Environmentally Forced Migration from PICS. How many

Download Report

Transcript Environmentally Forced Migration from PICS. How many

Environmentally Forced Migration From PICS.

How many, where from, where too?

John Campbell

Department of Geography, Tourism and Environmental Planning

UNESCO/APMRN/School of Governance and Development Studies/FBE Workshop on Climate Change Related Migration

24 April 2020

Global Context

As RDB mentioned yesterday this is similar order of magnitude to likely projected migrants. This suggests CC will cause a doubling of migrant flows.

Range of estimates

Norman Myers (2002):

 

50 million by 2010 200 million ‘when global warming takes hold’

 

Brown (2008)

Good (B1 scenario) : increased migration of between 5 and 10 per cent along existing routes

Bad (A1B): dramatic increases in internal migration and international migration

Ugly (A1F1): predictions of 200 million people displaced by climate change might easily be exceeded.

IPCC doesn’t predict

Under the SRES scenarios, the coastal population could grow from 1.2 billion people (in 1990) to 1.8 to 5.2 billion people by the 2080s, depending on assumptions about migration (AR4, p. 317)

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 2

How many and where from?

Atolls

Populations easiest to determine

 

Not all atolls are the same Many ‘atolls’ are raised limestone islands of varying elevation

Coasts

Much more difficult to determine which coastal areas may be impacted on higher islands

Riverine areas

River flooding most likely to be an issue in larger islands, especially, but not confined to, the plate boundary islands

Delta communities affected from both directions

Drought prone areas

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 3

Atolls

204 atolls in the region (Pernetta, 1990)

Total population 250-300,000

4 political units entirely comprised of atolls (and in some cases low-lying raised limestone islands):

Marshall Islands

  

Kiribati Tuvalu Tokelau While there is considerable risk associated with atolls their fate is not known with absolute certainty.

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO

     

8 others have atolls as well as high islands:

   

Papua New Guinea Solomon Islands New Caledonia Federated States of Micronesia Palau American Samoa Cook Islands French Polynesia Tonga

24 April 2020 4

Population Projections: Atoll Countries

2009: 165,313 2050: 240,000

180000 160000 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Year RMI Tuvalu

2035 2040 2045 2050 Source of Data: SPC (2009)

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 5

Coastal Communities

Tendency toward coastal settlement patterns in most PICs

Exception: PNG high population densities in highland interior

Many (but not all) coastal communities on high islands have rights to elevated land and can relocate within customary territories

Numerous delta communities especially in Melanesia

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 6

Non coastal communities: PNG

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO

Highlands: higher CPD Lowlands: low CPD Outer Islands: moderate CPD But … Highlands more prone to frosts/drought

24 April 2020 7

Where too?

Internally

  

Atolls → Capitals or High islands Coasts → Inland and up River flood plains → Up

International

Atoll countries → Pacific high island countries (3 precendents)

Atoll countries and territory → freely associated ones* (previous) Colonial countries and

  

Australia, France, NZ*, UK, USA* Atoll countries → Pacific rim countries

New Zealand, Australia, USA, others?

Atoll countries → Any other takers

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 8

International Relocation

Only instances have been in the colonial era

Gilbert and Ellis Islands to:

Solomon Islands

Kioa (Fiji)

Rabi (Fiji)

At the destination communities had to be:

displaced (or had been previously displaced), or

 ➨

lose land to make way for relocatees.

unresolved grievances

Likely to be extremely difficult in the independence era

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 9

Banaba to Rabi

Banaba devastated by phosphate minning

1945

Post-war

Southwest Pacific High Commission

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 10

What happened to the original people of Rabi?

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 11

In the news 2007 … Relocated Fiji Villagers Want Rabi Island Back

PACIFIC ISLANDS REPORT

Pacific Islands Development Program/East-West Center, With Support From Center for Pacific Islands Studies/University of Hawai‘i

SUVA, Fiji (Fijilive, June 5 [2007]) – The traditional inhabitants of Rabi Island who were relocated to Fiji’s third largest island of Taveuni after World War II now want to reclaim Rabi.

The villagers, now living in Lovonivonu, have asked the Interim Government to help them in their fight to get their island back.

Village spokesman Viliame Seru said the villagers have wanted to return to Rabi for a long time and have gone as far Sydney, Australia in search of evidence and legal advice on the matter.

Fijilive: http://www.fijilive.com

RELOCATION OFTEN CREATES FESTERING WOUNDS

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 12

For environmentally forced migrants

There is no home to which to be repatriated.

Though may be other places in the home country.

