Transcript Slide 1

Understanding
PRO
in
hematological
disorders:
CoRPS
Do we have a consensus?
Center of Research
on Psychology
in Somatic diseases
Floortje Mols
Tilburg University &
Comprehensive Cancer
Center South
The Netherlands
London
26 & 27
October
2010
CoRPS
Goal of guideline
• Goal of guideline:
– Describe the importance of using PRO in hematology.
– Provide an overview of PRO instruments that can be
used in this field.
– Discuss practical and clinical implications of using PRO
in clinical practice and research.
– Ultimate goal: support health care providers in selecting
and implementing the most appropriate PRO
instruments in clinical practice and research, in order to
improve HRQOL and symptom management.
CoRPS
Target group
• EHA guideline on PRO in hematology is intended for:
– all health care professionals involved in the treatment
and care of patients with hematological disorders such
as: general practitioners, medical oncologists,
radiotherapists, radiologists, psychologists, etc.
– Also, this guideline can be used by researchers in this
field.
CoRPS
Definition of PRO I
• PRO is an umbrella term encompassing a number of
parameters related to patient’s health status and
perception of treatment side effects.
• PRO assessments introduce the patient’s perspective into
the clinical research process via standardized self-report
instruments that are scored by the patient.
• The use of PRO instruments is advised when measuring
something that is best known to the patient or best
measured from the patient’s perspective.
CoRPS
Definition of PRO II
“A measurement based on a report that comes directly from
the patient about the status of a patient’s health
condition without amendment or interpretation of the
patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else.”
CoRPS
Definition of quality of life I
• Quality of life is a multidimensional construct that
consists of:
– Physical functioning
– Psychological functioning
– Social functioning
• It is based on the patient’s perception, and changes over
time.
CoRPS
Definition of quality of life II
Subjectivity and Objectivity
• QoL is not subjective in the usual sense of the
term.
• It can be measured accurately in an individual, and
in a group.
• It is “subjective” in that it derives from the human
subject of research or clinical practice.
CoRPS
Symptom vs. Sign
• Symptom: any subjective evidence of a disease,
health condition, or treatment-related effect that
can be noticed and known only by the patient.
• Sign: any objective evidence of a disease, health
condition, or treatment-related effect that are
usually observed and interpreted by the clinician
but may be noticed and reported by the patient.
CoRPS
What do we mean with PRO?
• In general:
– Health status
– (Health related) quality of life
– Symptoms and signs
– (Anxiety, depression, fatigue etc)
• Disease-specific:
– Health status
– (Health related) quality of life
– Symptoms and signs
– (Anxiety, depression, fatigue etc)
Although this
looks identical,
the associated
PROinstruments
are different!!
CoRPS
Definition of PRO instruments
• A PRO instrument:
– Is defined as “any report coming directly from patients
about a health condition and its treatment” and
assesses how the patient “feels or functions with
respect to his or her health condition”.
– Can assess complex constructs but also more focused,
one-dimensional constructs.
– May include observable events, behaviours, feelings, or
unobservable outcomes that are known only to the
patient.
CoRPS
Choice of PRO instruments
• Choice of instrument depends on:
– Target population/condition
– Measurement properties
– Translation and cultural adaptation availability
• Clinical trials and research: adequacy of conceptual
framework, administration mode, respondent and
administrator burden.
• In clinical practice: recall period, patient burden, ease of
interpretation.
(Section III.B. FDA Guidance for Industry)
CoRPS
Importance of PRO’s
• Information on side effects (symptoms/signs) can help
physicians and patients in making informed treatment
decisions.
• Efforts to develop reliable and valid PROs instruments have
been successful, resulting in many well-validated instruments.
• FDA  Guidance for Industry on PROs.
• EMEA Reflection paper on regulatory guidance for use of
HRQOL measures in the evaluation of medicinal products.
• NIH  PROMIS
CoRPS
PRO in hematology I
• Hematological disorders and its treatment (e.g.
chemotherapy, radiotherapy, stem cell transplantation
etc.) can have a major influence on patient-reported
outcomes
– QoL among Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors is lower
compared to an age-matched normative sample (Mols
et al., EJC, 2006).
– Non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had received
chemotherapy (5-15 years ago) reported significantly
worse psychological and social well-being and HRQOL
than patients who had not received chemotherapy
(Mols et al. Cancer, 2007).
CoRPS
PRO in hematology II
• There is a paucity of studies on PRO in hematology, in
contrast to studies on other (solid) tumors.
• A systematic review1 on QOL among Hodgkin and nonHodgkin lymphoma survivors revealed 20 studies
published up until now and concluded that:
– “More research on the longitudinal comparison
between HL and NHL survivors and healthy controls
should be performed in order to better understand the
long term (side-) effects of treatment on HRQoL and
possibilities to alleviate these.”
(Oerlemans et al, submitted for publication)
CoRPS
Place of PRO in Hematology
• Clinical Trails
• Clinical practice
CoRPS
PRO in research/clinical trails
• PRO instruments can be used in research settings:
– In prospective studies, PROs can describe the course of
quality of life and possible side-effects, in large groups
of patients with a certain disease, or patients who
receive a specific treatment.
– In comparative studies, PROs can be compared with
healthy people to see whether cancer survivors get
back to a similar level of PROs after diagnosis and
treatment. Or, to see whether treatment A causes
more side-effects, or a worse quality of life, compared
to treatment B.
CoRPS
PRO in clinical practice
• Use of PRO instruments in clinical practice can tell us:
– if and how an individual patient is coping with his or
her disease, treatment, and its’ possible side-effects.
– PRO instruments can also be used repetitively, to see
whether this changes over time, provided that the
selected PRO instrument possess the necessary
psychometric properties.
– PRO’s can give an indication of a patients’ need for
additional support (e.g., from a medical specialist,
nurse, psychologist etc.)
CoRPS
Questions?