Transcript MIW ST Experimentation Issues/Plans

Mine Warfare Sea Trial
Experimentation Issues/Plans
CAPT Rich Medley
6 May 2003
For Official Use Only
Outline
Sea Trial Process
• Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
• MIW CD&E Plan
• Sea Trial Events
• Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03
2
Sea Power 21
Sea Shield
Sea Trial
Sea Warrior
FORCEnet
Sea Strike
Sea Enterprise
Sea Basing
5/6/03
3
Sea Trial
• Navy process for Joint transformation
• Integrates emergent concepts and
technologies
• Continuously improves warfighting
effectiveness
• Sustains a commitment to innovation
• NWDC serves as the Project
Coordinator
5/6/03
4
The Task
• Implement Sea Trial
– Formalize experimentation process with fleet
as a major partner.
– Integrate Concept Development and
Technology insertion with fleet
experimentation.
• Outcomes
– Fleet-led, enduring process of innovation
– Accelerated concept and technology
development
– Enhanced headquarters/fleet alignment
All in a Joint environment
5/6/03
5
The Challenge with Navy CD&E
• Tremendous activity and
investment in CD&E
• Not focused across echelons
from Headquarters to Fleet
• Gaps between Concept
Development – Experimentation
– Implementation
• Lacks synergy w/ USMC & Joint
Processes
5/6/03
6
Where we are…going
Sea Trial Campaign
Sea Trial Plan
Playbook
Sea Trial Process
Initiated
Sea Trial Process
Message
May 03
Sea Trial
Mar 03
Workshops
SP 21
Implemented
Sea Trial
Naval Conference
Transformation
Roadmap
Sea Power 21
Announced
Feb 03
STESG Mtg
Feb 03
Oct 02
Nov Dec 02
Sep 02
Jul 02
Jun 02
Building the Foundation
5/6/03
Defining the Process
Process Execution
7
Sea Trial Process
N3/N5
Naval
Strategy
Develop Sea
Trial Events
Prioritized
Naval
Capabilities
NCJO –
CONOPS
Integrate
Sea Trial Events
JCDE
FNCs
Tac D&E
Title X Games
Fast Track
DOTMLPF
Iterative
Experimentation
& Development
Sea Trial ESG
CFFC
Operational
Assessment
Execute
Sea Trial
Experiments
N70 MCPs
5/6/03
Sea Trial
Campaign
Plan
Experiment
Analysis
DoN
Transformation
Roadmap
8
Sea Trial Organizations
CFFC
CPF
N7
ONR
Operational Agents
Sea Strike: C2F / C5F
Sea Shield: C3F / C7F
Sea Basing: C2F / C6F
FORCEnet: NNWC
5/6/03
CNE
MCCDC
NWDC
Pillar Groups
STESG Members
SYSCOMS
Numbered Fleets
9
Sea Trial C/D&E
Collaborative Teams
N701
N703
CNO
N702
N704
CFFC
Sea Trial ESG
Sea Strike
Sea Shield
Sea Basing
FORCEnet
C2F/5F
C3F/7F
C2F/6F
N6, NNWC
Sea Strike
Conventional Strike
(Include SOF)
NWDC
CMWC
NNWC
SWDG
MCCDC
HPC
Strategic Deterrence
NSAWC*
N702
Sea Shield
CSDS 12
CLF
NWDC
C6F
C5F
N71*
C7F
CSF
N701
HPC
MCCDC
CPF
FIWC
ONR
NSAWC
Information Operations
CUS
NWDC NNWC*
NWDC
N702
EOD/VSW
ONR
HPC
NSAWC
ONI SWDG
MCCDC*
FIWC
NNWC
CMWC
HPC N61
ASW
CPF*
CFFC N2 NWDC
CMD
CMWC
FIWC
N701
MCCDC
CSDS 12 CMWC*
FIWC
SWDG
NSOC
CSDS 12
SWDG
CUS
EOD
VX-1
MCCDC
VX-1
ONR
N701
ONR
N701
NSAWC
HPC
NSAWC
CMWC
5/6/03
MIW / MCM
NWDC
NWDC
HPC
ASUW/MIO
NWDC
VX-1
CMD
N701
ONR
USCG
N42
EOD
SWDG*
NSAWC
CSDS 12
FIWC
MCCDC
CUS
HPC
AT/FP WDC
MSG
FORCEnet
Operational Level C2
NWDC ONI
NAVSUP
ONR NNWC*
MCCDC
N61 NNSOC
CFFCN4
MSC
N2 NSAWC
MCCDC SWDG
N931
EOD CFFCN6
BUMED
CUS NSWC
HPC
N931 N703
NSAWC
NCFC CMWC
Undersea Warfare
