Tampa Bay Dredged Material Management Strategy

Download Report

Transcript Tampa Bay Dredged Material Management Strategy

Tampa Harbor
Project
General
Re-evaluation Study
Hydrodynamic
Modeling
Presented by:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Jacksonville District
December 11, 2003
Introduction
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
USACE South Atlantic Division
Directed Jacksonville District to seek
support for modeling tools & procedures
from
• Sponsors
Tampa Port Authority, City of St. Pete
• Other stakeholders
ABM, TBEP, USGS
Outline
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
• Introduction
• Purpose for Hydrodynamic Modeling
• Model Selection
• Alternatives
• Scope of Modeling
• Other Tasks
Introduction
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
• Navigation Projects
Tampa Harbor GRS
St Petersburg GRS
• Previous Corps Funded Hydro Model
Circulation Changes due to Dredge & Fill (Goodwin, ’87,’91)
YBOR
N
PORT
SUTTON
CLEARWATER
PORT
TAMPA
ALAFIA
RIVER
BIG BEND
Gulf
of
Mexico
ST. PETERSBURG
LOCATION MAP
LOCATION MAP
LOCATION MAP
NASSAU
NASSAU
COUNTY
COUNTY
TAMPA HARBOR
PROJECT
TAMPA BAY
PORT MANATEE
Purpose of Hydrodynamic
Modeling
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
• Provide currents to Ship Simulator
• Evaluate changes to circulation/salinity
due to channel modifications
Existing Conditions
• Strong wind, current and tide considerations
• 43-foot deep main Federal channel by 500-foot wide (Cut A-F)
• Increased vessel sizes and port calls
• Vessel accident history from 1980 resulting in loss of life,
navigation delays & environmental damage
• Tampa Bay Safety Guidelines Committee established
• Vessel Handling Guidelines for Movement established
• Commerce light-loaded, traffic flow impeded, navigation delays
• Tampa Harbor Safety Zones established
• Tampa Harbor Security Zones established
Model Selection
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
• Criteria
• Model Types
Structured Grid
Represent Channel Mods
Local Mass Conservation
Orthogonal – ECOM, EFDC
Boundary Fitted – CH3D
Nested – Mike2/3
Unstructured Grid
Finite Element – ADCIRC, RMA, MIKE FM
Finite Volume – UnTrim, ELCIRC, FVCOM
MIKE FM, Delft
Structured Grids
Structured Grids
Unstructured Grids
UnTrim (Casulli & Walters 2000)
MIKE FM/FV (DHI)
• Unstructured grid
• MIKE Zero
• Mass Conservation
• (Sediment Transport)
• Stability independent of
surface wave speed
• (Water Quality)
• Degenerate to 2D & 1D
• (Ecolab)
• Flooding & Drying
• Stability dep. Surface wave
speed
• Proprietary
• Proprietary
ELCIRC (Oregon Grad Institute 2001)
• Open Source
Alternatives
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
• Six preliminary plans
• 2 to 6 alternatives for each
Preliminary Alternative Plans
Orchid
Daisy
Rose
Zinnia
Violet
Iris
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
Scope of Modeling
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
• Model Simulations
Calibration & Verification (existing data)
Existing Conditions – Base year w/o project (future w/o ?)
Three Alternative Project Plans
•
Time Scales
Project Alternative Optimization – 30 days
Impacts to Circulation & Salinity – Seasonal (3-4 months)
• OLD
Revised Scope
A re-evaluation of the entire harbor project
Feasibility-level study
• NEW
Main ship channel congestion relief measures
- Anchorage areas
- Loop channel
- Non-structural alternatives
Other Tasks
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
• Ship Simulator - optimize channel design
• Channel Shoaling- Diagnostic Modeling System
• PORTSIM-
queuing model/ economic analysis
• Ship Wake Analysis - potential impact on seagrass
• Harbor Oscillation – limited to local areas
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Jacksonville District
Thank You
Point of contact:
Steve Bratos
904-232-1824
[email protected]
Project Schedule
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study
• 1 Mar 04 -
Tampa & St Pete
Calibration / Verification
Existing Condition
• 1 April 04 - Alternatives (~ 3 model simulations)
• 1 Jun 04 - Recommended Plan, Locally Preferred Plan
Vessel Calls & Cargo Type
Tampa Distribution of Calls by Vessel & Cargo Type CY 2001
VESSELL TYPE
Cruise Ships
General Cargo Ships
Bulk Carriers & Barges
Tankers & Barges
CARGO TYPE
% OF CALLS
Passengers
6%
Break Bulk, Neo-bulk,
Containerized
18%
Dry Bulk
29%
Petroleum Products
47%
Environmental Resources
Diverse, high quality fish & wildlife resources within Tampa Bay
• Bethnic Resources
 Seagrass - beds extensive; high value fisheries nursery
 Soft bottom – sand/muck (80%)
 Hardbottom – invertebrate & fish habitat (850 acres)
 West Indian Manatee – extensive protection zones (FWS, DEP, FWC)
• Estuarine Resources
 Marshes & mangroves – fisheries habitat
 Mud flats & salt barrens – microscopic organisms fuel for Bay productivity
 Associated uplands – foraging, nesting, loafing habitat (bald eagle, osprey,
wood storks)
 Low salinity habitats – oysters thrive
“Charting the Course,” CCMP for Tampa Bay, December 1996
Study Guidance
• ER 1105-2-100 - “Revised Planning Guidance Notebook”
• ER 1165-2-1 - “Digest of Water Resources Policies & Authorities”
• EM 1110-2-1613 - “Navigation Design Safety Component”
• ER 1165-2-131 – “Over Depth Dredging”
• EC 1165-2-203 – “Internal Technical Reviews”
• USCG 33 CFR 165 – “Security Zones”
• Port of Tampa Authority Input
• Tampa Harbor Pilot Association Input
Vessel Tonnage & Movement
CY 2001 Tampa Area Ports’ Tonnage and Vessel Movements *
TAMPA AREA PORTS
Tampa
CY 2001 SHORT TONS
CY 2001 INBOUND &
OUTBOUND TRIPS
45,793,544
6,930
Port Manatee
3,801,621
654
Weedon Island
1,038,674
124
St. Petersburg
52,000
852
50,685,839
8,560
Total
* WBC of the U.S., CY 2001, Part 2 – Waterways and Harbors, Gulf Coast,
Mississippi River System and Antilles
Critical Milestones
• Begin study
4/11/02
• Feasibility Scoping meeting
9/16/03
• Complete Draft GRR
6/30/04
• Alternative Formulation Briefing
9/13/04
• Project Guidance Memorandum Comments
10/26/04
• Release Draft GRR to the Public
2/9/05
• Complete Public Coordination Period
4/7/05
• Submit Final GRR to MSC *
7/19/05
• Division Commander’s Public Notice (begin design phase) 03/10/06
• Authorization Water Resources Development Act of 2006
• Begin construction
2007
• Complete construction
(tentative) 2010