Transcript Document

Calibrating, validating, and forecasting with the SLEUTH urban growth model
in the Baltimore metropolitan area
Claire A. Jantz and Scott A. Drzyzga, and Michael Maret
Shippensburg University
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Baltimore
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!!
!
Washington, DC
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
Research objectives
Generate forecasts of
urban growth in the BMR
o Incorporate “drivers” of
urbanization
o Loosely couple with
hydrologic model to
capture humanenvironmental feedbacks
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Baltimore
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!!
!
Washington, DC
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
CNH: Dynamic Coupling of the Water
Cycle and Patterns of Urban Growth
NSF award ID
0709537
How SLEUTH works
Calibration
1984
Irani, F.M. and P.R. Claggett, P.R. (2010) Chesapeake Bay watershed land cover data series: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 2010-505
How SLEUTH works
Calibration
1984
1992
Irani, F.M. and P.R. Claggett, P.R. (2010) Chesapeake Bay watershed land cover data series: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 2010-505
How SLEUTH works
Calibration
Forecasting
1984
1992
2001
Irani, F.M. and P.R. Claggett, P.R. (2010) Chesapeake Bay watershed land cover data series: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 2010-505
How SLEUTH works
Calibration
Validation
Forecasting
1984
1992
2001
2006
Irani, F.M. and P.R. Claggett, P.R. (2010) Chesapeake Bay watershed land cover data series: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 2010-505
Research Design
Unconstrained
Constrained
with Pop +
Emp forecasts
Base
Sewer
service areas
Pop + Emp
for RPDs
-
-
-
MIN
MIN
MIN
SQ
SQ
SQ
MAX
MAX
MAX
SLEUTH’s exclusion layers
Validation (unconstrained)
1,400
Mapped
Urban area (km2)
1,350
Base-unconstrained
Sewer-unconstrained
1,300
RPD-unconstrained
SLEUTH’s boom and
bust coefficients
remain unadjusted
1,250
1,200
1,150
1,100
1980
1985
1990
1995
Year
2000
2005
2010
Validation (unconstrained)
But the future is expected to be different
from the past
Baltimore Metropolitan Council - Cooperative Forecasting Group. Round 7-B population and employment forecasts.
Percent of Land as Urban
100
80
60
40
20
0
1,000
Population Intensity
(residents/km2)
8,000
1,000
Employment Intensity
(jobs/km2)
1,000
6,400
Human Intensity
(humans/km2)
Baltimore Metropolitan Council - Cooperative Forecasting Group. Round 7-B population and employment forecasts.
13,000
Validation (constrained)
1,400
Mapped
1,350
RPD-Min
Urban area (km2)
RPD-Status quo
1,300
RPD-Max
Adjust SLEUTH’s
boom and bust
coefficients
1,250
1,200
1,150
1,100
1980
1985
1990
1995
Year
2000
2005
2010
Validation (constrained)
Validation (constrained)
Constraining the forecasts
Baltimore Metropolitan Council - Cooperative Forecasting Group. Round 7-B population and employment forecasts.
Constraining the forecasts
1,400
Urban area (km2)
1,350
1,300
Adjust SLEUTH’s
boom and bust
coefficients
1,250
1,200
RPD-Min
RPD-Status quo
1,150
RPD-Max
1,100
Year
Constraining the forecasts
Conclusions and lessons learned
 SLEUTH’s calibration process can be used to
evaluate “drivers” of urbanization
 Validation is critical for:
o Improving our understanding of how the urban
system behaves
o Quantifying model uncertainty
o Incorporating additional models to inform
SLEUTH’s forecasts
References
 Baltimore Metropolitan Council - Cooperative Forecasting Group. Round
7-B population and employment forecasts.
 Irani, F.M. and P.R. Claggett, P.R. (2010) Chesapeake Bay watershed land
cover data series: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 2010-505
 Jantz, C.A., S.J. Goetz, P. Claggett, and D. Donato (2010). Modeling
regional patterns of urbanization in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34:1-16.
 Maret, Michael (2011). Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to identify
"drivers" of land use change in the Baltimore metropolitan region.
Geoenvironmental research. Student white paper published at
http://webspace.ship.edu/cajant/student_white_papers.html
 McConnell, W.J at al. (2011). Research on Coupled Human and Natural
Systems (CHANS): Approach, Challenges, and Strategies. Bulletin of the
Ecological Society of America 92 (2): 218-228
THANK YOU
Claire Welty (PI), Andrew Miller,
Bernadette Hanlon, and Michael P. McGuire
Claire Jantz (PI) and Scott A. Drzyzga
with Michael Maret.
Reed Maxwell (PI)
James Smith (PI)
Mary Lynn Baeck
Gary Fisher
NSF award ID
0709537
CNH: Dynamic Coupling of the Water
Cycle and Patterns of Urban Growth