Transcript Slide 1
Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard
T. Wiegand, G. Sullivan, G. Bjontegaard, and A. Luthra Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard,
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 560-576, July 2003.
CMPT 820: Multimedia Systems
Outline
Overview
Network Abstraction Layer (NAL) Video Coding Layer (VCL) Profiles and Applications Feature Highlights Conclusions
Evolution of Video Compression Standards
ITU-T MPEG
H.261
Video Telephony MPEG-1 Video-CD H.263
Video Conferencing H.262/MPEG-2 Digital TV/DVD MPEG-4 Visual Object-based Coding H.264 MPEG-4 AVC
H.264/AVC Coding Standard
Various Applications Broadcast: cable, satellites, terrestrial, and DSL Storage: DVDs (HD DVD and Blu-ray) Video Conferencing: over different networks Multimedia Streaming: live and on-demand Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS) Challenge: How to handle all these applications and networks Flexibility and customizability
Structure of H.264/AVC Codec
Layered design Network Abstraction Layer (NAL) formats video and meta data for variety of networks Video Coding Layer (VCL) represents video in an efficient way Scope of H.264 standard
Outline
Overview
Network Abstraction Layer (NAL)
Video Coding Layer (VCL) Profiles and Applications Feature Highlights Conclusions
Network Abstraction Layer
Provide network friendliness for sending video data over various network transports, such as: RTP/IP for Internet applications MPEG-2 streams for broadcast services ISO File formats for storage applications We present a few NAL concepts
NAL Units
Packets consist of video data short packet header: one byte Support two types of transports stream-oriented: no free unit boundaries use a 3-byte start code prefix packet-oriented: start code prefix is a waste Can be classified into: VCL units: data for video pictures Non-VCL units: meta data and additional info
Non-VCL NAL Units
Two types of non-VCL NAL units Parameter sets: headers shared by a large number of VCL NAL units a VCL NAL unit has a pointer to its
picture parameter set
a picture parameter set points to its
sequence parameter set
Supplemental enhancement info (SEI): optional info for higher-quality reconstruction and/or better application usability Sent over in-band or out-of-band channels
Access Units
A set of NAL units Decoding an access unit results in one picture Structure: Delimiter: for seeking in a stream SEI: timing and other info primary coded picture: VCL redundant coded picture: for error recovery
Video Sequences and IDR Frames
Sequence: an independently decodable NAL unit stream don’t need NALs from other sequences with one sequence parameter set starts with an
instantaneous decoding refresh
(IDR) access unit IDR frames: random access points Intra-coded frames no subsequent picture of an IDR frame will require reference to pictures prior to the IDR frame decoders mark buffered reference pictures unusable once seeing an IDR frame
Outline
Overview Network Abstraction Layer (NAL)
Video Coding Layer (VCL)
Profiles and Applications Feature Highlights Conclusions
Video Coding Layer (VCL)
(Like other) hybrid video coding: H.264/AVC represents pictures in macroblocks Motion compensation: temporal redundancy Transform: spatial redundancy Small improvements add up to huge gain Combining many coding tools together Pictures/Frames/Fields Fields: top/bottom field contains even/odd rows Interlaced: two fields were captured at diff time Progressive: otherwise
Macroblocks and Slices
Fixed size MBs: 16x16 for luma, and 8x8 for chroma Slice: a set of MBs that can be decoded without use of other slices I slice: intra-prediction (I-MB) P slice: possibly one inter-prediction signal (I- and P-MBs) B slice: up to two inter-prediction signals (I- and B MBs) SP slice: efficient switch among streams SI slice: used in conjunction with SP slices
Flexible Macroblock Ordering (FMO)
MBs in a slice: in raster-order Slice group: more flexible Each slice group contains one or several slices Possible usages: Region-of-interest (ROI) Checker-board for video conferencing
Adaptive Field Coding
Two fields of a frame can be coded as: A single frame (frame mode) Two separate fields (field mode) suitable for Interlaced and high motion A single frame with adaptive mode (mixed mode) Picture-adaptive frame/field (PAFF) frame/field decision is made at frame level 16% - 20% bit rate reduction over frame only Macroblock-adaptive frame/field (MBAFF) frame/field decision is made at MB level 14% - 16% bit rate reduction over PAFF [Ref] http://scien.stanford.edu/2005projects/ee398/projects/presentations/Guerrero Chan Tsang - Project Presentation - Fast Macroblock Adaptive Coding in H264.ppt
Intra-frame Prediction
In spatial domain, using samples to the left and/or on above to predict samples in a MB Types of intra-frame prediction: Intra_4x4: detailed luma block Intra_16x16: smooth luma blocks Chroma_8x8: similar to Intra_16x16 as chroma components are smooth I_PCM: bypass prediction/transform, send samples anomalous pictures, loseless, and predictable bit rate
Intra_4x4 Prediction
Samples in 4x4 block are predicted using 13 neighboring sample 8 prediction mode: 1 DC and 8 directional Sample D is used if E-H is not available
Sample Intra_4x4 Prediction
Interpolation is used in some modes [Ref] Foreman sequence, http://www.vcodex.com/files/h264_intrapred.pdf
Intra_16x16 Prediction
4 modes Vertical Horizontal DC Planer (Diagonal)
Inter-Prediction in P Slices
Two-level segmentation of MBs Luma MBs are divided into at most 4 partitions (as small as 8x8) 8x8 partitions are divided into at most 4 partitions Chroma – half size horizontally and vertically Maximum of 16 motion vectors for each MB
Examples of Segmentation
[Ref] http://www.vcodex.com/files/h264_interpred.pdf
Inter-Prediction Accuracy
¼-pixel for luma, 1/8-pixel for Chroma Half-pixel samples:
a
6-tap FIR filter
b
1
b
(
E
5
F round
(
b
1 20
G
/ 32 ) 20
H
5
I
J
) Quarter-pixel samples: average of neighbors
round
((
G
b
) / 2 ) E cc K F dd L A aa B C bb D G d h n M a b c e f g i j k p q r s H m N R gg S Chroma predictions: bilinear interpolation T hh U I ee O J ff P
Multiframe Inter-Prediction in P Slices
More than one prior reference pictures (by diff. MBs) Encoders/decoders buffer the same reference pictures for inter-prediction Reference index is used when coding MVs MVs for regions smaller than 8x8 uses the same index for all MVs in the 8x8 region P_skip mode: Don’t send residual signals nor MVs nor reference index Use buffered frame 0 as the reference picture Use neighbor’s MVs Large areas with no change or constant motion like slow panning can be represented with very few bits.
