Transcript Health, Nutrition and Feeding

What security of attachment
predicts
Messinger
1
Review
Most infants are attached but only 2/3 of
infants are typically securely attached.
 There is strong but limited experimental
evidence and extensive evidence from metaanalyses that caregiver sensitivity predicts
secure attachment
 What does secure attachment predict?

Messinger
2
What does secure attachment
predict?





Describe the stability (or instability) of attachment security
as in infancy?
What evidence supports the idea that attachment security
predicts the timing of puberty in girls?
What does insecure and disorganized attachment predict in
childhood?
Describe and explain correspondences between parental
and infant security of attachment.
EC. Describe the effects of double insecurity. 10 points.
The figure was correct.
Messinger
3
The Big Question
How do early experiences of attachment
relationships impact later relationships?
 Through behavioral and then internal
representations of what can be expected
from relationships

Messinger
4
Internal Working Models

Mental representations of the availability of
the attachment figure and what to do when
the attachment system is activated
•

Mental rules for organizing, accessing, and limiting
access to information relevant to attachment.
Impact individual differences in strange
situation behavior and, hence, infant
attachment classification.
Messinger
5
What infant expects:
Evidence for
Infants’
Internal
Working
Models of
Attachment.
2007.
Susan C. Johnson,
Carol S. Dweck, and
Frances S. Chen
6
The Big Question

How do early experiences of attachment
relationships impact later relationships?
–
–
–
–
Early infancy to later infancy
Infancy to childhood
Infancy to adulthood
Infancy to parenthood
Messinger
7
Impact of early experiences
Stability

Attachment classification should be stable
–
If you’re secure, you should remain secure
Or
 Transition should be linked to life-events
–
–
Negative events: Secure -> Insecure
Positive events: Insecure -> Secure
Messinger
8
Strange Situation classification
shows only moderate stability


NICHD, 2001, Dev. Psy
Similar to Seifer et al.,
MLS findings
And similar to Belsky,
Campbell, Cohn, &
Moore, 1996 findings
9
Stability of infant classification?

75% stability in ABC from 12 to 18 months
–

five studies of "nonrisk" samples, N = 205 (1980s)
46-55% (non-significant) ABC ‘stability’ from 12
to 18 months
–
–
–
1 study with 3 independent samples (n = 125, n = 90,
and, with fathers (n = 120) (1990s)
Bigger single sample
Coding Disorganization may influence coding
•
Messinger
Belsky et al. 1996
10
Large scale study stability

Modest stability for A, B, C, and D classifications
from 15 to 36 months
–
–
Low maternal sensitivity from 24 to 36 months
predicted shift from secure to insecure
Higher maternal sensitivity from 24 to 36 months
predicted change from insecure to secure


NICHD Early Child Care Research Network
Marginal stability for A, B, C, and D
classifications from 18 to 36 months
–
Kappa = .06; p < .05

Maternal Lifestyle Study
Messinger
11
Disorganized stability

Disorganized infants show reasonably
stable categorization in the Strange
Situation
–
two studies; r=.34 over a mean of 25 months
 Also
have higher stress reactions (salivary cortisol)
than other infants
•
Meta-analysis: Van Ijzendoorn, Schuengel, & BakermansKranenburg (1999)
Messinger
12
The Big Question

How do early experiences of attachment
relationships impact later relationships?
–
–
–
–
Early infancy to later infancy
Infancy to childhood
Infancy to adulthood
Infancy to parenthood
Messinger
14
Is security a ‘vaccination’?

