Transcript An Overview of the Child Welfare “System”

An Overview of Child Welfare
Tom C. Rawlings
Director, Office of the Child Advocate
Women’s Legislative Caucus
Retreat
Perry, GA
October 16, 2007
Child Protection

Answer for yourself:
Is protecting our children society’s most
important responsibility?

The progress of a state may be measured by the
extent it safeguards the rights of its children -- Grace
Abbott, 1938


The test of the morality of a society is what it does
for its children -- Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 1940’s
There is no more important test of a society than how
it treats its children -- Ronald Reagan, 1985
Brief history of child welfare




Pre-1900: abandoned children
(“foundlings”) warehoused in
“almshouses” and orphanages
1840-1860: Huge influx of
immigrants over-populates New
York City, disrupted family
structures, tenements, disease
1853: Charles Lorring Brace
starts the “Children’s Aid
Society” of New York
1854-1930’s: “Orphan Trains”
ferried 150,000+ west

The Old Ursuline Convent at 112 Chartres Street
in the French Quarter, built in 1745, is believed to
be the oldest building in the Mississippi Valley.
In 1727 twelve women — Ursuline Nuns from
France — established the first school for girls, ran
the first free school and the first orphanage and
held the first classes for African slave and Native
American girls in what is now the United States.
Brief history of child welfare




American West promised pure air, food, work ethic
Groups of 10-40 children, chosen by families at stops
Mixed results, OrphanTrainRiders.com
1994 PBS documentary interviewed orphans
Brief history of child welfare

1874: Mary Ellen Wilson, 9,
abandoned in New York City,
enslaved, beaten daily by her
“foster mother”




No laws to protect children, no rights,
viewed as property
Etta Wheeler got the American Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals to go to court
Brooklyn court took protective
custody, first ward of the court
The beginning of the childwelfare system as we know it
today
Brief history of child welfare




“I saw a child brought in … at the sight of
which men wept aloud, and I heard the
story of little Mary Ellen told … that stirred
the soul of a city and roused the
conscience of a world that had forgotten,
and as I looked, I knew I was where the
first chapter of children's rights was being
written” -- Jacob Riis, reporter, photo-journalist
1875: Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Children chartered by
Henry Bergh (also ASPCA founder)
1922: 300+ SPCC chapters
Mary Ellen was raised by her rescuer’s
sister, married at 24, 2 children who
were teachers, died at 92 in 1956.
Brief history of child welfare




1899: First Juvenile Court in Cook County, IL; rapid
expansion, 46 states with juvenile courts by 1915
1912: Federal government forms the Children’s
Bureau, begin shift from non-governmental SPCC’s
1935: Social Security Act, Aid to Dependent Children
(later AFDC); CB works with state public welfare
agencies; shift from institutions to foster care
1929-1962: Shift from publicity-hungry SPCC’s to
publicity-shy government; confidentiality officially hides
child welfare from the public; little research or
professional social-work
The Traditional Concept:


Doctrine of “Parens Patriae,” in which
Court is “In Loco Parentis” for child whose
parents cannot control.
Court as Big Daddy
Brief history of child welfare



1962: C.H. Kempe publishes “The battered-child
syndrome” in the Journal of the American
Medical Association
1960’s and 1970’s: Explosion of interest in child
abuse and neglect, medical & social-work
research
1969: Protecting the Child Victim of Sex Crimes
Committed by Adults, Vincent de Francis,
American Humane Society; research, women’s
movements, rape reform reveal prevalence of
child sexual abuse
Where was the judicial branch
during these changes?




Sporadic
Developing across country…..not standard
Developed under a contract system—saw
children still as property
Also, concepts of “child protection” were
evolving…parent’s rights v. children’s
rights…when should the state “rescue”…children
need permanency in a home with a
family…moving away from institutional care.
In Re Gault - 1967
Concept of judicial review was
emerging
 Case of Gerald Frances Gault pushed
us down this path

Recognized the liberty interest in a
parent being able to raise one’s own
child
 Concept of due process was applied to
children

Aftermath of In Re Gault
But we didn’t keep teach clinicians the
value of the law in this field, the role of
due process and fundamental rights,
how to investigate a case, or how to
use evidence in a court of law
 We didn’t teach judges or lawyers
about child development, children’s
needs, or psychological issues about
separating children from their families.

