What's in the 2009 MUTCD For Bicyclists?

Download Report

Transcript What's in the 2009 MUTCD For Bicyclists?

What's in the 2009 MUTCD
For Bicyclists?
Richard C. Moeur, PE
Chair, NCUTCD Bicycle
Technical Committee
NCUTCD
• National Committee on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices advises FHWA on
MUTCD
• NCUTCD has been developing new &
revised content for the new MUTCD
over past 8+ years
NCUTCD
• MUTCD changes initiated by
• Requests by public agencies
• Items identified by FHWA
• Issues identified by BTC
• NCUTCD recommendations based on
• Research & experimentation
• Expert review & analysis
New 2009 MUTCD
• Final Rule issued
December 16, 2009
• In effect at Federal
level January 15, 2010
• States have 2 years to
adopt (by January
2012)
Parts of MUTCD
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Introduction
Part 1 - General
Part 2 - Signs
Part 3 - Markings
Part 4 - Signals
Part 5 - Low Volume Roads
Part 6 - Temporary Traffic Control
Part 7 - Schools
Part 8 - Railroad & Light Rail (Part 10 moved into Part 8)
Part 9 - Bicycles
Significant Changes MUTCD
• Old MUTCD: All devices must be compliant
• Agencies were required to update devices, both
new and existing
• New MUTCD: Only new devices must be
compliant
• Agencies are required to update devices as they
wear out
• Older devices can remain for "remaining service
life" unless there's a defined compliance date
Significant Changes MUTCD
• Railroad & Light Rail parts
combined
• Fluorescent Yellow-Green:
• School Signs - Required
• Bicycle & Pedestrian Signs
- Optional
Significant Changes MUTCD
• New Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon
• (AKA "HAWK")
• Can be used at
path-roadway
crossings
Significant Changes - Part 9
•
•
•
•
•
•
Revised sign height & offset standards
Signing no longer mandatory along bike lanes
New "Bikes May Use Full Lane" regulatory sign
New signs for path users (skaters, equestrians)
New combo Bicycle/Pedestrian warning sign
New bicycle-focused guide signs, route markers,
and mileposts
• New shared lane marking
Sign Height/Offset For Paths
• Deleted maximum mounting height &
maximum offset
• Increases flexibility for practitioners
without compromising safety
• Conforms with sign mounting on other
facility types
Sign Height/Offset For Paths
Bike Lanes - Signing
• BIKE LANE signs are recommended,
but no longer mandatory
• Signs are still the same
Bikes May Use Full Lane Sign
• Optional for use in
"narrow" lanes
• Can be used
independently, or
with SLM
• Supported by UVC
and many states'
laws
New Signs for Path Users
New Combo Bike/Ped Sign
• Optional for use at
path crossings
• Shows 2 types of
primary path users
• Cannot "fix"
problems at sidepath
intersections
New Bicycle-Focused
Guide Signs
• Provide detailed routing /
destination / distance
information
• Greatly improved over old
"BIKE ROUTE" signs
Shared Lane Marking
• Intended to show correct
cyclist location where bike
lanes shouldn’t or can’t be
installed
• Can be used in locations
with and without on-street
parking
Future Items
• Several new devices & treatments under
experimentation & review
• Treatments may consist of several new
devices, or existing devices used in new ways
• Cities & states are stepping up &
implementing good experiments
• Federal research funding in next bill...?
Projects Underway
• Standardized signs for bikes on freeways
• (Approved by NCUTCD)
• Revised US Bicycle Route sign
• (Approved by NCUTCD)
• "Except Bikes" plaque for regulatory signs
• New figures for bikes in work zones
• Bicycle traffic signals
• Studies recently completed
• Draft MUTCD content under development
Pending Stuff
• Colored Bike Lanes
• Earlier studies showed inconclusive results
• Awaiting data from Portland, Austin, elsewhere
• Large San Francisco study getting underway
• Bike Boxes
• Offset stop lines already allowed (w/o color fill)
• Awaiting data from Portland & Austin
• Austin: Staged implementation (box/color/signs/PR)
Pending Stuff
• Other Items:
• Improving existing MUTCD figures & text
• Improved signs / guidance / markings for bike lane
- shared lane transitions
When's The Next MUTCD?
• FHWA would like a 5-year cycle for new
MUTCD editions
• Proposed content would need to be ready &
submitted to FHWA in 2-3 years
• Rulemaking cycle: Typically 2 years from NPA
to Final Rule
• 2015...?
• Items can be added earlier via Interim Approval
Questions?
Richard C. Moeur, PE
(602) 712-6661 or (602) 909-8451
[email protected]