Concierge Medicine: Key Legal Considerations Complying
Download
Report
Transcript Concierge Medicine: Key Legal Considerations Complying
Concierge Medicine:
Key Legal Considerations
Complying with Medicare Regulations,
Insurance Laws and the Anti-Kickback Statute
Texas Health Law Conference
October 15, 2012
David W. Hilgers, JD
[email protected]
Brown McCarroll, L.L.P.
Robert M. Portman, JD, MPP
[email protected]
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC
Road Map
• Overview of Concierge Medicine and
Models
• Federal Legal Issues
• State Law and Private Insurance Issues
• Contracting Issues
• Valuation Issues
Concierge Care
a/k/a “boutique” or “retainer” medicine
Reasons for development
lower reimbursement
payment denials, delays
rising malpractice premiums
greater liability risk/regulatory burdens
increasing overhead/paperwork
higher patient loads
Concierge Care
Positive outcomes
Personal care
Professional satisfaction
May make preventative care affordable and
accessible
Looks a lot like a family medical home
Concierge Care
Common Characteristics
Primary care
Fixed monthly or annual fee
Limited number of patients 300-800
Special services/attention
Greater physician access
Plan of care
Amenities
—
Must pay retainer to receive any services
Services Provided
Typical Services/Amenities
priority/extended/Sat. appointments
nicer, less crowded waiting rooms
24/7 pager/email/cell phone access
house calls/visits to specialists
preventive/wellness care
telephone/email consultations
Prescription/claims assistance
Services Provided
Premium Services
Unlimited appointments
Same day appointments
All physician office services covered
Transportation
Spa-like amenities (bathrobes/slippers)
“free” x-rays
Practice Models
Non-participation (no insurance)/all
preventive and primary care (which
can include specialists)
Participation (accepts
insurance)/retainer only covers noncovered services
Participation/amenities only
Practice Models
Variations
Hybrid – concierge and non-concierge services within
same practice
Direct Care – retainer plus high deductible insurance
Bifurcated corporate structure
Franchise/Practice Management
Direct non-physician ownership – only in states with
weak corporate practice of medicine laws
Practice Models
Key Decisions
Participation vs. Non-participation
All concierge vs. hybrid
What services included in the fee
What fees to charge
Size of patient panel
Independent practice or affiliate with franchise
or management company
The Numbers
750-2,000 doctors
200,000 patients
Retainer fees ranging from $600-30,000
100-500 patients
Concierge practices in most states
All but 11 states have concierge practices (per 2010
MedPAC report)
Concierge Care Examples
• MD2 – www.md2.com Portland based
Does not accept insurance
Will franchise for $75k plus 5% royalty
Goal is to create international network of
similar practices
Concierge Care Examples
• MDVIP – http://www.mdvip.com/
• Boca Raton based closed model
• Starbucks approach – over 450 physician affiliates in
32 states
•
•
$1500-1800 annual fee
600 patients per physician
Does accept insurance
Will franchise turn-key operation for percentage of
franchisee’s concierge fees
Franchisee keeps all insurance reimbursements
Concierge Care Examples
Personal Physician Health Care, LLC/PC
www.personalphysicians.net
Boston based/closed model
Dual corporate structure – LLC and PC
PC accepts Medicare/private insurance
LLC provides concierge services
$5,000 per patient
300 patients per physician
Concierge Care Examples
Health Access RI
Network of independent medical practices
Monthly membership fee of $25-30 per month
Per visit fee of $5-10
Provides primary care services
Does not accept insurance
Concierge Care Examples
Qliance Medical Management, Inc.
