Transcript NELAC and EPA PE Program Privatization Update
QA/QC Considerations for Sampling and Analysis Associated with EPA Method 1631
Chuck Wibby Wibby Environmental
Seminar on Low Level Mercury Data and Analyses
Boulder, Colorado September 23, 2004
Presentation Overview
General overview of lab QA/QC Sampling considerations Facility considerations Method 1631 QA/QC requirements PT requirments Summary
Hardcopy of presentation
www.wibby.com
[email protected]
303-940-0033
Basic QA/QC Approach
Ref: John Taylor, “Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements” Lewis Publishers, 1987 Artisan Based on expertise of person completing the task Academic research Chef Good approach in a non-regulatory situation Small one, two person laboratories
Basic QA/QC Approach
Systematic Dependent on Quality System Independent of person performing task Cook book approach Documentation – lots of it Results can be reviewed Usually required in regulatory situation
Sampling considerations
EPA Method 1669 Can’t be emphasized enough “The ease of contaminating ambient water samples…cannot be overemphasized.” – Section 1.4
Sample bottles from commercial vendor or produced per Section 6.1.2
Sample bottle considerations
Example: ESS Glass (Hg only) or Teflon containers washed per the method with detergent, trace grade nitric acid and Milli Q DI rinsing with drying in a “Low Particle” oven.
Bottles available with preservation; HCl or Bromine monochloride.
Analyze these containers by lot by method 1631 to <0.15 ng/L. The analytical report is provided with the containers.
Bottles double bagged.
Containers
Lab considerations
Ref: Hampton Roads Sanitation District – Virginia Beach, Virginia Use a dedicated room Doesn’t have to be a clean room Simply dedicated to low level Hg Use a Class 100 clean bench to produce reagents, standards and samples Bake KBrO using it to produce bromine monochloride solution 3 for 8 hours at 250 o C prior to
Lab considerations
Disposable tubes on autosampler Rinsed with high purity water Glassware washing Soak in 1:1 nitric for at least 24 hours Rinse with high purity water Use immediately Bubble argon though stannous chloride for 30 minutes prior to starting Continue to bubble argon through stannous chloride during analysis
Method 1631 QA/QC
Contamination Control Section 4.3
Interferences Section 4.4
Reagents and Standards Section 7.0
Sample Collection, Preservation and Storage Section 8.0
Section 9.0 QC
Changes to method – Section 9.1.2
“ 9.1.2 In recognition of advances…the analyst is permitted certain options to improve results or lower the cost of measurements. These options include automation of the dual-amalgamation system, single-trap amalgamation (Reference 14), direct electronic data acquisition, calibration using gas-phase elemental Hg standards, changes in the bubbler design (including substitution of a flow-injection system) to maximize throughput, or changes in the detector (i.e., CVAAS), where less sensitivity is acceptable or desired. Changes in the principle of the determinative technique, such as the use of colorimetry, are not allowed. If an analytical technique other than the CVAFS technique specified in this method is used, that technique must have a specificity for mercury equal to or better than the specificity of the technique in this method.”
Method 1631
QC by batch 1 – 20 samples Same 12 hour shift
Method 1631
Batch – Section 9.1.7
Three blanks Five calibration standards Ongoing precision and recovery (OPR) Quality control sample Method blank Seven samples
Method 1631
Batch (continued) Method blank Three samples Matrix spike/Matrix spike duplicate Four samples Method blank Six samples Matrix spike/Matrix spike duplicate Ongoing Precision and Recovery
Method 1631
Initial Demonstration of Capability Section 9.2
Method Detection Limit – equal to or less than 0.5 ng/L (Section 9.2.1) Initial precision and recovery (Section 9.2.2) 79 – 121% (Accuracy) 21% RSD (Precision) Four replicates
Method 1631
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate – Section 9.3
Spike at 1-5 times the sample concentration 71 – 125 % (accuracy) 24% RSD (precision)
Method 1631
Blanks – Section 9.4
Bubbler blanks System blanks Reagent blanks Method blanks Field blanks Equipment blanks Bottle blanks
Method 1631
Ongoing precision and recovery (Section 9.5) 77 – 123% (Accuracy) Same source as that used for calibration ICV/CCV
Method 1631
Quality control sample (Section 9.6) No limits specified in method Suggestion is to use OPR limits Different source than that used for calibration, external to lab or made internally from second source Wibby Environmental QC-UTM-WP, $95 QC-UHG-WP, $65
Method 1631
Field duplicates (Section 9.7) May be required to meet project specific requirements
Method 1631
Calibration (Section 10) Very specific requirements that must be met Should review and be familiar with requirements
PT Requirements
Necessary for accreditation Once a year or twice a year Levels much higher than trace levels 0.5 – 30 ug/L (WP) 0.5 – 10 ug/L (WS) Method 1631 0.005 – 0.100 ug/L Acceptance criteria different Approximately + 24% (WP) + 30% (WS)
Thank You!
Chuck Wibby
Wibby Environmental 6390 Joyce Drive, #100 Golden, CO 80403 303-940-0033 [email protected]
www.wibby.com