Transcript LCS Acquisition Approaches Brief to ASN

Modular Approach
 LCS Seaframe modular in architecture
 Enables multiple “focused” missions to be
accomplished with use of modular mission
packages
– Primary, secondary & possible future missions
– Separate acquisition from core Seaframe
 Common core mission and HM&E systems and
adapters to support multiple modules
– Enables ability to reconfigure, refocus, and adapt
 Integration via standard interfaces (technical
architecture) developed to support current and
future technologies
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 1
7/7/2015
LCS Vision
Reconfigurable Mission Systems
Standard Interfaces
Seaframe Zones
C4
Air
Air
Sea
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 2
7/7/2015
Sea
C4
Core Systems
and Mission Packages
+
=
CORE SYSTEMS
• Self Defense
• Navigation
• C4
• Mine Avoidance
• Torpedo Detection
& Avoidance
• Warning Shots
• Detect, ID, & Track
Surface Contacts
• Limited ISR
• Core Crew
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
MISSION PACKAGE
+
Slide 3
7/7/2015
• Modules
• Manned Aircraft
• UVs
• Offboard Sensors
• Mission Crew
=
FOCUSED
MISSION
Module / Seaframe Interface Concept
Systems
Modules
Seaframe Zone
Module
Module
Station
Module Station
Module Station
Module
Common resource stations/
panels for services connection
Module
PackUp Kits, etc
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 4
7/7/2015
Mission Package Development & Modules
Spectrum of Modularity
Process to Select
and Validate
Mission Packages
for Each Warfare
Area (MIW, ASW,
SUW)
“Tightly coupled” Zones and Modules
Mission Profiles:
Identified
Required Capabilities:
Determined
Module Box
Large Mission Bay Zone with Greater Tolerances
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Littoral Gaps:
Quantified
Slide 5
7/7/2015
Mission Modules:
Selected
Wargaming / Analysis:
Validation
LCS Reconfigurability
Rapid module
shipping
worldwide
Core OA C2
system enables
rapid module
“plug and play”
VERTREP/
CONREP
Use of
commercial
modules enables
rapid movement
via ramps and
cranes
Potential for atsea module
transfer
Multi-Purpose
Flight Deck
Large Offboard Vehicle
Zones (Hangars) for
combinations of modules
Cranes, Elevators, and
Innovative Technologies for
internal module reconfiguration
3 Day
threshold for
module install
& OPTEST 1 Day
objective
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 6
Innovative transfer
systems for simplified
module load-out
Common,
Reconfigurable
storage
Boat / Offboard Vehicle
Ramp and/or Davits enables
launch and recovery of
multiple modules
7/7/2015
Target LCS Flight 0 MIW Mission Package
Detect
Engage
Battlespace Minehunting
Preparation (Detect/ Classify/
Identify)
Beach
Surf
Zone
Near
surface &
floating
VTUAV+
COBRA
Neutralize
VTUAV+
COBRA
Near Surface
Surface
30 ft
MH-60 &
RMS +
AQS-20
Volume
150 ft
SCULPIN
BP-AUV
MH-60 &
RMS +
AQS-20
MH-60 +
AMNS
EOD
Close-Tethered
Close-CloseTethered
30 ft
Bottom
Buried
Naval
Special
Clearance
Team
MH-60+
RAMICS
NSCT, EOD
MH-60+ALMDS
Volume
and
bottom
mines
Buried
EOD
Bottom
MH-60 &
USV +
OASIS
MH-60 +
AMNS
EOD
* NOTE : Depth Coverages Vary with System and Mine Type
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 7
7/7/2015
Sweep
MH-60 &
USV +
OASIS
Target LCS Flight 0 Ship 2 ASW Mission
Package
Detect
Engage
Non-Acoustic Sensor
Surface Tactical Data Radar
(ARPDD)
LF Active Acoustic
(ALFS)
Surv/Data Relay: VTUAV
Multi-Static Active
Distributed LF Sonobuoys:
ACES/EER/DMNS Family
Torpedo Countermeasures
Torpedo Defense Systems
Mobile Units
Weapons Delivery
MH-60R /
SPARTAN USV
LCS
Transmit and Receive
Acoustic Arrays
(RMS and Spartan USV)
(Towed Array / MFTA)
Distributed Passive Sensors:
Advanced Deployable System
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 8
7/7/2015
Mk54 Torpedo
LCS Mission Systems and Ship
Integration Team
FY03 LCS Mission Systems and
