Transcript MEDIA LAW

MEDIA LAW
Copenhagen University
Session 7
Dirk VOORHOOF
Ghent University
www.psw.ugent.be/dv
(->contact)
Recent restrictive trends in case law ECtHR
Seminar in ECtHR Strasbourg 10 October 2008
Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France (GC), 22 October 2007
Stoll v. Switzerland (Grand Chamber), 10 December 2007
Rumyana Ivanova v. Bulgaria, 14 February 2008
Alithia Publ. Company Ltd. & Constantinides v. Cyprus, 22 May 2008
Backes v. Luxembourg, 8 July 2008
Soulas a.o. v. France, 10 July 2008
Flux (n°6) v. Moldova, 29 July 2008
Cuc Pascu v. Romania, 16 September 2008
Petrina v. Romania, 14 October 2008
and … Denis Leroy v. France, 2 October 2008,
“Reasons for serious concern regarding the future of freedom of
expression in Europe”
See http://www-ircm.u-strasbg.fr/seminaire_oct2008/index.htm
Interesting recent judgments
and decisions


ECtHR 10/3/2009 Times Newspapers v. UK
(Internet Publication Rule not in breach with Art.
10)
ECtHR DECISION 10/2/2009
The Wall Street Journal a.o. v. UK
(onus on defendant to give evidence of
defamatory allegations, presumption of falsity is
not incompatible with Art. 10)
Other interesting recent judgments



ECtHR 02/12/2008
UK v. Finland
(Internet, right of anonymity based on FOE is not
absolute, breach of Art. 8)
ECtHR 16/12/2008
Khursid Mustafa and Tarzabachi v. Sweden
(Satellite antenne installation, right to recieve
TV-programs, end of tenancy agreement,
violation of Article 10)
ECtHR 5/3/2009
Hachette Filipacchi Presse v. France
(Restrictions/sanctions (indirect) advertising for
tobacco products no violation of Art. 10, public
health, minors)
More interesting recent judgments


ECtHR 18/12/2008
Kasakov v. Russia
(Court order to make public apology is in breach
with Art. 10)
ECtHR 26/2/2009
Kudeshkina v. Russia
(whistleblower, judge, manipulation,
interviews in media, dismissal, breach of Article
10)
And one more particular
recent judgment

ECtHR 03/02/2009
Women on Waves v. Portugal
(concerning the Portuguese authorities’ decision
to prohibit the ship Borndiep, which had been
chartered with a view to staging activities
promoting the decriminalisation of abortion, from
entering Portuguese territorial waters. The ship
was banned from entering Portuguese territorial
waters by a ministerial order, on the basis of
maritime law and Portuguese health laws, and its
entry was blocked by a Portuguese warship.
Violation of Art. 10)