the change is extraordinary, registering an increase of 31 %
and 158.6% respectively.

The watershed projects in almost all the districts have generated employment opportunities for the inhabitants of the
project area.
 The quality of maintenance of the functional assets is rated as 20% very good, 63% good and 16% fair. Only 1 percent
is of poor quality, confined to Bokaro (1 earthen check dam and 2 nurseries) and Deoghar (4 gully control measure, 3 nala bank
stabilization, 4 contour bunds and 7 nurseries).
Tentative Cost Estimates for creation of Water Harvesting/Irrigational Structures
Vision of
coverage
Sl.
No.
District
1
2
Daltanganj
1
(Palamu)
2 Garhwa
Total Estimated
cost(In Lakh)
3
2003-04
2004-05
Year wise Likely Work Plan
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Likely Amount
Likely Amount
Likely Amount
Likely Amount
Likely Amount
Likely Amount
Likely Amount
Likely Amount
needed (@Rs. needed (@Rs. needed (@Rs. needed (@Rs. needed (@Rs. needed (@Rs. needed (@Rs. needed (@Rs.
6000/hect)
6600/hect)
7200/hect)
7800/hect)
8400/hect)
9000/hect)
9600/hect)
10200/hect)
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
22611.39
1949.26
2144.18
2339.11
2534.03
2728.96
2923.89
3118.81
3313.74
3 Deoghar
4066.35
350.55
385.60
420.66
455.71
490.77
525.82
560.88
595.93
4 Dhanbad
3578.67
308.51
339.36
370.21
401.06
431.91
462.76
493.61
524.46
5 Dumka
4726.49
407.46
448.20
488.95
529.69
570.44
611.18
651.93
692.67
6 Giridih
15382.70
1326.10
1458.70
1591.31
1723.92
1856.53
1989.14
2121.75
2254.36
3815.07
328.89
361.77
394.66
427.55
460.44
493.33
526.22
559.11
11388.31
981.75
1079.93
1178.10
1276.28
1374.45
1472.63
1570.80
1668.98
21948.64
1892.12
2081.34
2270.55
2459.76
2648.97
2838.19
3027.40
3216.61
517.79
44.64
49.10
53.56
58.03
62.49
66.96
71.42
75.88
14 Pakur
2010.51
173.32
190.65
207.98
225.32
242.65
259.98
277.31
294.64
15 Ranchi
8690.69
749.20
824.12
899.04
973.96
1048.88
1123.80
1198.72
1273.64
3325.91
286.72
315.39
344.06
372.73
401.40
430.07
458.75
487.42
2795.02
3049.11
3303.20
3557.29
3811.39
4065.48
4319.57
12473.36
13607.30
14741.24
15875.18
17009.12
18143.07
19277.01
7 Bokaro
8 Godda
9 Gumla
10 Hazaribag
11 Chatra
12 Koderma
13 Lohardaga
16 Sahebganj
17 Singbhum (West)
29474.72
2540.92
18 Singbhum (East)
G. Total
131537.23
11339.42