Transcript Waste Management Areas

Waste Management Strategy
Outline
-
Geography
Future Needs – 5 and 25-Year Time Frames
Capacity
Near-Term Needs
Long Term Needs
Waste Management Areas
Waste Stream Definitions
Three types of waste soil:
Institutional Controls Program (ICP)
- Homeowner demo and renovation projects
- Commercial, infrastructure development
Basin Property Remediation Program
- Yard cleanup program
Ecological Remediation
- Upper Basin: mine sites and tailings
- Lower Basin: river bed and bank deposits
Total Future Needs
25-Year Repository Needs Projection
Waste Streams
Total
(cy)
ICP
(cy)
BPRP
(cy)
Commercial
Development
(cy)
Infrastructure
Redevelopment
(cy)
Eco-RAA
(cy)
10% - 25%
5% - 10%
25% - 50%
25% - 50%
25% - 50%
Lower Basin
150,405
204,595
0
0
2,643,901
2,998,901
Box
564,500
0B
460,000
176,000
250,000C
1,450,500
Upper Basin
262,551
249,606D
253,458
282,000
770,400
1,818,015
East Upper
Basin
49,837
D
0
0
67,260
117,097
Grand Total
6,384,513
Sub Regions
Range of
Uncertainty
Near-Term Repository Needs
Near-Term (0 – 5 Years) Waste Streams
Sub
Regions
Total
(cy)
ICP
(cy)
BPRP
(cy)
Commercial
Development
(cy)
Infrastructure
Redevelopment
(cy)
Lower Basin
15,786
94,858
0
0
110,644
Box
106,500
0A
137,000
50,000
293,500
Upper Basin
21,917
226,292B
40,557
105,000
393,766
East Upper
Basin
7,898
B
0
0
7,898
Grand Total
805,808
Long-Term Repository Needs
Long-Term (6 – 25 Years) Waste Streams
Sub
Regions
Total
(cy)
ICP
(cy)
BPRP
(cy)
Commercial
Development
(cy)
Infrastructure
Redevelopment
(cy)
Eco-RA
(cy)
Lower
Basin
134,619
109,737
0
0
2,643,901
2,888,257
Box
458,000
0A
323,000
126,000
250,000B
1,157,000
Upper
Basin
240,634
23,314C
212,901
177,000]
770,400
1,424,249
East
Upper
Basin
41,939
C
0
0
67,260
109,199
Grand Total
5,578,705
Estimated Capacity
Remaining Capacity
(Page capacity assumes approval of footprint expansion)
Sub Region
Repository
Total Capacity with
Current
Footprint
Remaining
capacity
with
current
footprint
Total Capacity
with
Footprint
Expansion
Remaining
Capacity
with
Footprint
Expansion
1,187,000 cy
400,000 cy
3,142,000 cy
2,355,000 cyA
Big Creek Repository
220,000 cy
32,500 cy
505,800 cy
318,300 cy
Lower Basin
EMF Repository
400,000 cy
400,000 cy
NA
NA
East Upper
Basin
Mullan Repository
35,000 cy
35,000 cy
NA
NA
Box
Page Repository
Upper Basin
Short- and Long-Term
Repository Waste Balance
Existing Repositories
Near-Term Waste Balance
Near-Term (0 – 5 Years) Waste Streams
Sub
Regions
Total
(cy)
Repository
Capacity
Surplus/Deficit
(cy)
0
110,644
289,356
137,000
50,000
293,500
2,061,500
226,292B
40,557
105,000
393,766
(75,466)C
B
0
0
7,898
27,102
ICP
(cy)
BPRP
(cy)
Commercial
Development
(cy)
Infrastructure
Redevelopment
(cy)
Lower
Basin
15,786
94,858
0
Box
106,500
0A
Upper
Basin
21,917
East
Upper
Basin
7,898
Long-Term Waste Balance
Long-Term (6 – 25 Years) Waste Streams
Sub
Region
s
Total
(cy)
Repository
Capacity
Surplus/Deficit
(cy)
ICP
(cy)
BPRP
(cy)
Commercial
Development
(cy)
Infrastructure
Redevelopment
(cy)
Eco-RA
(cy)
Lower
Basin
134,619
109,737
0
0
2,643,901
2,888,257
(2,598,901)A
Box
458,000
0B
323,000
126,000
250,000C
1,157,000
904,500D
Upper
Basin
240,634
23,314E
212,901
177,000
770,400
1,424,249
(1,499,715)
East
Upper
Basin
41,939
E
0
0
67,260
109,199
(82,097)
Total Repository Capacity Needs
Questions?
Comments?
East Mission Flats Update
- Archaeological Monitoring Report
- Groundwater Monitoring Program
- Flood Monitoring
- Phase I Operations
- 60% Design Report
- Visual Simulations
East Mission Flats Update
Archaeological Monitoring Report
•
•
•
•
No recorded sites on State Register at EMF site;
10 test pits excavated in July 2007, no cultural
resources observed in any of the 10 pits;
Cuttings from 12 drill holes were monitored in
October 2007; no cultural resources observed in
any of the 12 drill holes; and
Recommend to have an archaeologist on-site to
observe all excavations scheduled for the site.
East Mission Flats Update
Groundwater Monitoring – December 2007
- Four wells sampled
- Water levels suggest flat surface; flow from NW to SE
- No dissolved metal concentrations reported above
drinking water standards (MCLs)
- Existing soil contamination has no significant impact to
groundwater
- Underlying “native” soil sorbs leaching metals
- Next sampling event in March 2008
East Mission Flats Update
December 2007 Results (in mg/L)
Constituents
Well No.
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Zinc
MW-A
ND1
ND
0.000578J
ND
0.347J
MW-B
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0243J
MW-C
ND
ND
0.0013J
ND
1.45J
MW-D
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0326J
Reporting Limit
0.003
0.003
0.0002
0.003
0.0025
Regulatory Threshold
0.0062
0.012
0.0052
0.0152
5.03
Notes
1. ND - Not detected above method reporting limit
2. MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level - enforceable
3. NSDWR - National Secondary Drinking Water Regulation - non-enforceable
J - Reported concentration an estimate based on data quality review
East Mission Flats Update
Flood Monitoring
- Two level loggers installed this week
- Hourly readings through June 2008
- Compare results to Cataldo Gaging Station to establish stagewater level relationship
- Use data to compare to HEC RAS flood model
- Incorporate results in 90% Design Report
East Mission Flats Update
Phase I Operations
- Phase I Design Report out for Agency comment
- Scheduled limited opening in May 2008
- Limited to 20,000 cubic yards
- ICP and Basin Yard Cleanup wastes
- Need to construct security fence and gate
- Scheduled to acquire additional property between EMF
site and Canyon Road in March 2008
East Mission Flats Update
60% Design Report
- Draft Design Report completion in April 2008
- Begin 90% Design in Summer 2008
- Begin construction of full project in Summer 2009
East Mission Flats Update
Visual Simulations
- Simulations prepared for 7 observation points
- Two seasons:
Fall (October 2007)
Winter (December 2007)
Questions?
Comments?