Transcript Slide 1

1
M. Mardani Kivi MD.
Guilan University of Medical Sciences
2
3
4

40% of the population over 70 years of age
suffers from osteoarthritis of the knee and by
the year 2020 this figure is expected to rise
by 66-100%.
Williamson L, Wyatt MR, Yein K, Melton JT. Severe knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial of
acupuncture, physiotherapy (supervised exercise) and standard management for patients awaiting knee
replacement. Rheumatology 2007; 46: 1445-9.
5
a major advance in the treatment of DJD
excellent restoration of joint function
pain relief
low perioperative morbidity

over 500,000 TKAs being performed, on
average, in the United States annually.
6



In 2001, 171,335 primary TKAs were
performed.
Demand for primary TKA is projected to grow
in the USA to 3.48 million procedures by
2030.
By 2015, medical expenses for this procedure
in the United States are calculated to increase
to a staggering $40.8 billion.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from
2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89:780–785.
7
May cause
May cause
Increased
increased
prostheses
functional
wearing
outcome after
TKA
8

Most of the functional scoring systems
quoted in literature use pain, the ability to
walk or to ascend and descend stairs, the use
of a walking aid, etc. as measurements of
outcome. The ability to kneel is often
ignored.
9

The lack of literature addressing the specific
concerns of a large percentage of our Iranian
patients with their particular cultural habits,
regarding the capacity to which they will be
able to kneel post-operatively, has motivated
us to investigate: “kneeling ability after TKA
in patients with OA of the knee.”
10
Design: cross-sectional longitudinal study
Inclusion criteria: clinical diagnose of Ant-lat
impingement synd. ,
Exclusion criteria: simultaneous OA of the hip and/or
lumbar spine, Incomplete patient charts and/or
questionnaires, and TKA performed by other surgeons
11
prostheses type: Zimmer(NexGen) or Stryker
(Scorpio NRG)
Approach: midline
Medial parapatellar arthrotomy
No resurfacing of the patella
PCL substituting prosthesis
Femoral cut: in 3° of ext. rotation
12
Variables:
Knee Society Score (KSS)
Functional Knee Score (FKS)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Kneeling ability: to kneel on a soft flat surface
Variables were assessed 3 times: pre-op, one year post-op,
and during the final follow-up visit.
13
14
15

Post operatively along with Physiotherapy,
which included a special program for knee
flexion, patients were also encouraged to
kneel vigorously and frequently.
16
Pre-op Kneeling
ability :
Group (A): patients without pain or with mild pain (VAS:
0-4).
Group (B): patients that because of severe knee pain
could not kneel (VAS: 5-10).
Group (C): patients that because of non-related knee
pain, could not kneel.

Group A and B were analyzed for changes in
kneeling ability.
17




Total patient population:144114 were possible
to follow-up
Mean age: 67.9±6.2 years (range:52 to 81)
Sex: 69 female (60.5%), 45 male (39.5%)
Mean follow-up length: 26.7±2.4 months
(Range:14 to 44)
18
Score
Pre-op
1-year f/up
Final f/up
P-value
VAS
9.24 ± 0.7
1.82 ± 1.04
2.01 ± 1.19
p<0.0001
KSS
59.79 ± 4.54
89.07 ± 5.63
89.82 ± 5.11 p<0.0001
FKS
59.57 ± 4.48
87.72 ± 5.21
88.23 ± 5.36 p<0.0001
19
Total patient
population
N=114
Pre-op
Pt's able to kneel
pre-op: 38 (33.3%)
Post-op
Pt's unable to kneel
pre-op: 76 (66.7%)
Due to knee related
problem: 59 (77.6%)
Able to kneel at final
f/up: 43 (71.2%)
Due to non-related knee
problem:17 (22.4%)
Unable to kneel at final
f/up: 17 (28.8%)
20
No surgical
complications
• such as infection, wound dehiscence,
loosening of the skin around
prosthesis, etc
No revision
required at the
final f/up
21

Similar to other studies, Our study showed a
statistically significant improvement in
functional outcome (KSS, FKS) and pain relief
(VAS) after TKA.
◦ Ahmad Hafiz et al, 2011
◦ Tahmasebi et al, 2009
◦ Dierick et al, 2004
Dierick F, Avenière T, Cossement M, Poilvache P, Lobet S, Detrembleur C. Outcome assessment in
osteoarthritic patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. Belg 2004; 70: 38-45.
Tahmasebi MN, Motaghi A, Shahrezaee M. Total Knee Arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: Results
of 34 operations. Tehran university medical Journal 2009; 67(2): 146-150.
Ahmad Hafiz Z, Masbah O, Ruslan G. Total Knee Replacement: 12 Years Retrospective Review and
Experience. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2011; 5 (1):34-9.
22
Cultural
differences
Prosthesis
type
Surgical
technique
OA or RA
Kneeling
after
TKA
misinformation
about kneeling
23

A meta-analysis using results from 130 studies:
a PCL retaining prosthesis 107°
knee flexion
after TKA
a PCL substituting prosthesis 103°

Although more recent studies have shown
data to be more in favor of PCL substituting
prostheses.
Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tri-compartmental total knee
replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 271:1349–57.
24
Factors that may negatively influence a
patient’s ability to kneel after TKA
Tightness of the retained PCL
Elevation of the joint line
Increase in patellar thickness
Trapezoidal flexion gap
Chiu KY, Ng TP, Tang WM, Yau WP. Review article: Knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Journal of
Orthopaedic Surgery 2002: 10(2): 194–202.
25


Yoshino et al. : The ‘unintentional’ passive
flexion exercise imparted by the Japanese
sitting-style appears to be important in
achieving and maintaining full knee flexion
after TKA.
In Iran: eating traditionally on the ground and
praying
Yoshino S, Nakamura H, Shiga H, Ishiuchi N. Recovery of full flexion after total knee replacement in rheumatoid
arthritis—a follow-up study. Int Orthop 1997;21:98–100.
26


No study has supported that kneeling
repetitively may damage knee prostheses.
Palmer et al. (2002)
Palmer SH, Servant CT, Maguire J, Parish EN, Cross MJ. Ability to kneel after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint
Surg [Br] 2002; 84-B: 220-2.
27

Radiographic study has shown that forces
exerted from the femur to knee joint:
At the time
of kneeling
While normal
standing or
during
walking
Palmer SH, Servant CT, Maguire J, Parish EN, Cross MJ. Ability to kneel after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint
Surg [Br] 2002; 84-B: 220-2.
28

Schai et al. and Palmer et al. showed that
kneeling ability, when measured objectively,
is greater than when measured subjectively
after TKA.
Schai PA, Gibbbon AJ, Scott RD. Kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999; 367:195-200.
Palmer SH, Servant CT, Maguire J, Parish EN, Cross MJ. Ability to kneel after total knee replacement. J Bone
Joint Surg [Br] 2002; 84-B: 220-2.
29

Jenkins et al. (2008) a single-blind
randomized controlled trial The
improvement in patient-reported kneeling
ability was thought to be due to the kneeling
intervention provided and not to any of the
previously reported barriers to kneeling such
as scar position, numbness, range of flexion,
involvement of other joints, and pain.
Jenkins C, Barker KL, Pandit H, Dodd CAF, Murray DW. After partial knee replacement, patients can kneel, but they
need to be taught to do so: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2008; 88: 1012–21.
30


A 68 Y/O
Female
DJD
31
32
33
34
35
36
37