Most competent 3-yr-olds have both secure
attachment (at 15 mo) & (relatively) highsensitive mothering (at 24 mo)
NICHD Study of Early Child Care
Insecurely attached children who subsequently
experienced high-sensitive mothering significantly
outperformed secure children who subsequently
experienced low-sensitive mothering.
–


Belsky, J. and R. M. P. Fearon (2002). "Early attachment security, subsequent maternal sensitivity, and later child development:
Does continuity in development depend upon continuity of caregiving?" Attachment & Human Development 4(3): 361-387.
Messinger
15
Sensitivitybeyond attachment
Fraley, R. C., Roisman, G. I., & Haltigan, J. D. (2013). The legacy of early experiences in development:
Formalizing alternative models of how early experiences are carried forward over time. Dev Psychol, 49(1), 109126.
Messinger
16
Attachment & emotional
development

In 2nd and 3rd yrs, secure children  less angry.
–

Higher attachment  less fear and anger at 33 mo
Insecure children's negative emotions increased:
–
–
Avoidant children  fearful
Resistant children were most fearful / least joyful,

–
distress even in episodes designed to elicit joy.
Disorganized/ unclassifiable children more angry.
•
Kochanska, G. Child Development. 2001, 72 474-490
Messinger
18
Insecure & disorganized
 risk of externalizing problems

Disorganized at elevated risk, weaker effects for
avoidance & resistance
 Meta-analysis,
–
•

69 samples (5,947).
overall d = 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.40)
Larger effects for boys, clinical samples, observationbased outcome assessments, attachment assessments other
than the Strange Situation.
Fearon, R. P., M. J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, et al. (2010). "The significance of insecure attachment and disorganization in the development of children s externalizing behavior: A
meta-analytic study." Child Development 81(2): 435-456.
Messinger
20
Disorganized
externalizing
Nonsecure (avoidant) 
internalizing/externalizing
Based on 42 independent samples (N = 4,614),
Messinger
(Groh, Roisman, van
Ijzendoorn, BakermansKranenburg, & Fearon,
21
2012)
Double insecurity  Behavior problems
(insecurity with dad key variable..)
Messinger
22
But insecure attachment may
have positive functions
The function of attachment is safety
 Avoidance minimizes unfruitful attempts to
elicit caregiving
 Resistance maximizes attention to
separation & minimizes separation
 Even disorganization balances exposure to a
threatening but needed caregiver
 Security may not be the only way to ‘get it
right.’

•
Crittenden (Dahra Jackson)
Messinger
24
Attachment and Maturation

Evolutionary framework
–
–
–

Does infant attachment
change maturation?
Does attachment signal
challenges an infant faces?
Away from Mental Health
conceptualization
Difficult environment
=> Earlier menarche
Mattson
Belsky, Houts, & Fearon 2010
25
Attachment-Maturation Model


Early menarche:
insecure overrepresented
Is insecurity a
better fit to
certain
environments?
Belsky, Houts, & Fearon 2010
controlled for mother’s age of menarche
Mattson
Attachment and Children's Peer Relations

“Small-to-moderate” association between
attachment security to mother and quality of
children’s peer relations
–

meta-analysis of 63 studies indicates
Effects “higher for studies that focused on
children's close friendships rather than on relations
with other peers.”
–
Effects larger after early childhood

“Gender & cultural differences … minimal”
–
A Quantitative Review (Schneider et al ’2001)
Messinger
28
The Big Question

How do early experiences of attachment
relationships impact later relationships?
–
–
–
–
Early infancy to later infancy
Infancy to childhood
Infancy to adulthood
Infancy to parenthood
Messinger
30
Stability: Infant to adult


2 studies report significant levels of stability
between infant attachment security and adult
security
2 studies do not
–

But 1 did not use a traditional strange situation
In all studies, negative life events associated with
transitions from infant security to adult insecurity
–
But negative life events (e.g. divorce, parental
depression) are not the same in all studies
Messinger
32
The Big Question

How do early experiences of attachment
relationships impact later relationships?
–
–
–
–
Early infancy to later infancy
Infancy to adulthood
Infancy to childhood
Infancy to parenthood
Messinger
33
Overview
Introduction to the Adult Attachment
Interview (AAI)
 Correspondence between parents’ security
of attachment (from AAI) and their
children’s security of attachment
 Practice the Adult Attachment Interview
(AAI)

Messinger
34
A Big Question

Do parents’ representation of their own attachment
experiences relate – presumably through their own
parenting behaviors – to the attachment
classification of their children in the next
generation?
To answer such questions, attachment theory has moved to
the level of representation.
Messinger
35
In adulthood

