Transcript Slide 1

Tim Clinton, Ed.D.

Gary Sibcy, II, Ph.D.

Joshua Straub, Ph.D.

Brain Mind Relation ship

      Neural Networks—based on experience The Brain as a “social organ” Neural Plasticity Neural Integration Gene Expression Enriched Environments

   ◦ How the brain grows Bottom to top; right to left Integrated, regulated brain ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Top to bottom; left and right Finding the Zone— Support—safe, regulated Challenge—emotional activation Think—label, communicate, problem solve Relate—attend, back-and-forth, collaborative

  ◦ ◦ ◦ Brain wires itself based on experience Asks several questions: Is the world a safe place?

Can I count on my caregiver’s to help me in time of need?

Can I get the care I need when I need it?

Care = Love

 ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Implicit Memory— Present at birth Includes behavioral, emotional, perceptual, body Mental models—states become traits Conscious attention not required for encoding No sense of recollection when memories recalled Does not involve hippocampus—mostly amygdala and limbic-motoric

 ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Explicit Memory Emerges in second year of life Sense of recollection when recalled If autobiographical, sense of self and time present Includes semantic (factual) and episodic (autobiographical) Requires conscious attention Involves hippocampus—converts to context If autobiographical—involves prefrontal cortex

  ◦ Sensitive, timely responses to child’s distress Enhance regulation, brain stem, limbic system Stimulate integration of these systems, ultimately through integration of these systems with the middle prefrontal cortex

The Big Five

Seeks Proximity in times of trouble

Safe Haven Experience

Secure Base

Exploration

Separation

anxiety/anger

Loss

Grief

Self-Confidence/Exploration Felt security

Secure Base

Caregiver’s Signal detection Safe Haven Perceived Threat

Attachment System

Signaling

Proximity Seeking

 ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ The middle prefrontal cortex Anterior cingualate Orbital prefrontal cortex The mediate prefrontal Ventral lateral All work together as a team

         Body regulation- Attuned communication- Emotional balance- Response Flexibility- Insight— Empathy  Mindsight Fear modulation Accessing intuition Morality

Parent Responses Themes Responsive/Attuned Rejecting/disengaged /overly Intrusive Inconsistent/Role reversal Frightening/ Threatening/ Dissociated Attachment Style Secure Avoidant Ambivalent Disorganized

AAI Classifications of Pre-term Mothers in Third Trimester of Pregnancy 70% ACCURACY Child Strange Situation Classification At Twelve –Months 75% TO 78% ACCURACY AAI Classification 16 To 20 Years Later

 The Sacred Romance -- “Lover of our Soul”  Love and Marriage -- Genesis 2:18-25; SOS; Matt.19; I Cor. 7; I Cor. 13; Eph.5:21 ff; I Peter 3:1-10  The Family -- Deut. 6:6-9, Psalm 127; I Tim. 5:8

Self Other •Am I worthy? •Am I capable?

•Am I willing?

•Are you trustworthy?

•Are accessible?

•Are you capable?

•Are you willing?

SELF

Positive View Low Anxiety Negative View High Anxiety

SECURE Comfortable with intimacy and autonomy DISMISSING Downplays intimacy, overly self-reliant PREOCCUPIED Preoccupied with relationships and abandonment FEARFUL Fearful of intimacy, socially avoidant

Figure 1.Bartholomew’s model of self and other

+ Other __ +

Secure Attachment

Self Dimension

 I’m worthy of love  I’m capable of getting the love I need

Other Dimension

 Others are willing and able to love me  I can count on you to be there for me _

Ambivalent Attachment

Self Dimension

 I am not worth of love (I feel flawed)  I’m not able to get love I need without being angry or clingy

Other Dimension

 Capable but unwilling (bc my flaws)  May abandon me (bc my flaws)

Avoidant Attachment

Self Dimension

 I’m worthy of love (false pride)  I’m capable of getting love I want and need (false sense of mastery)

Other Dimension

 Others are incompetent  Others are untrustworthy

Fearful Attachment

Self Dimension

 I’m not worthy of love  I’m unable to get the love I need

Other Dimension

 Others are unwilling  Others are unable  Others are abusive, I deserve it

Secure Attachment

Full range

Good control

Self-soothes

Shares feelings

Ok with others’ feelings

Capable of accurate empathy

Avoidant Attachment

Restricted Range

Too much control

Uses things to soothe self, prone to addictions

Keeps feelings at a distance

Doesn’t share feelings

Restricted empathy

Ambivalent Attachment

Full range

Poor control

Can’t self soothe

Shares Feelings too much

Overwhelms others with their feelings

Uses feelings instrumentally to gain proximity

Disorganized Attachment

Full Range, but few positive feelings

Poor control

Can’t self-soothe

Can’t really share with others

Overwhelmed by others feelings

Dissociates when in face of strong emotion

Secure Attachment

Comfortable with closeness

Shares feelings and dreams

Willing to commit

Balances closeness and distance

Avoidant Attachment

Not comfortable with closeness

Withholds feelings and dreams

Difficulty with commitment

Distances

Ambivalent Attachment

Desires closeness, but never seems to have enough

Wants to merge with other

Preoccupied with abandonment

Clings and criticizes

Crisis

attachment

Disorganized Attachment

Desires closeness, but fears and avoids it

Wants to merge, then wants to distance

Terrified of abandonment

Sabotages closeness

Attracted to people who victimize

  Kirkpatrick ◦ Reframes attachment within religious context Christian conception of God satisfies Ainsworth’s attachment criteria:  Seeks closeness in times of trouble  Safe Haven  Exploration  Separation  anxiety/anger  Loss  Grief Christian Attachment Therapy 27

   Philippians 4:4-7 Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it again: Rejoice! Let your gentleness be evident to all. The Lord is near. Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God.