Seattle-based “Direct Care” – retainer for concierge
services backed up by high deductible insurance
Funded by venture capital and other investors
Shows growing interest of venture capital firms in
direct care model
Monthly fee of $39-79 for unlimited preventive and
primary care
Concierge Care Examples
Other Examples
SignatureMD – Arizona, California, Georgia,
Indiana, Missouri, Montana, New York,
Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Washington
D.C
Concierge Choice Physicians (National)
PartnerMD – Virginia
Concierge Medicine:
Key Legal Considerations
Best Practices to Comply
with Medicare Regulations
Concierge Medicine Under Medicare
Secretary of HHS, 2002:
Physicians participating in Medicare can charge patients a
special fee to provide services that are not covered by Medicare
2002 – Congress sent letter to HHS and OIG
Alleged that fees charged by MDVIP violated
Medicare limiting charge rules and false claims act
HHS response did not call practices illegal as long as
charges were for non-covered services
Cautioned that physicians entering arrangements should
seek legal counsel
Medicare Reimbursement Issues
Participating physicians
Physician accepts assignment
Medicare pays physicians 80% of fee schedule
directly
Physician bills patient co-payment of 20%
80% plus 20% is payment in full
Non-participating physicians
Patients pay physician directly
Patients seek reimbursement from Medicare
Limiting charge 115% of Medicare
Medicare Reimbursement Issues
Opting Out
Physician has private agreement with Medicare
beneficiary and Medicare is not billed by
physician or patient for any services provided by
physician
Review Medicare’s Opt-Out rules carefully
Be certain to properly opt out before billing any
patients
Failure to properly “opt-out” renders any contracts
entered into with Medicare beneficiaries void and
nullifies the physician’s decision to opt-out
Medicare Reimbursement Issues
Physicians who opt-out may not receive ANY
remuneration from Medicare, including sharing
in practice income where other practice
physicians have not opted out for two years
Other physicians in practice are not required to
opt-out
Recognize that opt-out is for two years
Medicare Prohibition
Physicians cannot charge patients for
services already covered by Medicare
Applies to participating and non-participating
physicians
Violation of assignment agreement and
carries civil money penalties
Opt-out physicians are not subject to rule
Medicare Coverage Issues
What does practice bill patient for?
Medicare prohibits billing patients for
covered services beyond limiting charges
Unclear distinction between “covered” and
“not-covered”
Covered Services
Generally, routine photocopying, routine
overhead (including malpractice insurance
costs, heating, lighting, staff salaries, etc),
supplies, rent, continued education or
certification fees
Malpractice fees
Covered Service?
Annual Wellness Physical
Medicare covers annual wellness visit
Is it the same as an annual physical?
Many screening tests now covered
But, covered under specific intervals: cardiology screen every 5
years, pap smears 24 months, colonscopy 10 years
Women’s health issues: screening pap tests, pelvic exams, and
mammography
Medicare enrolled physicians with retainer practices must clearly
be certain they are well aware of current Medicare coverage
guidelines
Non-Covered Services
Same day appointments
Cell phone access
Email consultations/texting
Lectures to patients on wellness
Claims facilitation
Home visits
Access that has been explicitly expanded in measurable
ways
Is this enough??
Non-Covered Services
Additional or extra-ordinary services
CDs, booklets, or pamphlets prepared by the
physician regarding the patient’s health, well-being, or
a plan to achieve either
Testing or treatment that is explicitly not covered by
Medicare
Any other services which provide a genuine value
and which are not part of a patient’s covered service
Is the retainer fair market value for the services?
Government Pronouncements
2004 – OIG Alert to physicians about added
charges for covered services
2004 OIG settlement with physician for Personal
Health Care Medical Care Contract with $600
annual fee because some covered services
were included in the contract services
2007 OIG settlement for over $100,000 with
physician in North Carolina allegedly violating
Civil Money Penalty Law for violating
assignment agreement
OIG Roadmap for New Physicians:
Avoiding Medicare Fraud and Abuse
• OIG education materials to teach physicians
• Issued in 2011
• Specifically discusses “’boutique, concierge, retainer’”
practices
– Explains that can’t get paid a second time for a Medicare
covered service
– IMPORTANT – Explicitly states that it is legal to charge for
service not covered by Medicare
– Access fees or administrative fees are not allowed where they
are to obtain Medicare covered services
OIG Roadmap for New Physicians:
Avoiding Medicare Fraud and Abuse
Alleged violation of assignment agreement
because SOME of the services were
already covered by Medicare
Legality of agreement turns on what
additional fees cover
OIG Roadmap for New Physicians:
Avoiding Medicare Fraud and Abuse
Specifically notes CMP settlement
Physician paid $107,000 to resolve allegations of
charging patients annual fee for Medicare covered
services
Fee covered
Annual physical, same or next-day appointments, dedicated
support personnel, around the clock physician availability,
prescription facilitation, expedited and coordinated referrals,
and other amenities at the physician’s discretion
Potential Fraud and Abuse Issues
When dealing with Concierge Practice Management
Companies be sensitive to:
State Fee Splitting Prohibition: prevent a physician from sharing
any part of their fees with a third-party without the third-party
performing certain substantive services
e.g., often payments are appropriate, but need to be tied to the
value of the services
Potential kickback issues for marketing; see Advisory Opinion
10-23 (November 4, 2010)
Amenities as inducements that violate antikickback rules
Prognosis for Concierge Care After
the ACA
• Primary care doctors at a premium
– Many more patients
– Primary care can opt for the better paying
practice methodologies
• ACO’s—Can concierge doctors be
participating providers if they are seeing
Medicare patients.