But, how likely will third countries to be queuing up as destinations:

In 2007 according to UNHCR there were:

11.39 million refugees*

14 third countries accepted refugees for resettlement

A total of 75,300

0.66 per cent * This figure includes Palestinian refugees that do not fall under the auspices of UNHCR but excludes internally displaced people, asylum seekers, etc., the number swells to little less than 30 million

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 13

Reasons for environmentally forced migration from PICs

      

Loss of habitability

  

Loss of land Loss of water security Loss of food security Repeated floods, storms and or droughts

}

Loss of settlement security

Possible scenarios or any combination thereof Atolls become uninhabitable (erosion, water shortages, food shortages) Coastal locations become uninhabitable (erosion, increased freq/magnitude of inundations) Riverine locations (especially deltas) become uninhabitable (increased frequency / magnitude of floods) Inland areas become subjected to successive droughts of high magnitude

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 14

But … is migration good enough

Individuals, families and groups migrate

What happens when whole community is forced to leave?

Can it retain:

Social cohesion

Kinship relations

Moral economy

Visceral link to the land (land, which in the extreme case, may no longer exist)

My concern is: Can communities be relocated?

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 15

What is community relocation?

Important to distinguish community relocation from other concepts such as evacuation, displacement, migration and environmental refugee, although there is often some overlap in the meanings of these notions.

The definition adopted is ‘a process by which a number of … people from one locale come to live together in a different locale.’ (After Lieber, 1977: 343).

Key element: community integrity maintained .

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 16

Key issues in community relocation in PICs

Importance of land

At origin

And destination (if in PICs)

The role of colonial governments

 

Enabled ‘international’ relocation Often decisions were made to suit colonial government rather than the relocatees

Ambrym to Epi (New Hebrides Condominium)

Sense of loss

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 17

A note on land

Just because a country has elevated land doesn’t mean that land is freely available to those who have no customary rights.

Overlooked by many external observers concerned with environmentally forced migration.

May lead to increases in the numbers of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in PICs.

May lead to tensions among different groups within PICs.

May result in increased demand for international migration / resettlement options.

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 18

Costs of Community Relocation

Unsuccessful Adaptation?

Beyond international border Within nation but beyond island or province Proximate beyond land boundaries

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO

Proximate within customary lands Distance from origin

24 April, 2020 19

An atoll somewhere in Oceania

What’s left?

What community?

What culture?

What land/society relationship?

ACCELERATED climate change may present us with NEW problems that Maybe even Australia existing and historical experience simply can’t explain National capital Suva Auckland / Wellington

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 20

Conclusions

• •

Community relocation is extremely difficult Community relocation is extremely costly

Increase with distance

There are long term costs

  

Tensions over land do not recede Getting water up hill … forever Sense of loss

International relocation will be extremely difficult if not impossible

 

Community disintegration Loss of culture The idea that communities will be able to successfully adapt by relocating cannot be used to allow countries to abrogate their responsibilities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 21

Final Note

A discourse of vulnerability has emerged about islands and island countries.

Natural hazards

Climate change

Economies

But, at the community level there are tremendous levels of resilience that have been evidenced over centuries of radical change, although some may be eroding.

Nevertheless, it is critical that these resiliences are not overlooked in planning for climate change.

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 22

Vinaka Vakalevu

WWW.WAIKATO.AC.NZ

0800 WAIKATO

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 23

In our neighbourhood

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 24

Current response to refugees

 (i) UNHCR protects, assists and seeks durable solutions for refugees. The three main solutions are voluntary repatriation to the home country; (ii) local integration in the country of asylum; and (iii) resettlement in a third country.  Voluntary repatriation is generally considered as the preferred option of the three.

Source UNHCR (2007)

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 25

Category of forced displacement Total (millions)

Refugees under UNHCR mandate Refugees under UNRWA mandate

Total number of refugees

Conflict-generated IDPs Natural disaster IDPs

Total number of IDPs Total number of refugees and IDPs

11.4

4.6

16.0

26.0

25.0

51.0

67.0

Refugees today

 Estimated Number of Asylum Seekers, Refugees and Other of Concern to UNHCR, 1st Jan 2007 Asia 14,910,900 Africa Europe Latin America & Caribbean Northern America Oceania TOTAL 9,752,600 3,426,700 1,143,100 3,542,500 85,700 32,861,500

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 27

The IPCC View:

Source: IPCC, AR4, p. 368

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April 2020 28

‘International Migration’

© THE UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO • TE WHARE WANANGA O WAIKATO 24 April, 2020 29

The only other comparison: Maldives

600 000 500 000 400 000 300 000 200 000 100 000 0 2010 2015 2020 2025

Year

2030 2035 2040 2045 DataSource:http://www.maldivespartnershipforum.gov.mv/pdf/Population%20Projections.pdf

Crude Population Densities

2000 1500 1000 500 0 Kiribati Marshall Islands Tuvalu Tokelau Maldives