Brief history of child welfare



1974: Child Abuse Prevention and
Treatment Act, foundation of today’s
federal regulations
1980: Adoption Assistance and Child
Welfare Act tied federal dollars to judicial
oversight
1993 Family Preservation Act (includes
Safe and Stable Families funding and Court
Improvement Projects).
Brief history of child welfare

1997 Adoption & Safe Families Act (ASFA)




Focus of law is on health and safety of the child
Goal = end “foster care drift” and move children
into permanent homes more quickly
Limits number of months child can be in foster
care before TPR is filed
Provides financial incentives to states to increase
number of adoptions
What we’re talking about





Most child abuse comes in the form of neglect.
Neglect is sinister; the damage is below the
surface.
Other abuse is more obvious, but the public is
shielded from it -- that may be part of the
problem.
The next slide contains gruesome images of
infant abuse victims.
I’ll show them for a second, then move on.
Avert your eyes ...
What we’re talking about
The Hazards of Neglect


Early, frequent, and intense stress tunes the brain
to set stress regulation mechanisms at high
levels. This often results in a child operating in a
persisting fear state.
Under Stress, the Brain





loses ability to take in subtle clues
reverts to “tried & true” behaviors
becomes more automatic & over reactive
is less able to use “higher order” thinking skills
loses some memory capacity
Many Bad Adult Outcomes are associated
with Child Abuse and Neglect (Putnam, 2002)
Child Maltreatment is the Greatest Risk Factor for
Major Public Health Problems





Major Psychiatric Illnesses
Health Risk Behavior (organic diseases later in life )
Alcohol and Substance Abuse in Women
Crime and Violence in Women
HIV High Risk Behaviors in Adolescents
Childhood Trauma and Adult
Outcome



almost all criminal justice population (US)
almost 50% arrested for nontraffic-related
offenses by the age of 32
75% of perpetrators of child sexual abuse
report to have been sexually abused
(Teplin, 2002; Widom, 1996)
Why Does Childhood Maltreatment Exert Such
Powerful Effects?


It occurs during sensitive developmental periods
(e.g., Synaptogenesis, Experience-dependent
Maturation of Neuronal Systems)
It impacts on fundamental developmental
processes (e.g., Attachment, Emotional
Regulation, Impulse Control, Integration of Self,
Socialization)
F. W. Putnam, Mayerson Center for Safe & Healthy Children, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital
Stevie L.





Both parents mentally ill
Arm broken at age 2, removed by DFCS
Went to live with relatives
In and out of Central State
Inconsistent MH care





Kicked out of CSB day treatment program
Only seen by doc for meds
Meds terribly inconsistent
Originally refused by MATCH because of alleged MR
diagnosis
Referred to Juvenile Court for incidents at psychoed
center
What we’re talking about
CPS agencies took 2.6 million
reports involving 4.5 million
children in 2002 in the US.
1600
1400
1200
600
400
200
Source: DHHS ACF Children’s Bureau Child Maltreatment 2002
2
20
0
0
1
20
0
19
9
8
0
6

800
19
9

935
1000
7

900,000 children are ultimately
found to be victims each year
700,000 receive services
265,000 children are removed
from their homes each year
Death rate up 60% over 6
years
1089
979
19
9

1098
1390
1373
1306
20
0
There are 73 million kids in
the US, 4.1 million had an
asthma attack in 2002.
9

Child Deaths Attributed to
Abuse
19
9

What we’re talking about




Georgia takes maltreatment
reports on about 127,000
children, finding about
41,000 victims each year.
Maltreatment Types:
US
Neglect: 59%
Physical: 19%
Sexual:
10%
GA
78%
16%
5%
Neglect is every bit as
damaging, just more
degrees of it than other
types of abuse
About 60 fatalities per year
What we’re doing about it
Executive


Governor’s Office
Dept. of Human
Resources (DHR)







Division of Family
and Children
Services (DFCS)
Mental Health
Public Health
Office of the Child
Advocate (OCA)
Dept. of Juvenile
Justice (DJJ)
Attorney General
Law Enforcement
Judicial





