Transcript Slide 1
ADDRESSING ADOLESCENT ANAEMIA We Must Act Now Dr. Sheila Vir Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anaemia (Global Scenario) • Iron Deficiency - 3 out of 4 persons • Iron Deficiency Anaemia - 1 out of every 3 persons or IDA (2 billion) Anaemia Prevalence (%) in Adolescent Girls Norway 4 USA 5.9 England 10.5 Thailand 17 Bhutan 26.4 Indonesia 30 Sri Lanka 40 Bangladesh 40 Myanmar 45.2 Nepal 46 Maldives 50 India 90 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Percentage (%) Anaemia prevalence in developing countries • Adolescent girls - 27% (6% in developed world) • non pregnant women (WRA) 15-49 years - 43% • pregnant women - 56% Causative Factors • Significant increase in requirements of iron • Low intake of bioavailable iron Prevention of IDA • Dietary diversification • Fortification of food • Iron supplements Prevention of IDA – Both Health and Economic Issue Iron Folic Acid Supplementation – Benefits Investment not limited to pregnancy Positive influence on cognitive development Enhanced concentration in school and work Increased physical output Improved growth (10-14 years) Improved appetite Decreased morbidity Overcome irregularity in menstruation Investment in pregnancy (Iron supplementation during pregnancy might be too late!) Overcome large prepregnancy deposits Reduces chances of LBW and MMR Reduces chances of neural tube defects (NTD) Improves iron status of infants Prevention of Anaemia Daily or Weekly Dose of IFA ? Global Efficacy and Effectiveness Trials Meta Analysis Weekly Iron Folic Acid Supplementation (WIFS) is Effective for Prevention of Anaemia in adolescent girls India – Impact of Daily and Weekly IFA Administration to adolescent Girls (1996-1998) WEEKLY [Baseline anaemia prevalence (%)] DAILY [Baseline anaemia prevalence (%)] 66.2 Percentage (%) 70 60 WEEKLY [Final anaemia prevalence (%)] DAILY [Final anaemia prevalence (%)] 65 63.5 61.6 53.8 50 44.4 49 48.2 47 40 30.9 33.9 26.2 30 20 10 0 n=438 n=441 Baroda n=506 Delhi n=617 n=680 n=558 Mumbai Meta analysis (3 India + 6 others) - CONCLUSION – Weekly supplementation should be considered only in situations where there is strong assurance of supervision and high compliance (Beaton et al, 1999) Indonesia Adolescent Study 25 Daily (n=64) Weekly (n=70) Placebo (n=75) 21.3 20 20 17.3 15.6 15 10 7.8 5.7 5 0 12 week 0 week Haemoglobin < 120 g/L Prevalence of anaemia at baseline and after 12 weeks of supplementation Daily – 60 mg Fe, 750 µg retinol, 250mg folic acid and 60 mg vitamin C Weekly – 60 mg Fe, 6000 µg retinol, 500mg folic acid and 60 mg vitamin C Placebo - 0 mg Fe, 0 µg retinol, 0 mg folic acid and 0 mg vitamin C Angeles-Agdeppa et al, 1997 Sri Lanka Adolescent Study Before treatment anaemia prevalence (%) Before treatment ferritin level (µg/L) After treatment anaemia prevalence (%) After treatment ferritin level (µg/L) 92.3 100 82.7 80 66.6 60 40 25 20 0 59.1 56.3 54.1 9.5 n=220 19.8 18.5 8.6 n=9 Weekly n=222 Daily n=22 13.4 n=217 n=11 Placebo Prevalence of anaemia and serum ferritin level (in a sub sample) before and after 8 weeks of treatment Intervention • Iron Folic Acid Supplements • 6 monthly Deworming done Jayatissa and Piyasena, 1999 India Experience – 2000-2005 Weekly Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation (WIFS) – 100 mg Fe + 500 µg Folic Acid 13 states (8.7 m girls) Age group between 10 – 19 years In School