Simplified Ecological Risk Assessments
Download
Report
Transcript Simplified Ecological Risk Assessments
SONS 2010:
RRT Presentation & Discussion
Scott Lundgren
First Coast Guard District,
Incident Management Branch
Unclas
March 2009
Topics
Background on SONS definition and exercises
SONS management structure
SONS 2010 selection and specifics
Objectives Discussion
Prior to Concepts & Objectives Meeting
Unclas
March 2009
What is SONS?
NCP Language at 40 CFR 300.323 - Spills of national significance.
(a)
[EPA Administrator or Coast Guard Commandant may delcare]
(b)
[EPA Administrator procedures to declare a SONS]
(c) For a SONS in the coastal zone, the USCG
Commandant may name a National Incident
Commander (NIC) who will assume the role of the OSC
in communicating with affected parties and the public,
and coordinating federal, state, local, and international
resources at the national level.
This strategic coordination will involve, as appropriate,
the NRT, RRT(s), the Governor(s) of affected state(s),
and the mayor(s) or other chief executive(s) of local
government(s).
Unclas
March 2009
SONS Declaration Factors
A SONS is the rare catastrophic spill which exceeds
response capabilities at the local and regional levels.
Possible criteria:
Multiple COTP Zones, districts, or nations affected
Significant and widespread public health, welfare, environment,
or economic impacts
Protracted discharge or cleanup period
Significant public concern and demand for action
Actual or potential high level of political or media interest
Unclas
March 2009
Day 56
470 Miles
Unclas
March 2009
Unclas
March 2009
What does a SONS declaration mean?
No fundamental change in FWPCA authority
Significant recognition of national nature of discharge
Senior flag-level leadership to address:
Communications issues – political and media
Resource coordination issues
Liaison role with Governors, Mayors, Chief Executives, RRT, NRT.
Similarity in function to Principal Federal Official role
Unclas
March 2009
SONS Exercise Program
Regular exercise series since 1997
1997 Philadelphia
1998 Alaska
2002 Gulf of Mexico
2004 California
2007 Mississippi River Valley & Great Lakes
(New Madrid earthquake scenario)
2010 Northern New England
Unclas
March 2009
Exercising the Plans of the NRS
International
Joint Plans
National
Response
Framework
National
Contingency
Plan
Regional
Contingency
Plans
Federal Agency
Internal Plans
State/Local
Plans
Area
Contingency
Plans
Facility
Response Plans
Vessel
Response Plans
Unclas
March 2009
SONS Management System
Based in National Incident Management System (NIMS) and
National Response Framework (NRF)
Unified Area Command is key feature above
field Incident Command System/Unified Command
Oversee management of the Incident(s)
Focusing primarily on strategic assistance and direction, and
Resolving competition for scarce response resources
National Incident Command function will be at or above the
Unified Area Command level
Policy adjustments to account for NIMS/NRF changes underway
Seeking to address multiple possible connections
Unclas
March 2009
Area Command/Unified Area Command
Area Command well established in NIMS and Coast Guard ICS
doctrine and training.
Training (ICS 400, ICS 620)
Job Aids
Position Descriptions
AC Operating Guide (IAP equivalent), Forms
Supporting material (AC Planning “P”, Meeting Agendas, etc.)
Response management structure as needed in internal all
hazard plans (OPLAN 9710 in Organization and Marine
Environmental Response)
RCP limited on multi-area response approach
Unclas
March 2009
SONS National Incident Commander
responsibilities
National Incident Commander designated by Commandant
NIC will address key strategic and liaison functions:
National-level engagement with parties and public
Coordinate senior federal, state, tribal, international resources
NRT, RRT, Governors, Mayors, RP Corporate Management
NIC will be at the Unified Area Command or an echelon above
Details of relationships to potential NRF structures to be
defined, such as Principal Federal Official, Joint Field Office(s)
Unclas
March 2009
SONS 2010 specifics
Background – SONS 2010
High visibility: SONS is a Tier II of the National Exercise Program
One of 2-3 Annual Tier II (including DOD), single annual Tier I
Focus on federal strategy and policy at national level
Exercise planning and execution placed on and subject to
National Exercise Program calendar.
Exercise Roles:
Sponsor: Coast Guard Deputy Commandant for Operations (CG-DCO)
Director: Coast Guard Director of Response Policy (CG-53)
Lead Planner: Coast Guard Chief, Office of Incident Management and
Preparedness (CG-533)
Design Teams in formation: National and Local
Unclas
March 2009
SONS 2010 Venue Selection
Five ports considered by Coast Guard Headquarters
Criteria related to possible objectives
Prior SONS venue considered… first for D1 and SNNE
Sector Northern New England selected as playing venue in
January 2009
Training and exercise benefits to Area and Region
Unclas
March 2009
SONS 2010 – Restraints
Straight National Response System scenario
Largely US focused. We will have Canadian play and
involvement, but this is not principally a joint response.
NNE selected and only playing venue, e.g. full scale PREP
Other impact areas such as Sectors Boston, Southeast NE will
be simulated although there may be opportunity for contribution
to simulation.
