Transcript Document

Community-Wide Engagement
Boston Cease Fire to the Drug Market Intervention:
A Discussion of Program and Evaluation
Louis Tuthill – National Institute of Justice
Danica Szarvas-Kidd – Bureau of Justice Assistance
1
Outline: Community-Wide Engagement
• National Institute of Justice
• Evolution of Community Strategies of:
– Intervention
– Prevention
– Deterrence
• Current Programs and Evaluations (Drug
Market Initiative)
• Future Efforts
2
National Institute of Justice
• Research and evaluation office of the
department of Justice
• Goals of NIJ
– Partner with State and local practitioners and policymakers to
identify social science research and technology needs.
– Create scientific, relevant, and reliable knowledge — with a
particular emphasis on terrorism, violent crime, drugs and crime,
cost-effectiveness, and community-based efforts — to enhance the
administration of justice and public safety.
– Develop affordable and effective tools and technologies to enhance
the administration of justice and public safety.
3
4
5
Evolution of Community Programs
6
Evolution of Programs
• Boston Cease Fire (1996)
– Combined problem oriented policing
• Law enforcement, church, community stakeholders
– What they did
• If anyone in the gang shot someone, all members of the gang
would receive attention from law enforcement.
• The community needed the violence to stop.
• Social services and other help were available for those who
wanted off the streets.
– Replicated in other communities
– Evaluation not rigirous
7
Evolution of Programs
• SACSI – Strategic Approaches to
Community Safety Initiative (2000)
– Mirrored Boston Ceasefire
– Brought in more community partners
– Brought in a research partner
8
Evolution of Programs
• Project Safe Neighborhoods (2001)
– Implemented in all 94 US Attorney Districts
– Build on successes and failures of earlier programs
– Created partnerships among federal, state and local
prosecutors; law enforcement; researchers; media and
outreach specialists; and community leaders
– tailored the intervention strategy to the needs of each
individual district and to the gun problem in that particular
area
9
Evolution of Programs
• Rigorous Evaluation of PSN (2008)
– Researchers found there was a 13.1 percent drop in violent
crime in target city with high levels of implementation
– Contrast found a 7.8 percent increase in violent crime in
non-target cities in low implementation districts.
• Factors that accounted for the drop
–
–
–
–
Strong leadership
Cross-agency buy-in
Democratic shared responsibilities
Flexibility across sites
10
Evolution of Programs
• Compressive Anti-Gang Initiative and Drug
Market Initiative (Highpoint)
– Draw on the earlier principals of Ceasefire,
SACSI, and PSN
– Address open-air markets and gangs in addition to
firearms
• CAGI is being evaluated (results pending)
• DMI I will discuss in a moment
11
General Model of Programs
12
Current Programs and Evaluations
(Drug Market Initiative)
• Highpoint,North Carolina (DMI)
– Project Safe Neighborhood site
• Open-Air Drug Market not Guns
– Took and Action Research Model
approach to tweak the model
– Preliminary evaluation of data is showing
positive results (still in early stages)
13
Current Programs and Evaluations
(Drug Market Initiative)
• Drawing Highpoint as a prototype
– BJA has developed a nine step DMI initiative with
training and technical assistance
– They have replicated in 19 cities
– rigorously evaluated in DMI at two sites with
successful results
– BJA is creating website, guides, and so on to
assist local partners to implement this strategy
• http://www1.cj.msu.edu/~outreach/psn/DMI/
14
Current Programs and Evaluations
(Drug Market Initiative)
• Nine steps
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Crime Mapping
Survey
Incident Review
Undercover Operations
Mobilize the community
Contact with the offender’s family
Call in/Notification meetings
Enforcement
Follow up
15
Identifying the problem
• Identifying the problem and place through mapping
– Map data from calls for service
– Census
– FBI uniform crime report
• Survey law enforcement officers, probation officers,
vice officers, and community members in the target
area about area drug dealers
• Incident review of narcotics crime in the target area
16
Conduct Reconnaissance
• Undercover Operations
– Work a case on identified individuals catching them in the
act
• Mobilize Community
– Key community leaders involved
– Mobilize positive resources for identified individuals
• Contact the offenders family
– Contact influential people in individuals live for a call-in
meeting
17
Call-in meeting
• Arrest the worst offenders
• Bring individual, family, community
members, law enforcement, social
services together
• Bring people in and provide them
options and alternatives
18
Enforcement and Follow up
• Law enforcement continues to work with the
community to reduce drug crimes
– Law enforcement puts out newsletters of arrested individuals
• Identified individuals are given mentor to help move
them in a positive direction
• Law enforcements continues to dialogue with the
community
• Continue to monitor crime data, community feedback
and law enforcement feedback
19
Preliminary Findings
• Nashville
– Sustained decrease of property crime of 2.5 percent per month
(28.4%)
– 38.6 percent decrease in narcotics offences
– 18.1 percent decrease in police calls for service
• Rochester
– Target area
• 24.1 percent reduction in non-violent crimes
• 14.3 percent reduction in violent crime
– City reductions
• 9 percent reduction in non-violent crimes
• 2.3 percent reduction in violent crimes
20
Future Efforts
• In the areas of education and health President Obama has
focused on evidence-based programs
• US Attorney General Holder has said:
I believe that, ultimately, we cannot get smart on crime in isolation. A rational,
data-driven, evidence-based, smart approach to crime - the kind of
approach that this Administration is dedicated to pursuing and supporting
- must be part of a partnership in public safety. It requires the exchange and
evaluation of experiences, and exposure to new ideas. – October 24, 2009
• Laurie Robinson, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, OJP
One of the things you'll probably hear the Attorney General talk about is his
interest in evidence-based approaches. This has become his mantra, and
it's long been a central concern of mine. So I'd just ask that, when we have
our discussions today, you think about how we can improve and disseminate our
knowledge of what works in preventing and reducing crime.– September 9, 2009
21
Information
Louis Tuthill
National Institute of Justice
[email protected]
Danica Szarvas-Kidd
Bureau of Justice Assistance
[email protected]
Kim Norris
Bureau of Justice Assistance
[email protected]
22