Transcript Developing Local Government Finances
Reforming Property Taxes for Financing Local Government: Key Lessons Learned
Presentation to the World Bank January 9, 2003 Institut International de la fiscalité immobilière International Property Tax Institute
The presentation made on January 9 th taken from the slides included below.
is These slides form a more complete document and are provided for your information, as well as to address questions that you may have.
Property Tax Reforms
It is a widely held belief that the introduction of a real property taxation system will provide the means to improve the revenue flows and stability needed to finance local government. With this in mind many countries have embarked upon valuation work, mapping projects, computerized regression analysis and like activities . . .
In the Matter of the Blind Ones
None were aware of the elephant
Fundamentals of Property Tax Reform
What revenues are required to finance local government?
Where do property taxes fit in to this picture?
How do we get there?
Where do we start?
Property Tax Reforms
Real property tax reform is a process of financing local governments Not a series of unrelated functions Works well only when planned in a holistic fashion Relies on information and support from many government departments
Lessons from Tanzania
36 million people 5 million parcels (est.) 100 certified valuers Poor mapping and ownership records 18 year project for first national roll with current legislation
Lessons from Tanzania
Limited valuation expertise available No evidence of revenue planning or analysis of tax impacts Current legislation restricts process Need: Goal setting Tax policy review Re-work legislation Planning
Lessons from Uganda
25 million people Graduated poll tax in place 3 million parcels (est.) 11 certified valuers Lack of training facilities Impossible task under current legislation
Lessons from Uganda
Haphazard application of existing poll tax system – creates barriers to new tax acceptance Tax structure not independent from political structure – provides opportunity for corruption Lots of tax options – no plan on how they would be applied – creates inequity Incomplete ownership and cadastre info.
Lessons from Kosovo – UN Protectorate No land records No ownership records No certified valuers Started with revenue requirements Lack of IT and admin structures Crude assessment base
Lessons from Kosovo – UN Protectorate Legislation well formed Some limits on opportunities for corruption Cash flowing in one year to municipalities Need to continue and refine property tax processes
Lessons from Kyrgyz Republic
Unsophisticated land tax in place Real property tax proposed for 22 cities Potential double taxation Land cadastre and land registry reforms underway 70 trained appraisers in country Collection by national agency
Lessons from Kyrgyz Republic
Proper goal setting requires education of decision makers about impacts/ options Emphasis on openness and transparency required to counter-act historic patterns of corruption in government Need to limit options and opportunities for corruption Failure to integrate taxation processes Planning of property tax process required
Lessons from Czech Republic
Property taxes 7.5 bill. CZK 0.4% of GDP 9.0% of local municipal budgets Tax reform started in 1993 Issue before central government in 1997 2001 refusal to implement new property taxes system for political reasons 2002 – starting over
Lessons from Czech Republic
Vision of desired goals required Planning and implementation schedule required Political commitment from all levels of government required
Lessons from Poland
Land and area tax systems in place Generates up to 13% of local revenue Distortions between residential tax - 0.062% of value, and commercial tax - 8% of value Politically difficult to progress to next stage Vested interests in entrenched positions Urban productivity hampered by infrastructure deficiencies
Lessons from Poland
Ad valorem tax process too intricate for current level of financial support Jump start required End goals need definition Implementation process required Political commitment required
Lessons from Nova Scotia, Canada
72.7% of local government finances from property taxes 6.2% of taxes from payments in lieu Residential accounts generate 55% of property tax revenue Market value system is open and understood by public Proactive search for better methods continue
Summary of Lessons Learned
To be successful, strategies to support and implement local government financing must be created. This should start with an analysis of the current situation and then determine the desired ends.
Need for a pre-project review and audit – not a post project lament Findings of audit should be included as part of terms of reference for tax projects.
Summary of Lessons Learned
Need to consider the whole picture.
Educate decision makers about options.
Set goals and gain commitment from all levels of government.
Consider and plan for all aspects of project: Legislation Administration Valuation Political acceptance Adjudication Training Collection
Adjusting Systems in Balance
Present revenue system is in balance Change requires: Vision Strategy Documented process Change generates chaos that must be managed.
Transition period to arrive at a new balanced system.
Managing Transitions
Transitions fail because: 1. Lack of visions and documentation of Current state Desired state.
2. Transition is disruptive for people Creates risks and fears 3. Inability to see the whole picture
Basic Tests of a Good Tax System
Stable and assured source of revenue.
Understood by both taxpayer and administrator.
Distributes tax in a manner that is perceived to be fair and equitable.
Easy to administer and efficient to run.
Available appeal process.
Collection process that assures total compliance.
IPTI
International organization – world-wide expertise.
Multi-cultural background and sensitivity to local customs and standards.
Expertise in all areas of property taxation – tax policy, administration, legislation, valuation, data systems, quality control, adjudication and tax collection.
IPTI Project Management Style
The long-term goal for a self-sufficient property tax system requires a distinct approach: Holistic Supportive Instructive Sensitive to local needs and culture
IPTI Management Organization
Project Management and Coordination Specific Expertise Legal/ Legislation Valu ation Data Systems Admin/ Mgmt Collect -ion General Expertise Education/ Communication/ Quality Control
Description of Property Tax Implementation Process
Stepped Approach to Growth
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
Time
Step 1. Audit
1.
2.
3.
4.
Review all existing taxes.
Determine where tax system requires adjustment.
Establish commitment to re-distribute existing taxes and re-allocate the responsibilities between levels of government.
Audit current tax legislation and policies.
Step 1. Audit
5.
Audit current state of:
Mapping Land registry and ownership data Assessment policies and legislation Data systems and capabilities Tax administration and billing Collection practices and enforcement laws
Step 2. Goal Setting and Planning
Prepare for action by cooperating with Government officials to: Set immediate and long term goals for local taxation Establish social policy objectives Set up plan to establish taxation system to achieve social and fiscal objectives over time
Step 2. Goal Setting and Planning
Preparing for Action Consider types of property tax systems Develop Tax Policies Define exempt properties Establish penalties for non-compliance Determine implementation strategy
Step 2. Goal Setting and Planning Preparing for Action
Identify legislative requirements Identify infrastructure requirements Complete impact analysis
Step 3. Infrastructure Development
3
2 1 Write required legislation Establish property registration system Develop assessment administration system Develop assessment processes Develop adjudication processes and system
Step 3. Infrastructure Development Develop communication/ marketing materials for taxpayers Develop appropriate geographic information Develop levy, billing, collection and enforcement system
Step 4. Implementation and Training Set up assessment offices Communicate/ market new taxation process Train assessment administrators Train assessors Train data collectors Train tax administrators
Step 4. Implementation and Training Appeal Process Train adjudicators Train assessors Provide public information sessions for: Taxpayers Legal profession Set up appeal process and adjudication facilities
Step 5. Support
Assist with initial assessment and taxation process Provide quality control Assist with development of process see Step 6.
Step 6. Phased Development
The introduction of a property tax system can have planned phases. For example: Phase 3 Ad Valorem Phase 2 Tax Bands Phase 1 Land Only
Time
Step 6. Phased Development
Prepare/ train for next phase of process Make adjustments to existing processes where required.
Legislative Administrative Training Procedures Re-focus on long-term goals