Effective Individual Advocacy in the Adult System
Download
Report
Transcript Effective Individual Advocacy in the Adult System
Effective Individual Advocacy
in the ADULT System
August 2011
Presented by: Lana Hurt,
Regional Coordinator
1
Overview
Introductions
Self Advocacy / Individual Advocacy /System
advocacy
Distinctions between children & adult services
Understand the culture
Understand the menu – specific models
Recommendations
Questions & Answers
2
Premises
The only disability is
having no relationships
- Judith Snow
3
Self- Advocacy – the Individual’s pursuit of
his or her own needs and choices
Individual Advocacy- efforts by another
person to ensure an individual is supported
according to the person’s
needs/preferences
Systems Advocacy – One or more persons
engaged in efforts to improve or change the
system or quality of life for all people
4
Good Decisions Matter
“….Providers of human services
affect the daily experiences & future prospects of the
people, families, and communities who rely on them.
Their policies and daily practice influence…
• Where a person lives, learns, works, and plays
• What activities fill the person’s days
• Who the person gets to know and
• Where the person belongs
Services shape people's experience of
community life”
From “What’s Worth Working For – Leadership For Better Quality Human Services” by John O’Brien
http://thechp.syr.edu/whatsw.pdf
5
Role of the Individual Advocate
Understand the options
Know /represent the person
Focus on the “Big Picture” : goals, values,
safety guidelines
Communicate “non-negotiables” in
advance
6
Distinctions between
Children and Adult Systems
CHILDREN:
Lack decision-making capacity
Educational Services are mandated (IDEA)
Educational Services are adequately funded
7
Distinctions between
Children and Adult Systems
ADULTS:
• Capacity is presumed
• Adult services are not mandated
• When/if ICF/MRs close – no more entitlements
• Availability based on eligibility, funding &
willingness
• Poorly funded
8
Distinctions between
Children and Adult Systems
Decision-making is truly shared
Good collaboration skills are
important:
Listen, be direct, respect time
constraints, understand the system
9
Be Alert To The Culture:
For every complex problem
there is a simple solution and it is
wrong.
--Oscar Wilde
10
What Does A Person-Centered Organizational
Culture Look Like?
Flexibility is possible
Vision / values are clear
People closest to the person/problem are able to
speak up and be heard
Relationships are open, respectful
Learning happens – because changes are noticed
and observed AND acknowledged
People stay connected in learning/thinking
together through ongoing dialogue.
11
What Does A PC Organization
NOT Look like:
Passive / Blame Culture
“Professionals know best”
“Those are the rules”
CYA versus real
accountability to the person
Creativity is weird / risky /
not acceptable
Crisis Culture
Only time for “quick fixes”
Temporary solutions
become permanent – until
there is another crisis
Time to think is a luxury
Crisis management replaces
real accountability to the
person
12
What Helps –
When You’re In Between?
Vision : Leaders see through the “lens” of
helping people get the lives that THEY
want.
Trust
Problem solving – requires release of
people’s creativity, not formulaic
implementation processes.
13
Person-Centered Principles
John O’Brien and Connie Lyle
Community presence: Sharing ordinary places that define
community life.
Choice: Autonomy both in small, everyday matters (e.g.,
what to eat or what to wear) and in large, life-defining
matters (e.g., with whom to live or what sort of work to
do).
Competence: the opportunity to perform functional and
meaningful activities with whatever assistance is required.
Respect: a valued place among a network of people and
valued roles in community life.
Community participation: the experience of being part of a
network of personal relationships that include close
friends.
14
Rules of Trust
Trust is not blind
– You can only trust people you know
– Trust requires “face time”
– You can only know a finite number of people well
enough to trust
– Be willing to work together with people in a “chain of
trust”
– Trust requires boundaries
– Trust requires learning and communicating – AND
having the capacity/support to act on new learning.
15
What Helps
When resources are scarce - negative
symptoms can surface
Strategies that exceed (or are more ambitious)
than the resources available , will fail.
Sometimes we need to settle for the “least
evil” solution while we are working for change
– and letting others know this.
Consistent, incremental changes help.
16
Typical Family Concerns:
Initially, trust – Is the person safe? How
can this be verified?
Involvement – Will regular visits be
supported?
Communication – How will I know if the
service plan we agree on is happening?
Behavior Supports – If my loved one has
behavioral issues, will he/she end up in jail?
Other?
17
Rules Of The Road!
Providers of Licensed Services Work With
Three Sets of Regulations
Human rights
Licensing
Medicaid
18
Not All Agencies Are Alike
Typical Family Concerns
Trust / Safety
Visits / Involvement
Communication
Behavior Supports
Transfers
Related System Regulations
Licensure / Human Rights
guidelines/ contacts
Allies within the agency?
Visits impact provider income /
about 14 out of service days a year
is the norm.
In general – the smaller the “paid
circle,” the more responsive.