Girls (SG) and Non School Going Girls (NSG) Anaemia prevalence 54-99% Source: Dwivedi and Schultink, 2006 SCN News # 31 Change in Anemia Prevalence by States (Hb<12 g/dl) 120 Baseline 1 year post 2 years post 99.4 100 90 82.9 87.4 80 85 87.3 74.2 80 95 92.6 89 73.3 65.2 60 58 54.7 53.4 49.4 40.2 40.2 39.1 40 20 13 G ) (b )W B -S G G (L -S P *U *U P (L -N G SG G -S *U P (G -N (G P *U ) G ) ) SG G SG G &N -S G -N *M ah ra sh tra *M P -S ka nd (a )J ha r tS uj ar a *G SG G G G G G G G PS *A G 0 * statistically significant difference (Chi square test, p<0.001, CI 95%) (a) Baseline is the ICMR estimation of anemia (Chi Square Test not possible) (b) out of school non participants represent baseline and school going participants represent assessment (Chi Square Test not possible) WIFS – compliance 75-90% Change in Mean Hb levels (g/dl) 13 12.5 12.6 1 year post 2 years post 12.1 12 11.7 12 11.5 Baseline 11.1 11.1 11 10.5 11.7 10.9 11.4 11.1 11.25 10.5 10.4 10.12 10 9.5 9 8.5 8.5 (L P U (L P U * Statistical t test confirmed significant difference -S G) ) -N SG (G ) P U M ah *M P uj *G A P 8 Benefits Reported (all states) Benefits Less fatigue % Range 25.5 – 65 More concentration 24.2 – 85.5 Less breathlessness 0.7 – 83.5 Feel healthy 7.2 – 87.9 Able to work 21 – 24.2 Good appetite 18.2 – 88 Menstrual cycle regular Reported UMANG (Uplifting Marriage Age, Nutrition & Growth) UP State - A Case Study Coverage Two Districts : Adolescent Girls 0.5 m Coverage : ICDS Centres 3762 Schools 1028 Gorakhpur Lucknow Age of Marriage (Gorakhpur district) Age No. Interviewed Married % 10 -13 876 97 11% 14-16 630 103 16% 17-19 283 180 64% Total 1789 380 21% UMANG Project, LUCKNOW district, UP • • • • • 10 Administrative rural and urban blocks Population covered 3,647,834 Included Non School Going (NSG) girls (11-18 years) and School Going (SG) girls (10-19 years) Implemented in 3 phases (2001 – 2006) Intervention Package Weekly IFA tablets (Fe 100 mg, Folic acid 500 µg) Six monthly deworming tablets (400 mg Albendezole) Family life education (FLEd), Counseling delay conception > 18 years Reaching Adolescent Girls* Intervention package (Deworming, WIFA, FLEd) Non School Going (NSG) School Going (SG) Supervised Non - supervised Health (RCH)+ ICDS (Adolescent Girls Scheme)+ PRI Health + Education (Middle and Senior school)+ PRI * NGO (Vatsalya) facilitated district programme implementation Coverage of NSG and SG adolescent girls in Lucknow district Phase (implementation period) No. of blocks (total population) Age group (years) No. of ICDS centres No. of schools Adolescent girls (NSG+SG) covered I (Sept 2001 – Dec 2002) 1 Block (85, 383) 11 – 18 95 - 3800 (only NSG) II (Jan 2003 – Dec 2004) 2 Blocks (3, 24, 087) 11 – 18 169 100 22, 695 (NSG = 12695) (SG = 10, 000) III (Jan 2005 – Dec 2007) 10 Blocks (rural and urban in the district) (3, 647, 834) 10 – 19 1275 351 1, 50, 700 (NSG = 73, 700) (SG = 77, 000) Non School Going (NSG) girls AWW + Adolescent Girl Scheme (3 girls / AWC) incharge of supply, monitoring / record UMANG group (20-25 girls), (kitty ?) girl to girl approach additional 20 – 25 girls (1:2) Deworming IFA Counseling on benefits Diet + FLEd (Fixed theme) + Q box Recording in registers (4 th Saturday / month) 73,700 NSG School Going (SG) Girls Map middle and senior schools Orientation to Panchayat + district and block education officers 2 teachers / school (trainers) Each