And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.(NIV) Ps 17:6-10 I call on you, O God, for you will answer me; give ear to me and hear my prayer. Show the wonder of your great love, you who save by your right hand those who take refuge in you from their foes. Keep me as the apple of your eye; hide me in the shadow of your wings from the wicked who assail me, from my mortal enemies who surround me. They close up their callous hearts, and their mouths speak with arrogance.(NIV) Christian Attachment Therapy 28

 Ps 46:1-4 God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble. Therefore we will not fear, though the earth give way and the mountains fall into the heart of the sea, though its waters roar and foam and the mountains quake with their surging. Selah Christian Attachment Therapy 29

   -Research shows people seek God for a safe haven and secure base during times of stress. Most researched area of attachment theory in the context of religion In times of emotional distress or loss, it has been found that people: -turn to prayer rather than the church -grieving persons tend to increase their faith and religious devotion -soldiers pray more frequently in combat -times of death and divorce -fears associated with serious illness -emotional crises -relationship problems -other negative events

    As substitute attachment figure (Kirkpatrick, 1992) Provides “felt security” (Sroufe, 1977) More similar to parent-child relationship but moderate and consistent link to romantic attachment (Kirkpatrick, 1992, 1999; Rowatt & Kirkpatrick, 2002) Measured on two dimensions: Anxiety and Avoidance (Beck & McDonald, 2004)

THE ATTACHMENT TO GOD INVENTORY scale (Beck and McDonald, 2004) The Experiences in Close Relationships (Brennan et al. 1998) -Avoidance of Intimacy -Anxiety about Abandonment

Increased anxiety of abandonment Preoccupation and worry Angry protest Increased jealousy Resentment Concerns that they are lovable Increased Avoidance A reluctance to communicate Avoidance of emotionality Obsessive self-reliance

 Attachment style impacts how God is viewed ◦ Secure : He is there, I can count on Him. He will accepts me, in spite of my flaws ◦ ◦ ◦ Avoidant Him.

: He isn’t there for me when I need Him. I will have to go at life alone. I don’t really need Ambivalent : I’m too flawed; God is sure to reject me. I probably committed the unpardonable sin Disorganized : I’m flawed, beyond repair. God will strike me down if I turn toward Him. He will surely reject or punish me.

Christian Attachment Therapy 34

-God may serve as a compensatory attachment figure for individuals displaying insecure attachment patterns (Kirkpatrick & Shaver, 1997, 1998).

--avoidant attachment types had higher incidents of sudden conversions. These results indicate that God may serve the role of a substitute attachment figure (emotional compensation), compensating for the distant, unresponsive care giving style they experienced in infancy and childhood. This hypothesis is based upon Ainsworth’s (1985) findings that those with insecure attachment styles seek substitute objects of attachment.

proposes that individuals with secure attachment styles are more likely to sustain a future belief and relationship with God because a foundation has been established throughout childhood. This hypothesis is based on Bowlby’s (1969) idea that relationship permanence and stability stem from stable working models of attachment (Kirkpatrick & Shaver, 1997, 1998).

According to this hypothesis--the explanation to the root of religiousness in securely attached individuals may be derived “from without”, or socialization processes, whereas the religiousness of the insecurely attached individual may be derived “from within”, or emotional regulation (Granqvist & Hagekull).

The connection between attachment insecurity and sudden religious conversion may be considered the most robust and corroborated finding from the research on attachment and religion…This interpretation is in line with ambivalents’ observed tendency to desperately seek care and easily fall in love, and may be a continuation of the inconsistency in parental caregiving that has been shown to be characteristic of parents in ambivalent dyads

 Factual  Emotional  Volitional

Secure Childhood Secure Adult/Roman tic Corrective Relational Experience Trauma/Loss Insecure Childhood Insecure Adult/Roman tic Secure God Insecure God

       Warmth and security—responsiveness and attunement Regulation so child is not overwhelmed Relatedness and engagement Back and forth emotional signaling and gesturing Problem solving Using ideas in meaningful and functional way Thinking and reasoning

Step I: Remember Your Story – Narrative Recall Step II: Recognize Your Pain and Need for Healing – “Can’t heal what you don’t feel” Step III: Reframe the Meaning of Your Story Step IV: Repair Your Story – ‘forgiveness, grace and acceptance’ Step V: Reconnect – deepening emotional strands of safety, trust and intimacy; able to accept influence from others.