Transcript Document

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004

Observational Cosmology: 4.

Cosmological Distance Scale

Cosmological Distance Scale

The distance scale path has been a long and tortuous one, but with the imminent launch of HST there seems good reason to believe that the end is finally in sight

.”

— Marc Aaronson (1950-1987) 1985 Pierce Prize Lecture).

1

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.1: Distance Indicators

Distance Indicators • Measurement of distance is very important in cosmology • However measurement of distance is very difficult in cosmology • Use a

Distance Ladder

from our local neighbourhood to cosmological distances   Primary Distance Indicators  Secondary Distance Indicators direct distance measurement (in our own Galaxy)  Rely on primary indicators to measure more distant object.

Rely on Primary Indicators to calibrate secondary indicators!

2

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.1: Distance Indicators

Distance Indicators •

Primary Distance Indicators

• Radar Echo Parallax • Moving Cluster Method • Main-Sequence Fitting • Spectroscopic Parallax • RR-Lyrae stars • Cepheid Variables • Galactic Kinematics

Secondary Distance Indicators

• Tully-Fisher Relation • Fundamental Plane • Supernovae • Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect • HII Regions • Globular Clusters • Brightest Cluster Member • Gravitationally Lensed QSOs • Surface Brightness Fluctuations 3

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Primary Distance Indicators

Primary Distance Indicators

• • Radar Echo Parallax • Moving Cluster Method • Main-Sequence Fitting • Spectroscopic Parallax • RR-Lyrae stars • Cepheid Variables • Galactic Kinematics 4

2020/4/26 Radar Echo Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

• Within Solar System, distances measured, with great accuracy, by using radar echo • (radio signals bounced off planets).

• Only useful out to a distance of ~ 10 AU beyond which, the radio echo is too faint to detect.

d

 1 2

c

t

1 AU = 149,597,870,691 m

 5

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Trigonometric Parallax • Observe a star six months apart,(opposite sides of Sun) • Nearby stars will shift against background star field • Measure that shift. Define parallax angle as half this shift QuickTime™ and a Animation decompressor are needed to see this picture.

6

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Trigonometric Parallax • Observe a star six months apart,(opposite sides of Sun) • Nearby stars will shift against background star field • Measure that shift. Define parallax angle as half this shift

d d

 1

AU

tan

p rads

 1

p AU p



1 AU

1 radian = 57.3

o = 206265"

d

 1

p rads AU

 206265

p



AU

Define a parsec (pc) which is simply 1 pc = 206265 AU =3.26ly

.

A parsec is the distance to a star which has a parallax angle of 1"

 Nearest star - Proxima Centauri is at 4.3 light years =1.3 pc  Smallest parallax angles currently measurable ~ 0.001"   parallax 0.8" 1000 parsecs parallax is a distance measure for the local solar neighborhood. 7

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Trigonometric Parallax The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission Precise measurement of the positions, parallaxes and proper motions of the stars. •Mission Goals - measure astrometric parameters 120 000 primary programme stars to precision of 0.002” - measure astrometric and two-colour photometric properties of 400 000 additional stars (Tycho Expt.) •Launched by Ariane, in August 1989, • ~3 year mission terminated August 1993.

•Final Hipparcos Catalogue • 120 000 stars •Limiting Magnitude V=12.4mag •complete fro V=7.3-9mag •Astrometry Accuracy 0.001” •Parallax Accuracy 0.002” 8

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Trigonometric Parallax • GAIA MISSION (ESA launch 2010 - lifetime ~ 5 years) • Measure positions, distances, space motions, characteristics of one billion stars in our Galaxy.

• Provide detailed 3-d distributions & space motions of all stars, complete to V=20 mag to <10 -6 ”.

• Create a 3-D map of Galaxy. 9

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Secular Parallax Used to measure distance to stars, assumed to be approximately the same distance from the Earth. Mean motion of the Solar system is 20 km/s relative to the average of nearby stars  corresponding relative proper motion,

d

q

/dt

away from point of sky the Solar System is moving toward.