Non-Profit
Council of

Juvenile Court

Judges
Council of Superior
Court Judges
Administrative Office
of the Courts
Court Appointed
Special Advocates
(CASA)
Guardians ad Litem
(GAL)
Foster Parents
Treatment Providers







Residential (e.g.
Group Homes)
Non-Residential
Assessment
Abuse Prevention
Family Preservation
Advocacy
Child Advocacy
Centers
What we’re doing about it
Court
(127,000)
Screening
(70,000)
Investigation
Assessments
Assessment
Foster Home
Services
(13,000)
(24,000)
Removal
(4,500)
CPS
Ongoing
Reunify
(3,600)
Other
Permanency
(1,100)
Foster Care
Child Protective Services (CPS)
Abuse
Report
How are we doing at this?




The number of children we
remove from their families has
nearly doubled in 5 years
Georgia 2003:
Fulton 2003:
Illinois 1994:
Illinois 1998:
4.2
5.1
4.5
2.0
per
per
per
per
10K
10K
10K
10K
The number of children in
foster care has increased 51%
in 5 years, from 9,600 to
14,500
The DFCS budget has increased
about 20%, from $860M to $1B
How are we doing at this?
9%
8.4%
8%
7%
within 24 months, 37 months
median)
6%
The 6-month re-abuse rate
has doubled in 5 years
The bright side: 5 years ago
we wouldn’t have known any
of this!
4%
5.6%
4.9%
5%
4.2%
4.2%
3.6%
4.0%
3%
2%
1%
3
20
0
2
20
0
1
20
0
0
20
0
19
9
9
0%
8

10%
19
9

Georgia: Children Re-Abused
within 6 Months
7

We’re removing and returning
children to their families more
quickly (78% within 12 months)
We’re adopting children at
about the same speed we did
5 years ago (18% adopted
19
9

