Transcript Slide 1
Kano Model Objectives Origins Purpose Process Model Key Elements Methodology Application Examples Origins of the Kano Model Noriaki Kano Professor at Tokyo Rika University International Consultant Received individual Demming Prize in 1997 Origins of the Kano Model Noriaki Kano Developed foundation for an approach on “Attractive Quality Creation” commonly referred to as the “Kano Model” Challenged traditional Customer Satisfaction Models that More is better, i.e. the more you perform on each service attribute the more satisfied the customers will be. Proposed new Customer Satisfaction model (Kano Model) Performance on product and service attributes is not equal in the eyes of the customers Performance on certain categories attributes produces higher levels of satisfaction than others. When to use the Kano Model Project Selection Lean Six Sigma Design for Six Sigma New Product Development New Service Development Determine Market Strategies Key Elements Identify the Voice of the Customer Translate Voice of the Customer into Critical to Quality Characteristics (CTQs) Rank the CTQs into five categories: Type B (basic) attributes, or must be or expected Type O (one-dimensional) attributes Type E (excitement) attributes Type I (indifferent) attributes Type R (reverse) attributes Evaluate Current Performance Kano Model “Didn’t know I wanted it but I like it.” Satisfaction Satisfier One Dimensional Desired Quality Delighters Excited Quality Service Performance Service Performance Dissatisfier Must-be Expected Quality Dissatisfaction “Cannot increase my satisfaction, but can decrease.” Kano Model Process Research •Research available data sources •Determine data collection strategy •Design data collection instruments •Collect and summarize data Analyze & Brainstorm Plot & Diagram •Analyze results •Develop Customer from data collection Requirement Matrix •Brainstorm list of •Record features and Questionnaire functionality results in Matrix •Develop Functional and Summarize and Dysfunctional •Plot results on Questionnaire Kano Model •Distribute Questionnaire Strategize •Determine Project selection •Product Development •Service Development •Identify Marketing Strategy Analyze & Brainstorm Analyze data from available sources Brainstorm list of features and functionality Determine type of requirements: Output Requirements Service Requirements Kano Model Requirements Survey User Survey “Functional form” vs. “Dysfunctional Form” “How would you feel if the product had feature X?” “How would you feel if the product didn’t have feature X?” Kano Questionnaire Answers: I like it. I expect it. I’m neutral. I can tolerate it. I dislike it. Example: Requirements Survey Example: Requirements Questionnaire Functional vs. Dysfunctional Comparison Evaluation Customer Requirements C.R. 1 A 3 E 6 O 14 2 5 6 11 3 6 1 4 13 10 1 2 4 5 11 R 1 Q I Total Grade 23 O 1 23 O 11 23 I 23 E 23 A 9 Customer Requirement is: A: Attractive E: Expected R: Reverse O: One Dimensional Q: Questionable Result I: Indifferent Plot & Diagram Satisfaction Satisfier One Dimensional Desired Quality Delighters Attractive Excited Quality Service Performance Service Performance Dissatisfier Must Be Expected Quality Dissatisfaction Kano Model & QFD Strategize Project Selection Lean Six Sigma Design for Six Sigma Organizational Strategy – Must be’s – Cost of Entry Satisfier – More is better – Competitive Delighter – Latent Need – Differentiator Dissatisfier Application Break into Teams Select Team Leader Select Scribe Select Presenter Scenario – You work for a Hotel chain and your company is trying to identify Voice of the Customer information to improve Hotel performance. Instructions: Brainstorm important characteristics you expect when staying at a Hotel Identify whether they are a Must be, Expected or a Delighter from a Business Client perspective and from a vacationer perspective Add in what the current performance is for the Hotel Example Results References Walder, D., (1993). Kano’s model for understanding customerdefined quality. Center For Quality of Management Journal, 39, 65 – 69. Jacobs, R., (1997). Evaluating customer satisfaction with media products and services. European Media Management Journal, 32, 11 – 18. Ungvari, S., (1999). Adding the third dimension to auqlity. Triz Journal, 40, 31 – 35. Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. (1996). The kano model: How to delight your customers. International Working Seminar on Production Economics, 19, 313 - 327 Zultner, R.E. & Mazur, G. H. ( 2006). The Kano Model: Recent Developments. The eighteenth symposium on Quality Function Deployment.