This point is known as the apex For anangle q to the apex, the proper motion

d

q

/dt

Plot

d

q

/dt - sin(

q

)

 slope

=

m will have a mean component 

sin(

q

)

(perpendicular to

v sun

) The mean distance of the stars is

d

v sun

m 

4.16

m

(" /

yr

)

pc

4.16 for Solar motion in au/yr. green stars show a small mean distance red stars show a large mean distance  Statistical Parallax If stars have measured radial velocities,  scatter in proper motions

d

q

/dt

can be used to determine the mean distance.

d

 

v

q

r

v r

in pc/s

q

in rad/s

10 

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Moving Cluster Method v C v r q v t

d

q Observe cluster some years apart  proper motion m Radial Velocity (km/s)

v R

Tangential Velocity (km/s) from spectral lines

v T

 4.74

m

d

m (“/yr) Stars in cluster move on parallel paths  perceptively appear to move towards common convergence point (Imagine train tracks or telegraph poles disappearing into the distance) Distance to convergence point is given by q 

v T v R

 

v C v C

sin cos

q q    

d

4.74

v R

m

tan

q Main method for measuring distance to Hyades Cluster ~ 200 Stars (Moving Cluster Method  One of the first “rungs” on the Cosmological Distance Ladder c.1920: 40 pc (130 ly)  Hipparcos parallax measurement 46.3pc (151ly) for the Hyades distance. 45.7 pc).

11

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Moving Cluster Method Ursa Major Moving Cluster: ~60 stars 23.9pc (78ly) Scorpius-Centaurus cluster: ~100 stars 172pc (560ly) Pleiades: ~ by Van Leeuwen at 126 pc, 410 ly) ¿Ã ±³   QuickTime¢‚• ° ±‚ ¿ß«ÿ « ø‰«’¥œ¥Ÿ.

• Hipparcos 3D structure of the Hyades as seen from the Sun in Galactic coordinates.

• X-Y diagram = looking down the X-axis towards the centre of the Hyades. • Note; Larger spheres = closer stars • Hyades rotates around the Galactic Z-axis. • Circle is the tidal radius of 10 pc • Yellow stars are members of Eggen's moving group (not members of Hyades). • Time steps are 50.000 years. (Perryman et al. ) 12

 2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Standard Rulers and Candles To measure greater distances (>10-20kpc - cosmological distances)  Require some standard population of objects e.g., objects of • the same size ( standard ruler ) or • the same luminosity ( standard candle ) and • high luminosity can calculate • • Flux ( 

S

) from luminosity, ( • Calculate distance (

D

• Measuring redshift (

z L

) )

L

Cosmological parameters )

H o , S

 W

m,o ,

W L

,o

4

L

D L

2

m M

 

2.5lg(

 

2.5lg(

S

/

S

0

)

L

/

L

0

)

D L

L

4 

S d L

10

(

m

 5

M

 

M

m

5lg

 

d L

10

pc

  DISTANCE MODULUS

m

M

5lg

d L

,

Mpc

25

13

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Main sequence Fitting Einar Hertzsprung & Henry Norris Russell: Plot stars as function of luminosity & temperature  Normal stars fall on a single track 

Main Sequence

H-R diagram Observe distant cluster of stars, Apparent magnitudes,

m

, of the stars form a track parallel to Main Sequence  correctly choosing the distance, convert to absolute magnitudes,

M

, that fall on standard Main Sequence. Get Distance from the distance modulus

m

M

5lg

d L

,

Mpc

25

AGB Red Giant Branch  near stars Turn off WHITE DWARF far stars m-M • •  temperature Useful out to ~few 10s kpc (main sequence stars become too dim) used to calibrate clusters with Hyades 14

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Spectroscopic Parallax Information from Stellar Spectra • Spectral Type  • O stars - HeI, HeII • B Stars - He • A Stars - H Surface Temperature - OBAFGKM RNS • F-G Stars - Metals • K-M Stars - Molecular Lines •Surface Gravity  Higher pressure in atmosphere  • Class I - Supergiants • Class III - Giants • Class V - Dwarfs • Class VI - white Dwarfs line broadening, less ionization - Class I(low) -VI (high)

L L g

   4

M



T

4

R

2 

GM R

2 (  ~ 3  4) Temperature from spectral type, surface gravity from luminosity class  Measure flux  Distance from inverse square Law  mass and luminosity. 15

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Cepheid Variables Cepheid variable stars - very luminous yellow giant or supergiant stars.

