Transcript Command Presentation

ASNE (Tidewater Section)
INSURV Brief
G. B. Sanford
Deputy
21 SEP 05
Overview
• Board of Inspection and Survey
– Mission/Goals
– Changes
– Who We Are
• Fleet Scorecard
• Trends
• Path to Success
– Challenges
– Initiatives
INSURV Mission
“. . . To periodically ascertain and report on the
material condition and performance capabilities or
limitations of navy ships; . . .”
INSURV Goal
To independently verify that our ships are
materially combat ready to take our Sailors
into harm’s way
INSURV Goal
Develop cooperative energy
among stakeholders
to improve material
readiness on a
continuing basis.
‘Recent’ InSurv Changes
• Terminations -> Limited MIs
• U/W (was Day #2) is now Day #3
• Inspection Periodicities
• Functional Org vice Team Org
InSurv
Organization Chart (2005)
PRESIDENT
RADM 1110
RADM Curtis Kemp
CHIEF OF STAFF
CAPT 1110
CAPT Scott Anderson
TECHNICAL DEPUTY
GS-00801-15
Mr. Greg Sanford
DOCS SUBMARINES
CAPT 1120
CAPT Jackson Roeske
DCOS NEP/IHO
CDR 2300
CDR Ted Carrell
DCOS DC & HULL/INSP TECH
CAPT 1110/BSC: 20310
CAPT Holman/1110 (May 06)
DCOS ENGINEERING
CAPT 1110
CAPT Darrel Morben
DCOS COMBAT SYSTEMS
CAPT 1110
CAPT Tom Holman
DCOS AVIATION
CAPT 1300
CAPT Mike Zamesnik
DCOS SUP/HAB
CDR 3100
CDR Dennis Wilson
DCOS SURFACE TRIALS
CAPT 1110
CAPT John Wilson
FLEET REPORT CARD
(How Did the Fleet Do Last Year?)
MATERIAL INSPECTIONS
2004 REPORT CARD
CV/CVN
INSPECTION GROUP
DC
DECK
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICAL
PROPULSION
COMBAT SYS
C4I
AVIATION
NAVOSH
EP
SUPPLY/HAB
3
AUX CRUDES AMPHIB MINE
2
17
9
8
SUB
TOTAL
16
55
MI TRENDS (Surface ships)
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
2001
EOC
0.6
2002
0.5
2003
0.4
2004
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Damage
Control
DECK
Auxiliaries
Electrical Propulsion
Combat
Sys/C4I
Functional Areas
Aviation
NAVOSH
EP
Supp/Hab
MI TRENDS (Submarines)
Overall - Solid
Performance
…
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
EOC
0.6
2001 - 16
2002 - 8
0.5
2003 - 9
2004 - 16
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
DC
Deck
Auxiliaries
Electrical
Propulsion
Functional Areas
CS/C4I
NAVOSH
EP
Supp/Hab
Challenges
• The “brain” and the “sword” are sound. Some critical vital
organs are weak (Damage Control, Propulsion, Electrical/Aux).
• How could we do DC differently or change DC capabilities
while still guaranteeing crew safety?
For today’s ships? For tomorrow’s ships?
• MCM/MHC, LSD, CG systems are “aging” too fast.
What can be done to arrest these conditions?
•Does everyone understand shipboard material standards?
•How do we improve self-assessment capability?
How do we verify progress/status?
What Needs Attention
Technical Issues:
Oily Water Separators/Oil Content Monitors
Initial Point Detection System (IPDS)
Air Flow Alarms
Vertical Package Conveyors/Elevators
Watertight Doors
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Detectors
Halocarbon Monitors
What Needs Attention
Disciplines:
PMS Accomplishment
DC – Org & Training
Zone Inspection Program
Fuel Oil/Lube Oil leaks
EOSS/CSOSS Usage
OPA Systems
Self-Assessment Capability CHT Systems
Outside Assessment Cycle
Auxiliary Systems
Equipment Ownership
Valve Maintenance
Gage Calibration
InSurv Support Initiatives
• Qtrly SEA 05 Meetings
• SATs (Self Assessment Training visits)
• BG Lessons Learned Briefs
• AR (Annual Report) exchange w/ TyComs
• RAMs (Recommended Action Msgs)/
TIPs (Technical Issue Papers)
• GCC (Grading Criteria Conference) Review
• STANCO (Standardization Conference)
Summary
• Material Health of the Fleet – mixed.
- Good: Combat Systems/OPS/Deck
- Poor: DC/Auxiliaries/Environmental Protection
• Leading Issues in Poor Performing Ships:
- PMS: inadequate performance
- Standards: too low/not understood/not enforced
- Ownership
Your systems better be ready to fight
… they won’t get a second chance
?Questions?
www.spawar.navy.mil/fleet/insurv
G. B. Sanford
•757-462-7028 DSN 253
•[email protected]