Unless leadership is exceptional
Regional variations. 911 is a
potential. Be proactive!
VNPP-Protocol For Choice
19
Human Rights System
First & foremost: safety and the right to therapeutic
treatment
-The delicate balance between what is important to the person
and what is important for the person.
ALL complaints must be reported – many avenues for
complaint
Restrictions must be approved by LHRCs
Clients have rights. Providers have rights.
Human Rights Advocates are responsive to
calls of concern.
20
Licensing Regulations
Medication guidelines
Providers are mandated reporters. Providers
have been advised by LHRCs to report family
members who ignore doctor’s orders .
Environmental standards
High standards for operational records
Unannounced visits – Licensure Specialists
are receptive to calls of concern
21
Medicaid – the tax payer is
the primary stakeholder
Average daily billing and the 90 day
guideline on billable activities
General supervision is not billable
Medicaid audits can be very costly
22
We’ve Come a Long Way?
Old Perspective: People with disabilities are defective
and must be segregated until “fixed.”
New Perspective: Disability is a natural part of human
experience. Environments / attitudes must be “fixed.”
We are all interdependent. Learning is the glue.
Current service options scale from segregated to fully
inclusive
23
Different Institutions –
Different Waivers
NURSING HOMES
AIDS
Alzheimer’s
Elderly or Disabled with Consumer
Direction (ED/CD
Technology Assisted
Money Follows The Person (MFP)
HOSPITAL
AIDS
Technology Assisted
ICF/MR
Intellectual Disabilities/Mental
Retardation
Developmental Disabilities
Day Support
Money Follows The Person (MFP)
24
Accessing Providers
The case manager can
provide you with a list of
qualified providers for each
service in the plan
You have the right to
choose providers
You have the right to visit,
interview and research
providers
You decide when, where
and how you want approved
services provided
Case Manager will assist
you in locating and
choosing providers
Case Managers will
contact providers for
initiation of services
You can switch providers
if you choose
There are shortages of
some providers
25
Different Services – Different Rates
Medicaid makes a critical distinction between
assistance
and
training
Reimbursement rates for services http://www.dmas.virginia.gov/ltc-home.htm
26
Pros & Cons of In-Home Services
Good things
Very person-centered
Allows people to remain
with their families
Reimbursement rates are
higher than the assistance
level service
Bad things:
Providers who offer this
service are limited
Hours may be limited, often
coupled with respite and/or
attendant care
Turn-over rate can be high
Families are the “back-up”
plan
27
Group Homes versus Sponsored Placements
Traditional Group Homes
Staff do not live in the home
Staff work in shifts
Direct care work under supervisors.
Direct care staff are underpaid
Providers - well compensated.
Supervision is imposed/external
Subject to audit by DMAS, DBHDS &
Human Rights
Typically 4 to 8 clients
Typically agency directed
Often detachment is required
Sponsored Residential
Placements
Staff live in the home
Staff share lives
Direct Care staff are service owners
Providers - well compensated.
Supervisors are partners/facilitators
Subject to audit by DMAS,
DBHDS & Human Rights
Typically person-centered w/active
involvement of natural families
Typically 1 to 2 clients
Therapeutic relationship is central
28
Bonding versus Bridging
Bonding – the skills around being in warm and
therapeutic relationship with a person
Bridging – the skills around supporting a
person to have friends of his/her own, to have
a community presence, to have a meaningful
life beyond the service world
29
Pros & Cons of Sponsored
Residential Services
The upside
Very person-centered
Very flexible / responsive to
learning
Very close communication
with Guardians / Authorized
Representatives
The downside
Transfers can be very hard
Transfers can be sudden
Good succession planning is
important – and this is not a
regulatory requirement.
30
No Risk-Free Options
...the truth is,
things don't really get solved.
They come together & they fall apart.
It's just like that.
The healing comes from letting there be room
for all of this to happen:
grief, relief, misery and joy...
-Pema Chodron
31
What Can Parents Do
To Help??
History matters :
Gather evaluations / medical history / medication
history
Develop Communication Charts
Use Relationship Maps
What are the dreams?
Start with the end in mind
What are positive rituals?
What makes a good day?
32
What Can Parents Do
To Help?
Be open to new ideas
View the community as “landscape” for
day support? Have a vision that fits the
person’s needs/preferences.
Consider funding private therapies?
Stay in collaborative relationship
Try not to put the cart (agency/model)
ahead of the horse (focus on the person).
33
Person-Centered Plans –Use the Tools of the Trade!
• Part 1 - Essential Information
• Part 2 - Personal Profile , What’s Working or Not Working in 8
areas;
• Part 3 - Shared Planning / Outcomes based on Important TO /
Important FOR values as agreed by team members at the
annual meeting.
• Part 4 - Agreements (signatures)
• Part 5 - Support Plans (ISPs) from each provider, including
the CSB
• Appendix - Risk Assessment / Safety Supports
34