Regular pulsation - varying in brightness with periods ranging from 1 to 70 days. Star in late evolutionary stage, imbalance between gravitation and outward pressure  pulsation Radius and Temperature change by 10% and 20%. Spectral type from F-G • Henrietta S. Leavitt (1868 - 1921) - study of 1777 variable stars in the Magellanic Clouds.

• c.1912 - determined periods 25 Cepheid variables in the SMC  Period-Luminosity relation • Brighter Cepheid Stars = Longer Pulsation Periods • Found in open clusters (distances known by comparison with nearby clusters).  Can independently calibrate these Cepheids 16

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

Cepheid Variables 2 types of Classical Cepheids ¿Ã ±³   QuickTime¢‚• ° ±‚ ¿ß«ÿ « ø‰«’¥œ¥Ÿ.



M v

  

2.76lg

P d

1.0

 

4.16

Distance Modulus

m

M

 5lg

d L

,

Mpc

 25 Prior to HST, Cepheids only visible out to ~ 5Mpc  17

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.2: Primary Distance Indicators

RR Lyrae Variables Stellar pulsation  transient phenomenon Pulsating stars occupy instability strip ~ vertical strip on H-R diagram. Evolving stars begin to pulsate  enter instability strip.

Leave instability strip  cease oscillations upon leaving. Type LPV* Classical Cepheids-S Classical Cepheids-L W Virginis (PII Ceph) RR Lyrae ß Cephei stars d Scuti stars ZZ Ceti stars Period Pop 100-700d I, II 1-6 7-50d 2-45d 1-24hr 3-7hr I I II II I 1-3hr 1-20min I I Pulsation radial radial radial radial radial radial/non radial radial/non radial non radial • RR-Lyrae stars • Old population II stars that have used up their main supply of hydrogen fuel • Relationship between absolute magnitude and metallicity (Van de Bergh 1995)

Mv = (0.15

±

0.01) [Fe/H]

• Common in globular clusters major • Low luminosities,  ±

1.01

 rung up in the distance ladder only measure distance to ~ M31 18

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Secondary Distance Indicators

Secondary Distance Indicators

• Tully-Fisher Relation • Fundamental Plane • Supernovae • Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect • HII Regions • Globular Clusters • Brightest Cluster Member • Gravitationally Lensed QSOs • Surface Brightness Fluctuations 19

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Globular Clusters Main Sequence Fitting H-R diagram for Globular clusters is different to open Clusters (PII objects!)   Use Theoretical HR isochrones to predict Main Sequence  distance  Alternatively use horizontal branch fitting Angular Size Make assumption that all globular clusters ~ same diameter ~

D

 Distance to cluster,

d

, is given by angualr size q

=D/d

 Globular Cluster Luminosity Function (GCLF) (similarly for PN) Use Number density of globular clusters as function of magnitude M 

(

M

)

Ce

 (

M

M

* 2  2 ) 2 Peak in luminosity function occurs at same luminosity (magnitude) Number density of globular clusters as function of magnitude M for Virgo giant ellipticals Distance range of GCLF method is limited by distance at which peak M o is detectable, ~ 50 Mpc 20

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Tully Fisher Relationship Redshift Centrifugal

v R

2

R

GM R

2 Gravitational Flux Assume same mass/light ratio for all spirals 

M

/

L

Assume same surface brightness for all spirals  4 In Magnitudes

L M

  

M o



v R

2

G

 2.5lg

2  

L L o

v R

4  

M o

 

L

/

R

2  2.5lg

 

Cv R

4

L o

  Blueshift n 

M

 

10lg(

v R

)

