Polish Contribution to the Worldwide LHC Computing

Download Report

Transcript Polish Contribution to the Worldwide LHC Computing

Polish Contribution to the
Worldwide LHC Computing Grid
WLCG
M. Witek
On behalf of the team of Polish distributed Tier-2
Outline
• Introduction
• History and status of Polish Tier-2 Federation
• Examples of physics results from LHC experiments
CERN - European Organisation for Nuclear Reseach
LHC – Large Hadron Collider
LHCb
CMS
Atlas
Alice
Polish WLCG Tier-2 team
•
Polish WLCG Tier-2 team
– A. Binczewski3, M. Bluj5, A. Cyz2, M. Dwużnik1, M. Filocha4, L. Flis1, R. Gokieli4,5,
J.Iwaszkiewicz4, M. Kowalski2, P. Lasoń1, R. Lichwała3, M. Łopuszyński4, M. Magryś1, P. Malecki2,
N. Meyer3, K. Nawrocki4,5, A. Olszewski2, A. Oziębło1, A. Padee4,5, H. Pałka2, M. Pospieszny3,
M.Radecki1, R. Rowicki4, D. Stojda6,4, M. Stolarek4, T. Szepieniec1, T. Szymocha1,2, M.Turała1,2,
K.Wawrzyniak4,5, W.Wiślicki4,5, M.Witek2, P.Wolniewicz3
•
Institutions
–
–
–
–
–
–
1
AGH University of Science and technology, ACC Cyfronet AGH, Krakow
Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, IFJ PAN, Krakow
3 Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center, PSNC, Poznan
4 Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, ICM, Warsaw
5 Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, IPJ, Warsaw
6Copernicus Science Centre, CSC, Warsaw, Poland
2
More details will be available
in the article of PL-Grid Book
2
Eksperiment requirements
• Example of on-line conditions
– ~108 electronic channels to read at
40 MHz
– 1 PB/sec of raw info from the
detector
– ~few TB/sec of zero suppressed
data ( channels with signal only)
• Multi-level trigger system
– Reduction factor 106-107
– Output rate > 100 MB/sec
• 107 sec/year ~few PB of raw data
per experiment
WLCG
3
(Pre)History
• MONARC (Models of Networked Analysis at Regional Centres for
LHC Experiments)
– Simulate data processing (a kind of Monte Carlo model):
• a complex set of networked computing systems (CERN, Tier-1 and Tier-2
regional centres)
• the analysis process, composed of a dynamic workload of reconstruction and
analysis
• the behaviour of key elements of the system, such as distributed database
servers and the networks
One of the problems @ 2000:
data sharing difficult due to the
prohibitively high cost of networking
Even more pronounced in Poland at that time !!!
Summary: CERN-LCB-2000-001 4
From 2000 to 2011
•
2000:
DataGrid 2000 – HEP oriented EU project
•
2000:
CERN-Poland meeting (initiated by M. Turala & P. Malecki)
•
2002:
CrossGrid first Polish EU project with HEP task.
•
2002:
start of LCG (LHC Computing Grid)
•
2003:
First LCG testbed of 14 sites (Cyfronet participation)
•
2004-2010:
EGEE, EGEE II, EGEE III
•
2003-2008:
Participation in Data Challenges
•
2005-2010:
BalticGrid, BalticGrid II
•
2007:
Poland signs MoU for WLCG
•
2009:
start of PL-Grid project (WLCG infrastructure)
•
2009-2011:
LHC start. Smooth running of Polish WLCG sites.
5
Polish participation in networking and grid projects
Polish part of WLCG emerged out of many different projects.
Some of them not directly related to HEP. Nevertheless they provided infrastructure and common tools.
PIONIER, CrossGrid, EGEE and PL-Grid were essential for the
development of Polish WLCG infrastructure.
6
Polish infrastructure in WLCG
GDAŃSK
KOSZALIN
OLSZTYN
Tier1 FZK
Karlsruhe
GÉANT 10+10 Gb/s
SZCZECIN
TORUŃ
BYDGOSZCZ
BASNET 34 Mb/s
BIAŁYSTOK
Gorzów
Tier2 PCSS
Poznań
POZNAŃ
ZIELONA
GÓRA
HEP VLAN
1 Gb/s
Tier2WARSZAWA
ICM
Warszawa
ŁÓDŹ
WROCŁAW
HEP
PIONIER’S FIBERS
2 x 10 Gb/s
VLAN
1 Gb/s
RADOM
CZĘSTOCHOWA
KIELCE
OPOLE
KATOWICE
10 Gb/s
(1 lambda)
CBDF 10 Gb/s
Tier2 ACK
Cyfronet
KRAKÓW
Kraków
Bielsko-Biała
PUŁAWY
LUBLIN
RZESZÓW
1 Gb/s
CESNET, SANET
MAN
7
Pionier – Polish Optical Internet
•
Nationwide broadband optical network represents a base for research and
development
– Europe's first national academic network that uses its own dark fiber optics and DWDM 10GE
transmission
