Transcript Document

• DOEACC Centre, Kolkata
Centers at which training is being
conducted/to be conducted
•
•
•
•
•
Anantpur
Bangalore
Chennai
Gandhinagar
Gangtok/Guwahati
•
•
•
•
•
Kolkata
Lucknow
Patna
Guntur
Hyderabad
Centre-wise Status of Training
Training Centre
(As on February 28, 2003)
Course
Number of Batches
Number of Participants
OPT
5
70
DCA
3
51
DSS
2
16
OPT
9
176
DCA
6
55
DSS
4
18
OPT
5
140
DCA
5
110
DSS
2
36
GIS
1
14
OPT
9
204
DCA
6
84
DSS
4
32
OPT
2
34
DCA
1
33
OPT
1
15
DCA
1
14
DSS
1
1
Lucknow
OPT
3
91
Gangtok
OPT
3
22
Gandhinagar
Chennai
Hyderabad
Kolkata
Patna
Guntur
Total
1216
State wise break up of training (As on February 28, 2003)
State
Projected
Attended
OPT
DCA
DSS
DCA
DSS
GIS
9
1
1
11
1
1
0
0
2
284
161
70
515
140
124
37
14
315
Assam
42
13
10
65
20
1
0
0
21
Bihar
62
27
18
107
34
33
0
0
67
Chattisgarh
19
2
1
22
15
0
0
0
15
9
4
4
17
4
1
0
0
5
116
30
19
165
70
51
16
0
137
Jharkhand
29
10
2
41
19
5
0
0
24
Karnataka
122
45
23
190
72
6
2
0
80
Meghalaya
7
4
2
13
0
0
0
0
0
Orissa
36
14
6
56
21
4
1
0
26
Sikkim
7
2
2
11
8
0
0
0
8
Tamil Nadu
185
61
42
288
100
48
16
0
164
Uttar Pradesh
121
32
21
174
91
0
0
0
91
West Bengal
237
82
41
360
157
73
31
0
261
1285
488
262
2035
752
347
103
14
1216
Andaman & Nicobar
Andhra Pradesh
Goa
Gujarat
Total
Total
OPT
Total
Projected Participants From States
State
Projected
OPT
Andaman & Nicobar
DCA
DSS
Total
9
1
1
11
284
161
70
515
Assam
42
13
10
65
Bihar
62
27
18
107
Chattisgarh
19
2
1
22
9
4
4
17
116
30
19
165
Jharkhand
29
10
2
41
Karnataka
122
45
23
190
Meghalaya
7
4
2
13
Orissa
36
14
6
56
Sikkim
7
2
2
11
Tamil Nadu
185
61
42
288
Uttar Pradesh
121
32
21
174
West Bengal
237
82
41
360
1285
488
262
2035
Andhra Pradesh
Goa
Gujarat
Total
100 11
0
West Bengal
190
UttarPradesh
400
TamilNaidu
13
56
Sikkim
41
Orissa
165
Meghalaya
300
Karnataka
22 17
Jharkhand
107
Gujrat
Goa
65
Chattisgarh
200
Bihar
Assam
600
Andhra Pradesh
Andaman Nicobar
Projected No. of Participants
515
500
360
288
174
11
Attendance From Different States (As on February 28, 2003)
State
Attended
OPT
Andaman & Nicobar
DCA
DSS
GIS
Total
1
1
0
0
2
140
124
37
14
315
Assam
20
1
0
0
21
Bihar
34
33
0
0
67
Chattisgarh
15
0
0
0
15
4
1
0
0
5
Gujarat
70
51
16
0
137
Jharkhand
19
5
0
0
24
Karnataka
72
6
2
0
80
Meghalaya
0
0
0
0
0
Orissa
21
4
1
0
26
Sikkim
8
0
0
0
8
100
48
16
0
164
91
0
0
0
91
West Bengal
157
73
31
0
261
Total
752
347
103
14
1216
Andhra Pradesh
Goa
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
State-wise Attendance (As on 28.2.2003)
180
157
160
OPT
DCA
140
140
DSS
124
GIS
120
100
100
91
80
60
73
72
70
51
37
40
3433
20
20
31
16
15
14
1 10 0
48
1 00
00
00 0
4
10 0
0
21
19
5
6
00
20
0 00 0
16
4
8
10
00 0
0
00 0
0
West Bengal
Uttar Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Sikkim
Orissa
Meghalaya
Karnataka
Jharkhand
Gujarat
Goa
Chattisgarh
Bihar
Assam
Andhra Pradesh
Andaman & Nicobar
0
Percentage of Attendance From States (As on February 28, 2003)
State
Andaman & Nicobar
Percentage
18.18
Andhra Pradesh
56.6
Assam
32.3
Bihar
48.6
Chattisgarh
68.1
Goa
29.4
Gujarat
83
Jharkhand
58.5
Karnataka
42.1
Meghalaya
0
Orissa
46.4
Sikkim
72.7
Tamil Nadu
56.9
Uttar Pradesh
52.2
West Bengal
72.5
West Bengal
UttarPradesh
TamilNaidu
Sikkim
Orissa
Meghalaya
Karnataka
Jharkhand
Gujrat
Goa
Chattisgarh
Bihar
Assam
Andhra Pradesh
Andaman Nicobar
Percentage Attendance From States (As on February 28, 2003)