  More practically

M

 

a

lg



W o

sin

i



i W o

= spread in velocities = inclination to line of sight of galaxy

C b

21 

 2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Tully Fisher Relationship

M

 

b

Tully and Fischer (1977): Observations with I a = 6.25±0.3

b = 3.5 ± 0.3, Knowing

M

 

45 o

 

a

lg 

W o

sin

i

DISTANCE MODULUS

m M

 

2.5lg(

 

2.5lg(

S

/

S

0

)

L

/

L

0

)

d L

10

(

m

 5

M

) 

M

m

5lg

 

d L

10

pc

 

m

M

5lg

d L

,

Mpc

25

Tully-Fisher Fornax & Virgo Members Bureau et al. 1996 

Problems with Tully-Fisher Relation

• TF Depends on Galaxy Type

M bol M bol M bol = -9.95 lgV R = -10.2 lgV R = -11.0 lgV R + 3.15

+ 2.71

+ 3.31

(Sa) (Sb) (Sc)

• TF depends on waveband Relation is steeper by a factor of two in the IR band than the blue band. (Correction requires more accurate measure of M/L ratio for disk galaxies) 22

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

D  Relationship Elliptical Galaxies  Cannot use Tully Fisher Relation • Little rotation • little Hydrogen (no 21cm) Faber-Jackson (1976): Elliptical Galaxies L = Luminosity  = central velocity dispersion Large Scatter  Ellipticals Lenticulars L 

M M B

constrain with extra parameters 

B

4   19.38

   19.65

 0.07

 (9.0

 0.7)(lg 0.08

 (8.4

M32 (companion to M31)  0.8)(lg     2.3) 2.3) Define a plane in parameter space  Faber-Jackson Law Intensity profile (surface brightness) (r 1/4 De Vaucouleurs Law)

I

(

r

)

L

  

I I o e

 (

r

/

r o

) 1/ 4 

I o r o

2 Virial Theorem 

m

 2  Mass/Light ratio

L

1   

M

 

M

L

4(1   )

I o

 (1   ) 2 1

GM

m r o

  2 

M r o

Fundamental Plane (Dressler et al. 1987) 23  

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

D  Relationship Any 2 parameters  scatter (induced by 3rd parameter) Combine parameters  Constrain scatter  Fundamental Plane Instead of

I o , r o

: Use Diameter of aperture,

D n

,

D n

- aperture size required to reach surface Brightness ~

B=20.75mag arcsec 2

Advantages • Elliptical Galaxies - bright •Strongly Clustered  • Old stellar populations   measure large distances large ensembles low dust extinction Disadvantages • Sensitive to residual star formation •Distribution of intrinsic shapes, rotation, presence of disks • No local bright examples for calibration  Usually used for RELATIVE DISTANCES and calibrate using other methods 24

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Surface Brightness Fluctuations SBF method Measure fluctuation in brightness across the face of elliptical galaxies Fluctuations - due to counting statistics of individual stars in each resolution element (Tonry & Schneider 1988) Consider 2 images taken by CCD to illustrate the SBF effect; Represent 2 galaxies with one twice further away as the other Compare nearby dwarf galaxy, nearby giant galaxy, far giant galaxy Choose distance such that flux is identical to nearby dwarf.  measure the mean flux per pixel (surface brightness) rms variation in flux between pixels.

  m 

N S NS

 1

d N S

d

d

 2 2    m

S

is independent of distance

  m 2  

L

4

d

2 

d

Can use out to 70 Mpc with HST 25 

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Brightest Cluster Members •Assume: Galaxy clusters are similar Brightest cluster members ~ similar brightness ~ cD galaxies •Calibration: Close clusters 10 close galaxy clusters: brightest cluster member M V = 22.82

 0.61

•Advantage: Can be used to probe large distances •Disadvantage: Evolution ~ galaxy cannibalism Large scatter in brightest galaxy Use 2nd, 3rd brightest Use N average brightest N galaxies.

26

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Supernova Ia Measurements (similarly applied to novae) White dwarf pushed over Chandrasekhar limit by accretion begins to collapse against the weight of gravity, but rather than collapsing , material is ignited consuming the star in an an explosion 10-100 times brighter than a Type II supernova Supernova !

