Transcript Document

David Leat, Research Centre for
Learning and Teaching & SOLE
Central, Newcastle University
[email protected]
Back to the Future
Back to the future - reinventing the
curriculum in a digital age
1
• Definitions: ‘We see the curriculum as a desired
goal or set of values that can be activated
through a development process culminating in
experiences for students’ Wiles & Bondi, 2007,
p.5.
• Or ‘The curriculum of a school, or course, or a
classroom can be conceived of a series of
planned events that are intended to have
educational consequences for one or more
students.’ Eisner, 2002, p.31.
Back to the Future
The meaning of curriculum
2
• Curriculum as content, education as
transmission – students learn the stuff;
• Curriculum as product, education as an
instrument - students become workers;
• Curriculum as process, education as
development – students become
‘themselves’;
• (McKernan) Society and problem centred
– students & community (co-) create the
curriculum.
Back to the Future
Vic (A.V.) Kelly identifies 3 major
ideologies in curriculum planning:
3
1.
2.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Nature of curriculum – what is it, what is it for? (for
citizenship, for moral development, for delivery of vocational
skills, for preparation for HE, for healthy lives, to pass
exams!)
Elements of the curriculum – what is it composed of?
Who teaches it?
What is taught?
Where and when?
Why?
How?
What are the outcomes? Who learns what?
How is it assessed?
3. How you think when you teach and assess.
Back to the Future
Curriculum questions (Dillon
2009)
4
• Increasing focus on measuring student and school/teacher
performance - output regulation.
• Much ‘teaching to the test’ (Berliner, 2011), ‘target setting’
and monitoring.
• Knowledge that is ‘decontextualised’ and which loses its
‘organic’ connection to real life (Dewey 1916, 1966).
• Serious consequences for student engagement with learning
(Lawson & Lawson, 2013).
Back to the Future
Context in England since 1988:
introduction of the National Curriculum
5
Back to the Future
PISA reflects the tension – league
tables
6
Misconceptions about teaching
Back to the Future
The view of the inspectorate
p.15 Ofsted Annual report on Schools, 2012/13
7
The grammar of schooling –
change is hard
Back to the Future
• One of the recurring themes of educational research and
evaluation is that innovation and reform do not work well;
• ‘An innovative school is one which tries one new thing after
another without making any of them work’.
8
This sums it up
• This refers to an enquiry curriculum project Exploring Our
World (for ages 6-12).
• The teachers did not find the structure and culture of their
schools generally supportive for such significant educational
change.
Back to the Future
• ‘Enquiry-based learning runs up against the whole fixed and
immoveable school machinery’. (Pozuelos et al. 2010)
9
• One NE geography teacher in a high
performing school developing EBL:
• ‘My line manager said it was only
permissible if it “did not impede the end of
unit test” (even at Year 7), as these tests
were used to determine target grades and
these grades determined ability sets for
teaching, and these sets determined GCSE
options.
Back to the Future
A Geography experience
10
Back to the Future
Is innovation always like this?
11
Back to the Future
And worse still
12
Basil Bernstein
• Classification (p.88):
Strong Classification

Weak Classification
Framing (p.89):
‘the degree of control teacher and pupil possess over the
selection, organization, pacing and timing of the knowledge
transmitted and received in the pedagogical relationship’
Strong Framing
Weak Framing
Back to the Future
‘the degree of boundary maintenance between contents’
13
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Search Engines and Wiki sites
MOOCs and LOOCs
Khan Academy
Skype in the Classroom
Skype Seniors
United World Colleges Online
Google Hangouts
Webcams
Bootlegger
Edmodo
Back to the Future
Remaking curriculum in a
digital age?
14
• (highlights) the complex nature of many jobs, which cut
across discipline and sectoral boundaries and the
importance of collaborative working … rather than an
emphasis on individual achievement and …
qualifications.
• The work of Brown (2008) and others suggest that the
current focus on formal qualifications and credentials is
misplaced.
• The idea that initial education can be provided at the
start of people‘s lives that will serve them until they
retire has become increasingly outmoded.
Back to the Future
‘Beyond Current Horizons’
15
• Sponsored by Cisco, Intel and Microsoft, ATC21S aims to help
educators around the world enable students with the skills to
succeed.
• ATC21S started with a group of more than 250 researchers
across 60 institutions worldwide who categorized 21st-century
skills internationally into four broad categories:
• Ways of thinking. Creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving,
decision-making and learning
• Ways of working. Communication and collaboration
• Tools for working. Information and communications
technology (ICT) and information literacy
• Skills for living in the world. Citizenship, life and career, and
personal and social responsibility
Back to the Future
Consortium for C21st Skills
16
• Less power to the Secretary of State;
• Stronger emphasis on vocational education and EU
competences – broader curriculum, including emotional
maturity;
• Greater role for the Extended Project Qualification in access to
Higher Education.