March 2010 – for fiscal quarter, winter, and NLE Schedule
Simultaneous field and functional exercise – week of 22 March 2010
Senior Leader Seminar to follow in DC
Unclas
March 2009
SONS 2010 Planning
Planning Calendar
Two Design Teams being established
National: To address functional component of exercise
(UAC/NIC and SLS)
Local: To address full-scale component of exercise
(ME/NH, SNNE)
Two Priorities, Objectives, and Milestones lists
National Concepts and Objectives Meeting – 1 April 2009
Contact your NRT representative with objectives
Desire to serve in a planning role at RRT/regional level,
let Scott Lundgren know
Local Concepts and Objectives Meeting to follow
Desire to serve in a planning role at Local Unified Command level,
let Wyman Briggs know
Unclas
March 2009
Exercise Objectives
Will be defined during design process
Preliminary objectives have been discussed
National Objectives by Office of
Incident Management and Preparedness
Unified Area Command level by
First Coast Guard District
Incident Command/Unified Command
by Sector NNE and ME/NH Area Committee
National Design Team
Local Design Team
Unclas
March 2009
Preliminary National
Implement Response Organizations in Applicable Plans
National representation – NCP Alignment
NIC, Regional, and Local response structure integration
Resolve multi-regional coordination issues using organizations
Evaluate interaction between the Unified Command and Senior Leaders Group
Identify and evaluate current international agreements, MOU/MOAs, volunteer plans
Demonstrate UC’s incident management and direction
Communicate with public and stakeholders outside the
response using the response organizations
JIC’s capabilities to develop and release to important recipients
Address Social media
React to inaccurate information sources and proprietary information release
Unclas
March 2009
National Design Team Invite List
DOC/NOAA
DOT
DOD
EPA
DOE
FEMA
DOI
HHS
DOJ
MMS
DOL/OSHA
USCG:
HEADQUARTERS
LANTAREA
FIRST DISTRICT
SECTOR NORTHERN NEW
ENGLAND
USDA
Unclas
March 2009
Preliminary District
Overarching:
Effective Unified Area Command coordinating spill response
support, including media, political interface, partner agency
interface, and scare resources allocation in support of multiple
Unified Commands and National Incident Commander.
Plans/Policy
Regional Contingency Plan & Coast Guard 9710 OPLAN
SONS Policy (updated)
Area Command External Affairs Plan
Unclas
March 2009
Preliminary District
Training
ICS 620 – Area Command, selected members to ICS 320,
341
Media/Public Affairs/JIC Training
National Response System Awareness
Response Resources
Improve Incident Management Spaces,
Area Command/Unified Area Command Spaces
Unclas
March 2009
Preliminary Unit/Area Committee Objectives
Overarching:
Reality and perception that Unified Command (including SNNE)
is fully prepared for major oil spill response. Successful
exercise enhancing plans, training, and response resources.
Plans/Policy
ACP
ICP Standup – Initial and Predesignated
Public Affairs
Volunteer Management
Incident Management
SONS Guidance
Unclas
March 2009
Preliminary Unit/Area Committee Objectives
Training
ICS 320/341/400/620, position-specific training
Media/Public Affairs/JIC Training
Science of Oil Spills, Federal On-Scene Coordinator Rep &
Pollution Investigator Trng.
Response Resources
Equip and test initial and off-site Command Post
Unclas
March 2009
Local Design Team
USCG Sector Northern New England
ME Department of Environmental Protection
NH Department of Environmental Services
First Coast Guard District/other D1 Sectors
NOAA SSC
ME Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife?
Maine Marine Patrol?
Responsible Party
Lantarea Exercise Support Team
Unclas
March 2009
Preliminary RRT / Regional Objectives?
We can carry input to the National C&O meeting on 1 April.
_________________
_________________
_________________
Unclas
March 2009
CANUSLANT/JRT Impact
Further discussions with CCG Colleagues tomorrow
Tentative shift of JRT meeting and tabletop to November, to
allow connection to SONS Scenario
Not likely to be a classic Joint/CANUSLANT scenario
Potential to explore mutual aid topics, traffic impacts, fisheries
Unclas
March 2009
SONS Benefits
Recognition
Heightened
Preparedness
Training
Resources
Lasting investments
Multi-level play & issues
Unclas
March 2009
Questions or Comments?
Unclas
March 2009
Plans and Policy Objectives
Test and Validate:
ACP: Validate Nov 2009 ACP
Specific: Salvage/Lightering Plans, Geographic Response Plans and
Alternative Countermeasure approval process.
ICP Standup: Test on-site initial, and off-site predesignated ICP.
Public Affairs: Joint Information Center and Incident-Specific Website
Volunteer Management: Volunteer management plan
Incident Management: Unified Watch, Quarter and Station Bill, Special
Teams Augmentations.
SONS Guidance: Incident Command’s interaction with regional and
national leadership during a SONS.
Unclas
March 2009
Training Objectives
Unified Command: All members of unified command fully
trained and comfortable in handling designated roles in ICSbased response organization
ICS 320/620/400
ICS 341 and other ICS position-specific training
Media/Public Affairs/JIC Training
Field-level responders: Field-level responders trained to
oversee/conduct major environmental response operation
Pollution Investigator/FOSCR training
Science of Spills (Spill 301)
Volunteer Management/Bird Cleaning
Unclas
March 2009
Response Resources Objectives
Equip Initial Operations Center (IOC) in Rusty Scupper
Equip Incident Command Post (ICP) at ANG in South
Portland
Additional cold weather PPE for field responders
Unclas
March 2009
AC expectations of the IC/UC
1. Event or incident background (situation)
2. Initial priorities and actions taken
3. Resources committed
4. Planned Actions
5. Resources requested and needed
6. Agencies involved
7. Command structure (single or Unified Command)
8. If Unified Command, who are the players
9. Organization structure in place and/or ordered
10. Escalating potential and long-term commitment of resources
11. Constraints and limitations impacting response operations
Unclas
March 2009