Federal Energy Regulation in the United States An Overview

Download Report

Transcript Federal Energy Regulation in the United States An Overview

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
The
FERC Regulatory Process
Dennis H. Melvin, Esq.
Director – Legal Division (OAL)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Question
• How does FERC decide what a
utility can charge and what
goes into a tariff?
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
2
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
How Does FERC Regulate?
• Industry-wide Decisions
– Notice of Inquiry (NOI)
– Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR)
– Final Rule or Policy Statement
• Company Specific Decisions
– Applications (rate increase, change in a term or
condition of a contract, etc.) or complaints filed by
utilities, customers, interested parties or state
commissions
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
3
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Company Specific Decisions
• Application or complaint filed
• Filing is publicly noticed
• Staff analysis and recommendation to
the Commission (tight deadlines)
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
4
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Company Specific Decisions (con’t)
• Commission action
– Decide merits of case without further
procedures
– Hold a technical conference or call for
more written information
– Hold trial-type hearing before an
Administrative Law Judge
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
5
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
OAL
• Represents the public interest
• Only unbiased party
• The results we seek:
– Lowest rates consistent with a well-run
utility
– Non-discriminatory treatment for all
customers
– Opportunity for utility to earn a fair return
and compete
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
6
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Settlements Are Important
• Prevents the legal system from being
overloaded
• Settlement allows for faster resolution of
disputes
• Parties are usually happier with a
settlement
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
7
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Adjudication Milestones
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1. Judge assigned and Procedural Track set
2. Prehearing/Discovery
3. Prepared Testimony
4. Pre Trial Brief
5. Hearing
6. Initial and Reply Briefs
7. Initial Decision
8. Exceptions Briefs
9. Commission Order & Rehearing
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
8
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone One
• The Chief Judge will:
– Assign an Administrative Law Judge to the
case
– May indicate a deadline for decision
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
9
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone Two
• Prehearing Conference
– Conducted by Presiding Judge assigned
– Scope and timetable to be determined
– Settlement urged, Trial Staff available
• Discovery
– Discovery concerns raised with ALJ
– Procedures established
– Wide range of options
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
10
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Discovery
• Information regularly filed with the agency
• Written questions and answers
• Subpoenas available
– Necessary if non-party data required
– Nationwide reach
• Depositions, Inspections, Audits
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
11
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Protective Orders
• Intent is to safeguard confidential
information
• Order describes how confidential data is
to be handled
• Issued by the Judge
• Everyone must sign and agree to its
terms
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
12
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone Three
• Prepared Testimony
– Prefiled before the hearing
– May contain confidential information and
need special handling
– May be electronically filed
– Several rounds
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
13
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
14
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
15
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone Four
• Pre Trial Brief
– Includes the theory of the case
– Evidence to be presented
– Summary of witnesses’ testimony
– Description of exhibits
– Legal foundation and precedent
– Weaknesses in presentations of others
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
16
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone Five
• Hearing
– Can last one day to many months
– Witnesses sworn, direct testimony and
exhibits admitted, then cross-examination
– Confidential testimony requires special
procedures
– Written transcript made
– Judge ultimately decides admissibility of
evidence
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
17
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
A Hearing Room at the FERC
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
18
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Another Hearing Room
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
19
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone Six
• Initial and Reply Briefs
– Dates set by Presiding ALJ
– Simultaneous unless ordered otherwise
– Must not discuss evidence outside of the
record
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
20
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone Seven
• Initial Decision
– Usually summarizes evidence and
arguments
– Published in FERC Reports
– Certified to Commission with the record
– Always subject to Commission review
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
21
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone Eight
• Briefs On and Opposing Exceptions
– 30 days after ID, 20 days thereafter
– Must be less than 100 pages
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
22
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Milestone Nine
• Commission Order & Rehearing
– No deadlines on Commission action on
Judge’s ruling
– Published in FERC Reports
– Rehearing request must be filed within 30
days
– Further appeals can be made to the court
system
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
23
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Thank you for your attention !
• Dennis H. Melvin, Esq.
» Director, Legal Division
» Office of Administrative Litigation
» Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
» 888 First Street, NE
» Washington, DC 20426
» (202) 502-8042 : Phone
» (202) 208-0188 : FAX
» [email protected]
August 9, 2005
FERC Regulatory Process
24