NSWC CSDS 12
SWDG SPAWAR MCCDC
N702 FIWC
CSDS 12
Logistics
Regional
CFFC*
AT/FP WDC
Fleet
MCCDC
Logistics
N701
Coordination
N931
N703
BUMED
N42
EOD
HPC
ONR
MSG
EOD
CUS
NSAWC
CMWC
NWDC
N 701
N 707
N 42
USCG
FIWC
ONR
NSAWC
SWDG
MDA
SWDG*
N76
ONR
NSWC
HPC
FIWC
ONR
ONR NSAWC
STOM
Sea Basing
Force Protection
Air & Missile Defense
NWDC
HPC
CMWC
Network
Backplane
ISR
NNWC* NSAWC NWDC
ONI
NWDC SWDG
ONR CSDS 12 N702
HPC
ONI MCCDC
SPAWAR FIWC MCCDC
N702 N61
NSAWC*
SWDG
CSDS 12
NNWC
ONR
CUS
HPC CFFC N2
CMWC
Mission Capability
Integration
NWDC
NNWC*
ONI
NSAWC
N702
SWDG
HPC
CSDS 12
MCCDC
ONR
CMWC
CUS
* Likely Supported Commander
Rev 3-27
10
Mine Warfare Collaborative Team
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
5/6/03
Mine Warfare Command
Navy Warfare Development Command
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
OPNAV N701
Office of Naval Research
Naval Surface Warfare Center
Surface Warfare Development Group
Submarine Development Squadron Twelve
Naval Network and Space Operations Command
Fleet Information Warfare Center
Air Test & Evaluation Squadron One
Explosive Ordnance Disposal Units
11
Outline
• Sea Trial Process
Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
• MIW CD&E Plan
• Sea Trial Events
• Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03
12
The Way Ahead:
Sea Trial Campaign Plan
• Comprehensive roadmap
• Integrates studies, wargames,
experimentation, exercises
– Evaluation metrics, execution timeline
CNO
Guidance
for 2003
• Identify promising Concepts &
Technologies, improvements, systems
• Get warfighting capabilities to the
Fleet
5/6/03
13
Context
Approach
“Ready”
•
•
•
•
Defense Planning & Transformation Guidance
Joint Vision & Warfighting Concepts
Navy Vision: Sea Power 21
Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, Special Operations and COCOM’s
Visions, Concepts & Capabilities
• Assessments of Navy Mission Effectiveness
• Advancing Technology
Challenges, Opportunities & Fleet Priorities
•
•
•
•
Naval, Joint and National
Core Challenges Facing the Navy: Today and in the Future
Adversary Strategic & Tactical Weaknesses
Potential Asymmetric Advantages Over the Adversary
“Aim”
Strategy-Driven Concepts
• Solving the Core Challenges
• Creating and Exploiting Adversary Weaknesses
• Synergistic with Joint/ Marine Corps / Other Service / COCOM
Concepts, Capabilities and Challenges
Concept-Driven Experiments
“Fire”
• Test and Refine the Concepts
• Designed to Answer Key Unknowns Regarding Mission Effectiveness,
Implementation Alternatives, and Composing & Operating the Transformed Fleet
• Spiral Development and Evaluation Process
• Allow Evaluation and Guidance by Fleet Commanders and Sailors
• Establish Key Performance Thresholds and Material Development Needs
• Establish Revised Mission CONOPs
• Provide “Fast Track” Prototypes and Key Niche Forces to the Fleet
Analysis/Assessment
MCP, Requirements &
Acquisition Process
• Prioritizes, budgets, and
develops material improvements
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
Develop Doctrine and TT&P, and
Train Personnel
• Prioritizes and implements
DOTLP improvements
14
Contents (Streamlined Plan for May ‘03)
1.
