Verizon’s IP TV Access Architecture

Download Report

Transcript Verizon’s IP TV Access Architecture

Wireless Ethernet Backhaul : A Carrier’s Perspective

Rajesh Yadav [email protected]

Access Network Architecture and Design Verizon Communications

Presentation Outline

Trends in Wireless Backhaul Bandwidth

Ethernet Backhaul Service Requirements

Present Wireless Backhaul Technologies

Drivers for Ethernet Backhaul over PON

Implementation of Ethernet Backhaul over GPON

Concluding Remarks

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul Bandwidth Demand

    

Significant increase in broadband mobile users Data and multimedia mobile applications driving bandwidth utilization exponentially Higher growth possible with faster adoption of LTE technology 150+ Mbps bandwidth requirements per cell site shared by up to 3 operators Number of 3G/4G cell site expected to grow from 72,000 to 225,000 by 2012*

* Source: Heavy Reading, March 2009 © Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 3

Growth in High Bandwidth Base Stations

20 fold increase in number of base stations with 24M + of backhaul capacity

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 4

Wireless Backhaul Service Requirements

10, 150-300 Mbps; 4 9s 5; fiber 100/1000; LAG protection; dual EVCs 50 ms restoration; 5 ms OW, 1 ms FRDV Ethernet/ C/DWDM/ ??

10 x 1 GigE; 2 x 10 Gig; 5 9 s; LAG protection; dual NNI ATM/FR/TD M - PW Cell Site Access Source: VzW 4 QoS, p bits, Q-in-Q, shaping, L2CP blocking; 80.1ag CFM; SLA monitoring per EVC, High burst -PIR Transport

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved

MSC 100-150 cell sites per MSC MSC Access

Ethernet Backhaul Service Requirements

 

Cost effective scalable solution for Ethernet bandwidth up to 150-300 Mbps per cell site

  Initial requirements from carriers is for guaranteed bandwidth between cell site and MSC location  Maintains the current model of using TDM based transport “pipes” Expected evolution to multiple classes of service to better match traffic characteristics to the transport need

Circuit emulation support for TDM/ATM/FR

  Migration of cell sites with existing TDM/ATM/FR interfaces on a common Ethernet backhaul network Coexistence of TDM and Ethernet backhaul expected for sometime © Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved

Ethernet Backhaul Service Requirements – cont.

Low latency, jitter and packet loss transport

  

Multiple classes of service Transport network reliability 5 9’s

 50 ms restoration desired

Timing and frequency synchronization

Performance monitoring and Real time SLAs

Comprehensive Network management and OAM capability

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved

Present Backhaul Technologies

 

Leased T1 lines over copper

     Most prevalent for cell site backhaul today  Up to 8-10 T1s used per cell site Widely available High cost Not scalable to meet projected high bandwidth demands Optimized for voice traffic with dedicated bandwidth with little flexibility for bursty traffic

High capacity Microwave Ethernet backhaul

    Better bandwidth scalability compared to leased T1 lines Use of licensed spectrum Somewhat limited reach and line of sight requirements Susceptible to interferences © Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 8

Present Backhaul Technologies

Ethernet over SONET (Ethernet Private Line)

    Point-to-Point Ethernet transport Can scale to very high bandwidth to meet the current and projected bandwidth demand  Network bandwidth can be increased at STS1 granularity 50 ms restoration capability in the access and transport network Significant upfront cost for dedicated fiber facilities and optical equipment

NGADM Access OTP Transport OTP OTP MSC

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 9

Present Backhaul Technologies

Switched Ethernet Network

     Provide flexible bandwidth options with multiple class of services to support voice, video and data traffic  Point to point Ethernet virtual connection (EVC)  Use of Dedicated dark fiber pair or CWDM Limited availability in cell site locations Providing redundancy in the access can be expensive Dedicated pair of fiber required for every cell site  Could also use access CWDM infrastructure Desire for dedicated bandwidth from wireless carrier reduces the attractiveness of cost effective shared backbone network

Edge NID Aggregation/Core NGADM MSC

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 10

Why GPON?

    

GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Network) provides high bandwidth capacity which can be used in effective “pay as you grow” model

   2.4 Gbps in downstream and 1.2 Gbps in upstream generally shared across 32 customers Cost efficient point–to–multipoint utilization of fiber without need for dedicated fiber infrastructure  Only ~25% cell site are currently passed with fiber NG PON will be able to support up to 10 Gbps

Growing availability of GPON deployment in cell site locations Highly reliable with no active components in outside plant Ability to provide smooth migration from current TDM based backhaul to scalable Ethernet backhaul using hybrid TDM and Ethernet backhaul model Convergence of residential and business services over common infrastructure

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 11

Ethernet Backhaul over GPON

Converged access for TDM and Ethernet Shared feeder fiber and PON across multiple cell sites and customers Aggregated handoff at the Hub location Bypass of IP/MPLS network depending on traffic characteristics for more cost effective solution

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 12

Implementation of Ethernet Backhaul over GPON

 

GPON ONT can cost effectively support from 10Mbps to potentially 100s of Mbps to a cell site

 Bandwidth can be added on as needed basis

Support for guaranteed bandwidth to emulate current guaranteed “pipe” model with TDM based backhaul

 

Evolution to model with multiple classes of services to optimize bandwidth need to the traffic characteristics for more cost efficient backhaul

 Class of service differentiation based on 802.1p (p-bits) in VLAN header or DSCP in IP header

GPON provides support for carrying both Ethernet and TDM traffic

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 13

Implementation of Ethernet Backhaul over GPON – cont.

 

Synchronization options with Ethernet backhaul over GPON

    Outside of the Ethernet transport network  Via GPS at base station  Retention of a T1 circuit for synchronization Packet Based synchronization using dedicated packet flow  IEEE 1588 v2 Clock carried by circuit emulated data (e.g. T1) over Ethernet Transport Synchronous Ethernet  GPON Transmission Convergence (GTC) layer supports the transport of an 8 kHz clock via 125 ms framing  Transfer of synchronization over Ethernet interface on ONT

Redundancy can be supported at the cell site by providing dual connections from diverse PONs

Encryption of traffic with in GPON for additional layer of security

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 14

Concluding Remarks

  

Increase in bandwidth demand for mobile backhaul with new data and multimedia mobile applications and evolution to 4G technologies is creating significant opportunity for Ethernet backhaul

 Wireless carriers are looking for cost effective, scalable and flexible solution to meet expected bandwidth demand

TDM and Ethernet will coexist for some time and backhaul solution should provide converged access to support this hybrid model with easy migration to Ethernet backhaul GPON can provide scalable and cost effective “pay as grow” solution for Ethernet backhaul as the bandwidth demand for wireless backhaul grows overtime with evolution of wireless networks towards 4G technologies

© Verizon 2009 All Rights Reserved 15