Applications of Geostationary Data for Operational Forest

Download Report

Transcript Applications of Geostationary Data for Operational Forest

Applications of Geostationary Data for Operational Forest Fire Monitoring in Brazil

Global Geostationary Fire Monitoring Applications Workshop EUMETSAT Darmstadt, Germany March 23-25

Wilfrid Schroeder 1 João Antônio Raposo Pereira 1 Alberto Setzer 2 1 PROARCO/IBAMA 2 CPTEC/INPE [email protected]

Current Status of Fire Monitoring in Brazil • INPE is currently running fire detection for AVHRR (NOAA-12; NOAA-16), MODIS (Terra; Aqua), GOES-12 • IBAMA runs GOES-12 and DMSP fire products • On going agreement towards “the more the better” as many real cases suggest that • Integration of different data sets using GIS tools

Geostationary Data Use in Brazil • IBAMA is running CIRA’s RAMSDIS system since July 2000 – fire monitoring nearly 100% based on visual analysis of imagery (reflectivity product: ch2,ch4) – fire data from automatic processing still of limited use • CPTEC/INPE is running own algorithm since August 2002 – fire monitoring mostly based on data from automatic processing – limited visual analyses of imagery (except during algorithm tune up)

IBAMA’s July 2000 – Implementation of CIRA’s RAMSDIS system based on GOES-8 data & McIDAS OS/2 Warp GOES Fire Detection Algorithm Cloud Masking

Tb 4 >= 2ºC

Potential Fires

Night: Tb 2 > 17ºC Day: Tb 2 > 41ºC

Statistics

1 4 6 2 X 7 3 5 8

Day: (B i -B x )/B x >=0.25) Night: (B i -B x )/B x >=0.10) 6 out of 8 Sunglint Model (S o ZA-S a ZA >15 o ) +/- 5 o lat Persistence For visualization only

April 2003: Transition to Win2000 – GOES-12

Pros  Great results from visual image interpretation (reflectivity product)  Major fire events are 100% detectable  System provides fast response in many different cases Northern Sectors Southern Sector

Output Sample File Lat 13.97

13.95

13.25

12.87

12.57

12.53

12.22

12.19

Lon -90.41

-89.15

-87.41

-87.13

-87.11

-70.01

-71.8

-86.39

SZA 43.73

42.91

41.28

40.8

40.56

32.49

32.73

39.82

50 51 47 50 CH4 43 49 50 49 29 30 23 31 CH2 27 31 31 28 D D D D Day/Night CH4_thre CH2_thre Perc_dif Num_pix D D D D 86 86 86 86 32 32 32 32 0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

6 6 6 6 86 86 86 86 32 32 32 32 0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

6 6 6 6

Automatic Fire Detection – Case Study Roraima 28 Jan 2003

Automatic Fire Detection – Regional Scale 28 Jan 2003

Automatic Fire Detection – Continental Scale 28 Jan 2003

CPTEC/INPE Approach – Fire (by A. Setzer) Albedo (Ch1) 0.65  m 0 – 3% Tb (Ch2) 3.9

 m Tb (Ch4) 10.7  m Tb2-Tb4 > 308.15K (35 o C) > 263.15K (-10 o C) > 16K (16 o C) 3 – 12% 12 – 24% > 318.15K (45 o C) > 263.15K (-10 o C) < 308.15K (35 o C) > 22K (22 o C) > 323.15K (50 o C) > 263.15K (-10 o C) < 303.15K (30 o C) > 25K (25 o C)