1.1
Authority
1.2
Background, Objectives and Approach
1.3
Scope
2.
Future Environment and Mission
2.1
Capability Assessment and Core Future Challenges
2.2
Current Limitations/Issues
2.3
Joint and Service Modernization Environment
2.4
Future Naval Opportunities
3
5/6/03
Introduction
Future Concept Summary
3.1
Sea Strike
3.2
Sea Shield
3.3
Sea Basing
3.4
I&KA / FORCEnet
4. Key Unknowns, Metrics, and Mode of Experimentation
4.1
Sea Strike
4.2
Sea Shield
4.3
Sea Basing
4.4
I&KA / FORCEnet
Competing Capabilities, Feasibility, Performance, Risk and Cost
Force Structure and Deployment of Enabling Assets
Assembly: How do we put it all together?
Employment: How Best to Operate It?
5. Execution
5.1 Experimentation Threads, Events, Assignment and Schedule
5.2 Budget
6. Implementation
6.1 MCP Impacts
6.2 Key New Capability Requirements
6.3 “Fast Track” Initiatives
6.4 S&T and R&D Guidance, Transition Targets, and Timeline
6.5 Doctrine and TTP Changes
6.6 Implications for Navy Leveraging Joint, Service and National Capabilities
Annex A:
Concept Descriptions and Enabling Capabilities
Annex B:
Guide to Planning and Conducting Navy Experiments
Annex C:
Summary of Previous Navy Experimentation Results
Annex D:
SCI/SAP
For Official Use Only
15
Sea Shield
CONCEPTS
Concept-based Experimentation
Initiatives for LCS
Assured Access
Joint
Aerospace
Defense
Littoral
Sea Control
Deploy, manage, exploit,
refuel, replace,
reposition, recover and
redeploy (DMER5) a
range of off board and
organic systems
Employ modular, flexible
mission sensing,
weapons and network
capabilities
Deploy the associated
platforms and network
necessary to employ off
board systems
Deploy and sustain forces
to deny the enemy the
ability to gain access to
U.S. or allied power
projection battlespace.
Deploy forces to
conduct covert and
clandestine battlespace
environmental and
operational
characterization
Synergize access and
power projection forces
in creating and
sustaining access
Homeland Defense
Develop/Evaluate
LCS Mission
Packages and
CONOPS for
ASW, MIW, SUW
missions
LCS EXPERIMENTATION
INITIATIVES (PARTIAL)
Evaluate LCS/HSV
in roles as host
platform for
experimentation
Evaluate various LCS
modular aviation
packages to enable
Develop/Evaluate LCS
LCS missions
Mission Packages and
CONOPS for frequently
conducted mobility
missions.
Conduct vulnerability
evaluations examining
susceptibility,
survivability and
recoverability
Maximize deployment of
unmanned systems in
assured access
operations
Manage forces with an
access-centric
command and control
structure and
architecture
Provide analysis and
decision aid tools to
permit determination of
the level of access at a
given point,
Determine necessary
battlespace
environmental
characterizations for all
LCS missions
Determine LCS
capabilities/options re:
organic vs. modular sensors
and weapons.
