Transcript Document
Keeping your Automated Devices Alive
CenterPoint Energy’s IG Deployment Lessons Learned
John Rush
CenterPoint Energy
Crew Leader- Intelligent Grid Deployment
SWEDE
Austin, TX
May 1-3, 2013
Automation History
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) has had automation in place
for over 40 years
1970’s - Substation relays - SCADA
1980’s - Remote Control Reclosers & Pole Top Switches Distribution Automated Control System (DACS)
1990’s - Loop Sectionalizing - DACS
2010 – Department of Energy/CNP IG construction project begins
2010 - 18 IGSDs installed
2011 - 183 IGSDs installed; year end = 201
2012 - 183 IGSDs installed; year end = 384
DACS converted to Distribution Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (DSCADA)
2013 - 21 IGSDs installed to date, 4/11/2013
Legacy DACS Maintenance Program
Date Reported
5/12/2011
Totals
Number of Out of Service Duration Out of Service Duration Out of Service Duration
Devices Out
(Less than 30 days)
(30-90 days)
(Greater than 90 days)
91
32
17
42
Legacy DACS Maintenance Improvements
DSCADA equipment monitored by Telecommunication & Control
Systems Orgs
SAP Notifications
Intelligent Distribution Device (IDD) work orders dispatched via
Mobile Data
Distribution techs are DSCADA first responders
System oversight and 30 day restoration metric
Date Reported Number of Out of Service Duration Out of Service Duration Out of Service Duration
3/12/2013
Devices Out (Less than 30 days)
(30-90 days)
(Greater than 90 days)
Totals
11
11
0
0
Intelligent Grid Deployment
≈ 31 Substation
Upgrades
≈ 180 Distribution
Circuits
≈ 600 Intelligent
Grid Switching
Devices (IGSD)
≈ 420K Customers
Construction
Schedule
5,000 Square Miles
2.3M Customers
16.4 GW Peak
14-19 installations
per week
67% Complete YE
2012
100% by YE 2013
Challenges and Opportunities
New Technology
Multiple Vendors (5 IGSD combinations)
Failures & Material Issues
Firmware
Dual communication requirements
Distribution SCADA (DSCADA)
Volume of installations demanded higher expectations
Documentation of issues into a multi-departmental log
Training
Distribution Operations techs required training on new installations
and maintenance of devices
QA/QC Vendors
Vendor Audits
Audit Reports
Factory visits
CNP provided feedback
Good/Best practices
Gaps and improvement recommendations
Issue Resolution
Return Material Authorization (RMA) Reports
CNP encourages transparency with ALL issues
Encourage synergy between CNP and Vendors during acceptance
and installation
QA/QC CNP
Logistics
New Pallet design (Facilitates Testing and Shipping)
Shops
Itemized checklist (Tester’s signature)
Hi-Pot, Current Injection, and Relay Testing
Communication & DSCADA Testing
Kit (Distribution material palletized with IGSD)
QA/QC CNP (Cont.)
Field Installation and Commissioning
DPD crew and Telecom tech onsite
DPD crew and Distribution Controller partner to commission IGSD
IGSD Commissioning Document
QC Each site is independently inspected
IGSD QC report
Issue Log & Documentation
All issues are documented into a central issue log
Risk Management provides oversight
IGSD Test Farm
IGSD Test Farm
Availability Report 4-11-13
Operational Opportunities
Improved System Reliability
Critical Infrastructure is only out of service for short periods of time
Existing Manual Switch replaced by IGSD within 2 days
Existing IGSDs are out of service less than 14 days
Efficiencies Gained
IGSDs are fully tested prior to installation
IGSDs are communicating upon construction completion (87%)
Kits require less hot shot deliveries
Early issue/problem detection
Defined, Repeatable, and Scalable Processes
DOE Acknowledgement and
Disclaimer
Per the DOE Grant Agreement,:
“If you publish or otherwise make publicly available the results of the work conducted under
the award, an acknowledgment of Federal Support and a disclaimer must appear in the
publication of any material, whether copyrighted or not, based on or developed under this
project, as follows:”
Acknowledgment: “This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy
under Award Number [DE-OE0000210]”
Disclaimer: “This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the
United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof,
nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal
liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information,
apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe
privately owned rights. Referenced herein to any specific commercial product, process, or
service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute
or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or
any agency thereof. The views and opinion of authors expressed herein do not necessarily
state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.”
12