Major Challenges


Most of our knowledge, laws, and
responses to child abuse came within the
last 50 years. They are still embryonic.
Still, the body of state and federal child
welfare law is tremendous, complex, and
often confusing: layer after layer of
statutes and regulations
The Layers of Federal Law
The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 471(a)(15) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 671(a)(15)) is amended to read as follows:
`(15) provides that-`(A) in determining reasonable efforts to be made with respect to a child, as described in this paragraph, and in making such reasonable efforts, the child's health and safety shall be the paramount concern;
`(B) except as provided in subparagraph (D), reasonable efforts shall be made to preserve and reunify families-`(i) prior to the placement of a child in foster care, to prevent or eliminate the need for removing the child from the child's home; and
`(ii) to make it possible for a child to safely return to the child's home;
`(C) if continuation of reasonable efforts of the type described in subparagraph (B) is determined to be inconsistent with the permanency plan for the child, reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely
manner in accordance with the permanency plan, and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child;
`(D) reasonable efforts of the type described in subparagraph (B) shall not be required to be made with respect to a parent of a child if a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that-`(i) the parent has subjected the child to aggravated circumstances (as defined in State law, which definition may include but need not be limited to abandonment, torture, chronic abuse, and sexual abuse);
`(ii) the parent has-`(I) committed murder (which would have been an offense under section 1111(a) of title 18, United States Code, if the offense had occurred in the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States) of another
child of the parent;
`(II) committed voluntary manslaughter (which would have been an offense under section 1112(a) of title 18, United States Code, if the offense had occurred in the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United
States) of another child of the parent;
`(III) aided or abetted, attempted, conspired, or solicited to commit such a murder or such a voluntary manslaughter; or
`(IV) committed a felony assault that results in serious bodily injury to the child or another child of the parent; or
`(iii) the parental rights of the parent to a sibling have been terminated involuntarily;
`(E) if reasonable efforts of the type described in subparagraph (B) are not made with respect to a child as a result of a determination made by a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with subparagraph (D)-`(i) a permanency hearing (as described in section 475(5)(C)) shall be held for the child within 30 days after the determination; and
`(ii) reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely manner in accordance with the permanency plan, and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child; and
`(F) reasonable efforts to place a child for adoption or with a legal guardian may be made concurrently with reasonable efforts of the type described in subparagraph (B);'.
(b) DEFINITION OF LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP- Section 475 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 675) is amended by adding at the end the following:
`(7) The term `legal guardianship' means a judicially created relationship between child and caretaker which is intended to be permanent and self-sustaining as evidenced by the transfer to the caretaker of the following
parental rights with respect to the child: protection, education, care and control of the person, custody of the person, and decisionmaking. The term `legal guardian' means the caretaker in such a relationship.'.
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 472(a)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 672(a)(1)) is amended by inserting `for a child' before `have been made'.
(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Part E of title IV of such Act (42 U.S.C. 670-679) is amended by inserting after section 477 the following:
`SEC. 478. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
`Nothing in this part shall be construed as precluding State courts from exercising their discretion to protect the health and safety of children in individual cases, including cases other than those described in section
471(a)(15)(D).'.
SEC. 102. INCLUDING SAFETY IN CASE PLAN AND CASE REVIEW SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS.
Title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is amended-(1) in section 422(b)(10)(B)-(A) in clause (iii)(I), by inserting `safe and' after `where'; and
(B) in clause (iv), by inserting `safely' after `remain'; and
(2) in section 475-(A) in paragraph (1)-(i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting `safety and' after `discussion of the'; and
(ii) in subparagraph (B)-(I) by inserting `safe and' after `child receives'; and
(II) by inserting `safe' after `return of the child to his own'; and
(B) in paragraph (5)-(i) in subparagraph (A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting `a safe setting that is' after `placement in'; and
(ii) in subparagraph (B)-(I) by inserting `the safety of the child,' after `determine'; and
(II) by inserting `and safely maintained in' after `returned to'.
SEC. 103. STATES REQUIRED TO INITIATE OR JOIN PROCEEDINGS TO TERMINATE PARENTAL RIGHTS FOR CERTAIN CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE.
(
a) REQUIREMENT FOR PROCEEDINGS- Section 475(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 675(5)) is amended-(1) by striking `and' at the end of subparagraph (C);
(2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D) and inserting `; and'; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
`(E) in the case of a child who has been in foster care under the responsibility of the State for 15 of the most recent 22 months, or, if a court of competent jurisdiction has determined a child to be an
abandoned infant (as defined under State law) or has made a determination that the parent has committed murder of another child of the parent, committed voluntary manslaughter of another child of the
parent, aided or abetted, attempted, conspired, or solicited to commit such a murder or such a voluntary manslaughter, or committed a felony assault that has resulted in serious bodily injury to the child
or to another child of the parent, the State shall file a petition to terminate the parental rights of the child's parents (or, if such a petition has been filed by another party, seek to be joined as a party to the
petition), and, concurrently, to identify, recruit, process, and approve a qualified family for an adoption, unless-`(i) at the option of the State, the child is being cared for by a relative;
`(ii) a State agency has documented in the case plan (which shall be available for court review) a compelling reason for determining that filing such a petition would not be in the best interests of the
child; or
`(iii) the State has not provided to the family of the child, consistent with the time period in the State case plan, such services as the State deems necessary for the safe return of the child to the child's
home, if reasonable efforts of the type described in section 471(a)(15)(B)(ii) are required to be made with respect to the child.'.
(b) DETERMINATION OF BEGINNING OF FOSTER CARE- Section 475(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 675(5)), as amended by subsection (a), is amended-(1) by striking `and' at the end of subparagraph (D);
(2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (E) and inserting `; and'; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
`(F) a child shall be considered to have entered foster care on the earlier of-`(i) the date of the first judicial finding that the child has been subjected to child abuse or neglect; or
`(ii) the date that is 60 days after the date on which the child is removed from the home.'.
(c) TRANSITION RULES(1) NEW FOSTER CHILDREN- In the case of a child who enters foster care (within the meaning of section 475(5)(F) of the Social Security Act) under the responsibility of a State after the date of the
enactment of this Act-(A) if the State comes into compliance with the amendments made by subsection (a) of this section before the child has been in such foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months, the State shall
comply with section 475(5)(E) of the Social Security Act with respect to the child when the child has been in such foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months; and