– Connects 21 Academic Network Centers of Metropolitan Area Networks (MAN) and 5 of the
HPC (High Performance Computing) centers.
•
Cross-border links with: Germany (DFN), Czech Republic (CESNET), Slovakia
(SANET), Ukraine (UARNET), Byelorus, Lithuania
Started in 2000,
5917,5 km of fibres cables @ 2010
Data sharing problem due to networking limits
indicated by MONARC solved !
8
Towards physics results - that is what WLCG was built for
Successful LHC restart in 2009
Excellent performance of the LHC
and the experiments
3.5*1014 collisions delivered in 2011
Every experiment (ALICE, ATLAS, CMS, LHCb) has its own
computing model. All based on multi-tier structure
The RAW data reside in Tier-0 and Tier-1. The final
physics result is an effect of many processing steps.
Some steps have to be repeated when better
detector calibration and alignment appear.
Polish distributed Tier-2
Kraków-Poznań-Warszawa
The role of Tier-2 sites:
Monte Carlo production
Analysis centre (larger sites)
Limited reprocessing activity
9
LHCb computing model – DIRAC role
10
Polish WLCG resources
Atlas
LHCb
Atlas
LHCb
ACK Cyfronet AGH – Tier2
WLCG pledges
Alice
CMS
Poznan PSNC – Tier2
Warsaw ICM – Tier2
Polish Tier-2 Federation
2010
2011
2012
CPU (HS06)
10540
13050
15800
Disk (TB)
599
810
1020
July 2011
Relia
bility
Tier-3 at IFJ PAN
Availa
bility
Polish sites provide about 2% of the total computing power in proportion
to the engagement of Polish scientists in the LHC experiments.
Most of the resources comes from PL-Grid infrastructure
11
Poland in LCG accounting
Atlas
LHCb
CMS
1.6 %
Delivered
by Poland
Tier-1/2
3.9% delivered by Poland
2% delivered by
Poland
Performance of Polish Tier-2 (From WLCG Accounting)
Month
2011
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Usage as %
of pledge
165%
266%
299%
173%
229%
Highlight from LHCb
Increase over 100% mainly due to Cyfronet additional resources
At present 69 Tier-2 federations in 33
countries. The size of Polish Tier-2 is in
top 20.
A week with 9 % contribution of Cyfronet
to the LHCb reprocessing of 2011 data.
Congratulations for the site performance
from the LHCb computing team.
12
The Standard Model – Particles and Forces
Bulding blocks
of our Universe
13
ATLAS and CMS – direct discovery potential
•
Find the last undiscovered element of the Standard Model
– The Higgs bozon
•
Direct discovery of New Physics
– Supersymmetric particles or any object/phenomena beyond Standard Model we even did not
think about yet
ATLAS
The Higgs boson search
CMS
14
LHCb – LHC beauty experiment
• Hunting the signs of new physics by precision measurements
0 (bs)
Bs
meson contains two
quarks which are not present in
the world around us: b beauty
and s strange
Bs0→μ+μ-
Standard Model
Extremely rare decay
3 out of 109 decays
Supersymmery
New phenomena can
significantly increase
the decay rate
2 decays observed – 1.4 expected
2 events selected out of recorded 1010 WLCG
2 events selected out of 3.5*1014 initial collisions
No sign of New Physics yet
15
Summary
• Polish physicists and computer scientists created distributed WLCG
Tier2, which availability and efficiency is high; the delivered
resources are in the range 2-3 % of the total.
• The performance of the WLCG matches high requirements of the
data processing of LHC experiments.
• Lots of highest quality physics results are being shown recently.
Much more are on the way, hopefully showing New Physics.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all people for their contribution to the successful creation and operation of Polish Tier-2
Federation. In particular the management and staff of the three computing centres, ACC Cyfronet AGH in Krakow,
ICM UW in Warsaw and PSNC in Poznan for their constructive cooperation. A supportive approach of the
directorates of IFJ PAN Krakow and IPJ Warsaw is also appreciated. We are also grateful to many people from
CERN, the FZK Karlsruhe and other WLCG collaborating institutions for their friendly advice and support.
16