Analyze LCS
compatibility,
interdependence and
integration with ESG and
CSG across mission
areas
For Official Use Only
Assured
Presence
In-port
Force
Protection
On-shore
Force
Protection
To be Developed
with USMC
Experimentation Threads and Schedule
Description of
events in
Section 4,
& threads in
Section 5
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
17
Outline
• Sea Trial Process
• Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
MIW CD&E Plan
• Sea Trial Events
• Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03
18
MIW Portion of the Campaign Plan
• Section 1 documents linkage to:
– The Naval Operating Concept in support
of Joint Operations
– The Naval Transformation Roadmap
– Sea Power 21
• Section 2 is classified but discusses
the Future Environment and Mission
wrt MIW
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
19
MIW Concept Summary
• Rapidly locate and track all mines
• Must account for buried, shallow water
and mobile mines
• Use autonomous, unmanned vehicles
• Utilize undersea networking
• Consider tracking before deployment
• Possible Courses of Action Include
–
–
–
–
5/6/03
Destruction prior to deployment
Destruction of mine-laying platform
Mine avoidance
Autonomous mine clearance
For Official Use Only
20
Sea Shield
Sea Shield
(Access)
(2)
L1
Littoral Sea
Control
(2.1)
L2
L3
ASW
MIW
SUW
Theater Air Missile
Defense
(2.2)
Air & Cruise Missile Defense
Ballistic Missile Defense
MIW
example
Concept Development Plan
Level 1 – Sea Power 21 Pillar
Level 2 – Goals identified in SP-21 and NTR
Level 3 – Capabilities required to reach the Level 2 Goals
Level 4 – Functionalities required for the Level 3 Capabilities
Level 5 – Identify / define requirements for Level 4 Functionalities
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
21
Sea Shield
Level 2
2.1
Littoral Sea
Control
Level 3
2.1.1
Mine Warfare
Level 4
2.1.1.1
Mine
Countermeasures
2.1.1.2
Mining
2.1.1.1.1
Detection, Classification,
Localization, & Identification
2.1.1.1..2
Neutralization
2.1.1.1.3
Delivery of Sensor &
Prosecutors
Level 5
2.1.1.1.4
Network-Supported
Common Operating Picture
2.1.1.1.5
Operational and Tactical
Decision Aids
2.1.1.1.6
Refinement of CONOPS
And TT&P for MIW
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
22
2.1.1.1.1 Detection, Classification, Localization, &
Identification (Mine Counter Measures)
.1 Use inorganic sensors (e.g., space-based and covertly deployed long and
medium duration sensors within an Expeditionary Sensor Grid) to
provide pervasive and preferably covert wide area sensing over land to
assess the status of mines ashore prior to their deployment to delivery
platforms.
.2 Covertly track the movement of mines from production and storage
areas to staging areas and platforms.
.3 Autonomously detect, track, and establish track histories for mine
deployment platforms.
.4 Detect when mine operations have commenced through identification of
potential mine-laying events (e.g. splash, bottoming transients, and
visual).
.5 Provide the environmental characterization required to allow for optimal
deployment decisions and MIW assessment, including bottom
characterization and non-mine-like bottom object locations.
.6 Utilize organic assets including expendable and non-expendable OBS to
determine changes to baseline environmental surveys and to detect,
classify, and identify mines and mine-like objects in the contested littoral.
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
23
2.1.1.1.1 Detection, Classification, Localization, &
Identification (Mine Counter Measures) - Cont
.7 Achieve overlapping and parallel coverage of the battlespace by utilizing a
combination of OBS with different and complementary capabilities, to
include Laser, Biomimetics, Acoustic, Chemical, Magnetic, EO, PCL.
.8 Improve capabilities to counter mine CCD (Camouflage, Concealment, and
Deception) efforts.
.9 Display outputs from inorganic and organic sensors within a common
operational picture that is continuously updated (24/7 MIW
characterization for battlespace preparation).
.10 Rapidly locate and classify mine-like objects with high confidence, utilizing
OBS mobility, multiple look angles, multi-spectral processing, on-board
processing, and adaptive sensors.
.11 Positively identify contacts as mines to support neutralization or avoidance
decisions.
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
24
2.1.1.1.2 Neutralization (Mine Counter Measures)
.1 Assimilate information on mines and mine-like objects from all sensors to
enable the decision maker to choose optimal mine neutralization tactics
and options against mines prior to their introduction into the water.
.2 Assimilate information on mines and mine-like objects from all sensors to
enable the decision maker to choose optimal mine neutralization tactics
and options, including avoidance measures such as establishment of
safe transit lanes and safe operating areas.
.3 Provide the decision-maker with full suite of destructive and non-destructive
suppression and neutralization techniques.
.4 Enable parallel versus sequential mine detection through
suppression/neutralization.
.5 Integrate new detection, classification, identification, and neutralization
techniques with legacy/program Navy capabilities.