(B) if the State comes into such compliance after the child has been in such foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months, the State shall comply with such section 475(5)(E) with respect to the child
not later than 3 months after the end of the first regular session of the State legislature that begins after such date of enactment.
(2) CURRENT FOSTER CHILDREN- In the case of children in foster care under the responsibility of the State on the date of the enactment of this Act, the State shall-(A) not later than 6 months after the end of the first regular session of the State legislature that begins after such date of enactment, comply with section 475(5)(E) of the Social Security Act with respect
to not less than 1/3 of such children as the State shall select, giving priority to children for whom the permanency plan (within the meaning of part E of title IV of the Social Security Act) is adoption
and children who have been in foster care for the greatest length of time;
(B) not later than 12 months after the end of such first regular session, comply with such section 475(5)(E) with respect to not less than 2/3 of such children as the State shall select; and
(C) not later than 18 months after the end of such first regular session, comply with such section 475(5)(E) with respect to all of such children.
(3) TREATMENT OF 2-YEAR LEGISLATIVE SESSIONS- For purposes of this subsection, in the case of a State that has a 2-year legislative session, each year of the session is deemed to be a
separate regular session of the State legislature.
(4) REQUIREMENTS TREATED AS STATE PLAN REQUIREMENTS- For purposes of part E of title IV of the Social Security Act, the requirements of this subsection shall be treated as State plan
requirements imposed by section 471(a) of such Act.
(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this section or in part E of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 670 et seq.), as amended by this Act, shall be construed as precluding State courts
or State agencies from initiating the termination of parental rights for reasons other than, or for timelines earlier than, those specified in part E of title IV of such Act, when such actions are determined
to be in the best interests of the child, including cases where the child has experienced multiple foster care placements of varying durations.
SEC. 104. NOTICE OF REVIEWS AND HEARINGS; OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD.
Section 475(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 675(5)), as amended by section 103, is amended-(1) by striking `and' at the end of subparagraph (E);
(2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (F) and inserting `; and'; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
`(G) the foster parents (if any) of a child and any preadoptive parent or relative providing care for the child are provided with notice of, and an opportunity to be heard in, any review or hearing to be
held with respect to the child, except that this subparagraph shall not be construed to require that any foster parent, preadoptive parent, or relative providing care for the child be made a party to such a
review or hearing solely on the basis of such notice and opportunity to be heard.'.
SEC. 105. USE OF THE FEDERAL PARENT LOCATOR SERVICE FOR CHILD WELFARE SERVICES.
Section 453 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 653) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(2)-(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting `or making or enforcing child custody or visitation orders,' after `obligations,'; and
(B) in subparagraph (A)-(i) by striking `or' at the end of clause (ii);
(ii) by striking the comma at the end of clause (iii) and inserting `; or'; and
(iii) by inserting after clause (iii) the following:
`(iv) who has or may have parental rights with respect to a child,'; and
(2) in subsection (c)-(A) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and inserting `; and'; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
`(4) a State agency that is administering a program operated under a State plan under subpart 1 of part B, or a State plan approved under subpart 2 of part B or under part E.'.
SEC. 106. CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECKS FOR PROSPECTIVE FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENTS.
Section 471(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 671(a)) is amended-(1) by striking `and' at the end of paragraph (18);
(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (19) and inserting `; and'; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
`(20)(A) unless an election provided for in subparagraph (B) is made with respect to the State, provides procedures for criminal records checks for any prospective foster or adoptive
parent before the foster or adoptive parent may be finally approved for placement of a child on whose behalf foster care maintenance payments or adoption assistance payments are to be
made under the State plan under this part, including procedures requiring that-`(i) in any case in which a record check reveals a felony conviction for child abuse or neglect, for spousal abuse, for a crime against children (including child pornography), or for a
crime involving violence, including rape, sexual assault, or homicide, but not including other physical assault or battery, if a State finds that a court of competent jurisdiction has
determined that the felony was committed at any time, such final approval shall not be granted; and
`(ii) in any case in which a record check reveals a felony conviction for physical assault, battery, or a drug-related offense, if a State finds that a court of competent jurisdiction has
determined that the felony was committed within the past 5 years, such final approval shall not be granted; and
`(B) subparagraph (A) shall not apply to a State plan if the Governor of the State has notified the Secretary in writing that the State has elected to make subparagraph (A) inapplicable to
the State, or if the State legislature, by law, has elected to make subparagraph (A) inapplicable to the State.'.
SEC. 107. DOCUMENTATION OF EFFORTS FOR ADOPTION OR LOCATION OF A PERMANENT HOME.
Section 475(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 675(1)) is amended-(1) in the last sentence-(A) by striking `the case plan must also include'; and
(B) by redesignating such sentence as subparagraph (D) and indenting appropriately; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
`(E) In the case of a child with respect to whom the permanency plan is adoption or placement in another permanent home, documentation of the steps the agency is taking to find an
adoptive family or other permanent living arrangement for the child, to place the child with an adoptive family, a fit and willing relative, a legal guardian, or in another planned
permanent living arrangement, and to finalize the adoption or legal guardianship. At a minimum, such documentation shall include child specific recruitment efforts such as the use of
State, regional, and national adoption exchanges including electronic exchange systems.'.
TITLE II--INCENTIVES FOR PROVIDING PERMANENT FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN
SEC. 201. ADOPTION INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL- Part E of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 670-679) is amended by inserting after section 473 the following:
`SEC. 473A. ADOPTION INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.
`(a) GRANT AUTHORITY- Subject to the availability of such amounts as may be provided in advance in appropriations Acts for this purpose, the Secretary shall make a grant to each
State that is an incentive-eligible State for a fiscal year in an amount equal to the adoption incentive payment payable to the State under this section for the fiscal year, which shall be
payable in the immediately succeeding fiscal year.
`(b) INCENTIVE-ELIGIBLE STATE- A State is an incentive-eligible State for a fiscal year if-`(1) the State has a plan approved under this part for the fiscal year;
`(2) the number of foster child adoptions in the State during the fiscal year exceeds the base number of foster child adoptions for the State for the fiscal year;
`(3) the State is in compliance with subsection (c) for the fiscal year;
`(4) in the case of fiscal years 2001 and 2002, the State provides health insurance coverage to any child with special needs (as determined under section 473(c)) for whom there is in
effect an adoption assistance agreement between a State and an adoptive parent or parents; and
`(5) the fiscal year is any of fiscal years 1998 through 2002.
Major Challenges