Multiframe Inter-Prediction in B Slices
Weighted average of 2 predictions B-slices can be used as reference Two reference picture lists are used One out of four pred. methods for each partition: list 0 list 1 bi-predictive direct prediction: inferred from prior MBs The MB can be coded in B_skip mode (similar to P_skip)
4x4 Integer Transform
Why smaller transform: Only use add and shift, an exact inverse transform is possible no decoding mismatch Not too much residue to code Less noise around edge (ringing or mosquito noise) Less computations and shorter data type (16-bit) An approximation to 4x4 DCT: , where
2
nd
Transform and Quantization Parameter
2 nd Transform: Intra_16x16 and Chroma modes are for smooth area DC coefficients are transformed again to cover the whole MB Quantization step is adjusted by an exponential function of quantization parameter to cover a wider range of QS QP increases by 6 => QS doubles QP increases by 1 => QS increases by 12% => bit rate decreases by 12%
Entropy Coding
Non-transform coefficients: an infinite-extent codeword table Transform coefficients: Context-Adaptive Variable Length Coding (CAVLC) several VLC tables are switched dep. on prior transmitted data better than a single VLC table Context-Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding (CABAC) flexible symbol probability than CAVLC reduction 5 – 15% rate efficient: multiplication free
In-loop Deblocking Filter
Operate within coding loop Use filtered frames as ref. frames improve coding efficiency Adaptive deblocking, need to determine Blocking effects or object edges Strong or weak deblocking Intuitions Large difference near a block edge -> likely a block artifact If the difference is too large to be explained by the QP difference -> likely a real edge E.g., Filter p0 and q0 if
Hypothetical Reference Decoder (HRD)
Standard receiver buffer models encoders must produce bit streams that are decodable to HRD Two buffers Coded picture buffer (CPB) models the bit arrival and removal time Decoded picture buffer (DPB) models the frame decoded and output time in reference frame lists
Outline
Overview Network Abstraction Layer (NAL) Video Coding Layer (VCL)
Profiles and Applications
Feature Highlights Conclusions
Profiles and Applications
Defines a set of coding tools and algorithms Conformance points for interoperability 3 Profiles for different applications Baseline – video conferencing Main – broadcast, media storage, digital cinema Extended – streaming over IP (wire/wireless) 15 Levels pic size decoding rate (MB/s) bit rate buffer size [Ref] J. Ostermann, J. Bormans, P. List, D. Marpe, M. Narroschke, F. Pereira, T. Stockhammer, and T. Wedi
Video coding with H.264/AVC: tools, performance and complexity
IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine 4(1) pp. 7 - 28 May 2004
Outline
Overview Network Abstraction Layer (NAL) Video Coding Layer (VCL) Profiles and Applications
Feature Highlights
Conclusions
Feature Highlights -- Prediction
Variable blocksize MCs Quarter-sample accurate MCs MVs over pic. Boundaries Multiple reference pictures Weighted Bi-directional prediction Decoupling of referencing from display orders Decoupling prediction mode from reference capability (uses B frames as reference) Improved Skip/Direct modes Intra prediction in Spatial domain In-loop deblocking filter
Feature Highlights -- Transform
Small block-size transform 2-level block transform (repeated DC transform) Short data-type transform (16-bit) Exact inverse transform Context-adaptive entropy coding Arithmetic entropy coding
Feature Highlights -- Network
Parameter set structure (efficient) NAL unit syntax structure (flexibility) Flexible slice size Flexible macroblock ordering (FMO) Arbitrary slice ordering (ASO) Redundant pictures Data partitioning (unequal error protection) SP/SI switching pictures
Outline
Overview Network Abstraction Layer (NAL) Video Coding Layer (VCL) Profiles and Applications Feature Highlights
Conclusions
Conclusions
Key improvements Enhanced prediction (intra- and inter-) Small block size exact match transform Adaptive in-loop deblocking filter Enhanced entropy coding method [Ref] G Sullivan and T. Wiegand, Video Compression —From Concepts to the H.264/AVC Standard , Proc. of IEEE, 93(1), Jan 2005