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Directorate/FO wise breakup from different Centers
Guntur
Location Level
Directora
te
Projected
OPT
Guntur
RO&RAL
Vijayavada
FO
Visakhapatna
m
FO
Vizag
Total
SO
Dte. of
Marketing &
Inspection
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of
Marketing &
Inspection
Attended
DCA
Total
DSS
OPT
DCA
DSS
GIS
Total
42
42
17
101
9
9
13
2
1
16
5
7
2
2
11
1
13
14
3
1
1
5
3
1
4
65
47
21
133
18
14
1
1
6
33
Directorate/FO wise breakup from different Centers
Hyderabad
Location Level
Directorate
Projected
OPT
Hyderabad
FO
Hyderabad
FO
Hyderabad
Hqrs
Hyderabad
SO
Hyderabad
SO
Hyderabad,
Begumpet
FO
Hyderabad,
Somajegudda FO
Raipur
Total
FO
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
Dte. of Oil Seeds
Development
Dte. of
Marketing &
Inspection
All India Soil and
Land Use Survey
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
DCA
Attended
Total
DSS
OPT
DCA
DSS
Total
GIS
77
30
25
132
62
60
9
8
131
2
2
1
5
2
1
1
4
24
12
11
47
11
12
6
29
18
8
4
30
17
17
10
5
44
28
10
2
40
15
13
1
1
29
4
1
0
5
4
4
19
4
1
24
19
2
1
22
15
191
69
45
305
126
8
0
15
107
27
14
260
Gangtok/Guwahati
Location Level
Directorate
Projected
OPT
FO
FO
SO&RAL
Hqrs
RO
FO
SO&RAL
FO
FO
FO
Total
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of
Marketing &
Inspection
N-East Reg.
Farm Mech.
Trg. & Training
Inst.
National
Biofertilizer
Development
centre
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
Dte. of
Marketing &
Inspection
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
DCA
Attended
Total
DSS
OPT
DCA
DSS
Total
GIS
6
1
1
8
3
3
15
2
1
18
5
5
10
6
6
22
1
1
11
4
2
17
6
12
2
2
16
2
3
2
0
5
0
4
2
2
8
0
7
1
1
9
1
1
7
2
2
11
8
8
3
1
1
5
1
1
0
0
78
101
119
1
7
2
160
164
147
0
28
Patna
Location Level
Directorate
Projected
OPT
Hazaribagh
Hqrs
Patna
FO
Patna
FO
Patna
Hqrs
Patna
SO
Purnia
Hqrs
Total
Soil Conserv.
Trg. Centre
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
Dte. of Rice
Development
Dte. of
Marketing &
Inspection
Soil conserv.
Res. Demo and
Trg. Centre
DCA
Attended
Total
DSS
OPT
DCA
DSS
Total
GIS
9
6
6
21
0
16
1
1
18
4
2
0
6
15
9
2
26
11
11
22
18
9
9
36
11
10
21
12
12
24
0
0
62
27
18
107
34
33
0
0
67
Lucknow
Location Level
Directorate
Projected
OPT
Gorakhpur
FO
Kanpur
FO
Kanpur
SO&RAL
Lucknow
FO
Lucknow
FO
Lucknow
Hqrs
Varanasi
FO
Varanasi
SO
Total
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
Dte. of Sugarcane
Development
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
DCA
Attended
Total
DSS
OPT
DCA
DSS
Total
GIS
23
5
3
31
16
16
14
5
2
21
10
10
35
6
7
48
24
24
15
3
2
20
14
14
7
5
0
12
5
5
18
3
3
24
12
12
3
1
0
4
4
4
6
4
4
14
6
121
32
21
174
91
6
0
0
0
91
Kolkata
Location Level
Directorate
Projected
OPT
Port Blair
FO
Ranchi
SO
Bhubaneshwa
r
FO
Bhubaneshwa
r
RO
Bhubneshwar SO&RAL
Bhuvaneshar FO
Burdwan
FO
Calcatta
RO&RAL
Calcatta
Hqrs
Calcatta
SO
Calcutta -AJC
Bose Road
FO
Calcatta, Salt
Lake
FO
Kolkata
FO
Nadia (Near
Kolkata)
FO
Nadia, Calutta FO
Total
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
All India Soil and
Land Use Survey
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
National
Biofertilizer
Development
centre
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. of Jute
Development
All India Soil and
Land Use Survey
Pay & Accounts
office
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
Central Fertilizer
Qulaity Control &
Trg. Inst.
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
DCA
Attended
Total
DSS
OPT
DCA
DSS
Total
GIS
9
1
1
11
1
1
0
2
29
10
2
41
19
5
3
2
0
5
12
5
2
19
6
2
5
2
2
9
4
2
16
5
2
23
11
11
15
3
1
19
10
10
44
17
17
78
30
28
10
68
23
11
5
39
21
8
7
36
64
23
6
93
37
14
5
56
28
13
1
42
42
9
7
58
46
4
2
0
6
4
9
3
3
15
6
8
1
1
10
3
311
107
50
341
198
24
0
8
1
7
0
22
9
77
4
1
7
3
83
32
0
313
Gandhi Nagar
Location Level
Directorate
Projected
OPT
Ahmedabad
FO
Ahmedabad
SO
Ahmedabad
SO
Baroda
FO
Bhavnagar
FO
Gandhinagar,
Kandla
FO
Jamnagar
SO&RAL
Palanpur
FO
Rajkot
SO&RAL
Surat
SO
Total
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
All India Soil and
Land Use Survey
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
DCA
Attended
Total
DSS
OPT
DCA
DSS
Total
GIS
3
2
0
5
0
7
3
3
13
3
5
2
10
32
10
2
44
22
19
4
45
16
2
1
19
12
3
3
18
0
1
1
5
4
1
1
6
5
8
1
1
10
6
2
2
10
23
1
1
25
6
7
1
14
17
5
5
27
13
11
4
28
6
116
5
30
5
19
16
165
2
70
2
49
2
18
6
137
0
Chennai
Location Level
Directorate
Projected
OPT
Goa
FO
Margoan
SO
Panaji
SO
Banglore
FO
Banglore
FO
Banglore
RO
Banglore
SO
Banglore
SO&RAL
Manglore
SO&RAL
Raichur
Bodinayakna
or
SO
Chennai
FO
Chennai
FO
Chennai
FO
Chennai
Chennai Beasant
Nagar
RO&RAL
Madras
Nagapattana
m
Hqrs
Tirupur
SO
Trichy
FO
Tuticorin
FO
Tuticorin
SO&RAL
SO&RAL
FO
SO
Virudhunnagar SO&RAL
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
National
Biofertilizer
Development
centre
All India Soil and
Land Use Survey
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. Of
Economics &
Statistics
Central Fertilizer
Qulaity Control &
Trg. Inst.
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Pay & Accounts
office
Dte. of Tobacco
Development
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte of Plant
Protection,
Quarantine &
storage
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
Dte. of Marketing
& Inspection
DCA
Attended
Total
DSS
OPT
DCA
4
DSS
Total
GIS
6
1
1
8
2
2
2
6
0
1
1
1
3
0
2
1
1
4
0
21
5
4
30
12
5
2
19
6
6
64
24
6
94
37
37
17
6
6
29
15
3
2
1
1
4
4
3
3
10
2
1
1
1
0
2
38
9
8
55
28
10
2
1
0
3
1
1
12
1
2
5
1
15
18
0
1
4
0
2
40
2
9
3
0
12
5
3
1
9
56
18
18
92
33
31
9
73
28
13
1
42
8
2
2
12
1
1
1
3
8
7
7
22
3
1
2
6
17
3
2
22
12
2
2
16
9
1
1
11
8
8
4
1
1
6
2
2
4
316
1
110
1
69
6
495
2
176
0
6
6
0
55
18
0
2
249
Feedback from some of the centres
Feedback from Gandhinagar
Content Coverage
Teaching faculty
Hands on session
Food Quality
OPT
OPT
OPT
OPT
Feedback
No. of
Opinions
Adequate
549
Too less
21
Feedback
Very Effective
No. of
Persons
49
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Very Useful
36
Excellent
17
21
Very Good
19
Effective
7
Useful
Too detailed
0
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
0
Good
Can't say
0
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
No opinion
0
No opinion
1
No opinion
0
No opinion
DCA
DCA
DCA
8
12
1
DCA
Adequate
169
Very Effective
13
Very Useful
11
Excellent
Too less
117
Effective
18
Useful
20
Very Good
11
14
Too detailed
1
22
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
0
Good
Can't say
0
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
5
No opinion
2
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
DSS
DSS
Adequate
122
Too less
12
Too detailed
Can't say
No opinion
DSS
DSS
Very Effective
5
Very Useful
Effective
9
Useful
8
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
0
Good
18
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
3
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
0
3
11
Excellent
0
Very Good
0
11
Feedback from Gangtok
Content Coverage
Teaching faculty
Hands on session
Food Quality
OPT
OPT
OPT
OPT
Feedback
No. of
Opinions
Adequate
165
Too less
Very Effective
No. of
Persons
17
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Feedback
No. of
Persons
10
Very Useful
12
Excellent
10
Very Good
5