Attorneys and judges involved in child
abuse and neglect cases must understand
not only the law but also medicine, social
work, psychology, child development, and
public healthcare finance.
Major Points

We still don’t truly understand the answers
to these (and many other) questions:





Is it sometimes better to do nothing?
Is removal worth the trauma of removal?
What exactly does permanency mean?
What does it mean to be “safe”?
If the State assumes responsibility for a child,
how far must it go to ensure that child’s wellbeing?
Major Challenges
Our courts and agencies charged with
addressing these issues are fragmented,
divided, and often inefficient
Specific Challenges: Juvenile Justice





SB 440
Designated Felony Act
Detention of Status Offenders
Short Term Program
Budget Issues
Specific Challenges: Juvenile Justice

Remove Aggravated Child Molestation and
Aggravated Sodomy from the List of SB 440
Offenses



1994-2006, approximately 100 children in Dekalb
County charged as adults with aggravated child
molestation.
88% of those children’s cases were either no-billed by
the grand jury or prosecuted in juvenile court.
BUT in the interim many of them sat without services
in the RYDC
Specific Challenges: Juvenile Justice

Modify the Designated Felony Act




Reduce the number of crimes
Make the ages uniform
Give the Judges more discretion than simply
1-5 years.
Look possibly at blended sentencing
Secure Commitment Placements
YDC Commitment Types
90%
Average Length of Stay
80%
700 – 800 days
70%
60%
50%
Average Length of Stay
40%
300 - 400 days
30%
20%
10%
0%
FY00
FY01
Commitment
OFFICE OFNovember
PLANNING
AND BUDGET
(), 2006
FY02
FY03
Designated Felon
44
FY04
FY05
Superior Court Commitment
Community-Based Services
Program Cost Comparisons (Per Youth-Per Day)
Program: Community Non-Secure
Services
Secure Facility Confinement
$186
$6
Electronic Monitoring (Radio)
$16
Electronic Monitoring (Satellite)
Intensive Supervision Program
$38
Weekend Sanctions
$45
Community
Services
$50
Tracking Services
$53
Multi-Systemic Therapy
Family Based Intervention Services
$55
Wilderness Program
$121
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
Average community placement per day cost = $14
OFFICE OFNovember
PLANNING
AND BUDGET
(), 2006
45
$180
$200
Specific Challenges: Juvenile Justice