Internal working models impact attachment
behavior
–
–

Mental representations of the availability of the
attachment figure
What to do when the attachment system is
activated
Purpose of the Adult Attachment Interview
is to classify these internal working models.
Messinger
36
Interview

18 questions with follow-up probes, semistructured, hour-long, transcribed verbatim
–
–
–
–
5 adjectives describing each parent with
supporting (or contradicting) memories
what occurred when upset (when the
attachment system was activated)
impact of those experience on current
functioning
current relationship with parents
Messinger
37
Messinger
38
How Speakers are Categorized

As Autonomous (secure), Dismissing (avoidant),
or Preoccupied (resistant)
–


Not based on experiences themselves
But on speaker’s current relationship to the
experiences
–

And, independently, as Unresolved/Disorganized
how they’ve processed their past
Based on the coherence of their discourse
Messinger
39
Discourse coherence

Adherence or violation of Grice’s maxims of
coherent discourse
–
–
–
–

Quality: Have evidence for what you say.
Quantity: Be succinct but complete.
Relation: Be relevant.
Manner: Be clear and orderly.
Helps categorize speakers as autonomous,
dismissing, or preoccupied
–
Disorganized categorized in 3 main categories
Messinger
40
Specifics of the Hypothesized Link


Autonomous parents are sensitively responsive
and promote security
Dismissive parents avoid acknowledging
attachment needs of infants
–

who respond by minimizing attachment needs and
becoming avoidant
Preoccupied parents do not respond to infant
attachment needs predictably
–
Who respond by chronic attempts to achieve security
Messinger
41
Correspondence
Adult state of mind

Autonomous
–


Coherent narrative

Generalized normalizing
without specific examples
–

Lapses in reasoning
Not comforted by parent
Disorganized
–
Messinger
Does not make contact with parent
or express attachment needs
Resistant
–

Soothed by parent
Avoidant
–
Long, entangled narratives
Unresolved
Secure –
Preoccupied
–


Dismissing
–
Infant SS behavior
No coherent strategy
42
Autonomous (secure)

“Presentation and evaluation of attachmentrelated experiences is coherent and
consistent and their responses are clear,
relevant, and reasonably succinct” whether
or not experiences themselves were positive
or negative.
•
Messinger
(van IJzendoorn, 1995, p. 388)
43
Dismissing (Avoidant)

Minimize attachment-related experiences
–

Avoid activating attachment system
Describe parents with positive adjectives
that are unsupported or contradicted by
memories that are recounted
–
Violating the quality maxim
Messinger
44
Preoccupied (Resistant)

Preoccupied by attachment figures and
attachment-related experiences.
–

Attachment system chronically activated
Transcripts tend to be lengthy and
unfocussed
–
Violating the quantity maxim
Messinger
45
Unresolved - Disorganized Link
Unresolved parents are frightened or
frightening in dealing with attachment
issues.
 Infants often respond to a parent who is
threatening rather than comforting with
disorganized attachment behavior

–
No clear strategy.
Messinger
46
Validity of AAI

Classifications are stable
–

Not related to IQ measures
–

2 months, 3 months, 1.5 years
6 of 7 studies
Discourse style relates to attachment
–
not interviews about job
Messinger
47
Parent-Infant
Attachment Correspondence



Meta-analysis of 13 studies using three major
categories
75% secure vs. insecure agreement (K=.49)
70% three-way agreement (K=.46)
–
Prebirth AAI show 69% three-way agreement (K=.44)
•
Bakermans-kranenburg, M. J. & Vanijzendoorn, M. H.
(1993). A Psychometric Study of the Adult Attachment
Interview - Reliability and Discriminant Validity.
Developmental Psychology, 29, 870-879.
Messinger
48
Parent-Infant Correspondence
Parental Attachment
Infant Attachment
Dismissing Autonomous
InsecureAvoidant
Count
(Expected
Count)
Count
Secure
InsecureResistant
(Expected
Count)
Count
(Expected
Count)
Preoccupied
116
46
27
(51.2)
(105.5)
(32.3)
53
304
46
(109.1)
(225.0)
(68.9)
10
19
40
(18.7)
(38.5)
(11.8)
Messinger
52
Parent-Infant
Attachment Correspondence
Meta-analysis of 9 studies (k=9, n=548)
using four major categories
 Secure versus insecure, 74%
 Four-way agreement, 63%

