Transcript MSU Retention - Morehead State University

MSU Retention Profile
2010 - Present
DELIVERY TEAM
PURPOSE
 Statewide Network Reviewing Best Practice
and Implementation for Student Success
 Statewide Partners: EKU, NKU, KCTCS, KSU, MSU
 MSU Team: Jill Ratliff (Leader), Gerald Demoss,
Emma Perkins, Erin Wright, Michelle Barber,
Clarenda Phillips, Kevin Koett
FOCUS OF DELIVERY TEAM
• Retention and Graduation Rates
• Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
• APNA Link to Academic Units
STUDENT PROFILES
UNDERREPRESENTED MINORITY
CAMPUS LOCATION
COURSE DELIVERY
LIVING ARRANGEMENT
LIVING ARRANGEMENT / GPA
ADVISING
ACT
GRADUATING HIGH SCHOOL
FINANCIAL AID
UNDERPREPARED
One Year Retention by Living Arrangement
100.0%
90.0%
734
Residential, Retained
55.2%
Residential, Retained
53.5%
60.0%
Residential, Retained
50.0%
Residential, Not Retained
Not Residential, Not Retained
10.3%
324
207
Not Residential, Retained
17.5%
Residential, Not Retained
23.6%
173
201
Residential, Not Retained
17.0%
Not Residential, Retained
12.6%
141
Not Residential, Retained
40.0%
121
Retention Rate
70.0%
651
80.0%
Not Residential, Not Retained
10.3%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Term
Not Residential, Not Retained
Fall 2011 Retention by Living Arrangement and MSU GPA
Status Fall 2012
Not Retained
Retained
Living Arrangment with MSU GPA Count Percent Count Percent
Residential
NULL
5
1.1%
0.0%
0 GPA
48
10.3%
3
0.3%
LESS THAN 2.0
138 29.7%
65
7.2%
2.0 TO 3.0
74
15.9%
248 27.3%
3.0 AND UP
59
12.7%
418 46.1%
Residential Total
324 69.7%
734 80.9%
Not Residential
NULL
22
4.7%
1
0.1%
0 GPA
29
6.2%
1
0.1%
LESS THAN 2.0
48
10.3%
28
3.1%
2.0 TO 3.0
24
5.2%
65
7.2%
3.0 AND UP
18
3.9%
78
8.6%
Not Residential Total
141 30.3%
173 19.1%
Grand Total
465 100.0% 907 100.0%
One Year Retention by Assigned Advisor Status
80.0%
72.5%
70.0%
66.0%
Retention Rate
60.0%
50.0%
Fall 2010 No Assigned Advisor
Fall 2010 Has Assigned Advisor
40.0%
33.1%
30.0%
Fall 2011 No Assigned Advisor
Fall 2011 Has Assigned Advisor
26.7%
20.0%
10.0%
0.6%
0.8%
0.3%
0.1%
0.0%
Not Retained
Retained
Retention Rate by ACT Scores
ACT Composite
Null
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Total
Status Fall 2011
Not Retained
Retained
Count Percent Count Percent
4
0.3%
25 0.021186441
3
11
28
30
33
44
38
36
27
25
14
8
10
4
5
2
322
0.3%
0.9%
2.4%
2.5%
2.8%
3.7%
3.2%
3.1%
2.3%
2.1%
1.2%
0.7%
0.8%
0.3%
0.4%
0.2%
5
13
25
31
69
76
101
79
74
74
75
52
36
38
29
27
15
9
4
1
27.3% 858
0.4%
1.1%
2.1%
2.6%
5.8%
6.4%
8.6%
6.7%
6.3%
6.3%
6.4%
4.4%
3.1%
3.2%
2.5%
2.3%
1.3%
0.8%
0.3%
0.1%
72.7%
ACT Composite
Null
12
13
14
15
16↑2.7%
17
18
19
20
21
22
23↑3.2%
24
25
26
27
28
29
30↑.8%
31
32
33
Total
Status Fall 2012
Not Retained
Retained
Count Percent Count Percent
6
0.4%
18
1.3%
1
0.1%
3
0.2%
3
0.2%
5
0.4%
15
1.1%
13
0.9%
29
2.1%
19
1.4%
49
3.6%
44
3.2%
63
4.6%
58
4.2%
45
3.3%
82
6.0%
49
3.6%
82
6.0%
44
3.2%
80
5.8%
46
3.4%
84
6.1%
38
2.8%
69
5.0%
23
1.7%
58
4.2%
21
1.5%
77
5.6%
11
0.8%
54
3.9%
8
0.6%
49
3.6%
8
0.6%
42
3.1%
2
0.1%
35
2.6%
1
0.1%
12
0.9%
4
0.3%
13
0.9%
7
0.5%
2
0.1%
465
33.9% 907
66.1%
61.5%
58.2%
22.6%
16.6%
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
Provides Academic Services to Support Retention and
Graduation for:
• Developmental
• Provisionally Admitted
• Undeclared
• Bachelor of University Studies
• FYS
UNDERPREPARED STUDENTS
*UNOFFICIAL TOTALS
 Provisional Students
213
 College Readiness Needs (DE):
 College Readiness DE -
543
students with 1, 2,3
1001 (duplicated)
Summer Success Academy:
43
UNDERREPRESENTED
MINORITY STUDENTS
* CAMPUSWIDE

Total number of Students:
• Provisional Students
• Total College Readiness Needs (DE)
106
28
99
Campus initiatives:
Minority Retention Plan
Transitioning to MSU: Targeted Orientation
Much More to Me: Female Mentoring
Black Male Initiative: Minority Male Mentoring
DREAMS: Mentoring + Academic Component
Note: More than half of students tutored are
freshman; one out of five students tutored are
provisionally admitted.
OTHER INITIATIVES
* UNOFFICIAL TOTALS
 Retention Alert: Underutilized, early term intervention
Only around one-fourth of the students who do not return are
referred through attention alert .
 Midterm Grade Alert : Midterm Grade Review initiative
 Advising
Portal: 4000 hits since inception
Training:
Portal training 9/12 & 13
Jenny Bloom, Appreciative Advising 9/28
Advising 10/15
Advising Certification is in process
What we understand:







MSU’s retention of first-year students shows a pattern
of up and down fluctuations on a two-year cycle
Freshmen students do have assigned advisers
MSU retains URM freshmen students at the same rate
as the general population of freshmen students
For the fall 2011 freshmen cohort, there was a
significant increase in attrition among residential
students
Provisional students are retained at a consistent
annual rate; typically about 50% each year
On-line classes do not negatively impact retention of
freshmen; small number of participants
Extended campus instruction does not negatively
impact freshmen retention; small number of
participants
What we understand:



There was a 10% increase in the Y2Y attrition for the
fall 2011 freshmen cohort having a HS GPA at 2.0 or
higher
Fall to spring retention rates are significantly stronger
than fall to fall retention rates for both 2010 and 2011
freshmen cohorts
For fall 2011 freshmen, there was a:




4% increase in non-returning students having an ACT
Comp. at 21 or higher;
3.9% increase in non-returning students with an ACT
Comp. at 19 or higher;
3.2% increase for students with an ACT Comp. between
21 and 26
There was a 4.3% (59) increase in non-returning
students for fall 2012 that received <$7,000 in
financial aid in fall 2011
NEXT STEPS
Deeper Analysis and Future Strategies
Nov. 28, 2012 PLC Meeting





Fall 2012 Student Data
ACT Sweet Spot (21-26 ACT) students
Number of Hours Completed/Attempted
Impact of Financial Aid Changes
Retention by Program/Major