Ship Integration (MSSI) IPT
OPNAV SPONSOR
PEO
HEADQUARTERS/ONR
CDR Jim Malloy
Jeff Kent
PEO SHIPS PMS 501
SEA 05D2
CDR Al Gaiser,
Jeff Koleser, Pete
Czapiewski
Bill Schoenster,
Todd Tompkins,
Ken Montgomery, John
Vasilakos
Mark Shiffler
OTHER SYSTEMS COMMANDS
PEO C4I
Chuck Auxter
CDR Stone
05D1
Tim Barnard
SEA 03
Jim Thurber
AIR 4
Bob Jackson
Mike Van Ryswick
PMA263 Mike Henthorne
CDR Spitz
SEA 04
Charles Hall
PEO LMW
Including Industry
During LCS
Preliminary Design
CAPT Walter Wright
PMS-420
Charles Barnes
PMS-490
Philip Marshall
SEA 06
Colleen Cannon
PEO IWS
Jose Casals, Roy Okamoto,
Tom Owen, Miguel Rivera, Joe
Schaaf, Terry Sheehan
Dan Harris, Jose Velez,
Guy Santora, Rob
McDonald
Jack Abbott, Bill Tootle, S.
Peterson
– Develop & maintain Technical
Architecture for LCS Mission
Systems (Interface Control
Document (ICD))
 Targeted Interface Development
» JUSC2 ACTD, Others
Dick
Vogelsong
J. Jerry LaCamera, Jr.
Adrian Eversoll
LABORATORIES
 Integrated Product Team (IPT)
comprised of Government and
Industry Reps
 Reports to the LCS Program
Manager
 Integration efforts:
NWDC
CDR Todd Haeg
SPAWAR SSC
Dorrance / Chagnon
Deepwater
Steve Cohen
Chris Colby, Vic Ricci
Richard Oropeza
– Spiral Development & Technology
Management
 Flight 0 Mission Module offsites
– T&E / experimentation
Goal: Develop a LCS Technical Architecture (Seaframe to Mission Module ICD)
sufficiently “open” to insure mission reconfigurability and lifecycle
technology adaptability
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 9
7/7/2015
Mission Module Contracting
Approach
 Separate from Seaframe contracts
 PEO(LMW) lead
–
–
–
–
Direct mission module development and coordination
Develop contracts
Manages funds
Schedule development of each module to suit overall
mission module schedule
 PEO Ships
–
–
–
–
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Overall Program Management\
Ship integration of mission modules
Coordinate overall budgeting
Implement acquisition strategy
Slide 10
7/7/2015
Summary
 U.S. Navy is Committed to a Littoral
Combatant to Address Anti-Access Threats
in the Littorals
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 11
7/7/2015
BACKUP
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 12
7/7/2015
Program Status
 23 Feb 02
ASN(RDA) directed establishment of LCS Program
 08 Jul 02
N76 letter provided interim direction to PEO(S) on top
level objectives for exploratory studies for Family of Ships
concept
 14 Aug 02
RFP released for Ship Concept Studies
 17 Sep 02
Establishment of LCS Program Office (under PEO(S))
 08 Nov 02
Contract award for Family of Ships Concept Studies (focusedmission high-speed ship)
 15 Nov 02
Congressional New Start approval for Littoral Combat
Ship Program ($30M Congressional Plus-up)
 28 Feb 03
Planned solicitation for LCS Flight 0 preliminary designs
–
–
–
Receipt of proposals
Proposal evaluation
Contract(s) Award
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 13
7/7/2015
14 April 03
15 April-13 July 03
17 July 03
Mid-term Schedule
 Preliminary design
17 Jul 03 – 11 Feb 04
 1st update / contract modification
for option items
15 Oct 03
 Final update / contract modification
for option items
01 Dec 03
 Industry submit proposals for
next phase
31 Dec 03
 Downselect to one or two for
final design
03 May 04
 Exercise 1st construction option
18 Jan 05
 Exercise 2nd construction option
31 Dec 05
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 14
7/7/2015
LCS Developmental Process is
Continuing
Concept Development
Phase
Flight 0
Flight 1
Flight 2
Fleet Battle
Experiments
Industry
Concept
Mission
Analysis
Flight 0 Ship RDT&E
Results
NWC
Studies
Preliminary
Designs
Tailored
AOA
Concept Development
Document
Analysis of Multiple
Concepts
Interim Requirements
Document
January
2002
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 15
October
2004
(FY 04)
7/7/2015
October
2005 (FY 06)
LCS Execution MOA