Back to the Future
‘Making Education Work’ – Pearson
Publishing
17
• communication in mother tongue;
• communication in foreign languages;
• competence in maths, science and technology;
• digital competence;
• learning to learn (L2L);
• social and civic competence;
• sense of initiative and entrepreneurship; and
• cultural awareness and expression.
Back to the Future
EU Competences
18
• Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) is a critical and necessary
skill across educational settings and in the workforce.
• There is a growing emphasis in state and national educational
systems on project-based and inquiry-oriented learning
(National Research Council, 2011). This includes shaping
curriculum and instruction around critical thinking, problem
solving, self-management and collaboration skills (DarlingHammond 2011; Halpern, 2003).
Back to the Future
AND ….. PISA 2015
DRAFT COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING
FRAMEWORK
19
Back to the Future
Have you seen this man?
20
• Self organised; Curious; Engaged; Social; Collaborative;
• (p.3 Guide) ‘The SOLE approach embraces a process where kids
learn how to ask questions that make them come alive to the world.’
• Children (8-12 years old) choose their own groups of four and their
own questions to explore;
• Children can look to see what other groups are doing and take that
information back to their own group;
• Kids can move around freely and change groups at any time;
• Children can (should) talk … and discuss with other groups.
Back to the Future
Mitra describes the SOLE approach
as child driven learning which is:
21
• Anderson-Butcher (p.161) argues, based on the Ohio
Collaborative School Improvement initiative that ‘This
walled-in improvement planning reflects traditional
thinking about schools as stand-alone institutions
focused exclusively on young people’s learning and
academic achievement, and also reinforces the idea that
educators are the school improvement experts’. They
argue that resources, opportunities and assets are
‘walled out’, creating an unnecessary gulf between inschool learning and out-of-school learning.
Back to the Future
Are schools walled-in?
22
• about a place (Manchester and Peterborough): making use of
local context and resources to frame learning
• by a place: designed by schools in partnership with other local
stakeholders, and
• for a place: meeting the specific needs of children and local
communities
• Its objectives are to:
• Create learning experiences that are engaging for children
from all backgrounds;
• Increase children’s understanding of and attachment to the
place where they live;
• Embed schools more deeply within their communities and
localities.
Back to the Future
RSA Area Based Curriculum:
23
• Students enjoyed learning about where they live and learning
outside the classroom
• Students particularly enjoyed having other adults involved
• School and partner representatives reported a change to the
way organisations engage with schools
• Partners reported that more schools are now open to working
with outside agencies
Back to the Future
Upside
24
• For some schools the Peterborough Curriculum represented a
choice between a standards driven agenda and a more holistic
approach that involved developing students as whole
individuals. It was therefore framed as very much part and
parcel of a strategic direction that was in opposition to a
standards agenda.
• The secondary school curriculum in particular remained not
only resistant to modification, but also to enhancement by the
locality. This is in part due to the structures of the schools,
where subject and classroom teachers were difficult for
partners to access.
Back to the Future
Some downside
25
Infinite possibilities
Meal in a cup
Back to the Future
Village show
What gets
learned?
Health education
Wedding
26
REMAKING CURRICULUM
Dialogue - where
different voices are
heard and listened to.
Meaning is not given
but contested and
explored.
Back to the Future
ENQUIRY
SUBJECTS
COMMUNITY27
• School used a grant to appoint a part time community
development officer;
• She found and developed ‘enquiry’ partners in the
community;
• The pupils researched, designed and made new sandwiches at
the village bakery, weekend packages at the local dog hotel,
and a wedding and reception at the local church;
• The curriculum is developed with the community.
CPA Module Day 1
Armathwaite School – Cumbria
28
Back to the Future
So why are we like this?
29
• You have got to make a balancing judgement as to how much
time you are going to put into something versus the benefit it
gets you back erm... Emily and Debbie are enjoying themselves
more …, I am glad they got a lot out of it and I am glad they
are experimenting... I mean it’s a bit out of control now with
those two but not in a bad way, but I am a bit aware that …
they could start learning things that are very interesting but
not what they need. They are doing their exam in ten weeks
time … so they need to be back on focus with particular things
Back to the Future
The inhibitor
30
• If you have any ambition to be a creative curriculum maker
then take heart – you are not alone;
• Network whenever and wherever possible;
• Experiment whenever you can (EPQ etc.) and don’t feel too
bad if you end up with a ‘hybrid curriculum’;
• Curriculum thinking will change at some point so be prepared
to ‘seize the moment’;
• Do not just accept the ‘dominant discourse’ – as education can
be so much more than we are currently offering – be sceptical;
• Email me if you do want to be on our EPBL mailing list.
[email protected]
Back to the Future
Conclusion
31