Make the Status Offender Rules Consistent
With Federal Law
www.childwelfare.net
Problem: We don’t have the data from
the independent courts, so we can’t tell
how we’re doing.
Specific Challenges: Deprivation


Medicaid Unbundling
Child and Family Services Review
Major Challenges: Deprivation

Medicaid Unbundling

Separation of Room, Board, and Watchful
Oversight from Behavioral Services
A confusing process involving too many agencies
with no clear lines of reporting or authority
 Except for six PRTFs, residential providers have
been required to physically separate residential
services from behavioral services
 Many can’t afford the expense, are going out of
the business

DHR tells residential
Provider how to
Implement unbundling
DCH tells DHR that CMS
Is requiring unbundling
APS disagrees with
DFCS
DFCS secondguesses APS
DFCS/DJJ
Determine level
Of RBWO
Residential
Provider
Takes child
APS Healthcare
Determines
Needed
Therapy
DFCS second-guesses ORS
Core Provider determines
child needs care
ORS licenses
Residential
provider
Specific Challenges: Deprivation

Child and Family Services Review

Safety Outcomes

Are children free of abuse and neglect?


Timeliness of investigations, repeat maltreatment
Are children maintained safely in their homes
where possible?

Services to prevent removal, assessing risk of harm to
child
Specific Challenges: Deprivation

Child and Family Services Review

Permanency Outcomes

Children have permanency and stability in their
living situations


Timeliness and permanency of reunification, timelineness
of adoptions, permanency for children in foster care for
extended time periods, placement stability
Continuity of family relationships and connections
is preserved for children

Proximity of placement, visitation with family and siblings
Specific Challenges: Deprivation

Child and Family Services Review

Well-being Outcomes

Families have enhanced capacity to provide for
their children’s needs

Needs of family met, involvement of family in case
planning, worker visits with parents and children
Children receive appropriate educational services
 Children receive adequate mental and physical
health services


Also systemic factors: case reviews, SACWIS,
training, etc.
Specific Challenges: Deprivation

Child and Family Services Review

Positives:
Low rates of foster care re-entry
 Low repeat maltreatment
 Visits between children and families
 Placing children together
 Meeting physical health needs of children

Specific Challenges: Deprivation

Child and Family Services Review

Negatives:
Met none of the federal standards for the
composite outcomes
 Assessing risk
 Permanency – timeliness
 Insufficient efforts to engage fathers
 Insufficient visitation among siblings placed apart
 Adequate handling of cases of older youth,
especially in terms of appropriate placements

Specific Challenges: Deprivation
Top Three Issues
1.
The permanency choices of Adoption and APPLA (aging out and long
term foster care)...making sure that any child over 14 has access to the great
services provided by GA-the report says that youth are receiving the services
gave them high marks, but we have an access problem. Judges can help with
that.
-Remember, GA MET the federal standard on reunification and
placement with a relative (represents 70% of the children coming thru our
child welfare system according to the AFCARs data) which is great news.
2.
Meaningful involvement of family members on every level from
visitation, to case planning, to relationships, to family team meetings
3. Well-being of children in foster care (although the children in care fared
better on these #s than the children in CPS cases). Think about what could
be done from the bench to ensure that children get their health and
educational needs met.
Opportunities





Community-based care
Guardianship improvements
Improving representation
Revamping payment systems
Obtaining data
Promising Practices

KidsNet – System of Care


SafeCare




http://www.systemsofcare.samhsa.gov
Dr. John Lutzker, Marcus Institute
http://www.marcus.org/clinical/child_well.html
Family-Centered Practice
Bottom line: Go to the families; don’t make
the families come to you.