Transcript Slide 1
Proportional Control and Disturbance Changes
Chapter 11
From Fig. 11.16 and Eq. 11-29 the closed-loop transfer function
for disturbance changes with proportional control is
K p / τs 1
H s
Q1 s 1 KOL / τs 1
(11-53)
H s
K2
Q1 s τ1s 1
(11-54)
Rearranging gives
where τ1 is defined in (11-39) and K2 is given by
K2
Kp
1 KOL
(11-55)
1
• A comparison of (11-54) and (11-37) indicates that both closedloop transfer functions are first-order and have the same time
constant.
Chapter 11
• However, the steady-state gains, K1 and K2, are different.
• From Eq. 11-54 it follows that the closed-loop response to a
step change in disturbance of magnitude M is given by
h t K2 M 1 et / τ1
(11-56)
0
The offset can be determined from Eq. 11-56. Now hsp
since we are considering disturbance changes and h K 2 M
for a step change of magnitude M.
Thus,
offset 0 h K 2 M
K pM
1 KOL
(11-57)
2
Chapter 11
Figure 11.19 Load responses for Example 11.3.
3
Chapter 11
PI Control and Disturbance Changes
For PI control, Gc s Kc 1 1/ τ I s . The closed-loop transfer
function for disturbance changes can then be derived from Fig.
11.16:
K p / τs 1
H s
(11-58)
Q1 s 1 KOL 1 1/ τ I s / τs 1
Clearing terms in the denominator gives
K pτ I s
H s
Q1 s τ I s τs 1 KOL τ I s
(11-59)
Further rearrangement allows the denominator to be placed in the
standard form for a second-order transfer function:
H s
K3 s
2 2
Q1 s τ3 s 2ζ3τ3s 1
(11-60)
4
Chapter 11
where
K3 τ I / K c K v K m
(11-61)
1 1 KOL
ζ3
2 KOL
(11-62)
τI
τ
τ3 ττ I / KOL
(11-63)
For a unit step change in disturbance, Q1 s 1/ s , and (11-59)
becomes
K3
H s 2 2
(11-64)
τ3 s 2ζ 3τ3 s 1
For 0 ζ 3 1 , the response is a damped oscillation that can be
described by
h t
eζ 3t / τ3 sin 1 ζ 32 t / τ3
1 ζ 32
K3
τ3
(11-65)
5
6
Chapter 11
PI Control of an Integrating Process
Consider the liquid-level control system shown in Fig. 11.22. This
system differs from the previous example in two ways:
Chapter 11
1. the exit line contains a pump and
2. the manipulated variable is the exit flow rate rather than an
inlet flow rate.
In Section 5.3 we saw that a tank with a pump in the exit stream
can act as an integrator with respect to flow rate changes because
H s
1
Gp s
Q3 s
As
(11-66)
H s
1
Gd s
Q1 s
As
(11-67)
7
Chapter 11
Figure 11.22 Liquid-level control system with pump in exit line.
8
Chapter 11
If the level transmitter and control valve in Eq. 11.22 have
negligible dynamics, the Gm(s) = Km and Gv(s) = Kv. For PI
control, Gc s Kc 1 1/ τ I s . Substituting these expressions
into the closed-loop transfer function for disturbance changes
H s
Gd
Q1 s 1 GcGvG pGm
(11-68)
and rearranging gives
H s
K4 s
2 2
Q1 s τ 4 s 2ζ 4 τ 4 s 1
(11-69)
K4 τ / Kc Kv K m
(11-70)
τ 4 τ I / KOL
(11-71)
ζ 4 0.5 KOL τ I
(11-72)
where
And KOL = KcKvKpKm with Kp = - 1/A.
9
Stability of Closed-Loop Control Systems
Chapter 11
Example 11.4
Consider the feedback control system shown in Fig. 11.8 with
the following transfer functions:
Gc K c
1
G p Gd
5s 1
1
Gv
2s 1
1
Gm
s 1
(11-73)
(11-74)
Show that the closed-loop system produces unstable responses if
controller gain Kc is too large.
10
Chapter 11
Figure 11.23. Effect of controller gains on closed-loop
response to a unit step change in set point (example 11.1).
11