Transcript The_GFSP_ Mycotoxins_and_Aflatoxin_ 17 Nov 13_PACA
GFSP Overview Accra, November 2013
The Global Food Safety Partnership
Reduce risks to consumers and businesses Improve skills, efficiencies and public health Create economic opportunity
Global Food Safety Partnership Breaking New Ground
Formally established December 2012 at the first GFSP stakeholder conference in Paris Builds on earlier collaboration 2009-2011 with APEC FSCF PTIN First partnership supported by the World Bank combining public and private money with public and private implementation
Dual Approach
5-year initial capacity building work plan with defined activities In parallel, use the experience to learn and develop a new cooperation model for future collaboration
Operational Structure
Industry National Governments International Organizations Contributions Universities NGOs Other Stakeholders Service Providers Other inputs Advisory Working Groups GFSP Secretariat Donor Advisory Council Multi Donor Trust Fund for: Harmonization of Training Improving Outcomes from Training Ensuring Best Practices for Monitoring and Evaluation Cross-sector Coordination & Collaboration Developing a Common Baseline for Training Standards Preparing for the future
Organization & Management
Implemented by contracted service providers, themselves often stakeholders as well Use of Advisory Working Groups (WGs) IT/Learning Systems Food Safety Technical Communication Monitoring and Evaluation Governance (to be formed in 2014 to shape GFSP governance after initial 5-year period) Combined WG co-chairs meetings Donor’s Advisory Council Secretariat (hosted at World Bank)
Financing Sources
Initial contributions World Bank US$ 1 m US$ 1.2m
Multi-Donor Trust Fund US$ 45-50 m (pending) Program design and pilots Advisory Working Groups Global scaling up
Donor’s Advisory Council
• • GFSP Secretariat will convene a Donor’s Advisory Council (DAC) to provide an additional mechanism for direct consultation and advice on the Partnership. The DAC has been established to advise on: – – – – High level stakeholder engagement Fund raising Inputs to the Secretariat regarding funding priorities (topics, countries, sectors) Emerging issues The DAC will meet in the week of 9-13 December 2013 at the 2nd GFSP Conference to be held in Singapore.
Current Partners
Governments (Donors) Canada Denmark Netherlands United States Governments (Pilot countries)
China Indonesia Malaysia Vietnam Zambia
Multilateral & International Organizations
FAO Network of Aquaculture Centers in Asia-Pacific (NACA) UNIDO WHO
World Bank/IFC Industry and Associations Mars Inc.
Waters Corporation
Cargill Food Industry Asia (FIA) General Mills Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)
Current Partners
cont… Universities, NGOs and In-kind and Implementing Partners
Food and Environment Research Agency (FERA), UK DEFRA Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) Global Aquaculture Alliance/Responsible Aquaculture Foundations (GAA/RAF) GLOBALG.A.P International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) International Union of Food Science and Technology (IUFoST) Massey University Michigan State University Network of Aquaculture Centers of Asia-Pacific (NACA) Orange House
Advisory Process
Issues and Opportunities Feedback on current work program
Advisory Working Groups
Advice sought Advice Provided • • • Decisions on: Projects Activities Funding
GFSP Secretariat
Stakeholder feedback on GFSP progress and issues
GFSP Coordinated Approach for Greater Impact
Separate Independent (variably linked) actions Collective and Cohesive Approach (More Collaboration, Coordination, Communication, Connection)
GFSP 1
st
Current Work Plan
• • GFSP Secretariat reviewed Roadmap and 5-Year Plan and revised 1 st Year Plan for mid-2013 to mid-2014. The Roadmap describes three pillars of engagement by the GFSP: • Training Program Implementation • Global and Regional Scaling up • Program Facilitation
#1 Training Program APEC/FSCF+
Supply chain management Incident management Laboratory competency Risk analysis Food safety regulatory system On-farm quality assurance
#2 Global Scaling up
Country Capacity Building Needs Assessments East Asia South Asia Latin America East Europe & Central Asia Africa Middle East “Responsive activities”
#3 Program Facilitation
Learning Platform Open Education Resources Curriculum Development Food Safety Technical Communication Monitoring and Evaluation GFSP Secretariat
Country Selection Criteria
Partner priorities and cost sharing Country policy environment Countries are selected using criteria based on each category Potential for scaling up Public-Private commitment APEC countries
1
st
Year Workplan Implementation
• • • Phased implementation based on available funding Currently about US$2M available in multi-donor trust fund Enough to implement 40% of Year 1 workplan (total budget: US$5M)
Activities already planned for 2013-2014
GFSP activities recently completed, underway, or planned for implementation during 2013 and Q1,2 of 2014 – – – – – – Supply Chain Management (SCM) On-farm Quality Assurance and GAP Food Safety Incident Management Laboratory Competency Risk Analysis - Risk Assessment Food Safety Regulatory Systems
..but what about taking a risk-based approach?
• • • • • • •
Pros
Consistent with best practices in food safety Focuses attention May garner more poltical, technical, financial support Interests public, private, civil society all at once Facilitates testing and tweaking of GFSP collaborative model May be more doable in medium term May have positive spinoffs for broader food safety system • • •
Cons
Requires picking a “winner” among many real risks that compete for attention and resources Will not solve many other real problems Externalities not proven for food safety (although there is evidence for avian/human influenza and HIV/AID)
Pilots under consideration
• Food Safety in Aquacultural Supply Chains
Pilots under consideration
• • Food Safety in Aquacultural Supply Chains Food Safety for the Dairy Industry
Pilots under consideration
• • • Food Safety in Aquacultural Supply Chains Food Safety for the Dairy Industry
Pathways for Global Mycotoxin Preventioon and Control
the food safety field Agriculture
Food Safety Mycotoxins
Health Nutrition
Why start with aflatoxins?
• • • • • • • They matter greatly to agriculture, health and nutrition They simultaneously affect poverty/hunger, productivity, commerce/trade, and economic growth The challenge straddles the developed, emerging, and developing economies It is a global problem, growing in scope The science is advancing rapidly Awareness is also rising They require a concerted effort backed by significantly more resources
Why start with aflatoxins?
• • • • • • • They matter greatly to agriculture, health and nutrition They simultaneously affect poverty/hunger, productivity, commerce/trade, and economic growth The challenge straddles the developed, emerging, and developing economies It is a global problem, growing in scope The science is advancing rapidly
GFSP
Awareness is also rising
can add
They require a concerted effort backed by significantly more resources
value!
Opportunities and issues relating PACA
• How to coordinate approaches and programs while avoiding duplication
Opportunities and issues relating PACA
• • How to coordinate approaches and programs while avoiding duplication How to leverage and multiply respective resources
Opportunities and issues relating PACA
• • • How to coordinate approaches and programs while avoiding duplication How to leverage and multiply respective resources What is the best division of roles and responsibilities going forward
Opportunities and issues relating PACA
• • How to coordinate approaches and programs while avoiding duplication How to leverage and multiply respective resources • What is the best division of roles and responsibilities going forward •