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
25
2.1.1.1.3 Delivery of Sensors and Prosecutors
(Mine Counter Measures)
.1 Optimize a MIW mission-capable platform, utilizing a roll-on/roll-off MIW
mission capabilities module, capable of rapid delivery of OBS for
battlespace characterization, mine identification and neutralization,
exploitation of OBS network and inorganic signals, and operational and
tactical decision implementation based on sensor field outputs.
.2 Deliver large numbers of MCM OBS from tactical air/surface/sub platforms
or unmanned vehicles.
.3 Optimize size of OBS for modularity and physical manageability of high
volume payloads.
.4 Optimize OBS power/mobility profiles.
.5 Determine optimal OBS/platform interfaces, deployment TTP and servicing
options utilizing air/surface/sub platforms to allow for reduced manning in
launch and recovery.
.6 Develop OBS delivery options that overcome physical barriers.
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
26
2.1.1.1.4 Undersea Warfare Support Network
(Mine Counter Measures)
.1 Field a robust communications architecture that provides support for
network range/bandwidth requirements (acoustic, laser, RF, fiber) for
simultaneous use by all units in the littoral area of interest.
.2 Integrate surface, subsurface, OBS, and off-board sensor pertinent to the
same contact(s).
.3 Enable networked fusion of sensor information from multiple sensor outputs
within the common network.
.4 Enable off-board sensor and unmanned vehicle management from single
consoles or operating stations.
.5 Fuse MIW common operating picture with decision support information from
other domains (e.g. ASW, SUW, TAMD) to enable battle-space
monitoring and management from single consoles or operating stations.
.6 Enable Naval, joint and coalition forces to exchange digital data, share
information, collaboratively plan and execute operations.
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
27
2.1.1.1.5 Operational and Tactical Decision Aids
(Mine Counter Measures)
.1 Provide a full suite of tactical decision aids and automated tools to provide
optimized information to the operator.
.2 Provide operational decision aids to reflect commander’s intent and digital
expressions of guidance.
.3 Allow access to shared databases and common doctrine, algorithms, and
terminology within open architectures with multi-level security.
.4 Enable unmanned vehicle navigation and intelligent reporting capabilities
(navigation, contacts, action reports, autonomous reaction to changing
situations).
.5 Provide common displays enabling the operator’s decision processes for
contact deconfliction and water space management.
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
28
2.1.1.1.6 Refinement of CONOPS & TTP (Mine
Counter Measures)
.1 Provide fleet operators and decision-makers with robust concept of
operations across all MIW (Mine Countermeasures and Mining) mission
scenarios.
.2 Refine and mature the MIW Concept of Operations document, ensuring that
the concept is developed in conjunction with and integrated with other
concepts (e.g. ASW, SUW) required simultaneously to enable Littoral
Sea Control.
.3 Provide detailed TT&P for missions, equipment, and OBS for all MIW
mission scenarios.
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
29
2.1.1.2 Mining
.1 As an adjunct to Mine Countermeasures capability, utilize off-board sensors
designed to gain battle-space awareness to enable effective own-force
sea mining operations.
.2 Provide decision aids and campaign/operational models to assist operators
in planning mining operations. Take into account environmental and
threat assessments, mine sensors, desired mine effects, target types,
available delivery methods and platforms.
.3 Enable flexible joint capability for precise mine delivery using submarine,
surface and air platforms in a overt or clandestine manner .
.4 Enable new sea mining capabilities including remote control, standoff
delivery, full water depth coverage, enhanced counter detection, mine
safety and mine sterilization .
.5 Establish and maintain a capability to protect and maintain own-force
mining efforts.
.6 Provide for safe, timely and cost effective sea mine removal when hostilities
have ceased.