Type II (Hydrogen Lines) Type I (no Hydrogen lines)

SN1994D in NGC4526

Massive star M>8M o Type Ib,c (H poor massive Star M>8M o ) Stellar wind or stolen by companion Type Ia (M~1.4M

o White Dwarf + companion) 27

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Supernova Ia Measurements Supernovae: luminosities  (10 12 L o in neutrinos) entire galaxy~10 10 L o

SN1994D in NGC4526 in Virgo Cluster (15Mpc)

Supernova Ia: •Found in Ellipticals and Spirals (SNII only spirals) •Progenitor star identical • Characteristic light curve fast rise, rapid fall, • Exponential decay with half-Life of 60 d.

(from radioactive decay Ni 56  Co 56  Fe 56 ) • Maximum Light is the same for all SNIa !!

M B

,max  

18.33

5lg

h

100 

L

~ 10

10

L o

  28

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Supernova Ia Measurements

M B

,max  

18.33

5lg

h

100 

L

~ 10

10

L o

  Lightcurves of 18 SN Ia z < 0:1 (Hamuy et al )  Gibson et al. 2000 - Calibration of SNIa via Cepheids lg

H o

 0.2

M B

,max   

m B

,15,

t

 0.720

 0.459

  1.1

  1.010

   

m B

,15,

t

 1.1

 2  0.934

28.653

  0.042

 

m B

,15,

t

m B

,15   

m B

,15  0.1

E

(

B

 15 day decay rate

V

)

E

(

B

V

)  total extinction (galactic + intrinsic) after correction of systematic effects and time dilatation (Kim et al., 1997).

 Distance derived from Supernovae depends on extinction Supernovae distances good out to > 1000Mpc  Probe the visible Universe !

29

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Gravitational Lens Time Delays  q • Light from lensed QSO at distance

D,

travel different distances given by 

=[Dcos(

q

) - Dcos(

)]

• Measure path length difference by looking for time-shifted correlated variability in the multiple images source - lens - observer is perfectly aligned  source is offset  various multiple images Can be used to great distances Einstein Ring Uncertainties •Time delay (can be > 1 year!) and seperation of the images • Geometry of the lens and its mass • Relative distances of lens and background sources 30

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.3: Secondary Distance Indicators

Gravitational Lens Time Delays • Light from the source S is deflected by the angle a when it arrives at the plane of the lens L, finally reaches an observer's telescope O. Observer sees an image of the source at the angular distance h

from the optical axis

Without the lens, she would see the source at the angular distance

b from the optical axis.

The distances between the observer and the source, the observer

and the source, and the lens and the source are D1, D2, and D3,

respectively.

http://leo.astronomy.cz/grlens/grl0.html

Small angles approximation

Assume angles

b

,

h

, and deflection angle

a

are <<1  tan q~q

Weak field approximation

Assume light passes through a weak field with the absolute value of the perculiar velocities of components and G<lens equation (relation between the angles

b, h, a) b

h

a

 

D

3

D

1  

h

  2

h

Where  is the Einstein Radius   4

GMD

3

c

2

D

1

D

2 Lens equation - 2 different solutions corresponding to 2 images of the source: 

h

1   

b

 

b

2 2  4  2  1/ 2 

h

2  

b

 

b

2  4  2  1/ 2  2 For perfectly aligned lens and source (

b=0

) - two images at same distance from lens

h1 = h2 = e

 31

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.4: The Distance Ladder

The Distance Ladder

The Distance Ladder

32

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.4: The Distance Ladder

The Distance Ladder Comparison eight main methods used to find the distance to the Virgo cluster.

