Transcript Slide 1
Bridge Alarm Management
Atle Bulukin - Det Norske Veritas MNBNA379
March 2009
Bridge Alarm Management
Motivation:
The lack of Alarm management
Unimportant alarms
”blindness”
Inconsistent and confusing Alarm Presentation and Handling
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
Safety risk
Distractions and alarm
07 July 2015
Slide 2
Bridge Alarm Management
Outline:
Current International Standards
Current DNV regulations
Future International Standard
Bridge Alarm Management
Current IMO standards:
IMO’s Code on alarm and indicators (Res. A.830(19))
IMO performance standard for Bridge Navigational Watch
Alarm Systems –BNWAS (MSC 128(75))
IMO Guidelines on ergonomic criteria for bridge equipment
and layout (MSC/Circ.982)
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 4
Bridge Alarm Management
Current IMO standards (cont.):
IMO performance standards for the presentation of
navigation-related information on shipborne navigational
displays (Res. MSC.191(79)):
Purpose – harmonizing presentation on navigation displays
- Specifies how alarms shall be presented on individual
equipment
- Visual indication – colours to be used and flashing/
non-flashing
- Audible signals
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 5
Bridge Alarm Management
DNV’s NAUT Notations – General:
Objective – Reduce risk of failure in bridge operations by
addressing the total bridge system
- Technical system, Human operator, Man and Machine Interface, The
Procedures
Verification of compliance
Voluntary
Based on studies of numerous navigation-related casualties.
Centralized handling of certain important navigation-related
alarms was required in NAUT rules already 20 years ago.
Relevant notations: NAUT-AW, NAUT-OC and NAUT-OSV
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 6
Bridge Alarm Management
NAUT Notations
Bridge Alarm Management
DNV’s NAUT Notations – NAUT-AW and NAUT-OC:
Central alarm panel
- Workstations for Traffic Surveillance/ Manoeuvring and Workstation
for Navigation.
- May be integrated in Conning.
- Indicate the source (equipment) of the alarm.
Cancellation
- Source (individual equipment)
- Central alarm panel – i.e. single operator action.
Connected to all major navigation systems
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 8
Bridge Alarm Management
WS for Traffic Surveillance/Manouvering and
WS for Nav
Bridge Alarm Management
DNV’s NAUT Notations – NAUT-OSV:
Central alarm panel required for
- Workstations for Navigation, Navigation support and workstation for
Ship Handling.
- May be integrated in Conning.
Centralization of ALL audible alarm and warnings on the
bridge.
Equipment may be exempted:
- Only alarm when continuously operated
- Equipment or slave units is located at all workstations where central
alarm panel is required.
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 10
Bridge Alarm Management
Digital alarm interfaces:
BAM is heavily dependant on interfacing
Lack of appropriate alarm interfacing
Individual equipment
Central alarm panel
Major obstacle
Relay contacts most common interfacing
- Limited possibilities
- Insufficient for complex alarm interfacing.
NAUT-OSV
- Digital alarm interfaces according to IEC 61162-1 (serial interfaces)
- Alarm (ALR) and Acknowledge (ACK
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 11
Bridge Alarm Management
Digital alarm interfaces (cont.):
The alarm and acknowledge sentences has existed for
several years
Few manufacturers are using them.
- Lack of detailed instructions on the exchange of sentences
- New IEC document IEC 80/520/INF (2008).
Until recently – No requirement of use
Now – Requirement from DNV (NAUT-OSV) and IMO
(Radars, Galileo and lantern controllers)
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 12
Bridge Alarm Management
Future IMO Standards:
Currently - IMO developing Bridge ALERT Management
standard
-
Latest draft - January 2009.
Addresses all alerts presented on and transferred to the
bridge = NAUT-OSV
Two main parts:
General part:
CAM-HMI part:
Engine bridge
Engine bridge
GPS
alarm unit
GMDSS
GPS
GMDSS
CAM-HMI
CAM-HMI
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
alarm unit
07 July 2015
Slide 13
Bridge Alarm Management
Future IMO Standards – General part:
Alerts are classified into the following “priorities”:
- Emergency alarm
- Immediate danger to life or ship.
- Audible signal until acknowledged.
- Example: fire alarm.
- Alarm
- Immediate attention needed to avoid hazard and maintain safe state of the ship.
- Audible signal until acknowledged.
- Example: collision/ ARPA alarm.
- Warning
- Not immediately hazardous, but may become so.
- Single audible signal
- Example: equipment failure.
- Caution
- Informative. Condition or situation that the officer should be aware of.
- No audible signal
- Example: Sailing on un-official charts (Non ENC’s) in ECDIS
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 14
Bridge Alarm Management
Future IMO Standards – General part (cont.):
The draft standard further defines 3 alert categories:
- Category A
- Alerts where a graphical/ situation display is needed to evaluate the risk.
- Can be silenced on both Central Alert unit and equipment giving alert, but
acknowledged only on equipment where the risk can be evaluated.
- Examples: collision and grounding alarms.
- Category B
- Alerts where additional information is not needed to evaluate the risk.
- Can be silenced and acknowledged on both Central Alert unit and on
equipment giving alert.
- Examples: failure alarms.
- Category C
- Alerts that cannot be acknowledged on the bridge. Normally alerts
transferred to the bridge e.g. from engine or cargo control rooms.
- Can be silenced on Central Alert unit, but cannot be acknowledged on
bridge.
- Example: certain alerts from the engine.
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 15
Bridge Alarm Management
Future IMO Standards – CAM-HMI:
Can be integrated into other equipment
All alert should be displayed on the CAM-HMI.
Duplicates the audible signal
Alert messages should be complete, including aids for
decision making.
The CAM-HMI may handle aggregated alerts
In case of failure, a CAM-HMI back-up or individual alert
presentation/ handling is required.
Advanced functionality network communication needed?
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 16
Bridge Alarm Management
Q&A
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved
07 July 2015
Slide 18