ASN (RDA) Memo 17 March 2003 outlines PEO
roles in execution of LCS program

PEO Ships charged with overall program
management, acquisition, total ship systems
engineering, integration of the LCS and lifecycle
support
–
–
–
Including SeaFrame-Module Interface Control
Document (ICD)
Single point of contact to Congress, OSD, Media
Overall budgeting and implementation of the LCS
Acquisition Strategy

PEO Littoral and Mine Warfare (LMW) charged with
Mission Module development and lifecycle support

PEO Integrated Warfare Systems (IWS) charged
with platform warfare system development and
ensuring compliance with computing environment
Open Architecture standards
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 16
7/7/2015
LCS Flag Action Group
 Established to clarify/assign responsibilities and
take coordinated action to support the LCS within
the accelerated and aggressive timeline
 Representing organizations with responsibility over
one or more critical areas that support the
development of LCS
– CNSL, N76, N76B, N70, N75B, N780, PEO (LMW), PEO(IWS),
N76C, N77B, OLA, SEA05, DNAVSEA, N81, N61, N51, NWDC,
CFFC N-8, FORCEnet, DASN (SHIPS), COMOPTEVFOR,
NETWARCOM, N12, DJ8
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 17
7/7/2015
LCS Ship Integration Team
 Given the complexity of the integration and Seaframe-Module
ICD development challenge, we established the Mission
Systems and Ship Integration IPT
– Mission Modules (PEO Littoral and Mine Warfare lead)





PEO LMW Systems (Remote Minehunting System, etc)
PEO IWS Systems (Guns, etc)
PEO A Systems (Helicopters)
PEO W Systems (UAVs)
Future developmental systems and possible commercial / foreign systems
– Seaframe (PEO Ships lead)




PEO IWS Systems (Guns, etc)
PEO C4I Systems (Communications, etc)
Industry/Commercial Systems (engines, etc)
Future developmental systems and possible commercial / foreign systems
– Technical Authority
 NAVSEA, NAVAIR, SPAWAR
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 18
7/7/2015
LCS Experimentation Battle Lab Team


To insure the development of an integrated Experimentation plan, we
established an LCS Experimentation Battle Lab Team
Draft LCS Experimentation Roadmap
Phase I development completed 16 July 03
–
–
–
LCS T&E strategy developed; being signed
LCS experimentation roadmap process developed
Draft LCS Experimentation Roadmap developed
 Extensive leveraging of HSV 2
 X-Craft use TBD
 Extensive Mission Module testing outlined


