Transcript SYSLAB Russia

Systems Laboratory for Innovation and Employment
SYSLAB International AS
Thormøhlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway
Contact:
Jan S. Johannessen, Managing Director
E-mail: [email protected]
Per E. Rasmussen, Project Manager
E-mail: [email protected]
Tel: +47 55 54 38 80, Fax: +47 55 54 38 88
www.syslab.org
1
SYSLAB HISTORY I
•1992 Initial start-up in Bergen
•1996 1st international start-up in Paris
•1996 ESIE starts supported by European Commission
•1996-1999 New SYSLAB units in France starting up in
Bordeaux, Aix-en-Provence, Montpellier
•1998-2000 SYSLAB in Arboga and Enköping, Sweden
•1998 SYSLAB Bergen is discontinued
2
SYSLAB HISTORY II
•1999 Start-up in Pushkino and Fryazino in
Moscow/Russia
•1999 PANORAMA starts supported by European
Commission
•2001 SYSLAB International AS founded
•2001 Preparatory project in Lithuania completed
•2001 Start-up in Florence, Italy
3
THE SYSLAB NETWORK
4
WHY SYSLAB?
•
•
•
•
•
A new approach to training
People as actors…not passive students
Contribution to local company development
Faster re-employment
Knowledge and experience transfer
5
SYSLAB MAIN COMPONENTS
COMPETENCE
NETWORK
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
6
COMPETENCE
COMPETENCE
CR=
Knowledge
Skills
Experience
K(r) * S(r) * E(r) dr
R
KNOW - HOW
7
NETWORKS
Regional and
National Authorities
Social Links
Regional Business
Community
International
Relations
University and Research
Community
SYSLAB
collegues
8
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
SYSLAB
Innovation
Commercial
Development
Stimulation
Ideas
-Idea Stimulation
-Attitudes
-Culture
Person -Infrastucture
Comm.
Ideas
-Protect idea
-Businessplan
-Marketplan
-Financing
-Establish
SYSLAB
Incubator
Services
-Office space
-Industrial networks
-Daily services
-Professional external services
New companies
Operational
company
Microcrediting
-Early stage equity capital
-Active and competent
management
9
SYSLAB ORGANISATION
• Company simulation
– learning organisation
– professional apperance
• Matrix organisation
– flexibility and stability
• High-performance teams
– Individual participation
10
SYSLAB MATRIX
Manager(s)
IT/Administration
Marketing
Innovation
Project 1
Project 2
Project n
11
SYSLAB CONTENTS
Company visits
Project work
Project work
Project work
Work in internal departments
Idea development
Teambuilding
Computer training
Businessplan
Project
manangement
Start-up
Personal development
QA
1. Month | 2. Month | 3. Month | 4. Month | 5. Month | 6. month
12
MODEL OF THE SYSLAB
TRAINING AND LEARNING SCHEME
Motivation
Transmission
Understanding
Evaluation
SOLUTION
13
THE ESSENTIAL SKILLS OF SYSLAB
Personal skills
speaking, writing, debating, reporting
and presenting
Personality skills
evaluation, criticism, judgemental
Intellectual skills
mathematical, language, philosophic
Professional skills
marketing, finance, design,
management, ICT
Craft skills
drawing, design, technical
14
PARADIGM SHIFT
OLD ECONOMY
Competence
Technology
Finance
NEW ECONOMY
Competence
Technology
Finance
15
PARADIGM SHIFT
OLD ECONOMY
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Schooling
Job security
Job taking
Real capital
Status quo
Hierarchy
Null-sum
Centralisation
NEW ECONOMY
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Life-long learning
Risk-taking
Job making
Intellectual capital
Rapid change
Ad-hocracy
Win-win
De-centralisation
16
THE TRANSITION FROM OLD ECONOMY TO
NEW ECONOMY
Groups of homogeneous subject
Heterogenous networking,
knowledge
intellectual property
Universal themes
Mission led project
development, local problem
solving
final solutions
Disinterestedness
Serving pracical interest:
repackaging the knowledge base
Scepticism
Accountability and formal quality control.