5/6/03
For Official Use Only
30
HIGH SPEED VESSEL
LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP
EXPERIMENTATION PLAN
Version 1.0
As of 3 January 2003
5/6/03
31
MIW Mission for LCS
LCS Littoral MIW Mission;
• Conduct coordinated all sensor search
• CSG/ESG; MPA/MMA; UV’s; MH-60
• Locate and neutralize (limited) mines
• Establish Q Route(s)
Reachback
Mine Threat
Influence & Contact Mines
Deep water to beach
• Punch through
MH-60
USVs
Q-Route
LCS MIW Mission Module enables:
• Coordination and direction of area MIW search
employing off-board sensors & remote UVs
 Launch / recovery of MCM vehicle(s)
• Bottom mapping and survey mission support
• Coordination and connectivity with CSG/ESG
• Mine avoidance & limited neutralization
• Signature management
• Real-time connectivity with MIWC for re-tasking
• Reach back for:
• Mission planning
• METOC
• Intel
• Analytic support & data fusion
• Dissemination of mine location information
• Common Operational Picture
5/6/03
CSG
LCS Value Added
• Provides Commander with a first response
organic mine detection / avoidance capability
• Enables earlier flow of follow-on forces
32
Potential MIW Venues
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
5/6/03
12-21 September 2003 (East Coast icw JTFEX 03-3); recommended emphasis on
MIW experimentation.
22 October-7 November 2003 (West Coast icw JTFEX 04-1); recommended
emphasis on MIW and seabasing experimentation as conducted during JTFEX 03-3
and the PELELIEU ESG LOE...
14-21 November 2003 (PCOA icw GOMEX 04-1); recommended emphasis on
MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
4-30 April 2004 (Baltic Sea icw BLUE GAME 04); major MCM exercise.
Experimentation to support MIW.
1-17 September 2004 (CCOA icw RONEX 04-2) recommended emphasis on
MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
8-27 October 2004 (EUCOM icw UNIFIED SPIRIT) recommended emphasis on MIW
experimentationl.
1-24 November 2004 (GOMEX icw MIW Training) recommended emphasis on
MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
9-29 January 2005 (PCOA icw GOMEX 05-1); recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS
experimentation with new/prototype systems.
23 March-4 April 2005 (CENTCOM icw ARABIAN GAUNTLET 05); recommended
emphasis on MIW and Seabasing experimentation.
5-18 June 2005 (CCOA icw GOMEX 05-2); recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS
experimentation with new/prototype systems.
19-30 June 2005 (GOMEX icw MIW Training); recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS
experimentation with new/prototype systems.
For Official Use Only
33
Outline
• Sea Trial Process
• Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
• MIW CD&E Plan
Sea Trial Events
• Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03
34
Sea Trial Events
• Link to an enabling capability of the
Campaign Plan.
EXAMPLE: 2.1.1.1.1.6 Utilize organic assets including
expendable and non-expendable OBS to determine
changes to baseline environmental surveys and to
detect, classify, and identify mines and mine-like
objects in the contested littoral.
• Meet an established fleet priority.
• Developed with a sufficient analytical rigor
to answer specific operational or tactical
questions that further the Fleet’s
warfighting capability.
5/6/03
35
Approved Sea Trial Events
• Sea Basing
– Multi-National Split Staff LOE (C2F)…7 – 11Apr
– FBE Kilo (C7F) 14…Apr – 5 May
– JFMCC War Game…14 – 25 Jul
• Sea Strike
–
–
–
–
JFN IPB Phase II LOE…Apr
Hypersonic Rail Gun…14 Apr
JFN Workflow Management LOE…May
TES-N Fusion LOE…Jul
• Sea Shield
–
–
–
–
SOCEX 4-1…TBD
LWAD 03-3 ICW SHAREM 46…Jun
Joint Harbor Ops Center…TBD
SJFHQ Prototype LOE / CIE…8 – 26 Sep
• FORCEnet
–
–
–
–
5/6/03
Multi-National Split Staff LOE (C2F)…7 – 11Apr
FBE Kilo (C7F)…14 Apr – 5 May
JTFEX 3-3…12-22 Sep
ESG LOE / IPD…Sep / Oct
36
Outline
• Sea Trial Process
• Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
• MIW CD&E Plan
• Sea Trial Events
Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03
37
Sea Trial Information Management
System (STIMS)
• CFFC Sea Trial tasking to NWDC:
“...develop and host an interactive database which will
serve as a “central library” of initiatives and
technologies and serve as a useful tool to manage
Sea Trial Events and related activity...”
