Transcript Development and validation of a CFD model for the downcomer of
Evaluation of the flow mixing in VVER-1000 downcomer under natural circulation.
Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008
V. Lefterov, E. Popov Atoma Consult Ltd
Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
1
Reasons for fluid mixing evaluation in a reactor downcomer:
• risk of over-criticality in a local volume of the reactor core by low boron concentration • risk of over-criticality in a local volume of the reactor core by low coolant temperature • risk of local pressurized thermal shock (PTS) on the reactor vessel wall Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
2
Evaluation of flow mixing – How to?
large scale transparent model experiments large scale model experiments, using a lot of sensors in the facility Residence Time Distribution (RTD) method three dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations.
Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
3
CFD model – developed by Atoma Consult Ltd Two mutually independent components:
•
Mesh
– represents the geometrical characteristics of the investigated volume; •
Solver –
implements the mathematical apparatus, applied in the analysis.
4 Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
Investigated scenario Boundary conditions – Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) on loop 2
Calculations with RELAP5/mod3.3; Conservative initial and boundary conditions; Sensitivity study – failure of EFW and FAIV; Results: FAIV failure creates larger temperature difference (80 o C).
Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
5
Initial and boundary conditions Table I – Initial and boundary conditions for the CFD calculations
Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
6
Calculation results I
Figure I – Velocity distribution Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
7
Calculation results II
Figure II – Velocity stream lines Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
8
Calculation results III
Figure III – Temperature distribution in the downcomer and the core inlet Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
9
Calculation results IV
Figure IV– Loop 2 flow mixing in the downcomer and the core inlet Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
10
Calculation results IV
Figure V – “Cold spot” rotation in the core inlet Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
11
Sensitivity study
Table II – Loop inlet velocities for the sensitivity study Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
12
Sensitivity study – results I
Figure VI – “Cold spot” rotation in the core inlet for the high velocity case Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
13
Sensitivity study – results II
Figure VII – “Cold spot” rotation in the core inlet for the medium velocity case Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
14
Sensitivity study – results III
Figure VIII – “Cold spot” rotation in the core inlet for the forced circulation case Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
15
Sensitivity study – summary
Table III – Summary on the sensitivity study results Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
16
Conclusions 1.
2.
Selected scenario – MSLB on VVER-1000
Boundary conditions – RELAP5/mod3.3; Flow mixing and rotation – CFD calculations; Applied software and models are adequately verified and validated;
Results:
Relatively small core inlet area (~5%) from the quarter fed by the broken loop inlet is with very low (0 - 10 %) mixing coefficient; The flow rotation is independent of the velocities magnitudes at constant “intact/damaged” loops velocity ratio; The flow rotation depends
strongly
velocity ratio; on the “intact/damaged” loops Results can be finally validated against large scale model experiments.
Bulatom Conference 28-30 May 2008 Atoma Consult Ltd www.atomaconsult.biz
17