Excellence measured by success
Specialisation
Multidisiplinary transdisiplinary shifting
schemes + practical specialities
Vocation
Professional expertise, team work,
entrepreneurial spirit
17
THE TRANSITION FROM OLD ECONOMY TO
NEW ECONOMY
Old economy
Yesterday
New economy
Today
HIERARCHY
AD-HOCRACY
MECHANICAL
ORGANICAL
SUBJECT
RELATION
LOCAL
GLOBAL
SYMBOL
ORGANISATION
WORK PRACTICE
COMPETENCE
MARKET
18
THE COMPETENCE GAP
MARKETING
R SME
PRODUCTION
DEVELOPMENT
CGAP
APPLIED
RESEARCH
BASIC
SCIENCE
R
UNIV
UNIVERSITIES
SMEs
19
KEY FACTORS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH
(European Commission 1995 Green Paper)
1. Innovation and Entrepreneurial Spirit
2. Education and Competence
3. Employment
4. Individuals, Companies (SMEs), Nations
and Regions
20
SOURCES CONSIDERED OF IMPORTANCE FOR INNOVATION
Employees
Customers
Subcontractors
Competitors
Exhibitions
Periodicals
Seminars
EU
Universities
Norway
R&D Institutes
Patents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Percentage of enterprises
Sources: NHO
EU
21
INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS
CLASS
Incremental
Product
NATURE
TQM
Distinctive
Develop-- IBU
ment
Breakthrough
Research
JIT
Process
Quality
circles
Procedure
22
THE MODERN WORLD REQUIRES POSTACADEMIC RETRAINING










Holistic, not reductionist
Context driven, not subject driven
Empiristic and pragmatic, not foundational and
theoretical
Mission orientated, not blue skies
Market driven, not technology push
Team work, not individual scholar
Divergent, not convergent
Locally realistic representations
Shifting configurations
Hetrogeneous values, reflexive, not objective
23
SYSLAB EMPLOYMENT CHAIN
Results from Norway 1992-1998
METHODOLOGY
SUM CANDIDATES
485
APPLICATIONS
45 %
COMPANY VISITS
2000
+
SOLISITED
40 %
PROJECTS
486
+
JOB CREATION
10 %
STARTUPS
17
+
SELF-EMPLOYMENT
5%
SUM
100 %
24
JOB POSSIBILITY RELATED TO AGE
NORWAY 1992-1998
100 %
JOB POSSIBILITY
80 %
60 %
40 %
.
. .
.
. .
.. .
. .
SYSLAB (AVERAGE 81%)
PUBLIC PROGRAMME (AVERAGE 43%):
.
20 %
.
0%
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
AGE (YEARS)
25
GLOBAL RESULTS
ACCUMULATED 1992-2001
New companies established
Total no. of participants
Percentage women
Projects developed for SMEs
Overall job rate
Norway
23
450
55%
200
84%
Russia
8
120(40)
70%
~40
>95%
France
7
395(40)
39%
475
68%
Sweden
15
100
60%
54
70%
26
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND OF SYSLAB PARTICIPANTS
60
50
Bergen,
Norw ay
40
Pushkino,
Russia
30
20
10
0
Technical
Business
Social
sciences/other
27
EMPLOYMENT RATES
90 %
80 %
70 %
60 %
50 %
Short term
Long term
40 %
30 %
20 %
10 %
0%
Sweden
Average 40+ years
industrial specialists
Norway
Average 33+ years
Highly educated
28
AGE DISTRIBUTION AT SYSLAB
60 %
50 %
Norway
40 %
Sweden
30 %
Russia
20 %
France
10 %
0%
<30
31-40
41-50
>51
29
EMPLOYMENT RATE DEVELOPMENT TREND
100 %
95 %
90 %
85 %
80 %
75 %
70 %
65 %
60 %
55 %
50 %
Bergen, Norway
Pushkino, Russia
Aix-en-Provence,
France
1. Period
2. Period
3. Period
30