Saturday (Anaemia Day) Deworming IFA Tablet (Supervised) Individual recoding cards FLEd 77, 000 girls IFA Supply (6 months)* District Hospital (Kit A + UNICEF supply) District Education Department Block Education Department Selected Schools School Going (SG) girls Block PHC ICDS (CDPO Office) Anganwadi Centres Non School Going (NSG) girls * Identical to those provided to pregnant mothers by GOI, Cost = Rs 11.40/100 tablets (blister packs) Monitoring Form Phase I – Knowledge of NSG adolescent girls – baseline and following 6 months of Family Life Education intervention 11 – 14 years 1. Awareness related to anaemia • Yes 2. Measures for prevention • • • • • • By taking IFA tablets Both diet and IFA tablets Medicines and tonic Improved diet Any other DNK * Following 6 months intervention 15 – 18 years Baseline (%) Post* (%) Baseline (%) Post * (%) 44.0 94.7 64.1 98.9 4.2 1.5 26.0 12.5 0.8 56.6 38.0 35.3 6.5 16.8 0.5 7.3 10.3 3.6 27.9 21.8 1.2 39.1 37.3 22.8 4.6 31.4 0.3 4.4 Pre (N=437) 12 months (N=216) 6 months (N=413) Cut off point Mean Haemoglobin (gm %) 13 12 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 overall Age Phase I – Impact on haemoglobin levels following 6 and 12 months of weekly IFA consumption by non school going (NSG) adolescent girls Impact of WIFS on Hb Levels (NSG) 12.5 n = 600 girls 12 Hb (g/dl) 12 11.3 11.5 11 10.5 10.4 10 9.5 Baseline 1st 6 months Next 6 months 1 year Total Hb rise 2g/dl after 1 year of supervised consumption Percentage (%) 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 baseline 73.2 follow 6 months of IFA supplementation 53.7 46.3 53.7 44.9 26.8 19.4 0.1 Anaemic (Hb%<12g/dL) 0 1.4 Severe (Hb%<7g/dL) Moderate (Hb%7-10g/dL) Mild (Hb%10-11.9g/dL) Non Anaemic (Hb%12g/dl) Type of anaemia School Going Girls – Status of anaemia at baseline (596 girls) and following 6 months of weekly IFA supplementation (573 girls) Overall haemoglobin levels (g/dL) and anaemia prevalence (%) in SG (School Going – supervised) and NSG (Non – School Going – Non Supervised) adolescent girls Parameters Overall Hb level (g/dL) Overall % Anaemia (< 12 g/dL) School Going (SG) Supervised Pre Post (n=299) (n=276) 10.5 11.7 Non School Going (NSG) Non Supervised Pre (n=300) Post (n=297) 11.3 12.0 t=8.36 (p<0.01)* t=8.35 (p<0.01)* 92.6 58.0 t=8.545 (p<0.01)** 73.3 39.0 t=6.373 (p<0.01)** * Mean haemoglobin (gm %) - t value for SG vs NSG < 1 (no significant difference) **Prevalence of anaemia (%) – t value for SG vs NSG < 1 (no significant difference) 100 92.6 Overall Hb levels (g/dL) Overall % anaemia (<12 g/dL) 90 80 73.3 70 58 60 50 39 40 30 20 10.5 11.7 12 11.3 10 0 Pre supplementation Post supplementation SCHOOL GOING (Supervised) Pre supplementation Post supplementation NON SCHOOL GOING (Non Supervised) Overall haemoglobin levels (g/dL) and anaemia prevalence (%) in SG (School Going – supervised) and NSG (Non – School Going – Non Supervised) adolescent girls 80 Total % anaemic Severely anaemic Moderately anaemic Mildly anaemic Non Anaemic 74.6 73.3 70 65.4 Percentage (%) 61 60 50 39 40 37.9 26.7 30 25.4 17.3 20 7.9 10 6.5 0 0 1.1 2003 2004 1.6 0 (N=1173) (N=870) 2006 (N=301) Change in anaemia status of combined NSG and SG adolescent girls in two selected blocks followed between 2003-2006 IFA consumption analysis undertaken in 150 NSG girls* Percentage of girls (Numbers) Weekly consumption Yes No - Forget to take - health effects - other non specific 86 (129) 14 (21) 52.4 (11) 28.6 (6) 19.0 (4) Girls - perceived impact -Positive response -Negative response -No specific response 62.7 (94) 18.6 (28) 18.7 (28) Consumption time -any time -following dinner -empty stomach 16.7 (25) 82.7 (124) 0.6 (1) Method of consuming -with milk -with tea/coffee -with water 0.6 (1) 99.4 (149) * Girls with UMANG for minimum 24 months Cost incurred in the programme per beneficiary Year No. of Beneficiaries Cost (Rs) / Cost ( US$) head / head 2003 3800 119.62 2.96 2004 22,695 58.60 1.45 2006 1,50,700 14.60 0.36 UMANG Project - Cost ($)/Adol. girl 3.5 Cost ($ / girl) 3 2.96 2.5 2 1.45 1.5 1 0.5 0.42 0.36 2005 2006 0 2003 2004 Success Factors • High priority (State / District / PRI) • Integrated with ongoing programme •Supply regular and streamlined • Package presentation of IFA (blister packs) • Distribution of IFA (fixed day approach) • Family Life Education (Theme – fixed month) • Multisectoral Training (Training Manual) • IEC and Social Mobilisation (emphasis on benefits – increase compliance) • Monitoring (NGO involved) Preventing Adolescent Anaemia • Access to dietary iron – long term strategy •WIFS – short term strategy effective preventive strategy for iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia benefits in future outweigh the cost incurred manageable in community settings (schools, factories, community organisation, mass media) integrate with ongoing development programme (Education, ICDS, RCH) From District Project to UP State Programme Weekly Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation (WIFS) intervention integrated with ongoing state efforts for reaching Adolescent girls Health Sector (SG) - RCH II (UP) with Education sector (Every Saturday / week) ICDS (NSG) - Mission Poshan (4th Saturday of Month) Prevention of Iron Deficiency and Impact on MDGs MDG Goals Impact of IDA Prevention MDG # 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger • increases body’s capacity to do work (for every 10% increase in HB – 15% increase in physical work) • Reduces low birth weight • undernutrition in under 5 year MDG # 2 Achieve Universal Primary Education • Reduces frequency and severity of infections / morbidity and mortality • school attendance, retention, learning capacity and school achievement MDG # 3 Promote Gender Equality and • Anaemia in girls – often more severe than in Empower Women boys. Adversely influences school attendance and achievement. • gender disparity MDG # 4 Reduce Child Mortality • Reduces serious consequences on child health, including LBW, still birth • child mortality MDG # 5 Improve Maternal Health • Reduction of maternal anaemia • MMR (20% of these maternal deaths directly attributed to anaemia) Moving Ahead •1991 – National Nutritional Anaemia Prophylaxis Programme (NNAPP) revised to National Anaemia Control Programme (NACP) • 1998 – National Anaemia Consultation Report “Demonstrate large scale district level projects to study the effectiveness of WIFA supplementation to adolescent girls.” • 2007 – Review of Policy – IFA (23rd April 2007) “ Adolescents, 11 – 18 years will be supplemented at the same doses and duration as adults. The adolescent girls will be given priority.” • 2008 – We all must act now Redefine specific cost effective dosage and strategy (WIFS and Nutrition Education) for addressing anaemia prevention in adolescent girls Thank You