6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 Method Cepheids Novae Planetary Nebula Globular Cluster Surface Brightness Tully Fisher Faber Jackson Type Ia Supernova Distance Mpc 14.9

 1.2

21.1  3.9

15.4  1.1

18.8  3.8

15.9  0.9

15.8  1.5

16.8  2.4

19.4  5.0

Jacoby etal 1992, PASP, 104, 599 HST Measures distance to Virgo (Nature 2002) D=17.1 ± 1.8Mpc

33

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.4: The Distance Ladder

The Distance Ladder Supernova (1-1000Mpc) Hubble Sphere (~3000Mpc) 1000Mpc Tully Fisher (0.5-00Mpc) 100Mpc Coma (~100Mpc) Cepheid Variables (1kpc-30Mpc) RR Lyrae (5-10kpc) Spectroscopic Parallax (0.05-10kpc) Parallax (0.002-0.5kpc) RADAR Reflection (0-10AU) 10Mpc Virgo (~10Mpc) 1Mpc M31 (~0.5Mpc) 100kpc LMC (~100kpc) 10kpc Galactic Centre (~10kpc) 1kpc Pleides Cluster (~100pc) Proxima Centauri (~1pc) 34

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.5: The Hubble Key Project

The Hubble Key Project

The Hubble Key Project

35

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.5: The Hubble Key Project

To the Hubble Flow

cz

H o d

The Hubble Constant • Probably the most important parameter in astronomy • The Holy Grail of cosmology • Sets the fundamental scale for all cosmological distances  36

 2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.5: The Hubble Key Project

To the Hubble Flow To measure Ho require • Distance • Redshift Cosmological Redshift -

cz

H o d

The Hubble Flow - due to expansion of the Universe Must correct for local motions / contaminations 1 

z

 (1 

z

)(1 

v o

/

c



v G

/

c

)

v o -

Measured from CMB Dipole ~ 220kms -1 (Observational Cosmology 2.3)

v o v G

= radial velocity of observer = radial velocity of galaxy

v G -

Contributions include Virgocentric infall, Great attractor etc… Decompostion of velocity field (Mould et al. 2000, Tonry et al. 2000) 37

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.5: The Hubble Key Project

Hubble Key Project

cz

H o d

Observations with HST to determine the value of the Hubble Constant to high accuracy • Use Cepheids as primary distance calibrator • Calibrate secondary indicators • Tully Fisher •Type Ia Supernovae • Surface Brightness Fluctuations • Faber - Jackson D n  relation • Comparison of Systematic errors • Hubble Constant to an accuracy of   10%      Cepheids in nearby galaxies within 12 million light-years. Not yet reached the Hubble flow Need Cepheids in galaxies at least 30 million light-years away Hubble Space Telescope observations of Cepheids in M100.

Calibrate the distance scale 38

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.5: The Hubble Key Project

Hubble Key Project ¿Ã ±³   QuickTime¢‚• ° ±‚ ¿ß«ÿ « ø‰«’¥œ¥Ÿ.

H 0 =

75

10 km

=

s

=

Mpc

39

2020/4/26 Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004 Cosmological Distance Scale

4.5: The Hubble Key Project

Combination of Secondary Methods Mould et al. 2000; Freedman et al. 2000 H 0

= 71

6 km s

-1

Mpc

-1  t 0

= 1.3

10

10

yr

Biggest Uncertainty • zero point of Cepheid Scale (distance to LMC) 40

2020/4/26 Summary Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004

4.6: Summary

Cosmological Distance Scale • There are many many different distance indicators • Primary Distance Indicators  direct distance measurement (in our own Galaxy) • Secondary Distance Indicators  Rely on primary indicators to measure more distant object.

• Rely on Primary Indicators to calibrate secondary indicators • Create a Distance Ladder where each step is calibrated by the steps before them • Systematic Errors Propagate!

• Hubble Key Project - Many different methods (calibrated by Cepheids) • Accurate determination of Hubble Constant to 10% H 0

= 71

6 km s

-1

Mpc

-1  t 0

= 1.3

10

10

yr

Is the H

o

controversy over ?

41

2020/4/26 Summary Chris Pearson : Observational Cosmology 4: Cosmological Distance Scale - ISAS -2004

4.6: Summary

Cosmological Distance Scale

Observational Cosmology 4. Cosmological Distance Scale

Observational Cosmology

次:

5. Observational Tools

42