Transcript Service Needs and Utilization
Immigrants in the CHAIN NYC and Tri-County Cohorts
Service Needs and Utilization
Needs Assessment Meeting March 24, 2010
CHAIN study participants classified as: born in U.S., born in Puerto Rico, born elsewhere NYCDOH took the lead in defining a set of service domains, service need, and utilization measures Minor differences in need definition between Tri-County and NYC “Need” includes those currently using service “Unmet need” =% without adequate service utilization among those with need for service Compare 2006-2009 with earlier interview period 2001-2006
Background
Female 20-34yrs old
US n= (527)
PLACE OF BIRTH CHAIN COHORT ENROLLED 2001-2002
New York City PR Other US Tri-County Region PR Other (72) (94) (320) (27) (50) 43% 36% 28% 47% 48% 62% 24% 26% 33% 25% 22% 48%
Risk exposure
MSM Problem Drug Use MSM/ PDU Hetero/ Oth 18% 45 9 29 15% 54 8 22
Demographics
33% 16 4 47 18% 47 5 31 4% 63 7 26 10% 10 2 78
Who Needs the Service?
All Individuals
Measure of Adequate Utilization
One or more visits to HIV Primary Care Physician in last six months
Domain: Ambulatory Health Care Service : HIV Primary Care
Need
Always 100%
Adequate Utilization
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2001-2006 2006-2009
NEW YORK CITY
2001-2006 2006-2009
TRI-COUNTY
Trends in HIV Primary Care
US PR Oth
Who Needs the Service?
1. CD4 count< 200 & not on ARV 2. Not completely adherent to ARV meds or 3. Receiving support services for ARV meds
Measure of Adequate Utilization
Receiving support services for taking ARV’s from professional providers
Domain: Ambulatory Health Care Service : ARV Treatment Support
Need for Service:
80% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 47% 38% 38% 29% 48% 40%
New York City
70% 60% 50% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 57% 51% 49% 47%
Tri-County
42% 40% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Adequate Utilization:
2001-2006 2006-2009
NEW YORK CITY
2001-2006 2006-2009
TRI-COUNTY
Trends in ARV Treatment Support
US PR Oth
Who Needs the Service?
1. Self reported poor mental health 2. In last 6 months had an inpatient, emergency room or
mobile unit visit for psychiatric reasons 3. Being homeless or in unstable housing in last 6 months 4. During past year used cocaine, crack or heroin, OR 5. During past 6 months problem drinking Tri-County 100% of PLWHA
Measure of Adequate Utilization
A case manager did one or more of the following last 6 months: -Developed or revised a plan for dealing with needs, -Made referrals for social services, -Helped filling out forms for benefits or entitlements
Domain: Case Management Service : Social Service C.M.
Need for Service:
90% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 59% 48% 65% 54% 51% 44%
New York City
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Tri-County
100% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Adequate Utilization:
2001-2006 2006-2009
NE W YORK CITY
2001-2006 2006-2009
TRI-COUNTY
Trends in Social Service C.M.
US PR Oth
Who Needs the Service?
1. No HIV primary care in the last 6 months 2. Stopped going or no visit to provider in last 6 months 3. Missed more than one appointment in last 6 months 4. No CD4 or VL test in the past 6 months, OR 5. Had any of the above problems at prior interviews AND had a case manager helped in getting or referring for medical services in the last 6 months
Tri-County: 100% of PLWHA
Measure of Adequate Utilization
During the last 6 months a case manager helped in getting or referring for medical services.
Domain: Case Management Service : Medical C.M.
Need for Service:
90% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 69% 54% 51% 47% 58% 47%
New York City
80% 70% 60% 50% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Tri-County
40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Adequate Utilization:
2001-2006 2006-2009
NEW YORK CITY
2001-2006 2006-2009
TRI-COUNTY
Trends in Medical C.M.
US PR Oth
Who Needs the Service?
1. Self reported poor mental health 2. In the 6 months had inpatient, emergency room or mobile unit visit for psychiatric reasons, OR 3. In the last 6 months received counseling from a mental health care professional or clinical social worker
Measure of Adequate Utilization
In the last 6 months received treatment or counseling from a mental health care professional or clinical social worker
Domain: Mental Health Service : Professional Mental Health Services
Need for Service:
90% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 55% 50% 62% 63% 63% 64%
New York City
80% 70% 60% 50% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 57% 54% 67% 60% 48%
Tri-County
50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Adequate Utilization:
2001-2006 2006-2009
NEW YORK CITY
2001-2006 2006-2009
TRI-COUNTY
Trends in Mental Health Services
US PR Oth
Who Needs the Service?
1. During past year used cocaine, crack or heroin, 2. During past 6 months heavy or problem drinking OR 3. Reported receiving drug or alcohol treatment was important
Measure of Adequate Utilization
In last 6 months received any form of alcohol or drug treatment
Service: Alcohol or Drug Treatment
Need for Service: Adequate Utilization:
US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 65% 56% 57% 37% 52% 24%
New York City
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 65% 56% 57% 52% 37%
Tri-County
24% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2001-2006 2006-2009
NEW YORK CITY
2001-2006 2006-2009
TRI-COUNTY
Trends in Alcohol or Drug Treatment
US PR Oth
Who Needs the Service?
In last 6 months reported one or more: 1. Report need for transportation assistance 2. Did not get or delayed getting medical care or social services due to lack of transportation
Measure of Adequate Utilization
In last 6 months, received transportation services.
Service: Transportation
Need for Service:
US PR Oth US PR Oth 2001-06 2006-09 17% 13% 13%
New York City
2001-06 2006-09 33% 25% 37% 27%
Tri-County
11% 18% 7% 15% 16% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Adequate Utilization:
2001-2006 2006-2009 2001-2006
NEW YORK CITY TRI-COUNTY
2006-2009
Trends in Transportation Services
US PR Oth
Service Highest Need Lowest Utilization ARV Treatment Support
NYC Tri-CO
Medical Case Management
NYC Tri-Co
Social Service Case Mgmt
NYC Tri-Co US, OTH US PR, US - PR, US - PR,OTH OTH PR, US US PR, US US
Prof’l Mental Health Services
NYC Tri-CO
Alcohol/Drug Treatment
NYC Tri-Co OTH, PR PR US, PR US, PR PR OTH PR, OTH PR, OTH
Transportation
NYC Tri-Co PR US OTH US
Summary of Differences
Acknowledgements
A Technical Review Team (TRT) provides oversight for the CHAIN Project. In addition to Peter Messeri, PhD, Angela Aidala, PhD, Maiko Yamagido and Maria Caban, MA of Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health, TRT members include, Nina Rothschild, DrPH, Mary Irvine, DrPH, Fabienne Laraque, MD, Yoran Grant, PhD, Daniel Weglein, MD, NYCDOHMH; Julie Lehane, PhD, Tom Petro, Westchester County DOH; Mary Ann Chiasson, DrPH( Chair) and Roberta Scheinmann, MPH, Public Health Solutions.
This presentation based on analyses of CHAIN cohort service needs and patterns of service utilization prepared by Maiko Yomogida and Peter Messeri.
Funding for this research was provide by a grant from the NYCDOHMH as part of its Ryan White CARE Act grant, H89 HA 0015, from the US Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau with the support of the HIV Health and Human Services Planning Council. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the report authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, the City of New York, or Public Health Solutions.