Responding to Intimate Partner Violence in the Child

Download Report

Transcript Responding to Intimate Partner Violence in the Child

Judy Hughes
Shirley Chau
Faculty of Social Work
School of Social Work
University of Manitoba
UBC Okanogan
Acknowledgement: Social Sciences and Humanities
Research Council (SSHRC) Canada
Existing Research
• Case file reviews and qualitative interviews with workers
suggest two broad approaches: 1) minimization and 2)
intrusive confrontation.
• Unhelpful Responses: investigation to ensure child safety
and well-being, and intervention occurs ONLY when
children are at risk (Collings & Davies, 2008; Davis & Krane, 2006;
Edleson, 2004; Fowler & Chanmugam, 2007; Hazen, et al., 2004; Kohl & Macy,
2008; Shephard & Raschick, 1999).
• Helpful responses – seeking of protection orders and aid in
obtaining resources, i.e. childcare and housing (Alaggia, et al.,
2007; Antle, et al., 2007; Earner, 2009; Humphreys, 1999; Jones & Gross, 2000;
Johnson & Sullivan, 2008; Magen, 1999; Scourfield, 2001; Seith, 2001; Shepherds
& Raschick, 1999).
Study Purpose & Sample
• Purpose: Examine the interactions that occur between
women who have experienced IPV and the Canadian child
welfare system
• In-depth interviews as part of a larger project:
• Spring 2008: 12 women from Northern British
Columbia
• Spring – Summer 2009: 62 women from Winnipeg
• 74 women: 33 aboriginal, 26 white, 4 black, and 8 Métis
women. The majority reported low incomes, under 20,000
(n = 49) and 5 are under the age of 20, 8 were between the
ages of 20-29, 17 were between 30 – 39, 21 were between 4049, and 11 were between 50-59.
Method
• Ask women to tell their stories of involvement in the
Canadian child protection and family law system
• Based on 26 selected interviews, we examined the structure
of specific stories and the organization of plot, setting, and
character around a particular or a series of events (Bleakley,
2005; Carniawska, 2004; Earner, 2009; Riessman, 2002; Sandelowski,
1991)
• Representative Narratives: presentation of detailed
narratives that retain the subject positioning and temporal
order of events
Method – Exploring Stories
• Identified 26 interviews that contained stories with
character, plot, and a temporal order to the described events
• Internal structure of the stories:
• Position as narrator – Resist judgmental images
applied to women as the partners of abusive men and
mothers raising children in difficult circumstances
• Emplotment of events – when did child protection
become involved and the impact of this
• Examples of two narratives for this presentation
“They just assumed I allowed it"
• Contain a life history of abusive relationships (i.e. partners
and family members), which are described as the actions of
others against them.
•Stories are infused with attempts to live better, but this is not
recognized: “I had my own place and I was taking care of my
kids. I was doing fine but it was just he kept jumping back in,
coming into the relationship when he wasn’t wanted and I
told him many times to leave.”
•Dominant theme is that interventions offered are mainly
parenting programs that do not help.
“They Just Assumed I Allowed it"
“They just assumed that I allowed it. I said oh so I allowed
somebody to come in, be in my life, kick the shit out of me,
throw me around a couple times, and then just leave me. Did I
allow that? Well, that’s pretty much how it isn’t it. And I just
looked at her, I said your not listening. The ministry kept
telling him to go through these courses and do all this and he
kept saying, well I don’t need them and I didn’t do
anything.”
(Woman 01 Northern British Columbia)
“They Just Assumed I Allowed it"
"I would pray that the social worker could see that while my
husband was visiting me I was high. I couldn’t bring myself to tell
him about the situation. My husband had manipulated me to the
point that I believed that you know that he was the best for me and
my children, because I couldn’t make it on my own. Please see that
I am high and that I need help and he never did. He would come to
check out the house and he would carry on a conversation for
hours, you know the house would reek of crack cocaine. My eyes
were big and I couldn’t sit still. I was obviously high and he never
did anything about it, not for the safety of my children, not to get
me out and do something for myself, not for anything, he
completed ignored the signs. Sometimes I’d forget to hide my pipe
before he got there. These are things that he saw. And he never did
anything”
(Woman 30 Manitoba)
Robbed of a Relationship with my Children
•
Loss of relationships with children occurs
gradually:
1. Through their partners’ actions toward them
2. Through attempts to seek help for themselves
and their children.
• The child protection system is also given a role in
the events that lead to the removal of children:
1. Not providing concrete help when they ask
2. Not respecting the women as mothers after
their children are placed in care
Robbed of a Relationship with my Children
Initial Contact: “I can’t remember if I called them or they called
me but I think I called them because, as much as I loved my
husband, I found him very controlling and abusive especially
towards my son which isn’t his biological kid. I also told them
about my husband using the belt on my son. Well they told me to
take that belt and put it in the garbage."
Multiple Examples: “So my son was returned and right the next
morning my husband threatened to slap my son across the face. I
was so run down, by being, allowing myself to be controlled by this
man with the emotional abuse, that I didn’t even realize what was
going on. I couldn’t even have rescued myself and if I couldn’t
rescue myself, how could I rescue my children, you know?”
(Woman 04 Manitoba)
Findings – Subject Positioning
• Violence is also spoken of as direct by their partners
• Moments of powerlessness are entwined with others,
wherein they describe themselves as in control: in naming
the abuse as wrong, as verbally standing up to their
partners, and seeking help.
• Emphasize that they could not have known that these
partners are abusive:
• “Its not like they tell me”
• “Sure enough I end up with a man who hits me like
my dad hit my mom”
• “I was raised with violence and I think that’s why I
got attached to violent relationships”
Findings – Order of Events
• Through listening: it is possible to ‘hear’ how abuse from
partners and others leads to both mental health problems
and substance misuse.
• Contact with the system is described as brief or occurring
over many years:
• In some stories, women work to resist the role of workers and files
are closed when their partners dies or goes to jail.
• In other stories, the events that occur clearly describe how a lack of
appropriate intervention leads to the removal of children.
• In most of the stories, responsibility is placed on women as
mothers, they are not offered concrete help to leave partners and
there is no intervention with the abusive partner.