Effective
5
Useful
55
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
0
Good
6
Can't say
0
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
1
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
Too detailed
0
Feedback
Feedback from Hyderabad
Content Coverage
Teaching faculty
Hands on session
Food Quality
OPT
OPT
OPT
OPT
Feedback
No. of
Opinions
Adequate
958
Too less
46
Too detailed
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Very Effective
91
Very Useful
56
Excellent
16
Effective
34
Useful
65
Very Good
34
66
112
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
2
Good
Can't say
87
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
2
Fair
8
No opinion
47
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
No opinion
1
DCA
DCA
Adequate
208
Too less
18
Very Effective
DCA
19
Very Useful
DCA
16
Excellent
7
2
Effective
4
Useful
5
Very Good
Too detailed
4
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
2
Good
13
Can't say
0
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
1
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
No opinion
0
Feedback from Kolkata
Content Coverage
Teaching faculty
Hands on session
Food Quality
OPT
OPT
OPT
OPT
Feedback
No. of
Opinions
Adequate
1275
Too less
226
Effective
Too detailed
246
Less Effective
1
Less Useful
28
Not Effective
0
No opinion
6
Can't say
No opinion
265
DCA
Feedback
Very Effective
No. of
Persons
135
62
DCA
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Excellent
49
Very Good
82
0
Good
61
Not Useful
0
Fair
7
No opinion
8
No opinion
5
Feedback
Very Useful
Useful
No. of
Persons
106
90
DCA
DCA
Adequate
592
Very Effective
38
Very Useful
38
Excellent
8
Too less
117
Effective
41
Useful
43
Very Good
29
35
Too detailed
52
Less Effective
1
Less Useful
0
Good
Can't say
18
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
9
No opinion
61
No opinion
4
No opinion
3
No opinion
3
DSS
DSS
Adequate
225
Too less
DSS
DSS
Very Effective
11
Very Useful
11
Excellent
0
40
Effective
19
Useful
19
Very Good
9
Too detailed
12
Less Effective
1
Less Useful
1
Good
Can't say
15
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
8
No opinion
28
No opinion
1
No opinion
1
No opinion
1
14
Feedback from Patna
Content Coverage
Teaching faculty
Hands on session
Food Quality
OPT
OPT
OPT
OPT
Feedback
No. of
Opinions
Adequate
265
Too less
31
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Feedback
No. of
Persons
1
Very Effective
14
Very Useful
13
Excellent
Effective
18
Useful
20
Very Good
19
12
Too detailed
8
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
0
Good
Can't say
0
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
1
No opinion
0
No opinion
2
No opinion
1
No opinion
1
Feedback from Chennai
Content Coverage
Teaching faculty
Hands on session
Food Quality
OPT
OPT
OPT
OPT
Feedback
No. of
Opinions
Adequate
587
Too less
62
Too detailed
Can't say
No opinion
133
4
20
DCA
462
Too less
Too detailed
No opinion
Very Effective
Effective
No. of
Persons
111
43
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Feedback
No. of
Persons
Very Useful
69
Excellent
16
Useful
78
Very Good
53
Less Effective
1
Less Useful
6
Good
72
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
15
21
No opinion
23
No opinion
20
No opinion
DCA
Adequate
Can't say
Feedback
DCA
DCA
Very Effective
38
Very Useful
29
Excellent
2
11
Effective
16
Useful
24
Very Good
5
25
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
0
Good
27
2
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
20
No opinion
1
No opinion
2
No opinion
50
DSS
DSS
DSS
1
DSS
Adequate
87
Very Effective
9
Very Useful
8
Excellent
0
Too less
12
Effective
6
Useful
7
Very Good
2
Too detailed
10
Less Effective
0
Less Useful
0
Good
1
Not Effective
0
Not Useful
0
Fair
0
No opinion
4
No opinion
4
No opinion
4
Can't say
No opinion
80
13