ACA and Concierge Care
• ACA Expanded Medicare Covered
Services
– Prevention Plans
– Annual Wellness visits
• Potential Limitations on DME and other
prescriptions
• Will Medicare restrictions be expanded to
exchange policies.
• Family Medical Homes
Guidelines for Contracting with Patients
AMA Ethical Guidelines
AMA acknowledges that retainer contracts
enhance patient choice and pluralism in the
delivery and financing of health care.
However, AMA is concerned that a proliferation of
retainer practices might “threaten access to care”
The AMA provides that retainer contracts:
Be entered into without duress, with full disclosure
(including any knowledge the physician has regarding
the patient’s insurance coverage)
Guidelines for Contracting with Patients
AMA Ethical Guidelines
The AMA provides that retainer contracts:
Must be cancelable without financial penalty or “undue
inconvenience”
Cannot promise “more or better diagnostic and therapeutic
services”
a guideline which conflicts with the physician’s obligation to provide “more” in
return for non-covered service fees
In sum, AMA cautions against a physician’s use unfair
persuasion in the contracting process and emphasizes the
need to uphold quality of care standards for both retainer and
non-retainer patients alike
Guidelines for Contracting with Patients
Where a physician runs a “dual” practice (serving both
retainer and non-retainer patients) they must provide the
same level of diagnostic and therapeutic service to both
Physician must facilitate transfer of patients to other
physicians where necessary, or, if no other physicians
are available, they must continue to treat them
Contracts should clearly and specifically describe all
“non-covered” services and physicians must always be
honest in their insurance or other payor billings
Guidelines for Contracting with Patients
For Medicare beneficiaries
Contracts with beneficiaries must be available for
inspection (although not necessarily filed with CMS)
Missed appointment fees may be charged, but you
must charge all patients the same at the same rate
Never bill a patient for services covered by Medicare
Concierge Medicine:
Key Legal Considerations
State Laws
Private Insurance
Contracting Issues
State Insurance Law
Unlicensed insurance companies?
Practices that provide health care services for fixed,
prepaid fee may be health plans under state
insurance laws (e.g., Knox-Keene Act in California)
No other entity in chain of treatment/payment to
accept risk/subject to state regulation (e.g., reserve
requirements)
If practice goes under, patients left high & dry
Ex.: Washington medical group offered their own insurance plan
that was put in state receivership
State Insurance Laws
State Limitations on Concierge Medicine
West Virginia – Determined that a physician
providing care for a flat fee was operating as an
unlicensed insurer.
Maryland-2008 warning of insurance concerns
New Jersey – Warned that NJ physicians serving
on HMO or PPO panels could not require a
concierge fee, because it discriminates against
HMO and PPO patients.
New York – Issued an informal warning against
double billing for services already covered by
private insurance.
Reoccurring Issue: Which services are covered and which are
not?
State Insurance Laws
Positive State Trends
WVA legislature has pilot program allowing physicians/health
clinics to charge prepaid fee for primary care and preventive
services
Florida – Found that MDVIP did not require an insurance
license because the concierge fees were not considered
insurance.
Massachusetts – Found that Personal Physicians Healthcare
did not violate state insurance laws, and the state licensing
board for physicians also found that the concierge model was
legal.
Other State Laws
Abandonment
Concierge docs must be careful in how they
drop patients who do not become members
Must provide adequate written notice and
appropriate referrals
Do not leave patients in unstable condition;
provide transition care
Check state law
Other State Laws
Corporate Practice of Medicine
For franchise/practice management models,
physicians must control medical decision-making
Anti-kickback (all payor)/Fee Splitting
Will affect franchise or practice management fees
Franchise Laws
Check to see if state franchise laws apply if
franchise/practice management model is chosen
Private Insurance
• Balance Billing and Nondiscrimination
Most provider agreements and some state insurance
laws preclude balance billing of covered patients for
covered services
Key is to show these are not covered services
However it is not always easy to distinguish what is a
covered service and what is not.
