Transcript PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Introduction of TRIZ
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
History of TRIZ
Contradiction
Su-Field Analysis
ARIZ
Technology Evolution
Trimming
Case Study
Knowledgist ver. 2.5
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
History of TRIZ
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
History of TRIZ
• 1926 15 October
• 1940 First Invention (13-year-old)
• 1946 Military serves in Patent department
• 1946 Start of TRIZ development (20yr)
• 1949 Two Grand Prix in inventors
competition (23yr), Letter to Stalin, Arrest
• 1956 Freedom, first publication in journal
• 1958 Journalist and Science Fiction
• 1961 First book about TRIZ
• 1971 Lecture at University in Baku
• 1974 Publication Abroad (Japan)
• 1981 More than 300 school in USSR
• TRIZCON held & AI established in USA
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960, Altshuller researched “Contradiction”
Problem
Solutions
called “Inventive”
(Level 3 and 4)
Overcoming
Contradiction
Breakthrough
The typical engineering approach is to compromise, but that approach does not lead
to an invention. An Invention overcomes the contradiction.
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Problem
Solutions
called “Inventive”
(Level 3 and 4)
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Removal of
Contradiction
Breakthrough
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Problem
Solutions
called “Inventive”
(Level 3 and 4)
Removal of
Contradiction
Breakthrough
Analysis and
Classification
about
the Principles
used at
overcoming
Contradiction
Two Kinds of
Contradiction
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Technical
Contradiction
40 Principles
Physical
Contradiction
Separation
Principles
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Technical
Contradiction
(Generally, as soon as an engineer solve one problem,
another unexpected harmful results happen)
Airplane : Speed
Two Kinds of
Contradiction
, Weight
.
(by the powerful engine) (by the larger weight of engine)
Chemical : Speed , Quality .
reaction (by temperature increase) (undesired reaction also starts)
Physical
Contradiction
(Generally, by one reason, an engineer must choose an
action. But simultaneously an engineer must choose
count-action by another reason )
Airplane : Landing Wheels
must Exist, must not Exist.
(for landing on earth)
(for an air resistance at flying)
Bicycle : Chain must be
Rigid and Flexible.
(to transfer big force)
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
(for circular movement)
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Physical
Contradiction
Separation
Principles
Analysis and
Classification
about
the Principles
used at
overcoming
Contradiction
1. Separation in TIME
2. Separation in SPACE
3. Separation in SCALE
..
..
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Physical
Contradiction
Separation
Principles
1. Separation in TIME
2. Separation in SPACE
3. Separation in SCALE
..
..
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960, “Contradiction”
Technical
Contradiction
Analysis and
Classification
about the
Principles used
at overcoming
Contradiction
1 Segmentation
2 Separation
…
35 Parameter change
36 Phase transitions
…
40 Composite materials
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
40 Principles
divide an object into independent parts
make an object easy to disassemble
increase the degree of fragmentation (or segmentation) of an object
separate an 'interfering' part (or property) from an object,
or single out the only necessary part (or property) of an object
change an object`s physical state (e.g. to a gas, liquid, or solid),
change the concentration or consistency,
change the degree of flexibility,
change the temperature.
use phenomena occurring during phase transitions
(e.g. volume changes, loss or absorption of heat, etc.).
change from uniform to composite (multiple) materials
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
Contradiction
Is there any method to
use 40 principles with
easy ?
Altshuller made
standard vocabulary
at engineering field as
39 Engineering
Parameters.
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
Contradiction
Recommended
principles by
Altshuller ;
usually 3 or 4
principles among
40 principles
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Su-Field Analysis
• 1956 ~ 1970, Altshuller researched “Resource”
In every technological system, one can discern two objects or substances, S1 and S2.
[ex : two parts of system
the system itself and its product
the system and its environment]
These substances interact or communicate through a field, F.
[ex : Mechanical
Acoustic
Thermal
Chemical
Electric
Magnetic etc]
The relationship between the field and
the two substances can be expressed
in a Su-Field triangle.
This triangle diagram may be thought of
the technological system.
It is of course a very simple, abstract model.
More detailed models can be made
by adding more nodes,
linking triangles together, etc.
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
Su-Field Analysis
• 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource
These diagram can be made more informative by introducing different line symbols
for the connections between nodes.
If a Su-Field diagram contains dashed or wavy lines, then the system it represents
needs improvement ie, an inventive problem.
The solution to this inventive problem may also be presented by a Su-Field diagram,
which would be a modification of the original diagram.
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
Su-Field Analysis
• 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource
Analysis and
Classification
about the
Principles used
at more than
one million
patents
Initial Problem Situation is
described as graphic method
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
The recommended solution
by Altshuller for each
specific situation is also
described as graphic method
76 Standard
Solutions
described as graphic method
called Su-Field Diagram
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985, he researched Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
ARIZ Education at SAMSUNG by TRIZ Master Nikolai Khomenko
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
Step 1. Analyzing the Problem
1.1. formulate the mini-problem
1.2. define the conflicting elements
1.3. describe graphic models for technical contradiction
1.4. select a graphic model for further analysis
1.5. intensify the conflict
1.6. describe the problem model
1.7. apply the inventive standards
Step 2. Analyzing the Problem Model
2.1. define the operational zone (oz)
2.2. define the operational time (ot)
2.3. define the substance-field resources (sfr)
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
Step 3. Defining Ideal Final Result (IFR) and Physical Contradiction (PhC)
3.1. formulate IFR-1
3.2. intensify definition of IFR-1
3.3. Identify the physical contradiction for the macro-level
3.4. Identify the physical contradiction for the micro-level
3.5. formulate IFR-2
3.6. apply the inventive standards to resolved physical contradiction
Step 4. Mobilizing and Utilizing of Substance-Field Resources (SFR)
4.1. simulation with little creatures
4.2. to take a"step back" from IFR
4.3. using combination of substance resources
4.4. using "void"
4.5. using derived resources
4.6. using an electrical field
4.7. using a field and field-sensitive substance
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
Step 5. Apply the Knowledge Base
5.1. applying the system of standard solutions for inventive problems
5.2. applying the problem-analogous
5.3. applying the principles for resolving the physical contradictions
5.4. applying the pointer to physical effects and phenomena
Step 6. Changing or Substituting the Problem
6.1. transition to the technical solution
6.2. checking the problem formulation for combination of several problems
6.3. changing the problem
6.4. reformulation of mini-problem
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
Step 7. Analyzing the Method of Resolving the Physical Contradiction
7.1 checking the concept of solution
7.2. preliminary estimation of the solution concept
7.3. checking the priority of the solution through patent funds
7.4. estimation of sub-problems to implement obtained solution concept
Step 8. Applying The Obtained Solution
8.1. estimate of changes for super-system
8.2. find new application for obtained solution
8.3. apply solution concept for other problems
Step 9. Analyzing the Problem Solving Process
9.1. compare proposed process and real
9.2. compare obtained solution concept and knowledge from TRIZ
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
Technology
Evolution
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology
DFSS & TRIZ
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Ideal Final Result
Contradiction
Resource
History of TRIZ
Contradiction
Su-Field Analysis
ARIZ
Technology Evolution
Trimming
Case Study
Knowledgist ver. 2.5
These three part is done
separated material.
Hyo June Kim
[email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving