Duration – STM & LTM

Download Report

Transcript Duration – STM & LTM

Duration – STM & LTM


Peterson & Peterson (1959) – STM
Bahrick et al (1975) – LTM
These are key studies so make sure you
learn APFCC
www.psychlotron.org.uk
Clearly, LTM can store information for a
much longer time than LTM
Some researchers have tried to measure
their durations exactly:
Duration – STM


Between exposure & recall there was a delay
in which they did an interference task
The length of the delay was varied
Results obtained by plotting recall against
length of delay
www.psychlotron.org.uk
Peterson & Peterson (1959)
PPs presented with ‘trigrams’ (CVC
nonsense syllables) and asked to recall
them (accurately & in order)
3
6
9
12
15
Length of delay (s)
18
www.psychlotron.org.uk
% recall
Duration - STM
Duration - STM
Recall declined steadily with time


After 3s 80% correct
After 6s less than 50%
After 18s less than 10%
Information is lost rapidly from STM, which
seems to have a duration of about 20s if
nothing is done to maintain the info (i.e.
rehearsal)
www.psychlotron.org.uk

Duration - STM
The experiment lacked realism

Nonsense trigrams were used to eliminate the
effect of meaningfulness
However, this is unlike the info that people
typically deal with
The use of interference task is a problem

We cannot tell if the info decayed (as the
Petersons claim) or was displaced by the task
www.psychlotron.org.uk

Bahrick et al (1975)
Test of VLTM using naturalistic materials
392 US PPs who had left high school 1-48
years previously tested for recall of
classmates



Free recall
Recognition of photos
Name recognition & photo matching
www.psychlotron.org.uk
Duration - LTM
Duration - LTM
% recall
Picture
recognition
Free
recall
Years since leaving High School
www.psychlotron.org.uk
Name
recognition
Duration - LTM
Recall was remarkably high

80% accuracy for name recognition at 48yrs
30% accuracy for free recall at 30yrs
Supports the idea that LTM can store
some types of info for very long time

Free recall becomes more difficult over time,
but recognition does not diminish much
www.psychlotron.org.uk

Duration - LTM
Ecological validity was high

The study used a naturally occurring form of
info so avoided the artificiality often present in
memory studies


Classmates may have high emotional
significance, and there is usually great
opportunity for rehearsal
Conclusions not generalisable to other types
of information
www.psychlotron.org.uk
The type of info used was very specific