Examples: 24/7 doctor availability, physical examinations, and
coordination of care with specialists
Notice to patients
Nondiscrimination issue
Private Insurance
Negative Reactions
Premera Blue Cross in
Washington and Blue Shield of
Rochester: extra fees violate
balanced billing and nondiscrimination laws
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care in
Mass: no longer contracts with
physician groups that charge
access fees
Cigna and United Healthcare in
Florida and Texas: physician
concierge care practices no longer
qualify for their networks
Positive Reactions
Regence Blue Shield in
Washington: extras fees okay as
long as for noncovered services
BCBS of Mass: will contract
with concierge practices as long
as they notify patients of nature
of practice and fee structure
Contracting Issues
Business Entity-Practice Contracts
If franchise/practice management model
chosen, business entity will need to enter into
contracts with participating medical practices
Contract will specify whether business entity
or practice will collect retainer fees
Practice receives license to use entity’s name
and logo
Contracting Issues
Patient Contracts – should contain:
Services covered by the subscription fee
What services/costs are not covered and any out-of-pocket costs
Whether the physician accepts Medicare/private insurance
When the retainer fee is payable/refundable
When services covered by Medicare or private insurance will be
billed or collected
How much practice will charge for services not covered by
retainer fee
Contracting Issues
Patient Contracts
Contract should specify duration of membership and
whether it automatically renews or patient must affirmatively
renew
Patient should be able to terminate without financial
penalties or excessive inconvenience
Patient must be able to understand the contract and
sign it voluntarily – practice staff assistance
Contract should not make exaggerated claims about the
quality of care
Tips to Reduce Legal Risk
Charge retainer fees only for noncovered
medical services
Take proper steps to transfer nonparticipating
patients to other competent physicians
Fully inform patients which services are covered
by the annual fee, which are covered by
insurance, and which will require additional outof-pocket payments by the patient
Tips to Reduce Legal Risk
Follow carefully rules for opting out of Medicare as well
as the termination provisions in agreements with
managed care and other insurers
For those who do not opt out of Medicare or private
insurance, do not require insured patients to pay a
retainer fee as a condition of receiving covered services
To avoid bumping up against state insurance laws, do
not offer all necessary medical services in exchange for
a fixed, prepaid fee; rather provide clearly defined
services for retainer fee
Concierge Medicine:
Key Legal Considerations
Fair Market Value Considerations
Between Practice & Patient
and
Between Concierge Company & Practice
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
Determine FMV of Concierge Medicine
Program Annual Patient Fee
• Facts to Consider
• Program Offering & Patient Benefits
– Wellness Program with Annual Visit
» Wellness Plan
» Metabolic Panel, Heart Health, Diabetes Prevention
» Respiratory Health, Bone Density, Sleep, Vision, Hearing
» Comprehensive Risk Factor Analysis
» Comprehensive Lab Test Program
» 24/7 access to personal doctor, same day appointments, access to network of
physicians when traveling & access to nationally renowned specialists
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
What to Consider when Determining FMV
• Internal Information
• All Promotional Literature
• Membership Application & Agreement
• Encounter Forms
• Physician Curricula Vitae
• Annual Visit CPT Codes & Description of Services with Time
Estimates for Provision of Services
• Does Medicare Reimburse for Service?
Case Study1: Practice & Patient
• External Sources of Information
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”)
The Frank Cohen Group Advanced Healthcare Analytics
Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting’s Proprietary Paid Claims
Database
American Medical Group Association: 2010 Medical Group
Compensation and Financial Survey (“AMGA Compensation
Survey”);
Medical Group Management Association: 2010 Physician
Compensation and Productivity Survey (the “MGMA Survey”);
Sullivan Cotter and Associates: 2010 Physician Compensation
and Productivity Survey (the “2010 SCA Survey”); and
Economic Research Institute Salary Assessor (“ERI Survey”).