–
Prebirth AAI show 65% four-way agreement
•
Which parent category is not so strong a predictor of
infant category?
Messinger
53
Infant Attachment
Parent-Infant Correspondence
Count
Insecure(Expected
Avoidant
Count)
Count
Secure
(Expected
Count)
Count
Insecure(Expected
Resistant
Count)
Count
Disorgani
(Expected
zed
Count)
Parental Attachment
Dismissing Autonomous Preoccupied Unresolved
62
29
14
11
(23)
24
(58)
210
(10)
14
(25)
39
(57)
3
(144)
9
(25)
10
(62)
6
(6)
19
(14)
26
(3)
10
(6)
62
(23)
(59)
(10)
(25)
Messinger
54
How might link work?

Parental attachment accounted for 12% of
variation in observed parental
responsiveness
–

Meta-analysis of 10 studies (r = .34)
Parental sensitive responsiveness is, in turn,
associated with infant attachment security
–
van Ijzendoorn meta-analysis (r = .22)
Messinger
56
Putting the pieces together
Parent
Internal
Working
Model
r = .34
Sensitive
Responsiveness
r = .22
Attachment
Security
.40
Total Observed association, r = .47
(Direct * Direct) + Indirect = Total
(.34 * .22) + .40 = .47
Messinger
57
Breaking the Link
Parental attachment is not formed by past
experiences but by current orientation to
past.
 Supportive experiences with a partner,
friend or therapist can allow for earned
autonomy in the face of experiences that
would otherwise be associated with
insecurity.

Messinger
58
Interview
Interview a partner about one attachment
figure focusing on questions 2 through 4
 Each person analyzes their own responses

–

no comments form partner
Only share what you want to share
Messinger
59
Adult Attachment Interview
Messinger
60
How to Think About What
You’ve Said

Scales associated with autonomous category
–

Scales associated with dismissing category
–

coherence, metacognitive monitoring
Idealization of attachment figures, insistence on lack of
memory for childhood, dismissal of attachment-related
experience/relationships
Scales associated with preoccupied category
–
anger expressed toward attachment figure,
passivity/vagueness in discourse
Messinger
61
Longitudinal predictors of adult
attachment

Ongoing environmental impacts
–
–
–
continued parental sensitivity
social functioning
friendship
Messinger
62
“What struck me,” said Apted, “is how valuable
the family is. At 56, for people who put energy
into families, there was a big payback.”
Carter
Attachment has important
implications for adult functioning
• But relies on adult self-reported attachment
– Untested core assumption of adult attachment
• Follow up of NICHHD-Early Child Care and
Youth Development @ age 18
– Maternal sensitivity
– Social competence
– Quality of peer relationships
– Fraley, et al., 2013
Carter
Early care impacts later attachment
Fraley, et al., 2013
Est. early
sensitivity
received
Est.
change
in qual.
of care
Father
Social
Maternal
Friendship
Competence
Absence
Competence
Sensitivity
Depression
Quality (M)
(T)
Carter
Temperamental & Genetic Factors
Temperament
Gene & Gene X Environment
No statistically significant
No main effects of genetic
temperamental antecedents of
(serotonin receptor gene)
variables
previously studied
C allele of HTR2A
adult attachment styles
Homozygous = ↑ global
attachment related anxiety
Carter
References

The Adult Attachment Interview:
Historical and Current Perspectives
–

Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant
attachment: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the Adult
Attachment Interview
–


(Hesse, 1999)
(van IJzendoorn, 1995)
Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Schuengel, C., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.
J. (1999). Disorganized attachment in early childhood: Meta-analysis
of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae. Development and
Psychopathology, 11, 225-249.
Instability of infant-parent attachment security.
Belsky, Jay; Campbell, Susan B.; Cohn, Jeffrey F.; Moore, Ginger.
Developmental Psychology. 1996 Sep Vol 32(5) 921-924
Messinger
70