Transcript Document
Effects of correlation
between halo merging steps
J. Pan
Purple Mountain Obs.
outline
Introduction to the excursion set theory of
halo model
The fractional Brownian motion
Modified excursion set theory based on FBM
summary
The halo model of large scale
structure
To understand LSS we need knowledge of
dark matter distribution and corresponding
evolution
The halo model approximates the LSS by
Dark matter groups into halos gravitationally
Baryons trapped in halo form galaxies
How matter is partitioned into halos?
LSS
What is the status of matter inside a halo?
Starting points: dark matter’s distribution
as a random surface
Spatial density fluctuation of dark matter is
stochastic: a random surface defined on 3D
space
Standard description of the random
surface: random walks
For a general random surface:
2
2
2
h
~
r
x
y
z
local height v.s. distance
For a cosmic matter field:
R
Smoothed density fluctuation ( R) W ( R)
2
S
( R)
v.s. the variance over the smoothed field
the random walk:
( R) ~ S ( R)
Halos: as peaks of the random surface
PEAK
HALO
Dark matter distribution (evolution)
= halo distribution (evolution) + matter distribution (evolution) in halos
Excursion set theory
Excursion set theory (1) the frame
The random walk is a Brownian Motion
Q: the number density of trajectories
within dS and d
If no boundary
R , S 0, 0
Excursion set theory (2) halo formation as
a single barrier first-upcrossing problem
If > c, the matter within R will collapse
to form a halo
c serves as an absorbing barrier
on the random walk
No. of halos of mass M
S S (R), R M halo
1/ 3
n( M )dM n( S )dS
Connection to halo mass
S S (R), R M
1/ 3
halo
No. of trajectories which
firstly crosses barrier at S
Excursion set theory (3) merging as a two
barriers first-upcrossing problem
M1 , C ( z1 )
M 2 , C ( z2 )
z1 z2
C ( z1 ) C ( z2 )
M1 M 2
No. of progenitors of mass M1 at z1
given a parent halo of mass M2 at z2
n(M 2 , z2 | M1 , z1 )dM2
n[S2 , C ( z2 ) | S1 , C ( z1 )]dS2
No. of trajectories has first-upcrossing over c(z1)
at S1 given its first upcrossing at S2 over c(z2)
Halo formation/merging processes:
Fokker-Planck equation
No matter 1-barrier or 2-barriers jumping
C
Q
1 2Q
Q
S
2 2
S
If the collapsing is spherical,
there is analytical solution
If ellipsoidal collapsing,
no analytical solution
numerical
C const.
C B(S )
Success of the excursion set theory
Agreement with numerical simulations
Conditional mass func.
Halo mass function
Halo bias
more application …
The central engine of semi-analytical models
of galaxies (halos are warm beds of galaxies)
the 21cm emission during re-ionization
Critical problems : halo formation time
distribution
Critical problems: age dependence of halo
bias
Old halos are more strongly clustered than young halos of the same mass
Dense environment induces more old halos
The missing link: correlation between
random walk steps
Progenitor
Brownian motion
contains no memory of
its past history
Environment impact is
null in standard
excursion set theory
Halo forms
Halo
forms
Environment:
The overdensity
at large scale
P(2|1)=P(2, 1)/P(1)=P(2)xP(1)/P(1)=P(2) !
2: merging
1
So…
What if there is correlation, i.e. the random walk
performed by cosmic density field is not a random
Brownian motion?
How to model this correlation?
What will the correlation bring up to halo growth
history, exactly?
No one knows.
We need a class of random walk of which Brownian
motion is just a special case.
Fractional Brownian motion: definition
FBM:
the simplest random walks of
sub-diffusion, proposed by
Mandelbrot, a fractal concept.
X (t )
X (t )
t
t
Widely used in modeling
random surface in geology,
self-organization growth of
structures in solid physics,
even the stock price fluctuation…
If the hurst exponent a = ½, it is the random Brownian motion
FBM: properties
0.2
X (t )
X (t )
t
t
0.5
0.8
a < 0.5 anti-persistent negatively correlated with past
a > 0.5 persistent
positively correlated with past
a = 0.5 stable
no memory of past
back to excursion set …correlation!
2
1
0
modified excursion set theory: FokkerPlanck equation
2
C
Q
Q
Q
aS 2a 1
S
2
S
By substitution S 2a
~
S
It is the equation for random Brownian motion!
The standard excursion set theory results can be easily converted
for solutions.
modified excursion set theory: halo mass
function
the correlation between
merging steps can
change halo mass
function dramatically
positive correlation
reduces number of large
mass halos
No way to work out the
ellipsoidal collapse
(moving barrier problem)
spherical collapse
modified excursion set theory: conditional
mass function – weak positive correlation?
modified excursion set theory: halo
formation time distribution
effects of positive
correlation a > 0.5
small mass halos
less young, more old
large mass halos
more young, less old
summary
With FBM, the excursion set theory can be modified to include
correlation between merging steps with minimal efforts:
It seems there is weakly positive correlation shown in simulations.
easily transplanted from known results
easy implementation to SAM, Monte-Carlo merging tree algorithm
conditional mass function
halo formation time distribution
Troubles: no analytical to solve the Fokker-Planck equation for FBM
with moving barriers, we are struggling to have accurate
mass function
halo bias
environmental effects