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
• Approaches to Value
• Income – Not Relevant
• Cost – Relevant
• Market – Relevant
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
• Cost Approach
• Use Considered Surveys to Determine
Physician Compensation per FTE
• Adjust for Time Difference between Valuation
Date and Survey Date
• Add Benefits
• Determine Hourly Rate & Apply to High & Low
Time Estimates
• Use PFS to Determine wRVU & tRVU per
CPT
• Calculate Compensation per wRVU & tRVU &
Apply to wRVU & tRVU per CPT
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
• Results of Cost Approach Analysis
• Hourly Compensation Rates
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
• Results of Cost Approach Analysis
• Total Compensation per wRVU & tRVU
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
• Results of Cost Approach Analysis
• Total Compensation for Annual Wellness Visit
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
• Market Approach
• Reviewed Data by Frank Cohen Group
• National Average Charge Data per CPT
• Average Charge per CPT for Internal Medicine Specialty
• Average Charge per CPT for Family Practitioners
• Reviewed Sinaiko Proprietary Paid Claims Database
• Commercial Payor Reimbursement by CPT and location (physician
office)
• For Lab Tests CMS Clinical Lab Fee Schedule
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
• Analysis Summary
• Cost approach approximates the physician compensation
received in clinical practice for provision of the services absent
any other benefit available to the patients in concierge program.
• Family practice and internal medicine doctors generally earn
more for specialized services such as those provided in the
concierge program. The cost approach which looked at weighted
average compensation per hour and compensation per wRVU
and tRVU across all procedures does not adequately capture the
complexity and specialized nature of the concierge services.
• The market approach approximates what the physicians would
charge for the provision of comparable procedures to those
offered. Does not consider the added benefits received by
patients in the concierge program.
Case Study 1: Practice & Patient
• Conclusion
FMV Conclusion Annual Concierge Fee
Specialty
Average Charge
Internal Medicine
$1,554.82
Family Practice
$1,553.47
Case Study 2: Concierge Company & Practice
Determine FMV of Fee Concierge Medicine
Company Charges Physician Practice
• Facts to Consider
AKS Statute of Primary Importance – depends on
whether physician is seeing patients participating in
federal programs
State anti-kickback and fee-splitting laws may also
be implicated
Case Study 2: Concierge Company & Practice
• Approaches to Value
• Income – Not Relevant
• Cost – Relevant
• Market – Relevant
Case Study 2: Concierge Company & Practice
• What to Consider when Determining FMV
– Internal Information
• All Promotional Literature
• Agreement Between Physician Practice & Company
– Length of Time
– Right to Cancel
– Rights & Responsibilities of Parties to Agreement
• What Services Does Company Provide to Physicians
• Staff Providing Services
– Level of Professional
• Cost to Provide the Services
Case Study 2: Concierge Company & Practice
• External Sources of Information
– What Companies Providing Similar Marketing
Services to Non-Physicians are Charging Clients
• Reasonable Markup or Gross Margin for Marketing
Companies
– Franchise Fees for Non-Medical Arrangements
– Perhaps a Licensing Fee or Royalty Rate for use of a
Trade-name
– Points One Cost/Market Hybrid Approach
– Points Two & Three Market Approach
Case Study 2: Concierge Company & Practice
• Results of Analysis
– Review and Reconcile Cost Approach
Information
– Review and Reconcile Market Approach Info
– Reconcile Two Approaches
– Conclusion as to FMV of Fee
David W. Hilgers
David W. Hilgers is a Partner at Brown McCarroll, L.L.P.
and is a member of the firm’s Health Care Law
Section. He has practiced law for more than thirty-five
years. His primary focus is on health care, corporate,
and administrative law. Mr. Hilgers represents health
care providers, including physicians, dentists, health
systems, managed care organizations, long-term care
facilities, multi-specialty groups, hospitals, hospital
districts, and community mental health and mental
retardation centers.
David W. Hilgers
Brown McCarroll, L.L.P.
111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400
Austin, Texas 78701
512-472-5456 Main
202-703-5739 Direct
[email protected]
Robert M. Portman
Robert M. Portman is a principal in the law firm of Powers Pyles
Sutter and Verville PC in Washington, DC. Mr. Portman
concentrates his practice in health and association law, focusing
on certification law, administrative law, antitrust law, litigation,
transactions, election and lobbying law, and legislation and
regulation in the health care field. He represents a wide range of
non-profit health care organizations including a large number of
national professional societies, trade associations, other health
care associations, voluntary health organizations and certification
bodies, as well as numerous individual physicians, physician
practice groups and other health care providers.
Robert M. Portman
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville PC
1501 M Street NW Seventh Floor
Washington, DC 20005
202-466-6550 Main
202-872-6756 Direct
[email protected]