CPTEC/INPE Approach – Non-fire (by A. Setzer) Surface Characteristics: (i) Reflectivity (albedo) > 24% (ii) Water: 21x21 matrix having at least one pixel over 80% (iii) Water: 21x21 matrix having at least one pixel over 60% and Tb4 > 15K (iv) Reflective soils: 9x9 matrix having 25% of pixels with Tb2 > 45 o C (v) Clouds: 3x3 matrix having 75% of pixels with albedo > 24% Image Characteristics: (i) Night detection having over 300 hot spots (ii) 50 hot spot night time increase from latest synoptic hour (iii) Over 2000 hot spots during day time images (10:45h-23:45UTC) Bad lines: (i) Any line having 10+ hot spots over ocean waters (ii) 50 neighbour pixels processed as fire (iii) 300 hot spots along the same line (iv) 97% of Vis Channel pixels having DN=0

CPTEC/INPE Web Product

CPTEC/INPE Web Product

Output Sample File Nr 1 Lat 0.95

Lon -62.7167

LatDMS N 0 57 0.00

LongDMS O 62 43 0.00

Date Time 20040207 84500 Sat Mun GOES-12 Barcelos State Country AM Brasil Veg Suscept Prec DWR Risk Persist OmbrofilaDensa BAIXA 24 0 0.1

0 2 1.1

-62.7333

N 1 6 0.00

O 62 43 60.00 20040207 84500 GOES-12 Barcelos AM Brasil OmbrofilaDensa BAIXA 24 0 0.1

0 3 -12.9167 -38.6167

S 12 55 0.00 O 38 37 0.00

20040207 114500 GOES-12 Itaparica BA Brasil OmbrofilaDensa BAIXA 23.6 0 0 0 4 -9.383

-38.2333

S 9 22 60.00 O 38 13 60.00 20040207 114500 GOES-12 Paulo Afonso BA Brasil NaoFloresta 5 -8.55

-40.2

S 8 33 0.00 O 40 12 0.00

20040207 114500 GOES-12 Lagoa Grande PE Brasil NaoFloresta MEDIA MEDIA 0.9 10 0 10 0.8

0.9

0 0 6 -7.983

-40.3167

S 7 58 60.0 O 40 19 0.00

20040207 114500 GOES-12 Ouricuri 7 -0.016

-62.6167

S 0 1 0.00

O 62 37 0.00

20040207 144500 GOES-12 Barcelos 8 -0.016

-62.6333

S 0 1 0.00

O 62 37 60.00 20040207 144500 GOES-12 Barcelos 9 0 -62.6333

S 0 0 0.00 O 62 37 60.00 20040207 144500 GOES-12 Barcelos 10 0.05

-62.6167

N 0 3 0.00 O 62 37 0.00 20040207 144500 GOES-12 Barcelos PE Brasil AM Brasil AM Brasil AM Brasil AM Brasil NaoFloresta NaoFloresta Contato Contato NaoFloresta MEDIA BAIXA BAIXA BAIXA 27.5 0 27.5 0 BAIXA 5 5 0 10 9 9 0 0.9

0.4

0 0.4

0 0 0 0 0

Automatic Fire Detection – Case Study

Noaa_12 Noaa_16 MODIS GOES-12

Barcelos Amazonas 2004 Total area burned:18000ha

Automatic Fire Detection – Case Study Fire in Barcelos Jan-Feb 2004 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2 0 0 4 0 1 2 6 2 0 0 4 0 1 2 7 2 0 0 4 0 1 2 8 2 0 0 4 0 1 2 9 2 0 0 4 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 4 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 5 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 6 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 7 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 8 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 9 2 0 0 4 0 2 1 0 T o ta l M is si n g Noaa_16 Noaa_12 MODIS GOES

Automatic Fire Detection – Continental Scale

Conclusions • Image usefulness for visual identification of fires is outstanding and proves to be essential to any operational fire monitoring system • Overall performance of automatic detection is still questionable • Balancing “conservative” x “liberal” algorithms/thresholds would be desirable – is it attainable?

• Field validation should be reinforced and aimed by different groups – let’s optimize efforts and resources • If we are to consider realistic numbers of active fires being detected, we must continue (and improve) use of geostationary imagery integrating their fire products to other systems (polar orbiting)