• Desired database capabilities collected from
stakeholders Nov 02 – Jan03 and documented in
Functional Requirements Document (FRD)
• Developmental prototype system is posted on
SIPRNET
– http://www.nwdc.navy.smil.mil/nlls/stims
– Evaluation/Limited Functionality/Test Data Only
• Schedule
– STIMS 1.0 release scheduled for July 2003
5/6/03
38
5/6/03
39
5/6/03
40
5/6/03
41
Summary
• Sea Trial still a work in progress
• Campaign Plan is the roadmap
• NWDC is the Sea Trial Coordinator
• Sea Trial initiatives processed by NWDC
5/6/03
42
Points of Contact:
• General
– CAPT Rich Medley
– [email protected]
– (401) 841-2833 DSN 948
• Sea Trial Initiatives
– Mr. Rick Rigazio
– [email protected]
– (401) 841-7124 DSN 948
• STIMS
– Dr. Mike Kopp
– [email protected]
– (401) 841-4172 DSN 948
5/6/03
43
Backups
FBE J MIW
•
•
•
•
SOCAL Operating Areas
24 – 27 Jul 02: MCM Ops
24 - 31 Jul 02: MIWC Ops
HSV experimentation objectives
– Command and control platform for MCM forces (COMCMRON,
VSW Det, EODGRU ONE)
– Launch/recovery platform for Unmanned Under-water Vehicles
(UUV), Unmanned Surface Vehicles (SAIC, ONR, JOINT
VENTURE)
– Launch/Recovery/Collect Bottom Data and Mine Detection w/ Klein
5500 Sonar (SEA SLICE, EODMU 7)
– Launch/Recover EOD RHIB with REMUS from SEA SLICE (SEA
SLICE, EODMU7)
– MEDAL/Naval Mine Warfare Simulation as Course of Action tool
(COMCMRON,CSS)
– Reachback (EODGRU ONE, NAVO, COMCMRON)
5/6/03
45
High Speed Vessel--JOINT VENTURE
Comms/Sensor Employment
•
•
•
•
•
•
4 Tactical Radios (UHF & VHF LOS, HF)
2 UHF TACSAT DAMA
GBS (DBS Video Only)
GPS
TIBS/TDDS/TADIX
High Speed, Ku band (up to 27 mbps)
TCP/ IP (NIPR, SIPR, POTS (6, STU
Capable))
• Autonomous Unmanned Vehicles,
Pioneer Controller, & more
Platform Characteristics
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
5/6/03
Speed: 38 Kts loaded, 48 kts empty
Range: 3000+ NM (empty)
815 Short tons cargo
Draft: 13 ft (loaded)
Helo capable: CH46, MH/CH/SH-60
Crew - 30
Multi-mission, reconfigurable platform
FBE-J/MC02 Participation
Basing: San Diego Navy bases
Op Area: Western Sea Ranges
Missions:
•
•
•
•
•
Mine Warfare C2, employment platform
NAVSOC C2, employment platform
STOM support
IBCT Back-load
Logistics/sustainment/medical platform
46
MIW
BPAUV
EOD/MDSU
MH-6O SIM
OWL III
REMUS
KLEIN 5500
C4I
Observations
• No MCM Silver Bullets
• Family of Systems or Tiered systems = 5 vs 21 days for Q
route clearance
• Unmanned Undersea Vehicles reduced MCM Timeline
and threat to personnel and equipment
• Covertness valued attribute
• HSV and Sea Slice speed allowed sensor deployment
over large area
• Sea Slice Stability for sonar/UUV launch and recovery
• C4ISR suite support for MIWC C2 on HSV
• Precision MIW munitions for STOM: FASM and Hydra-7
• ISR assets and expertise required for Precision
Munitions
• Tactics and technology for autonomous coordinated
multi-UUV ops.
5/6/03
48
Preliminary Recommendations
• Accelerate introduction to the Fleet of ONR unmanned
undersea vehicles. Use this as opportunity to test
case Sea Trial.
– REMUS AND BPUAV (ONR)
• Develop unmanned surface vehicles for organic mine
counter measures. (NUWC & SPARTAN ACTD proposal)
• Continue assessment of reconfigurable vessels for
MIW. (NWDC, CMWC, C2F, C3F)
• Experiment with tactics and technology for
autonomous coordinated multi-UUV ops. (NWDC, ONR)
–
5/6/03
49