AOC, Chapter 13 - Concordia University
Download
Report
Transcript AOC, Chapter 13 - Concordia University
Assessing Organizational
Communication:
Strategic Communication Audits
Chapter 13
Phase 5: Final Analysis and
Interpretation
The Nature of Interpretation
“To interpret is to try to make sense of or
to understand something in a particular
way; as understanding increases, the
auditing process becomes worthwhile
and valuable.”
“The process of interpretation requires
the construction of an answer that
makes practical sense, rather than the
discovery of the ‘right’ answer that
already exists in the environment.”
The Nature of Interpretation
Eight Steps:
1.
Synthesize all data
2.
Develop focal areas
3.
Identify and define problems
4.
Identify organizational criteria for
success
5.
Consider the organization’s stages of
development
6.
Form tentative conclusions
7.
Make client-centered
recommendations
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
1.
Synthesize All Data
Use data from all instruments
Reconcile contradictions
Welcome Different Points of View
Avoid the halo effect
Use other auditors’ work carefully
Keep negative information in
perspective
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
2.
Develop Focal Areas
Brainstorm
Allow time; Do not rush
Remember that not all problems
are communication problems
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
3.
Identify & Define Problems or
Strengths
Make your search comprehensive
Determine whether an
observation really is a problem
Test different ways of
characterizing problems
Probe the nature of the problems
fully
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
4.
Identify Criteria of Organizational
Effectiveness
Organizational comparisons
Internal organizational comparisons
Comparisons with stated goals
Comparisons with past performance
Outcomes
Desirable characteristics
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
5.
Consider the Organization’s Stages of
Development (Tailor the Interpretation)
“…it is important to know what stage
of development the organization is in
and to realize that each new solution
breeds new problems in the long run.”
“One important implication for the
communication auditor is that the
same rules do not apply equally to all
organizations.” (Downs, 1988)
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
5.
Consider the Organization’s Stages
of Development
One Size Does Not Fit All
Consider the Influence of
National Culture
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
6.
Form Tentative Conclusions
Look At The Implications Of Your
Conclusions
Check Your Assumptions
Use Intuitive Powers
Beware Of The False Causeeffect Trap
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
7.
Finalize Your Conclusions
The final conclusions should
reflect strengths as well as
weaknesses.
They should be general
statements, amplified with
specific rationales.
They should cover only the most
important items.
A Systematic Approach to
Interpretation
8.
Make Client-Centered
Recommendations
Is it practical or workable?
Is it desirable?
Is it cost efficient?
Relation of Theory to Audits
Basically, interpretation is a
process of constructing theory
about organizational
communication.
In no organizational discipline do
scholars have enough “theoretical
truth” to make prediction exact.
Relation of Theory to Audits
Nevertheless, one must use
whatever theory one has. The
ultimate test of any theory is
whether it works, that is, whether it
is usable, useful, and relevant when
applied.
In this sense, communication
theories have been applied with
great success in communication
audits.
Assessing Organizational
Communication:
Strategic Communication Audits
Chapter 13
Phase 5: Final Analysis and
Interpretation
END