Transcript Document
Keeping your Automated Devices Alive CenterPoint Energy’s IG Deployment Lessons Learned John Rush CenterPoint Energy Crew Leader- Intelligent Grid Deployment SWEDE Austin, TX May 1-3, 2013 Automation History CenterPoint Energy (CNP) has had automation in place for over 40 years 1970’s - Substation relays - SCADA 1980’s - Remote Control Reclosers & Pole Top Switches Distribution Automated Control System (DACS) 1990’s - Loop Sectionalizing - DACS 2010 – Department of Energy/CNP IG construction project begins 2010 - 18 IGSDs installed 2011 - 183 IGSDs installed; year end = 201 2012 - 183 IGSDs installed; year end = 384 DACS converted to Distribution Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (DSCADA) 2013 - 21 IGSDs installed to date, 4/11/2013 Legacy DACS Maintenance Program Date Reported 5/12/2011 Totals Number of Out of Service Duration Out of Service Duration Out of Service Duration Devices Out (Less than 30 days) (30-90 days) (Greater than 90 days) 91 32 17 42 Legacy DACS Maintenance Improvements DSCADA equipment monitored by Telecommunication & Control Systems Orgs SAP Notifications Intelligent Distribution Device (IDD) work orders dispatched via Mobile Data Distribution techs are DSCADA first responders System oversight and 30 day restoration metric Date Reported Number of Out of Service Duration Out of Service Duration Out of Service Duration 3/12/2013 Devices Out (Less than 30 days) (30-90 days) (Greater than 90 days) Totals 11 11 0 0 Intelligent Grid Deployment ≈ 31 Substation Upgrades ≈ 180 Distribution Circuits ≈ 600 Intelligent Grid Switching Devices (IGSD) ≈ 420K Customers Construction Schedule 5,000 Square Miles 2.3M Customers 16.4 GW Peak 14-19 installations per week 67% Complete YE 2012 100% by YE 2013 Challenges and Opportunities New Technology Multiple Vendors (5 IGSD combinations) Failures & Material Issues Firmware Dual communication requirements Distribution SCADA (DSCADA) Volume of installations demanded higher expectations Documentation of issues into a multi-departmental log Training Distribution Operations techs required training on new installations and maintenance of devices QA/QC Vendors Vendor Audits Audit Reports Factory visits CNP provided feedback Good/Best practices Gaps and improvement recommendations Issue Resolution Return Material Authorization (RMA) Reports CNP encourages transparency with ALL issues Encourage synergy between CNP and Vendors during acceptance and installation QA/QC CNP Logistics New Pallet design (Facilitates Testing and Shipping) Shops Itemized checklist (Tester’s signature) Hi-Pot, Current Injection, and Relay Testing Communication & DSCADA Testing Kit (Distribution material palletized with IGSD) QA/QC CNP (Cont.) Field Installation and Commissioning DPD crew and Telecom tech onsite DPD crew and Distribution Controller partner to commission IGSD IGSD Commissioning Document QC Each site is independently inspected IGSD QC report Issue Log & Documentation All issues are documented into a central issue log Risk Management provides oversight IGSD Test Farm IGSD Test Farm Availability Report 4-11-13 Operational Opportunities Improved System Reliability Critical Infrastructure is only out of service for short periods of time Existing Manual Switch replaced by IGSD within 2 days Existing IGSDs are out of service less than 14 days Efficiencies Gained IGSDs are fully tested prior to installation IGSDs are communicating upon construction completion (87%) Kits require less hot shot deliveries Early issue/problem detection Defined, Repeatable, and Scalable Processes DOE Acknowledgement and Disclaimer Per the DOE Grant Agreement,: “If you publish or otherwise make publicly available the results of the work conducted under the award, an acknowledgment of Federal Support and a disclaimer must appear in the publication of any material, whether copyrighted or not, based on or developed under this project, as follows:” Acknowledgment: “This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number [DE-OE0000210]” Disclaimer: “This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Referenced herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinion of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.” 12