Phase II initiated with “Mini-Summit” 16 July 03
– Expanded Team including Fleet, PEO IWS, NAVSEA, NAVAIR, etc.
Initial Roadmap complete 31 October 03
– Linked with LCS Spiral Development process
– Updated as required
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 19
7/7/2015
LCS Experimentation Battle Lab Team
Oversight
Team
SEA 05D
CDR Al Gaiser,
Pete Czapiewski
SEA 03
Jim Thurber
SEA 06
TBD
Fleet
Input COMNAVSURFOR
PEO C4I
Chuck Auxter
Dick
Vogelsong
CDR Jim Malloy
Jeff Kent
PEO LMW
CAPT Walter Wright
PMS-420
PEO IWS
CAPT Al Greco
Adrian Eversoll
PEO SHIPS
PMS 501
Bill Schoenster,
Todd Tompkins
AIR 4
Bob Jackson
Mike Van Ryswick
Execution Team
Mark Shiffler
Ken Montgomery
WB
&B
Brian Schires
Larry Zimmerman
Chris Colby
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 20
7/7/2015
Tom Owen
Rob McDonald ,
Mario Berenger,
Jose Velez
NWDC
CDR Todd Haeg
Dave Lumsden
LCS Flight 0 Mission
Package Selection
CONOPs
NWDC
NWC
Technology
Management
Analysis of
Multiple
Concepts
(phase II)
PEO’s
MSSIT
Mission
Module
Offsites
Baseline
Mission
Module
Analyses
Module
Investment
Strategy
OPNAV / PEO’s
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 21
7/7/2015
CONOPS
Modular Mission Capabilities
Mine Counter Measure package
Small boat prosecution package
Provide organic punch through capability.
“Need to engage from close aboard to
over-the-horizon”.
Search, map, avoid with limited
neutralization.
Support remote & autonomous UVs and
operate helos.
Massed LCS Division = Dedicated MCM
capability.
Stabilized gun and missile system.
Integrated with EO/IR system.
Include non-lethal capabilities.
Helos & off-board systems.
Littoral ASW package
Inherent missions
Integrated with multiple
SOF
off-board sensor systems.
Maneuver, logistics, replenishment
Automatic on-board processing.
NEO
Helicopter(s).
MIO
Permits dedicated LCS ASW division.
Medical …
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 22
7/7/2015
Missions made
possible by the
removal of focused
mission modules
Technology Management
 Based on CONOPS, conducted targeted Technology
surveillance
– PEO’s and Naval War College
– Numerous offsites for technology “harvesting”
– Ongoing
 Evaluation of possible candidates for LCS Mission Architecture
 Facilitated by LCS Mission Systems and Ship Integration IPT
(MSSIT)
 Fed to analysis efforts as inputs for possible core Seaframe
and Mission Modules
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 23
7/7/2015
Offsites: LCS Flight 0
Mission Package Selection
 Need to make rapid programming decisions supporting
Mission Packages for Flight 0 due to programming cycle and
aggressive LCS schedule (FY07 ship 1 delivery)
 A Mission Module “Offsite” analysis process conducted
– Over course of 5 months, over 150 total participants
– COMNAVSURFOR, CFFC, NWDC, Fleet, resource sponsor, technical
community participants
– Numerous studies as input, including:




CONOPS
Technology Management study
NSWC DD Analysis of Multiple Concepts
SPA Mission Analysis
 Necked down approximately 1000 systems to ~30
 Culminating in Mission Module Offsite #3
– Focused on Mission Package capability definition
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 24
7/7/2015
LCS Flight 0 Mission Modules - PB04
MIW Module Package – Ship 1
MIW Mission Modules
QTY
RMS (AN/WLD-1)
SPARTAN
MIW Package
MH-60S
ALMDS
AQS-20A
AMNS
RAMICS
OASIS Sweep
LMRS
Explosive Ordnance Disposal Det
or Naval Special Clearance Team
BPAUV
REMUS / SCULPIN
21.1.2. RDML Hamilton MINWARA Brief 22Aug 03
Slide 25
7/7/2015
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1 set (2)
1
3
3
ASW Module Package – Ship 2
ASW Mission Modules
SPARTAN USV
SPARTAN ASW Package
MH-60R Helicopter
Torpedo
Sonar
Sonobuoys
ACES Family (EER) / Multistatic System (DMNS)
Torpedo Countermeasures
ASW RMV
Towed Arrays (Emit / Receive)
QTY
2
2
1
set
set
set
1
1
2
2 sets